which is to say that there's a chance of something happening in the next few million years.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2673067&forum_id=2#26319171)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2673067&forum_id=2#26320976)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federalist_Papers

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2673067&forum_id=2#26319511)

I'm not even sure how neoreactionaries can hope to win much at the moment given how outnumbered we are. Of course, opposing shitlibbery even when losses are assured can help in the long-run if it's done right. I think things will change in our favor, but it will take some time.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2673067&forum_id=2#26320329)

you'll see someone like twist break something down and say something like "...so it therefore makes no sense to simultaneously hold theses x and y because that would be [illogical/not just/whatever] and this is where [feminists went wrong/what feminists need to realize/whatever]"

thats the framework that needs to go.

youve already lost if you engage them in civilized debate because youve already assumed they have any interest in the truth or intellectual honesty or fairness or justice or equality

open ur eyes: they arent making poor arguments that need to be corrected, they are committing acts of violence.

its violence. not argument.

The signified of all their bullshit rhetoric is always going to be

"fuck you, were going to assault you and take what we want by force. and what we want is not an end to hierarchy or intolerance or injustice, what we want is not the end of oppression, no.

what we want is to be the oopressor in a new hierarchy--one with our boots on your neck. we like that the strong take what they will while the weak suffer as they must. and were going to make you suffer."

if somebody is punching you in the face its a pretty shitty idea to start from the premise that theyre doing what they honestly think is best for you and would appreciate your assistance in pointing out where theyre going wrong.

one loses his humanity by responding to violence with pusillanimous equanimity and cowardly retreat. violations of force require forceful resistance.

people need to wake up and stop participating in their own humiliation. you lose the second you concede their right to a charitable, honest response to their offensively dishonest, evil horseshit that is being used as a weapon against you.

if charity suggests a rebuttable presumption well then case fucking closed ok? the presumption has been rebutted by now. you are not obligated to humiliate yourself by taking them seriously. like robert trivers said about alan dershowitz: nazis need to be confronted directly. no handwringing about you wish those meanies would start being nicer/more honest/whatever. the time for that is over and it becomes immoral to give the benefit of the doubt to violent assholes who long ago crushed to dust any doubt about their evilness. no doubt, no benefit. simple.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2673067&forum_id=2#26319547)

I think a lot of libs really believe that they're not doing this, and when this happens it's usually an unintended result. What libs say they want sounds good enough, and it takes a close examination of consequences to realize that what they say is all bullshit. In particular, white libs have been sucked in by facile moral arguments and taken advantage of by people actually promoting their own group interests at the expense of whites.

Retreating or not responding to this absolutely does embolden the anti-whites--appeasement doesn't work.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2673067&forum_id=2#26320226)

so yeah they need to be confronted.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2673067&forum_id=2#26320240)

i have a lot to say on this but the main thing is that a fusion of two things. the whole deconstruction stuff is anti-reason and rejects knowledge, and the western marxist stuff is an ends justifies the means thing. so yes, they aren't arguing in good faith - ever - and you are right.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2673067&forum_id=2#26320260)

that's great if someone does appreciate you breaking down their bullshit or you really are inspired to create new, better ideas.

that's all good. but that's not the front line. shots have been fired. The primary question is if you're going to suffer the slings and arrows and beg for mercy or if you're going to defend your principles and brethren. and that's a question of character not intellect.

to paraphrase apocryphal-Trotsky you may not be interested in the fight but the fight is interested in you.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2673067&forum_id=2#26320284)

*smoke bomb*

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2673067&forum_id=2#31583540)