The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
The "planes" struck by Ukraine were decoys. Otherwise we'd have full nuke launch
Poast new message in this thread
Date: June 1st, 2025 2:06 PM Author: Costumed candlestick maker the lack of Russian nuclear retaliation after a supposed hit on its nuclear triad is telling. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5732172&forum_id=2#48978827) |
Date: June 1st, 2025 2:10 PM Author: rusted thriller boltzmann shrine r u an NSAM alt (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5732172&forum_id=2#48978833) |
 |
Date: June 1st, 2025 2:19 PM Author: Costumed candlestick maker Nuclear superpowers at my HS declined to retaliate after a successful strike on their nuclear triad all the time; it was no big deal (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5732172&forum_id=2#48978858) |
|
Date: June 1st, 2025 2:35 PM Author: Hairraiser primrose sweet tailpipe box office yea (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5732172&forum_id=2#48978902) |
|
Date: June 1st, 2025 2:29 PM Author: aphrodisiac out-of-control forum It appears to be a serious degradation of Russia's bomber arm, and there's no reason to think that Ukraine won't be able to do exactly the same thing in 6 months. Or to go after all civilian air travel.
Can Putin get away with just ordering an (ineffective) Oreshnik strike in retaliation for this? Can he get away with it again next time when Ukraine does exactly the same thing again? |
|
Date: June 1st, 2025 2:30 PM Author: Costumed candlestick maker It doesn't appear to be that at all. And there is plenty of reason to believe they won't even be able to hit decoys next time. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5732172&forum_id=2#48978891) |
|
Date: June 1st, 2025 2:53 PM Author: Costumed candlestick maker cr (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5732172&forum_id=2#48978939) |
|
Date: June 1st, 2025 6:09 PM Author: saffron sanctuary What is the virtue in a proportional response? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5732172&forum_id=2#48979298) |
|
Date: June 1st, 2025 6:14 PM Author: aphrodisiac out-of-control forum Putin is a Boomer (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5732172&forum_id=2#48979311) |
|
Date: June 1st, 2025 6:06 PM Author: Pea-brained toilet seat What would Putin nuke? The point of capturing Ukraine is to have it. It doesn’t make much sense to just bomb it out of existence (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5732172&forum_id=2#48979296) |
|
Date: June 1st, 2025 6:15 PM Author: Costumed candlestick maker He should and would nuke NATO if real nuclear assets were damaged. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5732172&forum_id=2#48979313) |
|
Date: June 1st, 2025 6:18 PM Author: Pea-brained toilet seat What would that accomplish other than ensuring that Russia gets nuked as well. You seem dumb (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5732172&forum_id=2#48979315) |
|
Date: June 1st, 2025 6:20 PM Author: Costumed candlestick maker (retard who's never heard of MAD doctrine and nuclear deterrence) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5732172&forum_id=2#48979324) |
|
Date: June 1st, 2025 6:18 PM Author: Ruby twisted persian lmao. So your position is that we know no real nuclear assets were damaged because Putin didn't start a war with NATO? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5732172&forum_id=2#48979316) |
|
Date: June 1st, 2025 6:20 PM Author: exhilarant pisswyrm Still more coherent than Russia’s assertion that NATO helped Ukraine nuke Russia last year, Russia did nothing, and none of the nuclear detonation surveillance stations reported anything because of a conspiracy (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5732172&forum_id=2#48979323) |
|
Date: June 1st, 2025 6:21 PM Author: flatulent arousing tattoo They don't have decoy planes (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5732172&forum_id=2#48979327) |
|
Date: June 1st, 2025 6:22 PM Author: Costumed candlestick maker Link? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5732172&forum_id=2#48979329) |