The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Did a man walk on the moon: YES or NO?
Poast new message in this thread
Date: August 11th, 2026 8:51 PM Author: Roland Kohl (Diesel Mechanic) I think we've been lied to our entire lives. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5892181&forum_id=2#50062306) |
Date: August 11th, 2026 8:52 PM Author: mentally ill shut-in You could have a long discussion with AI about this (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5892181&forum_id=2#50062312) |
|
Date: August 11th, 2026 8:53 PM Author: .,.,.,.,,,,.,,.,.,.,...,,..,, You’re a moron if you’re even asking this q (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5892181&forum_id=2#50062315) |
 |
Date: August 12th, 2026 12:30 AM Author: The Penis (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5892181&forum_id=2#50062694) |
|
Date: August 11th, 2026 8:57 PM Author: ''"'"''"''''"""''' yes you fucking retard (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5892181&forum_id=2#50062323) |
|
Date: August 11th, 2026 9:09 PM Author: Roland Kohl (Diesel Mechanic) (boomer) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5892181&forum_id=2#50062361) |
|
Date: August 11th, 2026 8:58 PM Author: our age of poasting is collapsing yeah (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5892181&forum_id=2#50062325) |
|
Date: August 11th, 2026 8:59 PM Author: coalition of rabbis No (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5892181&forum_id=2#50062327) |
|
Date: August 12th, 2026 12:24 AM Author: Roland Kohl (Diesel Mechanic) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5892181&forum_id=2#50062682) |
|
Date: August 12th, 2026 12:27 AM Author: you'd see the panties i believe yes but i wouldn't be surprised if it turned out to be a hoax (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5892181&forum_id=2#50062687) |
|
Date: August 12th, 2026 12:28 AM Author: The Penis the chances of it not being real are about as close to mathematically zero as possible (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5892181&forum_id=2#50062693) |
|
Date: August 12th, 2026 12:31 AM Author: you'd see the panties i haven't actually looked into it much tbh. you are a knowledgeable and intelligent poaster so i believe you if you say it happened
does your answer change if we narrow the claim to US astronauts walking on the moon in 1969? |
|
Date: August 12th, 2026 12:27 AM Author: The Penis Yes (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5892181&forum_id=2#50062689) |
|
Date: August 12th, 2026 12:28 AM Author: https://imgur.com/a/o2g8xYK When you look at all the other shit we did in the 50s and 60s it doesn't seem far fetched. No one doubted it at the time (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5892181&forum_id=2#50062691) |
|
Date: August 12th, 2026 12:28 AM Author: MISO HORNY Go ask Buzz Aldrin (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5892181&forum_id=2#50062692) |
|
Date: August 12th, 2026 12:35 AM Author: life is a hamburger let me put it this way, and this is how any disinterested rational mind would view it: there are serious questions about every piece of 'evidence' they provided, and serious questions about the lengths they went to *not* to provide (or not to preserve in the case of the telemetry data, etc) irrefutable, unequivocal evidence supporting a claim as incredible as 'we went to the moon.'
instead, every piece of evidence, without exception, is dubious on many levels, flimsy.
this makes any rational person begin to wonder. |
|
Date: August 12th, 2026 12:43 AM Author: The Penis Almost any historical event can be made to look suspicious if you isolate each piece of evidence and demand that it be individually “irrefutable” and “unequivocal.” It’s a typical crank pattern to list off objections to individual pieces of evidence like that without inheriting the explanatory burden of an alternate hypothesis. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5892181&forum_id=2#50062706) |
|
Date: August 12th, 2026 12:44 AM Author: nasa cgi (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5892181&forum_id=2#50062708) |
|
Date: August 12th, 2026 12:49 AM Author: our age of poasting is collapsing (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5892181&forum_id=2#50062710) |
|
Date: August 12th, 2026 12:52 AM Author: life is a hamburger all the more reason for them to have planned ahead and provided strong evidence, rather than simply saying: "hey, we took these 5 photos that look exactly like the Lost in Space TV show set we just happened to build for 'astronaut training' at NASA which is visible in other pre-mission photos. anyway, gotta go!"
it would have been very simple to avoid/mitigate the controversy. instead, they went out of their way not to avoid it (by providing only the weakest possible forms of evidence), which any rational person would find suspicious. |
|
Date: August 12th, 2026 1:44 AM Author: Roland Kohl (Diesel Mechanic) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5892181&forum_id=2#50062770) |