\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

Is there anything novel at all in "Simulation Theory"?

Philosophically and theologically, it doesnt seem nearly as ...
The Dismal Tide
  08/03/26
the monomyth
Jared Baumeister
  08/03/26
there is nothing new under the sun
Book1.xlsx
  08/03/26
it permits the viewer to be just some fag rather than a Godf...
Shema Yisrael
  08/03/26
LMAO tyft
Richard Ames
  08/03/26
it's just metaphysics, Champ. as gay as the rest of it
situational online awareness
  08/03/26
IMO the lineage goes Plato's Cave to Descarte's Demon to Har...
The Penis
  08/03/26


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: August 3rd, 2026 2:14 PM
Author: The Dismal Tide

Philosophically and theologically, it doesnt seem nearly as clever as Bay Area Fags make it out to be.

Lemme consider its deeper underpinnings:

- This reality is not the Final Reality. There's something off, something at least once-removed about this reality

- This reality begs for some sense-making. It doesn't sit well as chaos, and something written into our code compels us to order and rationalize, suggesting that reality itself is an ordered, purposeful narrative or code. What we call reality is, in fact, written / created

- Some being or beings engage in something akin to authorship, or coding, which creates our world and our selves. Their designs for us are mysterious and shrouded, but possibly discoverable

- Our desire for predictability and deeper understanding is best served by aligning ourselves with the invisible codes and laws which underwrite our experiences

All of this seems pretty much religion 101, or even Platonism 101. The metaphor of the Divine Word is expressed in binary rather than hebrew or arabic or whatever, but same shit.

A simulation dude might advocate for the novelty of his theory thus: "As we progress in tech, we obtain better metaphors for the Creator(s)/Creation act." Okay, instead of a quill and scroll its a screen, big whoop.

Am I missing some important thing?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5889096&forum_id=2#50042846)



Reply Favorite

Date: August 3rd, 2026 2:15 PM
Author: Jared Baumeister

the monomyth

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5889096&forum_id=2#50042848)



Reply Favorite

Date: August 3rd, 2026 2:23 PM
Author: Book1.xlsx

there is nothing new under the sun

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5889096&forum_id=2#50042855)



Reply Favorite

Date: August 3rd, 2026 2:28 PM
Author: Shema Yisrael

it permits the viewer to be just some fag rather than a Godfag

given how shitty this existence in (fucking pajeets literally exist) im pretty sure it's just some fag

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5889096&forum_id=2#50042862)



Reply Favorite

Date: August 3rd, 2026 3:18 PM
Author: Richard Ames

LMAO tyft

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5889096&forum_id=2#50042933)



Reply Favorite

Date: August 3rd, 2026 2:33 PM
Author: situational online awareness

it's just metaphysics, Champ. as gay as the rest of it

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5889096&forum_id=2#50042871)



Reply Favorite

Date: August 3rd, 2026 3:14 PM
Author: The Penis

IMO the lineage goes Plato's Cave to Descarte's Demon to Harman's technologically updated brain-in-vat (along with Putnam's semantic treatment) to Bostrom's computational and probabilistic modeling. Bostrom supplied the modern formulation. Parts of it are novel like using probability and the idea of ancestry simulations and future compute capacity to calculate what the chances are under certain assumptions.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5889096&forum_id=2#50042929)