The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Sotomayor admits she's not smart, strives to just be "competent"
Poast new message in this thread
Date: February 4th, 2014 9:43 AM Author: Deranged Dark Psychic http://washington.cbslocal.com/2014/02/04/sotomayor-labeling-illegal-immigrants-criminals-is-insulting/
On the Supreme Court since 2009, Sotomayor said it was tough at first as justices made references that went over her head. She said joining the high court amounted to joining an ongoing conversation among justices who had served for years.
“I figure I may not be the smartest judge on the court but I’m going to be a competent justice,” she said. “I’m going to try to be the best I can and each year I think my opinions have been getting better. And I’m working at finding my voice a little bit.”
Libs 'splain. |
 |
Date: February 4th, 2014 9:45 AM Author: Brass cruise ship 1)You have poor reading comprehension. She said she may not be the "smartest justice" on the bench, not that she's not smart. 2)She's self aware enough to recognize her aptitude ways to maximize it. 3)You're a MAF reptile looking to make a stir out of a misreading of her statement. |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 9:53 AM Author: excitant yapping principal's office 1) His comment "not smart" was clearly in the context of SCOTUS comparables. What else could he possibly mean? over 100 IQ?
2) It does not take alot of self-awareness to realize that people like Roberts and Kagan are substantially smarter than you. Also, her "ways to maximize it" involve being a loud bully.
3) Everybody knows Soto is an incompetent tard. Even Dems. Nothing to make a stir about really if it is already known.
|
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 9:57 AM Author: Brass cruise ship Let me get this straight: OP is justified in this post because Soto acknowledges she is not the smartest SC justice?
So, in essence, he'd be MAF if she claimed to be as smart as any other justice, and MAF if she didn't.
In that case, let him be equally MAF about Thomas and any other justice who we deem to be below anything except the highest standard for justices.
Justices, like any group, allow for some degree of variation in intelligence. What degree of variation is acceptable, CGM? Should we IQ test justices? In appointing justices, is a President required/strongly expected to select them on the basis of the highest possible intelligence to the exclusion of any other factors? |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 10:05 AM Author: excitant yapping principal's office 1) OP is not MAF about anything. It is however a pitty that we have a tard on the SCOTUS, whether she admits it or not is irrelevant.
2) Evidence that Thomas is below the standards for a member of SCOTUS, highest or otherwise?
3) With Soto is not a matter of a minor difference in intellect. You are strawmanning like a fucking retard here. Nobody shits on Breyer for not being as smart as Kagan. The reason? The gap is not that big. With Soto on the other hand, it is huge. That is why people on here, and elsewhere, make a big deal about it. |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 10:07 AM Author: Brass cruise ship 1) So OP's post was written in a tone of pity, yes? 2)Evidence that Soto is dumber than Thomas? 3)Evidence that Soto is SIGNIFICANTLY dumber than the average justice?
|
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 10:11 AM Author: excitant yapping principal's office 1) Obviously not. People are embarrassed and frustrated by the existence of a moron on SCOTUS.
2) Read what she has written and said. Then read what Thomas has written and said. Do it. Go now on youtube and watch some videos of Soto and her remarks (i.e. "wise latina") compared to Thomas and his 60 minutes interview, or his presentations at lawschools. Dont even have to bother reading their opinions.
3)
http://autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2160853&mc=126&forum_id=2
|
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 10:14 AM Author: Brass cruise ship I still see no such objective evidence. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486228&forum_id=2#24954436) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 10:16 AM Author: tripping milk Thomas isn't smarter than Sotomayor, he's a corrupt libertarian dumbass that pervs on women. He and Sonia Sosominority are both vastly inferior to Roberts, Kagan, and Scalia. Roberts and Kagan are on an entirely different intellectual level. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486228&forum_id=2#24954439) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 10:21 AM Author: Opaque scourge upon the earth sound barrier No love for RBG? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486228&forum_id=2#24954465) |
|
Date: July 12th, 2018 1:02 AM Author: chestnut university newt Thomas (or at least his writing) is clearly more intelligent than Sotomayor. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486228&forum_id=2#36410178) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 10:20 AM Author: excitant yapping principal's office If that link does not contain sufficient evidence to conclude that Soto is most probably the imbecile of the court I don't think there is much more we can discuss. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486228&forum_id=2#24954461) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 10:23 AM Author: Brass cruise ship There's nothing to discuss when bias and myopia are involved. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486228&forum_id=2#24954480) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 10:32 AM Author: excitant yapping principal's office What exactly is the bias and myopia?
ITT I have defended another minority, women and liberal who are on the court. |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 7:53 PM Author: fragrant corn cake Julia just got destroyed by CGM. and she was trying pretty hard too. LMAO (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486228&forum_id=2#24957627) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 10:16 AM Author: Mischievous curious toilet seat u repeatedly say "idiot" "tard" "moron" but then say it just means she's below scotus avg. so do u think everyone on scotus should be above scotus avg? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486228&forum_id=2#24954442) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 10:19 AM Author: excitant yapping principal's office Can you not read. I have mentioned in multiple posts that you don't get called tard for being below average on SCOTUS. But rather for being NOTABLY (a term I fucking used two posts below this one) below. What do you think I meant when I raised the Breyer example? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486228&forum_id=2#24954454) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 10:21 AM Author: Mischievous curious toilet seat amazing distinction from a scholar of alot of stari decis. sorry i didn't grasp this term "notably" (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486228&forum_id=2#24954464) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 10:23 AM Author: Fishy ratface Thomas gives presentations at law schools? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486228&forum_id=2#24954478) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 10:38 AM Author: arousing bisexual base I saw him speak once, and he was a 180 a fuck speaker. Absolutely hilarious.
I met him at a cocktail party afterward, and he confirmed that there indeed used to be a basketball court in the upstairs of SCOTUS, the "Highest Court in the Land", but once everyone started getting old they dismantled it. |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 10:43 AM Author: Fishy ratface "Presentation" makes think he's doing powerpoints or some shit (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486228&forum_id=2#24954569) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 10:49 AM Author: arousing bisexual base no, it was just him up there speaking. he didn't even have a planned out presentation like some of the other ones I have seen, he just got up there and did a "Taking Qs" session with the crowd for an hour. He was charming, hilarious, and immensely likeable, and even my most shitlibbiest friends in attendance agreed. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486228&forum_id=2#24954618) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 10:52 AM Author: excitant yapping principal's office They are pretty good. Even shitlibs will like them. Not political on the whole. Mostly Q&A, about his life, etc. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486228&forum_id=2#24954651) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 10:26 AM Author: tripping milk you've said some pretty retarded stuff in the past. are you an idiot? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486228&forum_id=2#24954490) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 10:10 AM Author: Mischievous curious toilet seat "tard" "in the context of scotus comparables" means what exactly (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486228&forum_id=2#24954421) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 10:12 AM Author: excitant yapping principal's office Notably lower intellect than her peers. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486228&forum_id=2#24954428) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 10:13 AM Author: Mischievous curious toilet seat u fucking tard (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486228&forum_id=2#24954434) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 10:05 AM Author: Deranged Dark Psychic (the only actual MAF person itt, pretending not to be MAF in the slightest but failing) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486228&forum_id=2#24954401) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 10:12 AM Author: tripping milk But you, an idiot who scams pizza from reddit and things slavery is libertarian, are very competent. Well isn't that nice. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486228&forum_id=2#24954429) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 10:12 AM Author: multi-colored gay dysfunction immigrant how much self-awareness does it take to learn the difference between "alot" and "a lot"? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486228&forum_id=2#24954431) |
|
Date: February 5th, 2014 9:47 AM Author: Dun violent crackhouse friendly grandma is kagan "smart" because she did poorly in the only objectively comparable period of law school (one ELLL)?
or is she "smart" like the "top" 76% of the HLS class graduating "with honors"?
just curious |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 9:55 AM Author: Deranged Dark Psychic (literalist who doesn't understand that sometimes, just sometimes, poasters on this here shitbort purposely feed into ongoing bort themes such as "soto is a less-than-wise burrito farting latina" for entertainment purposes) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486228&forum_id=2#24954352) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 7:57 PM Author: Purple box office You seem really butthurt Julia....are you butthurt? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486228&forum_id=2#24957655) |
|
Date: February 5th, 2014 11:30 AM Author: chrome wild business firm lib here.
I can't stand Sotomayer. She seems like an idiot in oral arguments. |
Date: February 4th, 2014 9:45 AM Author: Bearded trust fund dingle berry whats there to explain she got on the court because she is the right race and gender |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 9:52 AM Author: balding violet jewess or at least, not a fucking embarrassment like thomas (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486228&forum_id=2#24954328) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 9:55 AM Author: excitant yapping principal's office Describe how thomas has been an embarrassment. This is the difference between shitlibs and normal humans.
When a normal person makes a claim (i.e. Soto being an idiot) they back that up with evidence (such as transcripts which have been posted on here).
When a shitlib makes a claim they just leave it hanging out there with no evidence or support. As if the point is supposed to stand on its own. |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 9:57 AM Author: Effete school cafeteria death wish you won't see Thomas in any transcripts (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486228&forum_id=2#24954367) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 10:07 AM Author: excitant yapping principal's office And?
If you think oral arguments are retarded why would you participate?
Thomas has an entirely valid reason for not bothering to speak.
This is how weak your argument is. We have decades of decisions and written work by him. We have his academic performance and credentials. And the best "evidence" you can come up with is the fact that he does not talk as much as you would like. |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 10:00 AM Author: balding violet jewess tell me about all of the american case law you read, canadian (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486228&forum_id=2#24954383) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 10:07 AM Author: excitant yapping principal's office I'm asking you to tell me what support you have for the contention that Thomas is an embarassement. Please have atleast a shred of intellectual honesty here you faggot. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486228&forum_id=2#24954416) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 10:12 AM Author: Stirring senate His version of constitutional interpretation, for one. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486228&forum_id=2#24954432) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 10:16 AM Author: excitant yapping principal's office 1) That means Scalia is also an embarrassment. As their positions are, on the whole, very similar in that regard. Obviously some differences on stari decis and such as it impacts constitutional interpretations. But pretty close.
2) This is a thread about a retard on the SCOTUS. Saying that "Thomas is an embarrassment" implies in this context that you are talking about his intellect not his position on the constitution. If it does indeed only refer to his position than 20% of the legal thinkers are embarrassments.
|
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 10:18 AM Author: Mischievous curious toilet seat yea very complicated stari decis jurisprudence (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486228&forum_id=2#24954452) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 10:22 AM Author: excitant yapping principal's office I used it as an example where they would differ. Are you just making fun of the typo? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486228&forum_id=2#24954471) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 10:24 AM Author: Mischievous curious toilet seat protip: u know literally nothing about law or the supreme court or the English language and your ignorance permeates every post you make (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486228&forum_id=2#24954482) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 10:20 AM Author: Stirring senate you have no idea what the fuck you are talking about and you should just kill yourself right now for even trying to discuss this. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486228&forum_id=2#24954459) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 10:22 AM Author: Mischievous curious toilet seat if he should kill himself than 20% of the legal thinkers should too (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486228&forum_id=2#24954474) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 10:23 AM Author: Stirring senate they probably should to be honest (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486228&forum_id=2#24954477) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 10:28 AM Author: Fishy ratface You're an imbecile if you think Scalia and Thomas have that much in common in terms of jurisprudential philosophy. You've obviously never read an opinion by either one.
Furthermore they are both oafs compared to Roberts and Kagan. Scalia probably gets a slight nod over Thomas in terms of intelligence, but Thomas is much more intellectually honest. They're both pure SHIT in terms of writing persuasive opinions though. |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 10:29 AM Author: Stirring senate Scalia can at least be entertaining. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486228&forum_id=2#24954497) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 10:31 AM Author: Fishy ratface He's like a SCOTUS Dave Barry. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486228&forum_id=2#24954508) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 10:52 AM Author: Grizzly Duck-like Digit Ratio (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486228&forum_id=2#24954645) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 10:30 AM Author: tripping milk Scalia has declined in his old age, but in his glory days he was easily their equal. He is the best writer on the court as well. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486228&forum_id=2#24954503) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 10:45 AM Author: Fishy ratface Yeah, thinking of the Scalia opinions that are likely to survive on a liberal court, obvious examples like Lujan are from like 20 years ago. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486228&forum_id=2#24954585) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 10:51 AM Author: Grizzly Duck-like Digit Ratio You're done here. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486228&forum_id=2#24954641) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 10:00 AM Author: Mischievous curious toilet seat (guy who literally believes deduction from axioms about "human nature" is sufficient evidence from which to develop an empirically robust theory of economics) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486228&forum_id=2#24954385) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 10:21 AM Author: galvanic orchestra pit (sinead o'friedman singing 'nothing compares 2 what') (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486228&forum_id=2#24954462) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 7:46 PM Author: Bearded trust fund dingle berry no, Thomas is smart enough to know not to open his mouth Soto, not so much |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 7:48 PM Author: underhanded state french chef ROFL. You're delusional. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486228&forum_id=2#24957589) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 8:00 PM Author: Sinister racy house (das racist) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486228&forum_id=2#24957682) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 9:52 AM Author: rusted boistinker reading party *wise burrito fart* (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486228&forum_id=2#24954333) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 9:53 AM Author: motley lay (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486228&forum_id=2#24954338) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 10:16 AM Author: Impertinent Nibblets I've been called competent before. It hurts.
But I think, as you get older, you handle it better--once you realize how few people are truly competent and hard-working, and that these qualities are praiseworthy when they manifest themselves consistently and in abundance. |
|
Date: July 12th, 2018 1:11 AM Author: carnelian splenetic coldplay fan (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486228&forum_id=2#36410222) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 10:24 AM Author: galvanic orchestra pit she was probably dispirited by the l'affaire richwine tbh (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486228&forum_id=2#24954483) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 10:52 AM Author: boyish umber factory reset button WTF is she on the Court when there are literally hundreds of others more qualified? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486228&forum_id=2#24954646) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 10:54 AM Author: Drab turdskin lol at shitlibs bashing xo thomas, the greatest justice of all time
also, she gets insulted when people label criminals as a criminal? |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 10:55 AM Author: Mischievous curious toilet seat compared to what? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486228&forum_id=2#24954664) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 10:58 AM Author: galvanic orchestra pit (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486228&forum_id=2#24954684) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 11:17 AM Author: stimulating irate place of business azn Yeah that criminal part was what really bothered me. She is basically saying if you disagree with laws then breaking it doesn't make you a criminal. WTF? How can you be on the SCOTUS and refuse to call someone who violates the law a criminal? If she wants to run for Congress and change the laws go ahead, but if the law is there and you break it you are a criminal. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486228&forum_id=2#24954768) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 10:58 AM Author: twinkling crotch lettuce So CGM is a Canadian consultant who reads SCOTUS opinions and watches Clarence Thomas lectures in his spare time? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486228&forum_id=2#24954681) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 10:59 AM Author: galvanic orchestra pit what hard evidence do u have of that (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486228&forum_id=2#24954688) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 11:01 AM Author: twinkling crotch lettuce hard compared to what? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486228&forum_id=2#24954703) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 11:29 AM Author: impressive wonderful menage pocket flask http://www.xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=2160853&mc=127&forum_id=2 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486228&forum_id=2#24954804) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 12:04 PM Author: Fantasy-prone Volcanic Crater darrel • 5 minutes ago
−
Sotomayor, Calling you a Justice is insulting. YOU are a quota hire... pure and simple. You filled the woman/minority square... nothing more. YOU'RE JUST A BROWN SOW IN A ROBE.
jfc |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 12:05 PM Author: Mischievous curious toilet seat xo: less humorous version of cbslocal comments (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486228&forum_id=2#24954975) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 12:10 PM Author: Fantasy-prone Volcanic Crater yeah i just can't stop reading these
ObamaHillaryKilledBenghaziFour • 14 minutes ago
−
They are criminals you idiot bimbo. You are a disgrace to the bench.
|
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 12:11 PM Author: Fantasy-prone Volcanic Crater like wtf does this one even mean
Bossman • 17 minutes ago
The mush minds in Ivy League Schools could not get up and asked…. "What do Illegal mean?"
spoken in a way that she might get.
5 • Reply • Share ›
|
|
Date: February 5th, 2014 7:53 AM Author: Mischievous curious toilet seat 180 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486228&forum_id=2#24960245) |
|
Date: February 5th, 2014 11:38 AM Author: Fantasy-prone Volcanic Crater (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486228&forum_id=2#24960910) |
|
Date: February 5th, 2014 8:54 AM Author: Impertinent Nibblets "What do illegal mean?" "What do illegal mean?" How law get broekn? |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 12:12 PM Author: Green internal respiration becky "finding [her] voice" ??? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486228&forum_id=2#24955021) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 7:58 PM Author: Sinister racy house didn't you know writing opinions is like literature these days. thanks scalia. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486228&forum_id=2#24957666) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 7:48 PM Author: underhanded state french chef Admirable, actually. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486228&forum_id=2#24957587) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 7:50 PM Author: fragrant corn cake this stupid bitch is going to tarnish the fuck out of obama's legacy for decades to come (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486228&forum_id=2#24957611) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 8:00 PM Author: Sinister racy house there could have been a lot worse picks than her. at least she isn't a completely partisan hack. definitely could have been worse. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486228&forum_id=2#24957678) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2014 8:02 PM Author: fragrant corn cake she was 100% partisan in the sense that she was an AA pick designed to secure Obama"s reelection. politicizing the SCOTUS selection is not only partisan as fuck, but disgraceful and abhorrent and should never ever be forgiven. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486228&forum_id=2#24957692) |
|
Date: February 5th, 2014 8:25 AM Author: Spectacular buff dilemma windowlicker At least she's trying? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486228&forum_id=2#24960272) |
|
Date: February 5th, 2014 11:28 AM Author: disrespectful step-uncle's house Isn't she a Princeton undergrad graduate and a H or Y law graduate? To attack her intellectual ability in a discipline(law) that is, basically, nothing more than made up "opinions" without any real social science research skills, is problematic, in my opinion. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486228&forum_id=2#24960867) |
|
Date: July 12th, 2018 12:48 AM Author: Aggressive stage (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2486228&forum_id=2#36410130) |