The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
NYU's Fall 2010 LSAT Numbers are INSANE
Poast new message in this thread
Date: August 30th, 2010 4:15 PM Author: godawful provocative stage masturbator 476 full-time day students (no part-time or evening) LSAT 75th%25th%: 175/169 Undergraduate GPA 75th%/25th%: 3.9/3.6
http://www.law.nyu.edu/admissions/jdadmissions/applicants/classprofile/index.htm |
 |
Date: August 30th, 2010 4:28 PM Author: Fuchsia high-end forum Damn. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1409833&forum_id=2#15922260) |
|
Date: August 30th, 2010 4:52 PM Author: light glittery sandwich turdskin "An applicant's undergraduate record and Law School Admission Test (LSAT) score, while important, are not the sole determinants for admission. No index or cut-off is used in reviewing applications. The information on LSAT and undergraduate GPA is offered above to give prospective students one estimate of the strength of the Law School’s applicant pool." (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1409833&forum_id=2#15922560) |
Date: August 30th, 2010 4:30 PM Author: Stimulating Underhanded Electric Furnace SullCrom! SullCrom! SullCrom! (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1409833&forum_id=2#15922280) |
|
Date: August 30th, 2010 5:05 PM Author: Rebellious hospital coffee pot kids and adderall these days (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1409833&forum_id=2#15922677) |
|
Date: August 30th, 2010 5:07 PM Author: Indecent electric jap famous landscape painting I guess they were a bit pissed about getting knocked out of the T6. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1409833&forum_id=2#15922693) |
|
Date: August 30th, 2010 5:10 PM Author: sexy toilet seat they mad (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1409833&forum_id=2#15922720) |
|
Date: August 30th, 2010 5:13 PM Author: topaz new version pervert any idea what numbers CLS has for this year? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1409833&forum_id=2#15922748) |
|
Date: August 30th, 2010 5:14 PM Author: sexy toilet seat i think 170-175 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1409833&forum_id=2#15922764) |
|
Date: August 30th, 2010 5:09 PM Author: excitant corner lettuce Those 75% #s would have given you a shot at a Hamilton 5 years ago. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1409833&forum_id=2#15922711) |
|
Date: August 30th, 2010 5:14 PM Author: orchid library But those who have 75% lsat at NYU are unlikely to have 75% gpa as well.
A 3.9/175 still gives you a decent shot at Hamilton and a great shot at HLS. |
|
Date: August 30th, 2010 5:17 PM Author: henna mad cow disease juggernaut if a 3.9/175 isn't a mortal lock at HLS, something is seriously fucked, they need to recenter the LSAT or something. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1409833&forum_id=2#15922793) |
|
Date: August 30th, 2010 5:19 PM Author: topaz new version pervert it wasn't this year. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1409833&forum_id=2#15922810) |
|
Date: August 30th, 2010 5:27 PM Author: Indecent electric jap famous landscape painting The issue is that they no longer report averaged LSAT scores. The solution is to reinstate averaging. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1409833&forum_id=2#15922882) |
|
Date: August 31st, 2010 2:12 PM Author: Crusty ruddy marketing idea CORRECT (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1409833&forum_id=2#15930511) |
|
Date: August 31st, 2010 8:18 PM Author: Swashbuckling Rehab Multi-billionaire Averaging would help big time, but it's also that the prep companies have beaten the test. any monkey with a couple months to kill can memorize the LG bible and hit 170 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1409833&forum_id=2#15933500) |
|
Date: August 30th, 2010 5:56 PM Author: Exciting flushed ceo A 3.9/175 wasn't a lock for either HLS or a Hamilton this year.
They all seemed to get into SLS, though. |
|
Date: August 31st, 2010 10:26 AM Author: irradiated milk skinny woman really? i would imagine a 3.9/175 from an ivy would all but guarantee HLS. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1409833&forum_id=2#15929148) |
|
Date: August 31st, 2010 2:11 PM Author: Crusty ruddy marketing idea THE PROBLEM IS THE NEW RETAKE POLICY (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1409833&forum_id=2#15930500) |
|
Date: August 30th, 2010 5:24 PM Author: excitant corner lettuce Is this attributable to increase in apps? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1409833&forum_id=2#15922861) |
|
Date: August 30th, 2010 5:57 PM Author: Cracking market voyeur Proof that lawyers are dumber than business people: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703959704575453350418748176.html?mod=WSJ_hpp_sections_careerjournal
|
|
Date: August 30th, 2010 6:11 PM Author: bipolar son of senegal stead Amazing.
Business-oriented person: "Having evaluated the risk/reward, an MBA is not a good idea at this time."
Law-oriented person: "Duh, my grandpappy said you can wait out the storm!" |
|
Date: August 31st, 2010 10:21 AM Author: emerald nursing home wagecucks lol (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1409833&forum_id=2#15929126) |
|
Date: August 31st, 2010 2:13 PM Author: Crusty ruddy marketing idea EVERYONE NOW TAKES THE LSAT 3 TIMES (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1409833&forum_id=2#15930514) |
|
Date: August 30th, 2010 6:10 PM Author: bipolar son of senegal stead I would guess it's a combo of more apps and an increase in multiple-takers. I would guess that multiple-takers are massively disproportionately represented in the top schools. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1409833&forum_id=2#15923361) |
|
Date: August 31st, 2010 12:15 AM Author: submissive titillating senate I would also argue that fewer are taking full rides to lower ranked schools. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1409833&forum_id=2#15927456) |
|
Date: August 31st, 2010 8:03 PM Author: lilac floppy faggot firefighter Taking on a ton of debt seems like a good idea ITE. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1409833&forum_id=2#15933373) |
|
Date: August 30th, 2010 6:15 PM Author: Sadistic awkward abode wow almost as good as cls
well, guess you'll always be #6 |
|
Date: August 31st, 2010 12:14 AM Author: submissive titillating senate Yea but Chicago shouldnt be ahead. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1409833&forum_id=2#15927450) |
|
Date: August 31st, 2010 9:48 AM Author: light glittery sandwich turdskin And neither NYU or Chicago should be ahead of UT. The rankings obviously suck. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1409833&forum_id=2#15929026) |
|
Date: August 31st, 2010 5:26 PM Author: puce comical national security agency LOL, shut up, hick (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1409833&forum_id=2#15932077) |
|
Date: August 31st, 2010 9:50 AM Author: Blue National Dopamine how are you so convinced that you got it right and USNEWS and all of the people filling out the reputational survey got it wrong? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1409833&forum_id=2#15929029) |
|
Date: August 31st, 2010 9:52 AM Author: citrine brunch digit ratio so the new crop of will-be lawyers have better stats than the unemployed ones now? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1409833&forum_id=2#15929039) |
|
Date: August 31st, 2010 9:59 AM Author: Blue National Dopamine assuming joblessness, wouldn't that be "would-be" lawyers???? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1409833&forum_id=2#15929061) |
|
Date: August 31st, 2010 2:15 PM Author: Crusty ruddy marketing idea ONLY B/C THEY TOOK THE LSAT 3 TIMES (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1409833&forum_id=2#15930540) |
|
Date: August 31st, 2010 10:34 AM Author: Appetizing low-t spot how many people even get above a 175 every yera? 150K test takers so about 750 175+ scores? sound right? so NYU fucking law is sucking up a full 16% of the top .5th percentile lsat scorers now.
this doesn't reflect well on people that take the lsat, because it suggests there aren't a lot of people getting high scores and then deciding not to go to LS |
|
Date: August 31st, 2010 1:53 PM Author: Blue National Dopamine Despite the cw on this board, ccn @ sticker is still credited for ppl w shitty or no we (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1409833&forum_id=2#15930322) |
|
Date: August 31st, 2010 2:16 PM Author: Crusty ruddy marketing idea RETAKES BRO. RETAKES RETAKES RETAKES (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1409833&forum_id=2#15930549) |
|
Date: August 31st, 2010 2:31 PM Author: Appetizing low-t spot uh doesn't matter. there can still only be that number of 175+ scores based on the percentile data that is available (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1409833&forum_id=2#15930694) |
|
Date: August 31st, 2010 4:15 PM Author: Crusty ruddy marketing idea Incorrect. There can only be a certain *percentage* of 175 scores. With everyone retaking, you have immensely more people taking each administration, and therefore far more 175+ scores -- even though plenty of those folks also have a couple 169's in their history. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1409833&forum_id=2#15931529) |
|
Date: August 31st, 2010 2:10 PM Author: Crusty ruddy marketing idea PSA: THIS IS ALL DUE TO THE NEWER ABA POLICY RE LSAT RETAKES JUST AS I PREDICTED. LSAT IS NOW SOMETHING THAT EVERYONE DOES THREE TIMES BECAUSE RETAKING HAS NO DOWNSIDE. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1409833&forum_id=2#15930492) |
|
Date: August 31st, 2010 2:17 PM Author: bisexual talented locale mediation you are not the first to post such wisdom, but undoubtedly correct.
http://xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=1027860&mc=23&forum_id=2#12094103 |
|
Date: August 31st, 2010 2:32 PM Author: Appetizing low-t spot the retake data that exists suggests that the upside to retaking has not been that high, historically.
now, granted, in a world where retaking had substantial downside, maybe the people choosing to retake were already expressing slight stupidity. but i guess we'll see in a few yeras when some fresher retake data is released |
|
Date: August 31st, 2010 2:35 PM Author: mischievous trip patrolman Absolutely. Nobody re-took if they got a 168+, because the chances of doing worse were significant enough to deter it. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1409833&forum_id=2#15930735) |
|
Date: August 31st, 2010 2:38 PM Author: Appetizing low-t spot i woulkd have retaken at 168 jesus christ.
the more accurate statement is that nobody would retake if they hit their average prep test score. now people will probably retake if their real-score isn't equivalent to their highest prep test.
|
|
Date: August 31st, 2010 8:01 PM Author: cocky bat shit crazy cuckoldry meetinghouse I retook a 170. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1409833&forum_id=2#15933351) |
|
Date: August 31st, 2010 4:16 PM Author: Crusty ruddy marketing idea TY. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1409833&forum_id=2#15931545) |
|
Date: August 31st, 2010 8:04 PM Author: Big site coldplay fan White people in the early 2000s got into PEnn with 165s. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1409833&forum_id=2#15933388) |
|
Date: August 31st, 2010 8:15 PM Author: cocky bat shit crazy cuckoldry meetinghouse people today get into Penn with 166s. their LSAT range gets really low given their rank. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1409833&forum_id=2#15933469) |
|
Date: August 31st, 2010 8:16 PM Author: Big site coldplay fan Not white people. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1409833&forum_id=2#15933479) |
|
Date: August 31st, 2010 8:17 PM Author: cocky bat shit crazy cuckoldry meetinghouse their 25th percentile is 166. i don't think 25% of the class is non-white. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1409833&forum_id=2#15933496) |
|
Date: August 31st, 2010 8:18 PM Author: orchid library you can still get into penn with a 165. I have a 3.95/165 friend who made Penn off the waitlist. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1409833&forum_id=2#15933504) |
|
Date: September 1st, 2010 11:27 AM Author: godawful provocative stage masturbator 165 to make Penn in today's world? What a TTT. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1409833&forum_id=2#15938211) |
|
Date: September 1st, 2010 11:52 AM Author: zippy sepia heaven bbw you just need to show an aptitude for developing SWeet studies about preftigiouf law school placement. then, once you get into PEnn, you're pretty much set for life!
(GTO) |