Two clerkships?
| soul-stirring therapy | 02/09/10 | | Brass costumed boiling water | 02/09/10 | | Irradiated bistre rigor | 02/09/10 | | soul-stirring therapy | 02/09/10 | | Irradiated bistre rigor | 02/09/10 | | soul-stirring therapy | 02/09/10 | | cerebral white area milk | 02/09/10 | | Brass costumed boiling water | 02/09/10 | | elite 180 corn cake | 02/09/10 | | Bateful Maroon Station | 02/09/10 | | Obsidian Resort Roommate | 02/09/10 | | soul-stirring therapy | 02/09/10 | | drab nudist piazza | 02/09/10 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: February 9th, 2010 9:26 PM Author: Obsidian Resort Roommate
Two years of clerking is pretty overkill if all you want to do is work in biglaw.
If you want to to transactional work, you're not really advancing your biglaw career but at least you'll enjoy acting like a real lawyer for once in your career.
If you are going into biglaw litigation, the COA clerkship would be most likely less helpful for your career than your D.Ct. Though one important factor would be whether either is in the jurisdiction where you will be working. For example having SDNY or 2nd. Cir. experience is hugely useful if you are doing litigation in NYC. Especially since lots of NYC firms basically want their associates to spend some years in the US Attorney's Office before coming back and making partner.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1217225&forum_id=2#14070934) |
Date: February 9th, 2010 9:52 PM Author: drab nudist piazza
From someone who clerked on the COA, I'd say no, unless you want to teach. It's just not all that useful in biglaw, which rarely does appellate stuff (except for a few DC firms). Go to a firm. If you still want to clerk for the COA in a few years, it'll be there for you.
(Should clarify that I mean it's not all that useful for someone in the OP's shoes, who already has a district court clerkship.)
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1217225&forum_id=2#14071295) |
|
|