The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
JOY REID under fire for libel claims against her from MAGA woman! (link)
| cowardly laughsome mexican doctorate | 07/15/20 |
| Geriatric racy clown messiness | 07/15/20 |
| cowardly laughsome mexican doctorate | 07/15/20 |
| motley sneaky criminal | 07/15/20 |
| Irradiated pervert | 07/15/20 |
| Plum Toilet Seat | 07/15/20 |
| brilliant box office | 07/15/20 |
| low-t territorial son of senegal | 07/15/20 |
| motley sneaky criminal | 07/15/20 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: July 15th, 2020 12:58 PM Author: cowardly laughsome mexican doctorate Reid was hauled into court after she retweeted an activist who had posted the above picture along with the caption, "You are going to be the first deported.” In a second post on Instagram, she wrote that the woman in the photo had screamed “You are going to be the first deported ... dirty Mexican!” Subsequently, on Instagram and Facebook, Reid reached back to history and wrote, "Make the picture black and white and it could be the 1950s and the desegregation of a school. Hate is real, y’all. It hasn’t even really gone away."
https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/msnbc-host-joy-reid-faces-revived-libel-claim-big-appellate-decision-1303284 |
Date: July 15th, 2020 1:02 PM Author: Geriatric racy clown messiness https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/6989195/Liberte.pdf
Before: KEARSE, JACOBS, CABRANES, Circuit Judges.
Roslyn La Liberte appeals from the September 30, 2019 judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Irizarry, Ch. J.), which both dismissed her defamation claim against Joy Reid under Rule 12(b)(6) and “struck” the claim under California’s Anti-Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation (anti-SLAPP) statute. We VACATE that judgment and REMAND the case for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
We hold (for the first time) that California’s anti-SLAPP statute is inapplicable in federal court because it conflicts with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12 and 56. We also vacate the dismissal of the defamation claim under Rule 12(b)(6). As to one of the statements at issue, the court erroneously deemed La Liberte to be a limited purpose public figure (and accordingly dismissed for failure to plead actual malice); as to the other, the court mischaracterized it as nonactionable opinion. We affirm the district court’s conclusion that Reid does not qualify for immunity under section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. |
 |
Date: July 15th, 2020 1:02 PM Author: cowardly laughsome mexican doctorate 180000000000000000000000000000 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4585555&forum_id=2#40612367) |
|
Date: July 15th, 2020 9:16 PM Author: motley sneaky criminal (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4585555&forum_id=2#40614951) |
|
Date: July 15th, 2020 8:04 PM Author: Irradiated pervert (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4585555&forum_id=2#40614540) |
|
Date: July 15th, 2020 1:03 PM Author: Plum Toilet Seat Vive La Liberte! (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4585555&forum_id=2#40612373) |
|
Date: July 15th, 2020 8:29 PM Author: brilliant box office (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4585555&forum_id=2#40614666) |
|
Date: July 15th, 2020 8:48 PM Author: low-t territorial son of senegal 180. Charles take note. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4585555&forum_id=2#40614770) |
|
Date: July 15th, 2020 9:17 PM Author: motley sneaky criminal (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4585555&forum_id=2#40614953) |