The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
I took Organic Chemistry in college; Federal Courts was way hard
Poast new message in this thread
Date: September 1st, 2010 1:09 AM Author: Drunken Soul-stirring Senate Multi-billionaire Seriously O Chem was a joke (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1411329&forum_id=2#15936790) |
 |
Date: September 1st, 2010 1:09 AM Author: Big Cuckold retrosynthesis man! (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1411329&forum_id=2#15936794) |
|
Date: September 1st, 2010 1:10 AM Author: spruce appetizing menage preventive strike bullshit (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1411329&forum_id=2#15936796) |
|
Date: September 1st, 2010 1:11 AM Author: Drunken Soul-stirring Senate Multi-billionaire Have you taken Federal Courts? Because I've taken both and can objectively judge. Can you? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1411329&forum_id=2#15936808) |
|
Date: September 1st, 2010 1:17 AM Author: Deranged Sick Corner I've taken quantum mechanics and fed courts.
I didn't go to fed courts more than about 2/3 of the time, and got an A-. I got a C- in QM despite working my ass off. |
|
Date: September 1st, 2010 1:19 AM Author: Drunken Soul-stirring Senate Multi-billionaire Yes, I'm sure your mentioning of a complete straw man helped you with your Fed Cts. Grade!!! (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1411329&forum_id=2#15936882) |
|
Date: September 1st, 2010 1:20 AM Author: Deranged Sick Corner QM >>> OC (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1411329&forum_id=2#15936893) |
|
Date: September 1st, 2010 1:21 AM Author: Drunken Soul-stirring Senate Multi-billionaire Still a straw man either way bro. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1411329&forum_id=2#15936897) |
|
Date: September 1st, 2010 1:22 AM Author: Deranged Sick Corner I can objectively judge that fed courts was a joke compared to a course far more difficult than o-chem. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1411329&forum_id=2#15936902) |
|
Date: September 1st, 2010 1:28 AM Author: Drunken Soul-stirring Senate Multi-billionaire (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1411329&forum_id=2#15936960) |
|
Date: September 1st, 2010 1:19 AM Author: spruce appetizing menage preventive strike how long did you spend on the lab each week? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1411329&forum_id=2#15936884) |
|
Date: September 1st, 2010 1:20 AM Author: Drunken Soul-stirring Senate Multi-billionaire 7-8hrs. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1411329&forum_id=2#15936888) |
|
Date: September 1st, 2010 1:22 AM Author: spruce appetizing menage preventive strike yeah, you went to a TTT. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1411329&forum_id=2#15936904) |
|
Date: September 1st, 2010 1:24 AM Author: Drunken Soul-stirring Senate Multi-billionaire COOL! 20$ I attended a school ranked academically higher than yours in every publication imaginable. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1411329&forum_id=2#15936922) |
|
Date: September 1st, 2010 1:44 AM Author: spruce appetizing menage preventive strike Congrats brah. Your o-chem class wasn't challenging enough. Everyone here (this thread and others) disagrees w/ your premise. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1411329&forum_id=2#15937089) |
|
Date: September 1st, 2010 1:46 AM Author: Drunken Soul-stirring Senate Multi-billionaire 1. Top law school
2. Competeing against the top law school's top gunners
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
O chem undergrad bro.
|
|
Date: September 1st, 2010 1:11 AM Author: talented roommate You must have a attended a TTT. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1411329&forum_id=2#15936810) |
|
Date: September 1st, 2010 1:18 AM Author: Drunken Soul-stirring Senate Multi-billionaire Jesus Christ what a disasterous fail. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1411329&forum_id=2#15936878) |
|
Date: September 1st, 2010 1:23 AM Author: talented roommate ????
Ochem at a good school is an obscenely hard class. Ochem at a TTT toilet is a joke of a class where they spoon feed you half as much material and give you extra credit if you spell Diels-Alder properly. |
|
Date: September 1st, 2010 1:24 AM Author: Drunken Soul-stirring Senate Multi-billionaire Neat story! Did you forget about Fed Cts. in your fucking silly argument? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1411329&forum_id=2#15936930) |
|
Date: September 1st, 2010 1:28 AM Author: talented roommate Wow, you are dense. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1411329&forum_id=2#15936962) |
|
Date: September 1st, 2010 1:31 AM Author: Drunken Soul-stirring Senate Multi-billionaire Whatever dude, you can't transition an argument. If you're honestly a lawyer I feel bad for your clients. Even if you're sthick, you still don't get it. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1411329&forum_id=2#15936982) |
|
Date: September 1st, 2010 8:56 AM Author: talented roommate This aint a courtroom faggot and Im not being paid by the hour to connect every dot for you. If you cant connect simple logical dots yourself, you're a retard. Somehow everybody else got my point but you. Im sorry that you're a small brained mother fucker.
It's funnier still that I wasnt even the only poster to conclude that you must have gone to a TTT based on your OP.
http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1411329&forum_id=2#15936904 |
|
Date: September 1st, 2010 1:30 AM Author: Low-t Codepig credited.
I was tutoring my friend and took a look at his state-school o-chem final. Spoiler: it was laughably straightforward and easy. |
|
Date: September 1st, 2010 1:32 AM Author: Drunken Soul-stirring Senate Multi-billionaire At no point in this thread should anyone have brought up the difference b/w o chem programs at different schools. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1411329&forum_id=2#15936994) |
Date: September 1st, 2010 1:21 AM Author: tan at-the-ready rehab organic chem wouldn't have been so bad if it wasn't for the pre-med gunner faggots (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1411329&forum_id=2#15936896) |
|
Date: September 1st, 2010 1:30 AM Author: talented roommate And the 16 chapters in 8 weeks. The general problem with most orgo classes is they try to teach two years worth of material in one. Some TTT schools award 5 credits a semester for orgo to help their retards out. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1411329&forum_id=2#15936974) |
|
Date: September 1st, 2010 1:33 AM Author: rose heaven community account some T14's set up fake post grad internships when their students manage to graduate jobless. did cornell do this to help their retards (you) out? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1411329&forum_id=2#15937001) |
|
Date: September 1st, 2010 1:34 AM Author: Drunken Soul-stirring Senate Multi-billionaire Hey Steve,
Fed Cts. Q: suppose a death penalty petitoner asks the supreme court to hear his argument on an original habeas petition but the state remedies have not been exhausted under a 2254 claim, what result? |
|
Date: September 1st, 2010 1:38 AM Author: Chest-beating wagecucks set u have to exhaust state first. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1411329&forum_id=2#15937030) |
|
Date: September 1st, 2010 1:39 AM Author: Drunken Soul-stirring Senate Multi-billionaire or? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1411329&forum_id=2#15937041) |
|
Date: September 1st, 2010 1:41 AM Author: Chest-beating wagecucks set i don't know. isn't there like a 2253 or 2250 you can file. what about straight innocence appeals on material facts more than 2 years from the point of discovery until fed habeaus or something like that? fuck, i literally took this class 7 yrs ago. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1411329&forum_id=2#15937066) |
|
Date: September 1st, 2010 1:49 AM Author: Drunken Soul-stirring Senate Multi-billionaire Would have also accepted Supreme Court willing to hear the Constitutionally available original habeas petition (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1411329&forum_id=2#15937122) |
|
Date: September 1st, 2010 1:52 AM Author: Chest-beating wagecucks set can a defendant move a whistleblower irs relator to unseal the docket? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1411329&forum_id=2#15937144) |
|
Date: September 1st, 2010 1:56 AM Author: Drunken Soul-stirring Senate Multi-billionaire I don't know, but this is my thread and your question is barely English let alone relevant. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1411329&forum_id=2#15937165) |
|
Date: September 1st, 2010 1:58 AM Author: Chest-beating wagecucks set even i remember relators in qui tam actions. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1411329&forum_id=2#15937173) |
|
Date: September 1st, 2010 2:00 AM Author: Drunken Soul-stirring Senate Multi-billionaire From what class? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1411329&forum_id=2#15937190) |
|
Date: September 1st, 2010 2:00 AM Author: Chest-beating wagecucks set fed cts. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1411329&forum_id=2#15937194) |
|
Date: September 1st, 2010 2:04 AM Author: Drunken Soul-stirring Senate Multi-billionaire Don't you think that's sort of a broad question that would be determinative upon the particlar fact pattern? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1411329&forum_id=2#15937212) |
|
Date: September 1st, 2010 1:22 AM Author: fragrant nursing home if you know nothing entering either of the coures, o-chem would be harder to figure out what the fuck is going on (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1411329&forum_id=2#15936910) |
|
Date: September 1st, 2010 1:25 AM Author: Drunken Soul-stirring Senate Multi-billionaire true. but not a practical argument. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1411329&forum_id=2#15936936) |
|
Date: September 1st, 2010 1:56 AM Author: Deranged Sick Corner definitely true (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1411329&forum_id=2#15937164) |
|
Date: September 1st, 2010 1:39 AM Author: Canary Razzle Queen Of The Night Trying to make sense out of abstention nonsense vs. staring at IR spec diagrams: TIE. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1411329&forum_id=2#15937045) |
|
Date: September 1st, 2010 1:47 AM Author: Drunken Soul-stirring Senate Multi-billionaire Abstention should be inherently obvious though. But CR on this awful thread (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1411329&forum_id=2#15937115) |
|
Date: September 1st, 2010 1:50 AM Author: Canary Razzle Queen Of The Night That topic seemed far worse to me than anything else in fed courts including habeas. But who knows: I haven't used a single concept from fed courts in either clerking or private practice, except for sovereign immunity. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1411329&forum_id=2#15937129) |
|
Date: September 1st, 2010 1:53 AM Author: Drunken Soul-stirring Senate Multi-billionaire I bet you have and you just don't realize it. For example, if you clerked with a fed judge you would know prejudicial delay, dual sov., essential fedreal superiority over state courts, why successive federal prosecutions after state convictions don't violate double jeopardy. I promise you used some of it but didn't have to apply the crazy shit like death penalty habeas proceedings, etc. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1411329&forum_id=2#15937148) |
|
Date: September 1st, 2010 1:56 AM Author: Canary Razzle Queen Of The Night Could be, but we covered most, if not all, of that stuff (DJ, basic supremacy clause) in conlaw.
EDIT: Fed cts did give me a much better grasp of fed Q / diversity jurisdix, and was kinda like a Civ Pro II for me. |
|
Date: September 1st, 2010 1:59 AM Author: Drunken Soul-stirring Senate Multi-billionaire But Fed Cts. dispells a ton of those honestly basic assumptions. A ton of law students don't think a federal prosecution can initiate after a state conviction based upon the same transaction because of 5th amendment false assumptions. It's sad. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1411329&forum_id=2#15937184) |
|
Date: September 1st, 2010 2:02 AM Author: concupiscible resort Those students are fucking retarded. That's on the bar every year for Christ's sake. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1411329&forum_id=2#15937201) |
|
Date: September 1st, 2010 1:59 AM Author: concupiscible resort Nahbro. I got a better grade in Ochem because I worked harder and more, but it was a harder class.
Ochem at t10 school because I was a premed gunner for 1 year. Fedcourts at HLS.
But this thread is also correct to point out that orgo is a joke at a lot of places. Paradoxically, it's very easy to become a doctor coming straight out of a shitty commuter school in Nevada. It's a lot harder coming straight out of an ivy UG. A lot of kids need to do post-bach research or volunteering for a year to boost their app. |
|
Date: September 1st, 2010 2:01 AM Author: Drunken Soul-stirring Senate Multi-billionaire LOL how was FEDcts at HLS? haha. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1411329&forum_id=2#15937197) |
|
Date: September 1st, 2010 2:03 AM Author: concupiscible resort The closest thing to a real class I took in 3 years. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1411329&forum_id=2#15937207) |
|
Date: September 1st, 2010 2:04 AM Author: Drunken Soul-stirring Senate Multi-billionaire 180 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1411329&forum_id=2#15937216) |
|
Date: September 1st, 2010 9:22 AM Author: Curious institution stain LOL you took o chem AND fed cts. LOL at your life (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1411329&forum_id=2#15937733) |
|
Date: September 1st, 2010 9:30 AM Author: Passionate Dingle Berry yea, why would anyone actually take orgo if they were going to go to law school? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1411329&forum_id=2#15937762) |
|
Date: September 1st, 2010 11:14 AM Author: swollen bat shit crazy wrinkle persian I got A's in both. Ochem was much harder. Though both were easy compared to Pchem (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1411329&forum_id=2#15938149) |