The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Bar Essay Question
Poast new message in this thread
Date: July 21st, 2012 2:07 AM Author: unholy insecure indian lodge personal credit line Is it CR to write "This issue here is . . . " for every issue?
Bar review class told us to do it. None of the essays on baressays.com do it, even the high scoring ones (although they're all essays from people who fail, so...).
whats the general consensus? |
 |
Date: July 21st, 2012 2:09 AM Author: Milky Seedy Stage i have the same Q, breh. I write "The issue is ..." every once in a while, but not for every block. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2000385&forum_id=2#21136865) |
|
Date: July 21st, 2012 2:13 AM Author: unholy insecure indian lodge personal credit line yeah kaplan tells us to. but then they dont even have it on their model answers.
iamdisappoint, i hope we pass next week brother. i hope we are just being paranoid, aspie xo pussies. |
|
Date: July 21st, 2012 3:42 AM Author: Milky Seedy Stage yeah brother. i hope so too. where are you taking it? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2000385&forum_id=2#21137231) |
Date: July 21st, 2012 2:11 AM Author: flirting cyan site faggot firefighter No, that is stupid. Just use heading. If the issue is willfulness, just have an underlined heading called "Intent," and then jump into "The elements of intent are . . . " (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2000385&forum_id=2#21136881) |
|
Date: July 21st, 2012 2:12 AM Author: Laughsome Offensive Address you shouldn't have broader more sentence-like headings? Just one word? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2000385&forum_id=2#21136890) |
|
Date: July 21st, 2012 2:12 AM Author: Lascivious pontificating sweet tailpipe Bar review classes give you a failsafe retard level system for people who just can't figure out how to structure an answer. If you can clearly and concisely communicate the point to the grader, you don't need to follow their "system." They reward clean, competent writing, not following the bar review course method. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2000385&forum_id=2#21136886) |
|
Date: July 21st, 2012 2:15 AM Author: unholy insecure indian lodge personal credit line How much do they reward clean, competent writing? substantively, all the fucking essays from 55s to 70s look similar on baressays.com; havent really looked into quality of writing though. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2000385&forum_id=2#21136907) |
|
Date: July 21st, 2012 2:18 AM Author: Lascivious pontificating sweet tailpipe They reward it a lot. Part of what you're trying to do is not alert the bored, tired bar grader that you're somehow dumber than the last guy. Make yourself easy to follow, hit the blackletter as much as you can, but don't go apeshit with structuring and mechanically repeating whatever structure the course suggested. There are retards who will follow the course advice to a T and still write shit essays that read like legal madlibs. You probably know how to clearly and concisely express yourself after three years of law school, so just do that and don't worry about the bar course. Like I said, they're providing a parachute for the bottom quarter Chapman law grad who still thinks "alot" is a word. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2000385&forum_id=2#21136925) |
|
Date: July 27th, 2012 1:12 AM Author: overrated jet therapy skinny woman lulz (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2000385&forum_id=2#21187634) |
|
Date: July 21st, 2012 3:13 AM Author: Disrespectful Stage you could but i don't think you have to and it sounds dumb
just do heading/sub-heading, rule statement, and then application. your application should just be: "Here, ...."
|
|
Date: July 21st, 2012 3:51 AM Author: Mischievous Voyeur Tip - just do it for consistency. The grader will not care or pay attention if you have it in there, but if the essay looks sloppy, inconsistent or hard to follow you will get ding-febbared (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2000385&forum_id=2#21137260) |
|
Date: July 21st, 2012 2:09 PM Author: Hairless party of the first part Your bar review sounds SPS. The heading is the issue. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2000385&forum_id=2#21139423) |
|
Date: July 21st, 2012 2:16 PM Author: unholy insecure indian lodge personal credit line Kaplan PMBR. I should have COPPED DAT THEMIS. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2000385&forum_id=2#21139485) |
|
Date: July 21st, 2012 2:18 PM Author: tantric excitant whorehouse cuckold Barbri says the same. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2000385&forum_id=2#21139502) |
|
Date: July 21st, 2012 2:43 PM Author: Charcoal abode Nothing wrong with "The first issue is whether...", etc. But if you're using headings for every issue, which seems excessive to me, there's no need to repeat yourself. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2000385&forum_id=2#21139656) |
|
Date: July 27th, 2012 12:38 AM Author: tantric excitant whorehouse cuckold planned on doing this but took too much time to right a good issue statement. Just did headings. Hope Barbri was wrong about this...similar to how they were wrong about the MBE (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2000385&forum_id=2#21187386) |
|
Date: July 27th, 2012 12:43 AM Author: wild background story use headings.. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2000385&forum_id=2#21187450) |
|
Date: July 27th, 2012 12:45 AM Author: tantric excitant whorehouse cuckold did you use headings and then just go into the rule? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2000385&forum_id=2#21187471) |
|
Date: July 27th, 2012 1:15 AM Author: wild background story yes
|
|
Date: July 27th, 2012 1:22 AM Author: tantric excitant whorehouse cuckold thats great to hear. i changed it after the 1st essay because I was running out of time. My Heading weren't that special though. Doubt I get dinged for overbroad headings tho. The wait is gonna be the worst. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2000385&forum_id=2#21187678) |
|
Date: July 27th, 2012 1:23 AM Author: wild background story what about PTB? how did u format it (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2000385&forum_id=2#21187680) |
|
Date: July 27th, 2012 1:24 AM Author: tantric excitant whorehouse cuckold didn't take California. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2000385&forum_id=2#21187683) |
|
Date: July 27th, 2012 1:25 AM Author: wild background story LOL i did... (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2000385&forum_id=2#21187686) |
|
Date: July 27th, 2012 7:53 AM Author: tantric excitant whorehouse cuckold feel like I prob failed the bar. My headings didn't really state the issues properly. Time Pressure got to me and I prob lost an easy .5 point on every issue I spotted.
Negligence vs. Guy
P will likely bring a negligence claim. <Rule>
Procedural Due Process Violation
<Rule>
These won't get it done. Guess I'll be back at it in Feb. |