The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
what rank at fordham for cravath?
Poast new message in this thread
Date: March 17th, 2006 5:06 PM Author: fuchsia swashbuckling incel degenerate For at least an interview. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=381542&forum_id=2#5361332) |
 |
Date: June 4th, 2006 1:31 PM Author: violent laughsome mediation meetinghouse You have to be a tenured professor at Fordham. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=381542&forum_id=2#5906790) |
Date: March 17th, 2006 5:07 PM Author: Dun roommate public bath cravath is serously an unprestigious sweatshop that'll take ANYONE from HYS. But for fordham, you need top 15% probably. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=381542&forum_id=2#5361340) |
|
Date: March 17th, 2006 5:11 PM Author: fuchsia swashbuckling incel degenerate Any Fordham students know better than MDH, who is clearly prestigious, but clueless about Fordham. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=381542&forum_id=2#5361359) |
|
Date: March 17th, 2006 5:14 PM Author: Big ultramarine hominid ticket booth top 10%, probably, unless you bid them number 1 or 2, in which case you'll almost definitely get a screening interview regardless of rank. i didn't even bid them last year, so i don't know if numbers woulda cut it. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=381542&forum_id=2#5361378) |
|
Date: March 17th, 2006 5:16 PM Author: fuchsia swashbuckling incel degenerate Cool, how hard is it to get a job there once you make the cutoff? Obviously fit comes into play, but do you really have to be like top 1% or something? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=381542&forum_id=2#5361393) |
|
Date: March 17th, 2006 5:27 PM Author: Big ultramarine hominid ticket booth it looks like they give callbacks to about half the people they screen at fordham, and offers to most of those they callback. fall 2004 was 19 callbacks, 13 offers. most prior years it was more like 5 callback, 5 offers. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=381542&forum_id=2#5361482) |
|
Date: March 17th, 2006 5:31 PM Author: fuchsia swashbuckling incel degenerate Thanks a lot for that info. My life plan is to go to Fordham and work at Cravath. The Cravath part has been my plan since high school. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=381542&forum_id=2#5361521) |
|
Date: March 17th, 2006 5:36 PM Author: Outnumbered library french chef Interesting. Why is this? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=381542&forum_id=2#5361573) |
|
Date: March 17th, 2006 5:41 PM Author: fuchsia swashbuckling incel degenerate There was an article about biglaw in the NYT and the white shoe firm they referred to was Cravath. I then began to do research on law as a career and firms themselves, mainly Cravath, and the tightknit family qualities of Cravath really attract me. I also like how they are focused in NYC and the only little satellite office is in London (it would be cool to summer there!) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=381542&forum_id=2#5361612) |
|
Date: March 17th, 2006 5:44 PM Author: vigorous mahogany nursing home athletic conference If this was your goal since high school, why didn't you do better in college/LSAT and get into a decent school? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=381542&forum_id=2#5361640) |
|
Date: March 17th, 2006 5:45 PM Author: fuchsia swashbuckling incel degenerate I got really stoned the day before the lsat. I also had bad cravings for a cigarette during it. I'm a ttt. Fordham is a very good school, fuck what you people think otherwise. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=381542&forum_id=2#5361646) |
|
Date: March 17th, 2006 6:54 PM Author: Insane supple church building are fucking serious? you think you wouldve done better on the lsat if you hadnt gotten high the day BEFORE? why not take it again (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=381542&forum_id=2#5362185) |
|
Date: June 4th, 2006 2:48 PM Author: alcoholic liquid oxygen stage you're such an idiot. do you think that getting stoned prior to the exam excuses your poor score? why do you even bother to consistently reiterate this pathetic aspect of your application cycle? you had so many options: cancel, postpone, retake. your mistake wasn't getting stoned, it was your inability to strategize, an albatross you will carry forever. no matter how hard you troll for Fordham, you can not disguise your eternal TTTness. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=381542&forum_id=2#5907066) |
|
Date: March 17th, 2006 5:57 PM Author: Outnumbered library french chef They have had some interesting cases in their lit history. Have you read "The Partners" by James B Stewart? he's a former associate there who went on to publish/edit (?) American Lawyer. Good stuff on the AT&T trials (prominantly featuring Boies). I was a para there for a little over a year. Didn't strike me as a tight knit place from observations and talking with younger associates, but who the fuck knows. Paras see so goddamned little, through bleary eyes to boot. |
|
Date: March 17th, 2006 5:59 PM Author: fuchsia swashbuckling incel degenerate Interesting. I'm going to check out that book. How bad are the hours from what you did see? I meant tight knit in the sense of lockstep raises, staying with your class forever, never letting outsiders in. Seems like my kind of place. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=381542&forum_id=2#5361776) |
|
Date: March 17th, 2006 6:03 PM Author: Outnumbered library french chef Hours seemed completely miserable, especially for first years. I pulled 80-90 during busy cycles as a para (doc review, discovery pushes, ramp up before filings) and the associates were always a little more than that. It was busy more than it wasn't. I was also under a partner who had busy/good cases. Some of the older partners had slower/less cases and their associates probably did too. I'm sure someone here knows a lot more about this. |
|
Date: March 17th, 2006 6:04 PM Author: fuchsia swashbuckling incel degenerate Goddamn that's brutal. The hours are what keep me from committing myself to biglaw. I need to be able to have down time and foster a relationship with a woman. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=381542&forum_id=2#5361831) |
|
Date: March 17th, 2006 6:07 PM Author: Outnumbered library french chef I fostered relationships with strange russians on the F-train on the way to work on weekends, and with foreigners who had the city's traffic problems worked out in their heads in car service home. So all's not lost.
Seriously, check out that book. The Cravath chapter makes them sound sweet as fuck, and the other chapters give a nice look at the culture and values of the other big NYC firms, at least the culture in the 70's. |
|
Date: June 4th, 2006 12:51 PM Author: salmon base codepig ANNOUNCEMENT: THIS FUCKER IS A LOSER WHO SPENDS ALL OF HIS TIME ON THIS BOARD. HE KNOWS NOTHING ABOUT NOTHING, AND CONSISTENTLY TALKS OUT OF HIS ASS. HTH (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=381542&forum_id=2#5906678) |
|
Date: August 4th, 2006 4:28 PM Author: Fragrant Bearded Hall ORLY? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=381542&forum_id=2#6378351) |
|
Date: March 17th, 2006 5:14 PM Author: aromatic drab crackhouse mad-dog skullcap my guess is top 10% to get an interview, top 5% to have any sort of realistic chance.
EDIT: I don't go to Fordham, so take anything i say with a grain of salt. but that seems pretty accurate to me. |
|
Date: March 17th, 2006 5:17 PM Author: fuchsia swashbuckling incel degenerate Seems to fit in with some of what the other poster from Fordham said. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=381542&forum_id=2#5361395) |
|
Date: March 17th, 2006 5:18 PM Author: Disgusting headpube resort i would make the #1 student and the #2 student fight to the death. then i'd tell the winner that we don't have any spots open. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=381542&forum_id=2#5361404) |
|
Date: March 17th, 2006 5:18 PM Author: fuchsia swashbuckling incel degenerate You're an odd one dood. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=381542&forum_id=2#5361411) |
|
Date: June 4th, 2006 12:43 PM Author: Tantric sadistic digit ratio FRAUDULENTINDUCEMENTPWN3D (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=381542&forum_id=2#5906663) |
|
Date: March 17th, 2006 6:35 PM Author: know-it-all hospital dragon TRANSFERTOCN% (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=381542&forum_id=2#5362074) |
|
Date: March 17th, 2006 6:52 PM Author: Insane supple church building " and the tightknit family qualities of Cravath really attract me. "
LOL |
|
Date: June 4th, 2006 12:39 PM Author: Contagious gold corner What's funny? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=381542&forum_id=2#5906652) |
|
Date: June 4th, 2006 1:24 PM Author: copper water buffalo set I've never heard of anyone working there and not hating it and wanting to kill themselves everyday.
|
|
Date: June 4th, 2006 1:24 PM Author: judgmental friendly grandma jewess Does this differ from other biglaw firms? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=381542&forum_id=2#5906767) |
|
Date: June 4th, 2006 1:36 PM Author: Arousing gas station skinny woman the V5 firms are the worst of the worst to work for. they don't get those rankings by being nice to associates. they love to trick newly minted lawyers who come from poor backgrounds into working crazy hours by throwing around words like prestigious and V5.
the partners laugh all the way to the bank (actually they send someone else to the bank because they don't have time to go) because they pay about the same as everyone else yet get the associates to work significantly more time
here's what happens to suckers who buy into the mythology; http://xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=426082&mc=64&forum_id=2 |
|
Date: June 4th, 2006 1:36 PM Author: judgmental friendly grandma jewess Thanks for the warning. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=381542&forum_id=2#5906811) |
|
Date: June 4th, 2006 1:46 PM Author: ruddy titillating internal respiration Don't listen to him, biglaw is great. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=381542&forum_id=2#5906842) |
|
Date: June 4th, 2006 1:54 PM Author: judgmental friendly grandma jewess I don't believe you. Please post a pic. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=381542&forum_id=2#5906872) |
|
Date: June 4th, 2006 2:18 PM Author: copper water buffalo set I've heard good things about Latham and Cleary if the V5 distinction isn't important to you.
That said, I haven't heard nearly the terrible things about Sully or DP that I have about Cravath. |
|
Date: June 4th, 2006 2:26 PM Author: blathering bespoke space From anecdotal evidence S&C, DP, Simpson, and others all sound pretty sweet compared to Cravath and Skadden. This is if you believe random shit on message boards. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=381542&forum_id=2#5906978) |
|
Date: June 4th, 2006 2:30 PM Author: ruddy titillating internal respiration I live by things I read on message boards. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=381542&forum_id=2#5906984) |
|
Date: June 4th, 2006 2:31 PM Author: blathering bespoke space Sucking dick on a regular basis helps keep your teeth white and shiny. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=381542&forum_id=2#5906988) |
|
Date: June 4th, 2006 2:31 PM Author: ruddy titillating internal respiration Nice try. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=381542&forum_id=2#5906990) |
|
Date: June 4th, 2006 2:32 PM Author: copper water buffalo set It jives with what I hear IRL too. At least with regard to Cravath, SC and DP. The comments I hear on Skadden tend towards the middle (it sucks, but not more than it needs to) and I don't really hear much about Simpson. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=381542&forum_id=2#5906995) |
|
Date: August 4th, 2006 4:32 PM Author: red juggernaut jew (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=381542&forum_id=2#6378374) |
|
Date: August 4th, 2006 5:54 PM Author: provocative hyperventilating market Like all new Cravath associates, [William O.] Douglas quickly learned that the practice of law on Wall Street was a great deal less glamorous than he had imagined. New associates were crammed two to an office no bigger than a large closet and expected to bill three hundred hours per month. . . It was not unusual for his work day to last until two, three, or even four o'clock in the morning, whatever time it took to prepare the papers for the next day. Then, he rode the train home to Pelham for a couple hours of sleep, a shower, a fresh set of clothes, and a quick cup of coffee with Mildred before racing back to start the same cycle all over again.
--Bruce Allen Murphy, Wild Bill: The Life and Legend of William O. Douglas, p. 53
I wonder if anything has changed. |