The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
USA nukes (1945 - 2022)
Poast new message in this thread
Date: December 21st, 2013 3:32 PM Author: At-the-ready resort One prominent American who has questioned the future of ICBMs is Chuck Hagel, the current secretary of defense. As a private citizen in 2012 he endorsed a report that outlined a phased elimination of nuclear weapons, to include scrapping U.S. ICBMs within 10 years. The report by a group called Global Zero said the ICBM "has lost its central utility" in nuclear deterrence. http://tdn.com/news/national/govt-and-politics/us-nuclear-missiles-are-a-force-in-much-distress/article_39a7c5a8-0cfb-5f76-b87f-9318f7574419.html |
Date: December 21st, 2013 11:32 PM Author: At-the-ready resort (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2448184&forum_id=2#24689498) |
|
Date: December 21st, 2013 11:34 PM Author: 180 dopamine crackhouse If our leaders get actually scrap our nuke program then we'll go down in history as dumbest country ever. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2448184&forum_id=2#24689513) |
 |
Date: December 21st, 2013 11:37 PM Author: Orange Zippy Bbw Tcr. Even if we could somehow ensure our enemies completely eliminated their nuclear weapons, do we really want to go back to a pre-MAD world? a ground war in asia is just what we need (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2448184&forum_id=2#24689543) |
|
Date: December 22nd, 2013 12:34 AM Author: Lilac background story liquid oxygen Nukes on planes, nukes on subs is more than enough. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2448184&forum_id=2#24689928) |
|
Date: December 22nd, 2013 12:37 AM Author: Orange Zippy Bbw Why on earth should we prefer plane based delivery over ICBMs? that is the one part of the nuclear triad that should disappear (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2448184&forum_id=2#24689949) |
|
Date: December 22nd, 2013 12:39 AM Author: At-the-ready resort Better for states with shit air defense. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2448184&forum_id=2#24689953) |
|
Date: December 22nd, 2013 12:40 AM Author: Lilac background story liquid oxygen Expensive to maintain and so old their effectiveness may become questionable. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2448184&forum_id=2#24689957) |
|
Date: December 22nd, 2013 12:45 AM Author: Orange Zippy Bbw The minuteman fleet is tested regularly. A nuclear deterrent that is based around planes traveling great distances in order to deliver their payloads is of much less value than fast, reliable and basically unstoppable missiles. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2448184&forum_id=2#24689978) |
|
Date: December 22nd, 2013 12:56 AM Author: Lilac background story liquid oxygen Subs can deliver their payloads pretty quickly as well. I think the consensus is that large nation-states capable of launching a nuclear attack will not do so given the increasingly tangled web of economic interests between all nations. A large and expensive nuclear deterrent is unnecessary. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2448184&forum_id=2#24690020) |
|
Date: December 22nd, 2013 12:58 AM Author: At-the-ready resort (Guy on eve of WWI) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2448184&forum_id=2#24690032) |
|
Date: December 22nd, 2013 1:02 AM Author: Orange Zippy Bbw I am saying it makes little sense to keep the strategic bombers while getting rid of the ICBMs. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2448184&forum_id=2#24690050) |
|
Date: December 22nd, 2013 11:43 AM Author: cerebral nursing home All US ground wars in Asia happened after the introduction of nuke, you tard. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2448184&forum_id=2#24691323) |
|
Date: December 22nd, 2013 12:47 AM Author: Supple stead Aren't e sub missiles icbm's (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2448184&forum_id=2#24689986) |
|
Date: December 22nd, 2013 12:50 AM Author: ebony titillating theater stage technically, but people call them SLBS. I think Hagel was saying theyre all we need, and he's probably right. theyre much easier to hide, harder to shoot down, and with MIRVs we can still get as much firepower as we reasonably need (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2448184&forum_id=2#24690001) |
|
Date: December 22nd, 2013 12:59 AM Author: At-the-ready resort Shitlibs complain about SLBS why. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2448184&forum_id=2#24690037) |
|
Date: December 22nd, 2013 1:07 AM Author: ebony titillating theater stage ? who is complaining about slbs? |
|
Date: December 22nd, 2013 1:08 AM Author: At-the-ready resort Libs want obama to rule out first strikes under any circumstances. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2448184&forum_id=2#24690069) |
|
Date: December 22nd, 2013 1:09 AM Author: ebony titillating theater stage ? what does this have to do with slbms? edit: not exactly a shitlib here, no first strike sounds fine. In fact I bet its already our policy. It doesn't matter what we say we'l do what we're gonna do no matter what |
|
Date: December 22nd, 2013 1:10 AM Author: Charcoal embarrassed to the bone gunner USSR allegedly had a no first-strike policy (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2448184&forum_id=2#24690075) |
|
Date: December 22nd, 2013 12:53 AM Author: peach awkward feces water buffalo Sounds like a good idea to me. Why do we need to waste money on those things? Most of them have already been decommissioned.
We already have a foolproof second-strike ability with our Ohio sub ICBMs (not to mention the airforce). |
|
Date: December 22nd, 2013 1:00 AM Author: Orange Zippy Bbw What's concerning is the fact he endorsed a plan that envisioned it as part of a phased elimination of nuclear weapons. anyone who believes a world without nukes would a more peaceful place needs to be gassed immediately (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2448184&forum_id=2#24690042) |
|
Date: December 22nd, 2013 1:16 AM Author: peach awkward feces water buffalo Overall, I agree.
The only problem with NUKES, however, is that ONE WRONG MOVE is fatal. |
|
Date: December 22nd, 2013 1:19 AM Author: At-the-ready resort Fatal for the other guy. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2448184&forum_id=2#24690119) |
|
Date: December 22nd, 2013 12:58 AM Author: Charcoal embarrassed to the bone gunner ARE REPTILE rushing to this thread to post about shitty Russian ICBMs
|
|
Date: December 22nd, 2013 1:00 AM Author: Charcoal embarrassed to the bone gunner Anyway, the point of a nuclear triad is that each leg of the nuclear triad is vulnerable to a different thing. You have to basically believe that our SSBNs are infallible/unsinkable to believe that they, alone, are a sufficient deterrent. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2448184&forum_id=2#24690046) |
|
Date: December 22nd, 2013 1:32 AM Author: Crusty library kitty cat lol, as if we will believe anything out of your lying Yankee mouths. Under treaty your Trident MIRV's are supposed to be capable of only 8 warhead release rotations, but when the British sent up a Trident a few years back Russia's new radars clocked it performing a full 10 release rotations. Dumb limeys underestimated resolution of Russian radars. You lied in your START declarations then and you lie now. We don't believe a thing out of your politicians mouths. Only thing Russian can trust is its RVSN.
We know fully that you Yankees plan to nullify Soviet second strike potential with your GBI and land based SM-3 deployments. We will not sit back and let our nuclear parity erode. To ensure continued Soviet nuclear preeminence Vladimir Vladimirovich has funded the development and deployment of a wide variety of new missiles including the return of Soviet rail mobile ICBM's, the development of a new super-heavy ICBM with a 100 ton throw weight to replace the venerable SS-18 Satan, the return of Soviet MRBM's in the form of the brand new RS-26, a new version of the Topol with a hypersonic BUS, and a continued move away from single warhead Topol-M's to multi-warheard RS-24 Yars missiles for the obliteration of your population centers. And we have initiated a new program to rebuild and harden our silos against the current generation of puny Yankee warheads. The current silos being built can withstand even a direct strike from your pathetic W76 100kt warheads. And we will match your SM-3 deployments with S-500 deployments.
|
|
Date: December 22nd, 2013 1:34 AM Author: 180 dopamine crackhouse Did you used to post as 'Cumslut'? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2448184&forum_id=2#24690171) |
|
Date: December 22nd, 2013 11:35 AM Author: Racy Cream Lay Newt please tell us more about Russia nuclear "preeminence" as your rocket forces and submarine fleets turn into piles of rusted shit. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2448184&forum_id=2#24691282) |
|
Date: December 22nd, 2013 11:39 AM Author: Marvelous Bearded Private Investor (guy whose country was defeated by the japanese) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2448184&forum_id=2#24691306) |
|
Date: November 23rd, 2016 1:33 PM Author: galvanic very tactful school cafeteria basically an evan39 parody post (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2448184&forum_id=2#31977125) |
|
Date: November 23rd, 2016 1:34 PM Author: transparent aggressive site (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2448184&forum_id=2#31977132) |
|
Date: December 22nd, 2013 1:45 AM Author: Crusty library kitty cat And I don't want to live in a world without nukes to inspire songs like this.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rfspbLhAQ48 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uzMhGe_Y-gU http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vPLr6mQWWzk
Only in Russia are there scores of songs dedicated to nukes and nothing but nukes. |
|
Date: December 22nd, 2013 2:07 AM Author: Apoplectic sepia parlor Lol
you're dangerous but hitler was right about you being subhumans |
|
Date: November 23rd, 2016 1:36 PM Author: Aphrodisiac bawdyhouse ^^^^^^^ Guy that voted for Hillary Clinton. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2448184&forum_id=2#31977152) |
|
Date: December 22nd, 2013 11:36 AM Author: Racy Cream Lay Newt Eliminating them completely seems a bit much, we could reduce our inventory by at least 50% without suffering anything strategically. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2448184&forum_id=2#24691295) |
|
Date: November 23rd, 2016 12:33 PM Author: chocolate appetizing becky (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2448184&forum_id=2#31976711) |