The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
A war with Iran would be credited if it boosts domestic spending
| brilliant pit | 07/30/12 |
| slate indirect expression | 07/30/12 |
| ultramarine home sound barrier | 07/30/12 |
| brilliant pit | 07/30/12 |
| spectacular canary school cafeteria | 07/30/12 |
| Vengeful Deep Wrinkle | 07/30/12 |
| brilliant pit | 07/30/12 |
| spectacular canary school cafeteria | 07/30/12 |
| stubborn candlestick maker | 07/30/12 |
| milky swollen hell ladyboy | 07/30/12 |
| Brindle big mood senate | 07/30/12 |
| Turquoise heaven circlehead | 07/30/12 |
| Bateful brunch yarmulke | 07/30/12 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: July 30th, 2012 11:17 AM Author: brilliant pit And especially if we institute a draft and use it to train shiftless imbeciles to do something useful. I realize war spending isn't as stimulative as other spending but it's better than nothing.
Plus a war could provide a clean psychological break from our current state of fear and anxiety about our economy. A bloody, drawn out war could jostle the nation out of its self-induced stupor and prompt us create a bold new future for ourselves. |
 |
Date: July 30th, 2012 11:24 AM Author: slate indirect expression no (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2009227&forum_id=2#21213479) |
|
Date: July 30th, 2012 11:26 AM Author: ultramarine home sound barrier (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2009227&forum_id=2#21213496) |
|
Date: July 30th, 2012 11:27 AM Author: brilliant pit y? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2009227&forum_id=2#21213498) |
Date: July 30th, 2012 11:28 AM Author: spectacular canary school cafeteria (faggot boomer) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2009227&forum_id=2#21213499) |
|
Date: July 30th, 2012 11:30 AM Author: Vengeful Deep Wrinkle We tried this with Iraq and have nothing to show for it (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2009227&forum_id=2#21213512) |
|
Date: July 30th, 2012 11:40 AM Author: brilliant pit Obviously we should focus less on nation building and just outright conquer our enemies. Iraq would have gone a lot smoother if we'd sent in enough troops from the start and made total subjugation the end goal rather than trying to "rebuild civil society" or restore the marsh arabs' sovereignty or whatever the fuck libs thought we should do.
The British just fucking CONQUERED nations and made them colonies. In the long run this benefited the British and the colonies themselves. |
|
Date: July 30th, 2012 11:30 AM Author: spectacular canary school cafeteria how many youngs have to die till the boomer thirst is slaked? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2009227&forum_id=2#21213516) |
|
Date: July 30th, 2012 11:36 AM Author: stubborn candlestick maker http://mlkshk.com/r/4SL (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2009227&forum_id=2#21213548) |
|
Date: July 30th, 2012 11:30 AM Author: milky swollen hell ladyboy Fighting iran is not the same as going up against the axis powers, who had been building up in strength for some time before we started fighting them (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2009227&forum_id=2#21213518) |
|
Date: July 30th, 2012 11:41 AM Author: Brindle big mood senate What's your BMI? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2009227&forum_id=2#21213565) |
|
Date: July 30th, 2012 11:41 AM Author: Turquoise heaven circlehead we already built most of the shit that would be used in the war (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2009227&forum_id=2#21213566) |
|
Date: July 30th, 2012 11:45 AM Author: Bateful brunch yarmulke (neocon traitor) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2009227&forum_id=2#21213581) |