\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

GINSBURG PWNS THE FUCK OUT OF ROBERTS RE: CC AUTHORITY

Third, contrary to THE CHIEF JUSTICE's contention, our prece...
crusty bright useless brakes
  06/28/12
"Selling" marijuana and "selling" wheat ...
narrow-minded exhilarant property internal respiration
  06/28/12
Okay, well you're a retard.
Aquamarine contagious house pocket flask
  06/28/12
oh stop being a douche he was just flaming.
Topaz hominid abode
  06/28/12
...
crusty bright useless brakes
  10/08/15
LOL
Topaz hominid abode
  06/28/12
...
crusty bright useless brakes
  06/28/12
...
crusty bright useless brakes
  10/30/15
...
crusty bright useless brakes
  11/05/15
As it appears in all caps in the middle of a sentence, "...
Buck-toothed forum
  06/28/12
lol it does
Aquamarine contagious house pocket flask
  06/28/12
...
crusty bright useless brakes
  06/28/12
I'm inclined to agree, ssm, but it's you, ssm, and you're pr...
Aquamarine contagious house pocket flask
  06/28/12
Link to where my legal reasoning failed to live up to what y...
crusty bright useless brakes
  06/28/12
See the above poast, in which you wrote, "my legal reas...
Aquamarine contagious house pocket flask
  06/28/12
lol 180 brother. How ir8 are you with the OBamacare opinion ...
crusty bright useless brakes
  06/28/12
I really enjoyed it. Was in a good mood for most of the day...
Aquamarine contagious house pocket flask
  06/28/12
What about the rest? What bothered you brother?
crusty bright useless brakes
  06/28/12
Roberts stone cold control as he Marshalled Obama.
Aquamarine contagious house pocket flask
  06/28/12
overuse of parentheses
painfully honest impertinent french chef trust fund
  06/28/12
...
Aqua Nowag Quadroon
  11/06/15


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: June 28th, 2012 2:43 PM
Author: crusty bright useless brakes

Third, contrary to THE CHIEF JUSTICE's contention, our precedent does indeed support “[t]he proposition that Congress may dictate the conduct of an individual today because of prophesied future activity.” Ante, at 26. In Wickard, the Court upheld a penalty the Federal Government imposed on a farmer who grew more wheat than he was permitted to grow under the Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1938(AAA). 317 U.S., at 114–115. He could not be penalized, the farmer argued, as he was growing the wheat for home consumption, not for sale on the open market. Id., at 119. The Court rejected this argument. Id., at 127–129. Wheat intended for home consumption, the Court noted, “overhangs the market, and if induced by rising prices, tends to flow into the market and check price increases [intended by the AAA].” Id., at 128.

Similar reasoning supported the Court's judgment in Raich, which upheld Congress' authority to regulate marijuana grown for personal use. 545 U.S., at 19. Homegrown marijuana substantially affects the interstate market for marijuana, we observed, for “the high demand in the interstate market will [likely] draw such marijuana into that market.” Ibid.

*50 Our decisions thus acknowledge Congress' authority, under the Commerce Clause, to direct the conduct of an individual today (the farmer in Wickard, stopped from growing excess wheat; the plaintiff in Raich, ordered to cease cultivating marijuana) because of a prophesied future transaction (the eventual sale of that wheat or marijuana in the interstate market). Congress' actions are even more rational in this case, where the future activity (the consumption of medical care) is certain to occur, the sole uncertainty being the time the activity will take place.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1981776&forum_id=2#20977048)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 28th, 2012 10:45 PM
Author: narrow-minded exhilarant property internal respiration

"Selling" marijuana and "selling" wheat vs. "consuming" health care. Action vs. inaction.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1981776&forum_id=2#20980287)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 28th, 2012 10:47 PM
Author: Aquamarine contagious house pocket flask

Okay, well you're a retard.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1981776&forum_id=2#20980299)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 28th, 2012 10:47 PM
Author: Topaz hominid abode

oh stop being a douche he was just flaming.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1981776&forum_id=2#20980306)



Reply Favorite

Date: October 8th, 2015 4:48 PM
Author: crusty bright useless brakes



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1981776&forum_id=2#28928140)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 28th, 2012 10:47 PM
Author: Topaz hominid abode

LOL

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1981776&forum_id=2#20980301)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 28th, 2012 11:16 PM
Author: crusty bright useless brakes



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1981776&forum_id=2#20980643)



Reply Favorite

Date: October 30th, 2015 4:23 PM
Author: crusty bright useless brakes



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1981776&forum_id=2#29076044)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 5th, 2015 11:52 AM
Author: crusty bright useless brakes



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1981776&forum_id=2#29116129)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 28th, 2012 10:59 PM
Author: Buck-toothed forum

As it appears in all caps in the middle of a sentence, "THE CHIEF JUSTICE" always comes off as sarcastic/condescending.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1981776&forum_id=2#20980432)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 28th, 2012 11:05 PM
Author: Aquamarine contagious house pocket flask

lol it does

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1981776&forum_id=2#20980491)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 28th, 2012 10:44 PM
Author: crusty bright useless brakes



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1981776&forum_id=2#20980274)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 28th, 2012 10:46 PM
Author: Aquamarine contagious house pocket flask

I'm inclined to agree, ssm, but it's you, ssm, and you're pretty suspect when it comes to legal reasoning. Sorry, ssm.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1981776&forum_id=2#20980295)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 28th, 2012 10:47 PM
Author: crusty bright useless brakes

Link to where my legal reasoning failed to live up to what you believe is the standard of legal reasoning?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1981776&forum_id=2#20980307)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 28th, 2012 10:49 PM
Author: Aquamarine contagious house pocket flask

See the above poast, in which you wrote, "my legal reasoning failed to live up to what you believe is the standard of legal reasoning?"

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1981776&forum_id=2#20980332)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 28th, 2012 10:51 PM
Author: crusty bright useless brakes

lol 180 brother. How ir8 are you with the OBamacare opinion today though? Seriously.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1981776&forum_id=2#20980344)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 28th, 2012 10:58 PM
Author: Aquamarine contagious house pocket flask

I really enjoyed it. Was in a good mood for most of the day.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1981776&forum_id=2#20980422)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 28th, 2012 11:06 PM
Author: crusty bright useless brakes

What about the rest? What bothered you brother?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1981776&forum_id=2#20980514)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 28th, 2012 11:20 PM
Author: Aquamarine contagious house pocket flask

Roberts stone cold control as he Marshalled Obama.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1981776&forum_id=2#20980685)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 28th, 2012 11:12 PM
Author: painfully honest impertinent french chef trust fund

overuse of parentheses

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1981776&forum_id=2#20980583)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 6th, 2015 11:08 AM
Author: Aqua Nowag Quadroon



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1981776&forum_id=2#29123302)