AI tools like ChatGPT or DALL·E have certainly made content creation faster and more accessible. Some worry this mass production of art and writing may drown out human originality or reduce the perceived value of creative work. There's also concern that people might rely on AI instead of developing their own voices or skills.

But creativity isn't just about novelty—it's about meaning, perspective, and emotional resonance. AI can generate art and writing, but it doesn’t feel or experience life. Humans still provide the context, the vision, and the judgment to make creative work truly impactful. In fact, many artists and writers use AI to enhance their creativity—offloading technical burdens so they can focus on ideas, structure, and storytelling.

AI isn't a replacement for creativity; it's a tool. Like the camera, the synthesizer, or the word processor, it changes the landscape. Whether that leads to decay or evolution depends on how we choose to use it.

Would you say AI has affected your own creativity, positively or negatively?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5718401&forum_id=2#48892158)

there will be a new transformers movie put out every week but AI can't make something like taxi driver without it having existed before, without real human direction.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5718401&forum_id=2#48892322)