(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3175339&forum_id=2#30130181)

So status quo?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3175339&forum_id=2#30130314)

If it's true she turned down a 60k job, half the jury would probably kill to make that.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3175339&forum_id=2#30130542)

I didn't know that when I poasted.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3175339&forum_id=2#30130571)

Take home 3000 dollars;

Loans: 1600

Rent: 1200

Transportation: 150

Food: 300

Opps there is no more money left. Guess I'll just make it work for 25 more years until this thing is paid off

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3175339&forum_id=2#30134983)

"The jury was asked to decide whether the school intentionally misrepresented the employment statistics or was simply negligent."

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3175339&forum_id=2#30130437)

"Thomas Jefferson employees maintained that they did not understand the importance of the employment data"

The fact that these two statements resulted in a judgment for the defendant shows how much undeserved respect universities have. They are fucking dirty wastes that are plagues on society.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3175339&forum_id=2#30130546)

http://abovethelaw.com/2016/03/understanding-the-alaburda-v-thomas-jefferson-law-verdict-a-conversation-with-one-of-the-jurors/

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3175339&forum_id=2#30134813)

Jurors: the data the plaintiff relied upon was only vague and sloppy. after plaintiff enrolled, the school began putting out deliberately false data, with bad intent, and if the judge let us address that the verdict would have been different.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3175339&forum_id=2#30135008)