The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Obscure Civ Pro Question
Poast new message in this thread
Date: July 24th, 2012 11:55 PM Author: onyx laughsome set chad (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2004093&forum_id=2#21168903) |
 |
Date: July 24th, 2012 11:56 PM Author: copper hyperventilating generalized bond who cares?
CA civ pro question did not test this. |
|
Date: July 24th, 2012 11:59 PM Author: onyx laughsome set chad (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2004093&forum_id=2#21168940) |
|
Date: July 25th, 2012 12:11 AM Author: house-broken ocher turdskin i don't know if this is true bro... i am looking at pages 102-104 of the civil procedure in the California long outline book... i don't see denials of PJ being appealable immediately. i might be blind though (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2004093&forum_id=2#21169014) |
|
Date: July 25th, 2012 12:22 AM Author: onyx laughsome set chad (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2004093&forum_id=2#21169116) |
|
Date: July 25th, 2012 7:16 PM Author: Disgusting knife meetinghouse LOLOL of course not, have you even fucking read anything relating to 1291 at all you fucking douche (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2004093&forum_id=2#21174937) |
|
Date: July 24th, 2012 11:58 PM Author: vigorous library masturbator You have to take the interlocutory appeal. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2004093&forum_id=2#21168922) |
|
Date: July 25th, 2012 12:08 AM Author: onyx laughsome set chad (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2004093&forum_id=2#21168995) |
|
Date: July 25th, 2012 7:11 PM Author: Disgusting knife meetinghouse no you don't, you faggot (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2004093&forum_id=2#21174881) |
|
Date: July 25th, 2012 7:10 PM Author: Disgusting knife meetinghouse no you don't, you faggot. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2004093&forum_id=2#21174879) |
|
Date: July 24th, 2012 11:59 PM Author: Awkward mustard church are you smoe kind of faggit or something its common sense that you'd have to use it or lose it given the "thing you know" (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2004093&forum_id=2#21168937) |
|
Date: July 25th, 2012 12:05 AM Author: wine self-absorbed new version station pretty sure if you litigate you waive bro, interloc or gtfo (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2004093&forum_id=2#21168971) |
|
Date: July 25th, 2012 12:13 AM Author: henna excitant senate doctorate is it interloc? is that in CMR? i thought interloc was injunctions and appointing a receiver. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2004093&forum_id=2#21169029) |
|
Date: July 25th, 2012 12:19 AM Author: wine self-absorbed new version station you're beyond me here bro, been a while since i took the bar. in my experience interloc is used in convo to refer to any appeal taken pre-merits judgment. honestly that's what i thought it meant. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2004093&forum_id=2#21169090) |
|
Date: July 25th, 2012 12:27 AM Author: henna excitant senate doctorate ya, thats what it means. CMR indicates its a rare deal, and lists a handful of times it's applicable. I didn't see FQJ as one, althought I guess it would make sense to be. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2004093&forum_id=2#21169167) |
|
Date: July 25th, 2012 7:12 PM Author: Disgusting knife meetinghouse no you don't, you fucking faggot (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2004093&forum_id=2#21174891) |
Date: July 25th, 2012 12:25 AM Author: cream concupiscible fat ankles interesting. I think you CAN try for an interloc appeal but if its not granted, you can still raise on appeal. dont see why it would be otherwise (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2004093&forum_id=2#21169139) |
|
Date: July 25th, 2012 7:10 PM Author: Disgusting knife meetinghouse lol first lol no, you can raise it alongside your answer OR in a separate motion BEFORE your answer. and second no you can't interlocutory appeal it because it's not fucking appealable under 1291 see van cauwenberghe v. baird (1988), it's something you can just raise on ordinary appeal after final judgment. the only way you get it as an interlocutory appeal, which it isn't, is if you manage to convince the court to certify it, and even then an appeals court is probably going to just say fuck it. but short answer, not REQUIRED to eb immediately appealable. Shut the fuck up, you fucking white trash 0Ls from TLS. Let the fucking litigators talk. |
|
Date: July 23rd, 2018 6:39 PM Author: Wonderful Wrinkle (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2004093&forum_id=2#36483455) |