The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
The AI-generated CGI films are technically impressive but
Poast new message in this thread
Date: September 19th, 2026 2:14 PM Author: Oh, you travel? ( ) I honestly feel absolutely nothing when viewing them. The experience they project is just as hollow as the process of “making” them. So if it is somehow true that this is the future, does that mean everyone is going to blankly stare at computer generated “art” and have no response to it? Or maybe I’m an outlier and people are actually moved by products that no human could be bothered to make? How is this really gonna play out iyo. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5905191&forum_id=2#50144036) |
Date: September 19th, 2026 2:15 PM Author: cowgod What Films are you talking about? I've been out of the loop for a while tbh. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5905191&forum_id=2#50144039) |
 |
Date: September 19th, 2026 2:17 PM Author: Oh, you travel? ( ) https://x.com/charliedfilm/status/2098929162735997071?s=46 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5905191&forum_id=2#50144042) |
|
Date: September 19th, 2026 2:18 PM Author: Richard Ames If anything, I could see this sort of shit being good for smaller creators on YouTube. And I could see those creators who get a following for their work get called up to the "big leagues."
Sort of like the Backrooms dude. |
|
Date: September 19th, 2026 2:23 PM Author: Oh, you travel? ( ) The Backrooms dude modeled and rendered all of that stuff himself iirc (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5905191&forum_id=2#50144053) |
|
Date: September 19th, 2026 2:40 PM Author: Richard Ames True, though with the tools that existed at the time it's hardly like he was making Toy Story in 1995.
I think the real potential is in people that use AI in concert with other tools. We are probably not far from some 17 year old making a high quality feature film that he releases direct to YouTube. |
|
Date: September 19th, 2026 2:24 PM Author: cowgod Are you saying that these films offer a Reprieve? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5905191&forum_id=2#50144056) |
|
Date: September 19th, 2026 2:38 PM Author: Richard Ames (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5905191&forum_id=2#50144070) |
|
Date: September 19th, 2026 2:19 PM Author: hex its just getting started, they feel "hollow" initially but eventually you won't be able to tell if made by a human or ai (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5905191&forum_id=2#50144048) |
|
Date: September 19th, 2026 2:21 PM Author: Oh, you travel? ( ) If that’s true I’ll just assume everything is “AI” and have the same reaction to it which is a blasé acknowledgement of its competence combined with utter indifference to everything else about it. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5905191&forum_id=2#50144050) |
|
Date: September 19th, 2026 2:23 PM Author: jstor addict This. I make a lot of quality stories on grok imagine. It always starts with a 18000 chick that I literally fall in love with. But it always ends up with her cucking me. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5905191&forum_id=2#50144052) |
|
Date: September 19th, 2026 2:48 PM Author: potluck (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5905191&forum_id=2#50144081) |
|
Date: September 19th, 2026 2:34 PM Author: barnabyjones I'm all for it just so it can replace hollywood actors. I dont want to listen to another retarded actor wax philosophical about life (look at you mcconaughy...) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5905191&forum_id=2#50144067) |
|
Date: September 19th, 2026 2:46 PM Author: the walter white of this generation (walt jr.) They'll continue to be horrible for forever, but they'll also look close to indistinguishable from real film, and thus ruin real film, too.
I always laugh when I see middling-IQ AI boosters talking about how the increasing technical quality of AI will result in it evocating the same emotional reactions. My favorite is when they say this about porn; it makes me wonder these retards are also sexless. Bro, I don't jerk off because the appearance of a stretched-out anal muscle around a tube of flesh is so inherently beautiful and attractive; I jerk off because there's a REAL girl, like the ones I've known since HS and see everyday -- with their haughtiness and value and untouchable beauty and also their hidden traumas and insecurities and nasty sluttiness -- being put in her place and fucked hard and dominated and owned and ruined and sodomized and marked with cum, memorialized for all time on video for her future children and husband, if she can even have those now, by some tatted-up paunchy scumbag.
AI porn may replace like porn comics and shit, which have their own niche, but they'll never replace THAT. If it truly ever becomes the case that real porn girls can't verify themselves among the AI slop (and I can't see why that's the case, but let's assume it arguendo), it'll just kill all porn.
The counter argument here is just as laughably retarded as saying that fake AI-generated news articles ("Tidal wave destroys Shanghai") will replace real news due to its facial indistinguishability. No dickweed, you're missing the core point of why we're consuming this product. |