The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Reed Smith PATRIOTS ask Court to hold Mueller and Barr in CONTEMPT
| Curious abode | 04/26/19 |
| excitant painfully honest gas station elastic band | 04/26/19 |
| Curious abode | 04/26/19 |
| excitant painfully honest gas station elastic band | 04/27/19 |
| Curious abode | 07/10/19 |
| Curious abode | 03/16/20 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: April 26th, 2019 5:43 PM Author: Curious abode Concord's Reed Smith lawyers are staying on the attack against that treasonous snake Bob Mueller.
Concord filed a motion asking for an order to show cause why Mueller and Barr shouldn't be held in contempt for making improper extrajudicial statements related to the alleged guilt of Concord. The basic premise is that the Mueller report's conclusions that Concord participated in the 2016 election interference is an improper extrajudicial statement that would have the effect of tainting the jury pool. This violates the DC local rules and thus Mueller and Barr should be held in contempt.
Bold move.
https://talkingpointsmemo.com/muckraker/concord-management-mueller-barr-criminal-contempt (a copy of the motion is at the end of the article) |
Date: April 26th, 2019 5:58 PM Author: excitant painfully honest gas station elastic band Marine Corps Decorated Combat Veteran Robert Mueller*
Show some respect cokehead |
 |
Date: April 26th, 2019 6:07 PM Author: Curious abode LJL at having any respect for that clown who wasted tens of millions of taxpayer dollars trying (and failing) to take down our duly elected president. Maybe Vietnam-era Bob was a good guy. But he was a shit FBI director who helped Bush lie us into Iraq and he was a shit "special counsel." (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4249560&forum_id=2#38148125) |
|
Date: April 27th, 2019 6:06 AM Author: excitant painfully honest gas station elastic band Nope. Mueller delivered a fair assessment and did his job. Show some respect cokey. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4249560&forum_id=2#38150025) |
|
Date: July 10th, 2019 10:18 AM Author: Curious abode District Court Judge seemed to disagree. From the article (https://www.law360.com/articles/1176283/barr-mueller-broke-rule-beat-sanctions-in-russian-troll-suit )
In March, Mueller and the DOJ issued the public report on the alleged election tampering by Russia, mentioning Concord’s alleged roles. Soon thereafter, Concord asked the court to sanction Mueller and Barr, alleging that they violated court rules.
It claimed that the report unfairly linked the company to the Russian government, which it did not do in its indictment, and that it unfairly prejudiced the company by assigning guilt to it before a jury weighed in.
Judge Friedrich agreed, according to the unsealed opinion.
“By attributing IRA’s conduct to ‘Russia’ — as opposed to Russian individuals or entities — the report suggests that the activities alleged in the indictment were undertaken on behalf of, if not at the direction of, the Russian government,” she said.
She called the government’s decision to claim a link between the defendants and the Russian government “significant and prejudicial.” |
|
Date: March 16th, 2020 9:05 PM Author: Curious abode Yet another poast from this 🤡 that did not age particularly well 🤣🤣🤣 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4249560&forum_id=2#39784035) |