Is there a big difference between 160k a year vs 200k a year NYC
| Pale Tank Ratface | 06/03/12 | | Coral Heaven | 06/03/12 | | Pale Tank Ratface | 06/03/12 | | Coral Heaven | 06/04/12 | | Sapphire histrionic shrine | 06/03/12 | | cyan associate tanning salon | 06/03/12 | | Jet arrogant dilemma | 06/03/12 | | vermilion legal warrant | 06/03/12 | | Pale Tank Ratface | 06/03/12 | | vermilion legal warrant | 06/03/12 | | Pale Tank Ratface | 06/03/12 | | glittery smoky rehab | 06/03/12 | | vermilion legal warrant | 06/03/12 | | kink-friendly juggernaut | 06/03/12 | | Salmon legend point | 06/04/12 | | Turquoise big potus | 06/04/12 | | motley ivory institution jew | 06/04/12 | | glassy contagious hell | 06/04/12 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: June 3rd, 2012 9:49 PM Author: Pale Tank Ratface
Basically biglaw making 160k vs. ibanker associate making 200k all-in.
Is there really a big difference in these salaries post-bonus? I feel that biglaw is too self hating and there's not that much of a difference.
Why are ibankers always thought of doing models and bottles and not biglaw associates? The extra hours worked and that extra cash doesn't seem to be big enough of a difference, especially if bankers are blowing it at clubs.
mainly the difference is probably the fact that ibankers have 0 loans and biglaw is swimming in debt but if u compare salary only the two professions seem very similar.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1962977&forum_id=2#20820205) |
 |
Date: June 3rd, 2012 10:05 PM Author: Pale Tank Ratface
nope, bonuses were shit this year and some made even less than 200k all in. i have a few friends in the industry.
i even gave a high 200k all in first year salary to round up.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1962977&forum_id=2#20820277)
|
|
|