The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
why do people think logic games is so improvable?
Poast new message in this thread
Date: March 8th, 2012 10:16 PM Author: Slippery Stead this doesnt really make sense.
there's nothing esoteric about a logic game. the only difficulty is the time limit. what techniques are supposed to improve this? |
Date: March 8th, 2012 10:17 PM Author: azure state circlehead the diagramming, being a retard who doesn't instinctively get what a contrapositive is and learning it from an lsat logic games "bible" (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1893397&forum_id=2#20159728) |
 |
Date: March 8th, 2012 10:19 PM Author: orchid parlor (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1893397&forum_id=2#20159743) |
|
Date: March 8th, 2012 10:20 PM Author: orchid parlor also you get much better at them just by doing around 20-30 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1893397&forum_id=2#20159746) |
|
Date: March 8th, 2012 11:22 PM Author: Slippery Stead wouldnt you naturally diagram if it seemed necessary? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1893397&forum_id=2#20160373) |
|
Date: March 8th, 2012 11:23 PM Author: azure state circlehead I don't know, there are different ways to diagram, and you might not realize that diagramming's more efficient. I actually didn't diagram, just got one wrong (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1893397&forum_id=2#20160388) |
|
Date: March 8th, 2012 10:17 PM Author: Excitant friendly grandma http://top-law-schools.com/forums/viewforum.php?f=6 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1893397&forum_id=2#20159729) |
|
Date: March 8th, 2012 10:20 PM Author: Opaque Aromatic Stage People Who Are Hurt STFU doobs (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1893397&forum_id=2#20159753) |
|
Date: March 8th, 2012 11:23 PM Author: Slippery Stead doobs would murder everyone on this chatblog if he could have me take the lsat for him (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1893397&forum_id=2#20160380) |
|
Date: March 8th, 2012 11:24 PM Author: Opaque Aromatic Stage People Who Are Hurt what did you get breh? what kind of score would you guarantee? it would be awesome as fukkkk if i could take the LSAT for people. i think i could get $5,000 per administration if there was a good way to hook up with clients. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1893397&forum_id=2#20160398) |
|
Date: March 8th, 2012 11:26 PM Author: Slippery Stead should i do this?
im not a law student and not looking to ever be admitted to the bar. |
|
Date: March 8th, 2012 11:27 PM Author: Opaque Aromatic Stage People Who Are Hurt breh you didn't answer like any of my questions. the issue isn't really whether you can get admitted to a bar, but whether they will throw your ass in motherfucking jail if you get caught. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1893397&forum_id=2#20160443) |
|
Date: March 8th, 2012 11:28 PM Author: Slippery Stead would they really breh? im not a lawyer so i dont know (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1893397&forum_id=2#20160449) |
|
Date: March 8th, 2012 11:29 PM Author: Opaque Aromatic Stage People Who Are Hurt you'd catch a felony charge and the feds might get involved if you were crossing state lines to do it. i'd say there's a good chance they do give you some time. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1893397&forum_id=2#20160460) |
|
Date: March 8th, 2012 11:31 PM Author: Slippery Stead jesus, breh.
id probably charge at least 25k in that case |
|
Date: March 8th, 2012 11:33 PM Author: Opaque Aromatic Stage People Who Are Hurt too much money. no one's paying you $25k because you got a 172. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1893397&forum_id=2#20160509) |
|
Date: March 8th, 2012 11:35 PM Author: Slippery Stead fuck.
i dont want to go to jail, though. |
|
Date: March 8th, 2012 11:37 PM Author: Opaque Aromatic Stage People Who Are Hurt probably shouldn't take the SAT for bros then. although likelihood of getting caught would be low if you did it just a couple times. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1893397&forum_id=2#20160556) |
|
Date: March 8th, 2012 11:23 PM Author: Bull headed boyish karate because there's only 4 or 5 common setups - people who originally sucked at the section can generally learn these setups, how to deal with them, and profit (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1893397&forum_id=2#20160389) |
|
Date: March 8th, 2012 11:25 PM Author: Slippery Stead but if youre dumb enough to really suck at it then i think the time limit would fuck you anyway.
its not like theres a linear algebra section on the lsat. i can see why studying would make a big difference there, but logic games are pretty intuitive. |
|
Date: March 8th, 2012 11:26 PM Author: azure state circlehead not to a lot of reasonably bright ppl, actually (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1893397&forum_id=2#20160430) |
|
Date: March 8th, 2012 11:25 PM Author: diverse beta nursing home because you learn the few techniques and frameworks necessary to solve all logic games and practice applying them quickly. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1893397&forum_id=2#20160416) |
|
Date: March 8th, 2012 11:26 PM Author: Slippery Stead wheres the "technique" or "framework" thats not really obvious? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1893397&forum_id=2#20160433) |
|
Date: March 8th, 2012 11:30 PM Author: diverse beta nursing home unless you automatically know how to efficiently symbolically represent the games on paper and manipulate those symbols towards the correct solution without going down a wrong path, practice is the only way you'll learn to do so. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1893397&forum_id=2#20160468) |
|
Date: March 8th, 2012 11:32 PM Author: Slippery Stead havent these people been doing symbolic representation/manipulation/computation since 6th grade? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1893397&forum_id=2#20160505) |
|
Date: March 8th, 2012 11:38 PM Author: diverse beta nursing home i had very little experience with it the first time i'd ever seen it and i have a reasonably strong math background. my scores on games the first few times i tried them were abysmal. after practice and seeing some hints and techniques for attacking them, my scores were nearly perfect.
i think the real problem is that games require a minimal level of reading comprehension and mapping the ideas to symbols, then manipulating those symbols. this is different from writing essays or doing word problems in math. i guess it's closest to writing mathematical proofs but requires lower level but quicker logical reasoning. |
|
Date: March 8th, 2012 11:26 PM Author: provocative sweet tailpipe useless brakes because once you learn to ignore all the stuff about "apartment buildings" and "Radio Station Disc Jockeys", etc., the problems are easier to deal with in terms of logical relationships. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1893397&forum_id=2#20160431) |
|
Date: March 8th, 2012 11:27 PM Author: Slippery Stead what requires a book/class/tutor to teach you this shit? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1893397&forum_id=2#20160440) |
|
Date: March 8th, 2012 11:29 PM Author: azure state circlehead lacking a logical cast of mind (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1893397&forum_id=2#20160459) |
|
Date: March 8th, 2012 11:30 PM Author: Slippery Stead in which case youre fucked anyway, right?
im not doubting that techniques are useful to solve logic games. im doubting the kind of person who cant figure out these techniques on their own. |
|
Date: March 8th, 2012 11:32 PM Author: azure state circlehead nope, not fucked anyway. we can only repeat the same cycle of you rephrasing your point 50 different ways and me/other ppl saying you're wrong so many times (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1893397&forum_id=2#20160497) |
|
Date: March 8th, 2012 11:35 PM Author: Slippery Stead but theres no evidence im wrong.
the lsats are pretty similar. and people arent doing much better despite the increase in tutoring/practice. |
|
Date: March 8th, 2012 11:36 PM Author: azure state circlehead you know that raw scores haven't improved/that the test hasn't gotten harder over the past 15 years? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1893397&forum_id=2#20160550) |
|
Date: March 8th, 2012 11:42 PM Author: Slippery Stead no, i havent seen evidence of this.
|
|
Date: March 8th, 2012 11:38 PM Author: obsidian bearded cuck all the evidence indicates ur wrong u dumbshit. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1893397&forum_id=2#20160567) |
|
Date: March 8th, 2012 11:31 PM Author: provocative sweet tailpipe useless brakes i don't think you need a book or a class necessarily, just seeing the format of the problems ahead of time can help (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1893397&forum_id=2#20160489) |
|
Date: March 8th, 2012 11:27 PM Author: adventurous peach foreskin because shit tons of people improve on it by reading the LG Bible? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1893397&forum_id=2#20160439) |
|
Date: March 8th, 2012 11:27 PM Author: Slippery Stead i guess this is what i kind of doubt (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1893397&forum_id=2#20160446) |
|
Date: March 8th, 2012 11:28 PM Author: azure state circlehead it's a fact though (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1893397&forum_id=2#20160454) |
|
Date: March 8th, 2012 11:29 PM Author: Slippery Stead im guessing the lsac doesnt admit this. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1893397&forum_id=2#20160462) |
|
Date: March 8th, 2012 11:30 PM Author: azure state circlehead yeah I imagine they don't advertise it (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1893397&forum_id=2#20160472) |
|
Date: March 8th, 2012 11:31 PM Author: adventurous peach foreskin do you think everyone on TLS is gaining 10+ points by placebo effect or something? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1893397&forum_id=2#20160490) |
|
Date: March 8th, 2012 11:34 PM Author: Slippery Stead i dont think people are gaining a ton of points. otherwise the test wouldnt be breaking people over the curve so easily. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1893397&forum_id=2#20160520) |
|
Date: March 8th, 2012 11:36 PM Author: obsidian bearded cuck lol every1 is just lieing faggot. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1893397&forum_id=2#20160547) |
|
Date: March 8th, 2012 11:38 PM Author: provocative sweet tailpipe useless brakes i don't think it's as easy to improve as some people say. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1893397&forum_id=2#20160568) |
|
Date: March 8th, 2012 11:38 PM Author: azure state circlehead I think some ppl find it easy and others find it hard (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1893397&forum_id=2#20160576) |
|
Date: March 8th, 2012 11:39 PM Author: provocative sweet tailpipe useless brakes yes (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1893397&forum_id=2#20160588) |
|
Date: March 8th, 2012 11:40 PM Author: adventurous peach foreskin The average LSAT taker has never heard of TLS or LG Bible. I gained like 11 points from my diag, almost all of it on games. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1893397&forum_id=2#20160596) |
|
Date: March 8th, 2012 11:41 PM Author: azure state circlehead (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1893397&forum_id=2#20160600) |
|
Date: February 19th, 2026 6:45 PM Author: nyuug def. worth it to work on games now, in 2026, FOR SURE (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1893397&forum_id=2#49681283) |
|
Date: February 23rd, 2026 5:34 PM Author: nyuug dumbing down tests is superior anglo culture bro (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1893397&forum_id=2#49690069) |
|
Date: February 23rd, 2026 6:01 PM Author: Norwoody Allen What law school did you go to, big guy? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1893397&forum_id=2#49690119) |
|
Date: February 23rd, 2026 6:26 PM Author: nyuug u seem pretty mad@ america dumbing down literally every standardized test bro (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1893397&forum_id=2#49690191) |