Comparing this year's SA classes to last year's
| puce field | 02/06/07 | | gaped bright abode pocket flask | 02/06/07 | | Tan vigorous roast beef | 02/06/07 | | puce field | 02/06/07 | | alcoholic parlor | 02/06/07 | | puce field | 02/06/07 | | puce field | 02/06/07 | | puce field | 02/07/07 | | puce field | 02/07/07 | | Filthy corner | 02/07/07 | | puce field | 02/07/07 | | puce field | 02/10/07 | | cracking cream rigpig kitchen | 02/10/07 | | puce field | 02/10/07 | | puce field | 02/10/07 | | puce field | 02/13/07 | | puce field | 02/13/07 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: February 6th, 2007 7:55 PM Author: puce field
Here we go. This is comparing firm-for-firm, office-for-office, summer associate classes. Early, sure, but you can compare how identical offices have stacked up so far.
FIRST column is the total of 2007 summer associates at those firms.
SECOND column is net gain/loss of summer associates from the school from 2006 to 2007 at those firms. ***Gain/losses of 0 or 1 EXCLUDED.***
THIRD column is the % of that law school class it represents.
FOR EXAMPLE, in the chart below, USNWR ranked #1 Yale has 45 summer associates at the V100 firms listed below for 2007, representing a +17 increase in net summer associates at those firms from 2006, or 8.5% of their class.
Firms included: Akin DC; Baker Botts DC; Covington DC; Gibson NY, DC; Irell LA; Jenner DC; Jones Day NY; Kirkland CHI, LA; Latham SD; Munger LA; Wilmer BOS and DC.
1 Yale 45 17 8.5%
8 Michigan 27 10 2.7%
4 Columbia 35 7 1.9%
8 Virginia 26 6 1.6%
15 UCLA 15 5 1.6%
18 GWU 20 5 0.9%
27 Illinois 7 4 2.1%
39 Ohio State 4 4 1.8%
4 NYU 23 3 0.7%
27 Boston College 10 3 1.1%
43 American 5 3 0.6%
87 Northeastern 3 3 1.4%
8 Boalt 11 2 0.8%
16 Texas 7 2 0.5%
65 Loyola CA 2 2 0.5%
17 Vanderbilt 5 -2 -1.0%
27 Washington 0 -2 -1.1%
34 BYU 3 -2 -1.3%
37 George Mason 1 -2 -0.9%
37 Indiana 2 -2 -0.9%
22 Boston U 8 -3 -1.0%
6 Chicago 21 -4 -2.1%
2 Stanford 24 -5 -2.9%
11 Duke 9 -5 -2.5%
3 Harvard 73 -6 -1.1%
12 Northwestern 14 -6 -2.5%
14 Georgetown 21 -14 -2.4%
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=576163&forum_id=2#7556441) |
Date: February 6th, 2007 8:08 PM Author: puce field
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=576163&forum_id=2#7556517) |
Date: February 7th, 2007 9:18 AM Author: puce field
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=576163&forum_id=2#7559605) |
Date: February 7th, 2007 1:31 PM Author: puce field
Updated
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=576163&forum_id=2#7560735) |
 |
Date: February 7th, 2007 1:48 PM Author: Filthy corner
Why did you pick this particular group of firms? Some especially aren't particularly desirable (Jones Day NY). Are these the only firms for which there is currently data?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=576163&forum_id=2#7560840)
|
Date: February 10th, 2007 11:21 AM Author: puce field
Updated with Akin DC.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=576163&forum_id=2#7577956) |
Date: February 10th, 2007 11:55 AM Author: cracking cream rigpig kitchen
Yale is probably up by so much b/c of the large DC representation so far. It would be interesting to see DC v. non-DC firms for them. I bet DC will be up by a lot this year, where other cities will be down.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=576163&forum_id=2#7578035) |
Date: February 10th, 2007 5:02 PM Author: puce field
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=576163&forum_id=2#7579516) |
Date: February 13th, 2007 4:11 PM Author: puce field
Updated with Wilmer DC and Boston.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=576163&forum_id=2#7596755) |
Date: February 13th, 2007 7:36 PM Author: puce field
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=576163&forum_id=2#7598175) |
|
|