The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Consuela's Mom's packet contained every Consuela megathread this week.
Poast new message in this thread
Date: October 21st, 2026 2:34 PM Author: Fracture in the Maidenhead (gunneratttt) It was almost an inch thick. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5914381&forum_id=2#50200196) |
Date: October 21st, 2026 2:35 PM Author: Historical American (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5914381&forum_id=2#50200202) |
|
Date: October 21st, 2026 2:35 PM Author: Consuela would be nice to have that kind of support (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5914381&forum_id=2#50200203) |
 |
Date: October 21st, 2026 2:36 PM Author: Historical American Just ask (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5914381&forum_id=2#50200205) |
|
Date: October 21st, 2026 2:36 PM Author: Consuela shes a cheerleading lumpenprole, cheerleading from her would inflate my ego and have an overall very negative effect (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5914381&forum_id=2#50200209) |
|
Date: October 21st, 2026 2:37 PM Author: Historical American She prob loves you and thinks everything you do is 180 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5914381&forum_id=2#50200215) |
|
Date: October 21st, 2026 2:38 PM Author: Consuela yes, which is why i grew up with a massive ego despite no accomplishments (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5914381&forum_id=2#50200216) |
|
Date: October 21st, 2026 2:41 PM Author: Historical American There's still time to hold yourself to a higher standard. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5914381&forum_id=2#50200226) |
|
Date: October 21st, 2026 2:43 PM Author: Consuela im trying (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5914381&forum_id=2#50200235) |
|
Date: October 21st, 2026 2:45 PM Author: Historical American You should start by not using AI at all anymore. It would up your credibility instantly. If you just put everything in your own words it would sound a lot better to most people. You gotta quit cold turkey because you have an obvious dependency. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5914381&forum_id=2#50200241) |
|
Date: October 21st, 2026 2:47 PM Author: Consuela i don't agree that i have an obvious dependency, i write every rough draft without AI assistance and i aim for pangram to have a 10-20% AI rate on final scan - this is what i have quasi-settled on now (my next post scans to 9% AI), although it's been a process to discover the right balance - but i am aware of the *perception* pushed by critics, and it would be nice to say "hey champ, 0% AI use." i'm not settled on this (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5914381&forum_id=2#50200246) |
|
Date: October 21st, 2026 2:51 PM Author: Historical American Why do you use of at all? I'll be honest I don't think anyone reading it is gonna think about 9% or 23% or whatever. You either notice it or you don't and if you notice it at all it's just a huge turnoff and it makes you seem stupid to the outside world whether you are or not. So why even bother? If you're not addicted it would be pretty easy to quit. I don't think you could quit though because you enjoy it too much. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5914381&forum_id=2#50200258) |
|
Date: October 21st, 2026 2:54 PM Author: Consuela i enjoy the dialectical sparring enormously. it has allowed me to deepen my own views massively in very specific ways that would have taken far longer to develop, and on points that i have not seen developed elsewhere (the abraxian stuff is all new, developed from something jung backed away from)
it also allows me to scan my draft and identify areas of weakness and "buff them up", which is helpful, or at least to rethink the arguments
AI is an amazing tool, but it is a dangerous one that needs to be carefully handled |
|
Date: October 21st, 2026 3:02 PM Author: Historical American Even if you've learned a ton from arguing with the computer you can still put your final draft entirely in your own words and avoid obvious AI tropes. It's the fact that it seems like AI at all that makes it sound stupid to the reader. Humans are keenly attuned to noticing slop and the Slop Factor is a major turnoff. There's nothing wrong with using AI but if your work has the Stench of Slop it becomes utterly discredited. So regardless of whatever you learned from engaging the robot you ought to put it in a writing style that appeals to humans. AI writing does not. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5914381&forum_id=2#50200279) |
|
Date: October 21st, 2026 3:03 PM Author: Consuela yes, which is why i settled on the 10-20% target for AI rather than 50% or whatever. but maybe it's still too high, i don't know. this is novel technology, novel applications, i'm still feeling it out. i do notice the AI criticism and i've adjusted accordingly, but perhaps theres more to do (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5914381&forum_id=2#50200287) |
|
Date: October 21st, 2026 3:12 PM Author: ferengi yeah nothing wrong with bouncing ideas off of ai, it's great at that, but having it actually generate content is unnecessary and a turnoff for some readers.
i have my gpt settings s.t. it doesn't suggest wording unless i ask it to. then i can send drafts of things and just talk about the ideas without it being like, "say it this way instead!!" |
|
Date: October 21st, 2026 3:13 PM Author: Historical American Mfcr (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5914381&forum_id=2#50200318) |
|
Date: October 21st, 2026 3:12 PM Author: Historical American Yeah I would go bone dry on that shit. You have to come across as a commanding communicator to reach anybody deep in the soul. AI is immediate red flag. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5914381&forum_id=2#50200315) |