The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Marijuana a Schedule I drug (1972 - 2014)
Poast new message in this thread
Date: January 19th, 2014 12:36 PM Author: carnelian charismatic stage http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2014/01/19/obama-says-marijuana-no-more-dangerous-than-alcohol/ (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2472398&forum_id=2#24859995) |
Date: January 19th, 2014 12:39 PM Author: Dark flirting market antidepressant drug Reptile here about fucking time.
I think MJ is for retards but prohibition is fucking terrible. Libs have taken the right position on MJ but their leaders have been too faggoty to do anything about it. Lets hope BO finally just legalizes this shit federally
Were he to do that, I would look back and say he was the Prez who killed OBL and ended marijuana prohibition and basically be grateful we had him. |
 |
Date: January 19th, 2014 12:54 PM Author: marvelous resort this would arguably be the best legacy of any recent prez. BO fully legalizing recreational would be monumental. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2472398&forum_id=2#24860091) |
|
Date: January 19th, 2014 1:05 PM Author: Vibrant lay brethren Clinton's record on this shit was truly fucking reptilian. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2472398&forum_id=2#24860152) |
|
Date: January 19th, 2014 1:07 PM Author: carnelian charismatic stage http://thelantern.com/2008/04/students-who-get-high-suffer-financial-aid-loss/ (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2472398&forum_id=2#24860157) |
|
Date: January 19th, 2014 12:39 PM Author: Vibrant lay brethren 180 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2472398&forum_id=2#24860010) |
|
Date: January 19th, 2014 12:41 PM Author: Gay step-uncle's house 180 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2472398&forum_id=2#24860017) |
|
Date: January 19th, 2014 12:42 PM Author: Onyx yarmulke 180 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2472398&forum_id=2#24860020) |
|
Date: January 19th, 2014 12:43 PM Author: Gay step-uncle's house How unconstitutional is it for Obama to basically choose which laws he wants to enforce and not enforce the ones he disagrees with? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2472398&forum_id=2#24860024) |
|
Date: January 19th, 2014 12:49 PM Author: Demanding theater Shitlibs fall all over themselves to say this is a solemn and unquestionable power of the POTUS.
I look forward to when a Republican unilaterally cuts taxes by not enforcing their collection and that's NAWT OKAY. |
|
Date: January 19th, 2014 12:59 PM Author: Bisexual potus (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2472398&forum_id=2#24860116) |
|
Date: January 19th, 2014 12:49 PM Author: charcoal at-the-ready business firm regret The federal crackdown on marijuana has been more strict under Obama than Bush. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2472398&forum_id=2#24860053) |
|
Date: January 19th, 2014 1:00 PM Author: Khaki flatulent set What is this flame? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2472398&forum_id=2#24860123) |
|
Date: January 19th, 2014 1:04 PM Author: Vibrant lay brethren it's the same flame that reptiles run when they're like 'WHY IS GITMO STILL OPEN HURR DURR' (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2472398&forum_id=2#24860143) |
|
Date: January 19th, 2014 12:50 PM Author: buck-toothed menage courts can't make him do shit but should fashion a doctrine that if you selectively enforce, EPC is violated and the whole law is thrown out (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2472398&forum_id=2#24860061) |
|
Date: January 19th, 2014 12:59 PM Author: Khaki flatulent set 99.8 percent.
This is also 100 percent within his purview. Congress gave the executive the authority to classify drugs. If Congress wants it to be Schedule 1 they just need to pass a law saying that it is. |
|
Date: January 19th, 2014 12:44 PM Author: Exciting really tough guy pit 180 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2472398&forum_id=2#24860029) |
|
Date: January 19th, 2014 12:46 PM Author: Federal Mind-boggling Goal In Life Cruise Ship 180 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2472398&forum_id=2#24860040) |
|
Date: January 19th, 2014 12:49 PM Author: Razzle office 180 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2472398&forum_id=2#24860051) |
|
Date: January 19th, 2014 12:50 PM Author: chartreuse fantasy-prone sweet tailpipe ITT: nojerbed millennial faggots (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2472398&forum_id=2#24860055) |
|
Date: January 19th, 2014 12:50 PM Author: Impertinent olive property milk Obama should put political capital towards federal legalization. If it was accomplished, he would, IMO, have completed the holy trinity and go down as the greatest president of my lifetime.
Legalized Weed PAYE Killed Bin Laden |
|
Date: January 19th, 2014 12:52 PM Author: Bisexual potus Are you seriously retarded? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2472398&forum_id=2#24860075) |
|
Date: January 19th, 2014 12:54 PM Author: Impertinent olive property milk Not at all (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2472398&forum_id=2#24860089) |
|
Date: January 19th, 2014 12:55 PM Author: Bisexual potus Wrong (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2472398&forum_id=2#24860093) |
|
Date: January 19th, 2014 12:56 PM Author: Impertinent olive property milk Sorry breh, I'm just the average millennial voter. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2472398&forum_id=2#24860102) |
|
Date: January 19th, 2014 12:55 PM Author: charcoal at-the-ready business firm regret CR (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2472398&forum_id=2#24860097) |
|
Date: January 19th, 2014 12:56 PM Author: Vibrant lay brethren (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2472398&forum_id=2#24860103) |
|
Date: January 19th, 2014 1:07 PM Author: Talking Rehab (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2472398&forum_id=2#24860159) |
|
Date: January 19th, 2014 1:29 PM Author: Impertinent olive property milk (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2472398&forum_id=2#24860286) |
|
Date: January 19th, 2014 12:51 PM Author: Bisexual potus This is unbelievably retarded and unscientific. There have been ZERO clinical trials on weed. This is completely irresponsible. You're an idiot for 180ing this. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2472398&forum_id=2#24860064) |
|
Date: January 19th, 2014 12:53 PM Author: Vibrant lay brethren stfu george20 u deranged leather-wearing twink (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2472398&forum_id=2#24860080) |
|
Date: January 19th, 2014 12:54 PM Author: Bisexual potus Link to clinical trials on weed for Obama to make those preposterous claims? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2472398&forum_id=2#24860088) |
|
Date: January 19th, 2014 1:07 PM Author: hideous crackhouse Marijuana has not been shown to cause long-term cognitive impairment.
Wetzel, C.D. et al., “Remote Memory During Marijuana Intoxication,” Psychopharmacology 76 (1982): 278-81.
Deadwyler, S.A. et al., “The Effects of Delta-9-THC on Mechanisms of Learning and Memory.” Neurobiology of Drug Abuse: Learning and Memory. Ed. L. Erinoff. Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse 1990. 79-83.
Block, R.I. et al., “Acute Effects of Marijuana on Cognition: Relationships to Chronic Effects and Smoking Techniques.” Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior 43 (1992): 907-917.
Marijuana has not been shown to cause mental illness.
Iverson, Leslie. “Long-term effects of exposure to cannabis.” Current Opinion in Pharmacology 5(2005): 69-72.
SBD Bahri, MC Jockers-Scherübl. “Cannabis induces different cognitive changes in schizophrenic patients and in controls,” Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Pharmacopsychiatry 2005; 38
Weiser and Noy. “Interpreting the association between cannabis use and increased risk of schizophrenia.” Dialogues in Clincal Neuroscience 1(2005): 81-85.
"Cannabis use will impair but not damage mental health." London Telegraph. 23 January 2006.
Andreasson, S. et al. “Cannabis and Schizophrenia: A Longitudinal study of Swedish Conscripts,” The Lancet 2 (1987): 1483-86.
Degenhardt, Louisa, Wayne Hall and Michael Lynskey. “Testing hypotheses about the relationship between cannabis use and psychosis,” Drug and Alcohol Dependence 71 (2003): 42-4.
Weil, A. “Adverse Reactions to Marijuana: Classification and Suggested Treatment.” New England Journal of Medicine 282 (1970): 997-1000.
Marijuana use has not been shown to increase risk of cancer.
M. Hashibe et al., “Marijuana use and the risk of lung and upper aerodigestive tract cancers: results of a population-based case-control study,” Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention 15, no. 10 (October 2006): 1829-1834. Tan WC, Lo C, Jong A, et al.; for the Vancouver Burden of Obstructive Lung Disease (BOLD) Research Group. Marijuana and chronic obstructive lung disease: a population-based study. Canadian Medical Association Journal 2009;180:814–20.
Nahas, Gabriel G. and Nicholas A. Pace. Letter. “Marijuana as Chemotherapy Aid Poses Hazards.” New York Times 4 December 1993: A20.
Inaba, Darryl S. and William E. Cohen. Uppers, Downers, All-Arounders: Physical and Mental Effects of Psychoactive Drugs. 2nd ed. Ashland: CNS Productions, 1995. 174.
There is no compelling evidence that marijuana contributes substantially to traffic accidents and fatalities.
Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse. “Legalization: Panacea or Pandora’s Box”. New York. (1995):36.
Swan, Neil. “A Look at Marijuana’s Harmful Effects.” NIDA Notes. 9.2 (1994): 14.
Moskowitz, Herbert and Robert Petersen. Marijuana and Driving: A Review. Rockville: American Council for Drug Education, 1982. 7.
Mann, Peggy. Marijuana Alert. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1985. 265. |
|
Date: January 19th, 2014 1:09 PM Author: Bisexual potus Are you retarded? Link to clinical trial, dumbass? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2472398&forum_id=2#24860173) |
|
Date: January 19th, 2014 1:16 PM Author: Motley station clown go back to your daddy bear and lick his hairy ass george20
http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/pdq/cam/cannabis/healthprofessional/page5 |
|
Date: January 19th, 2014 1:17 PM Author: Bisexual potus Is English your second language? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2472398&forum_id=2#24860219) |
|
Date: January 19th, 2014 1:20 PM Author: Motley station clown yes let me see if i can parse out what that link is as a non native speaker
hew mann slash clen uh kill stoo dees
do you know what that means native english speaker |
|
Date: January 19th, 2014 1:21 PM Author: Bisexual potus NCI =/= FDA
Are you seriously this dumb? |
|
Date: January 19th, 2014 1:25 PM Author: Motley station clown as usual george the worlds messiest toilet twink moves the goalposts into a different zip code (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2472398&forum_id=2#24860261) |
|
Date: January 19th, 2014 1:28 PM Author: Bisexual potus Which clinical trials were approved by the FDA? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2472398&forum_id=2#24860273) |
|
Date: January 19th, 2014 1:22 PM Author: Bisexual potus Lol @ self-pwn
"A pooled analysis of three case-cohort studies of men in northwestern Africa (430 cases and 778 controls) showed a significantly increased risk of lung cancer among tobacco smokers who also inhaled Cannabis.[5]" |
|
Date: January 19th, 2014 1:25 PM Author: Motley station clown A large, retrospective cohort study of 64,855 men aged 15 to 49 years from the United States found that Cannabis use was not associated with tobacco-related cancers and a number of other common malignancies. However, the study did find that, among nonsmokers of tobacco, ever having used Cannabis was associated with an increased risk of prostate cancer.[6]
A population-based case-control study of 611 lung cancer patients revealed that chronic low Cannabis exposure was not associated with an increased risk of lung cancer or other upper aerodigestive tract cancers and found no positive associations with any cancer type (oral, pharyngeal, laryngeal, lung, or esophagus) when adjusting for several confounders, including cigarette smoking.[7]
A systematic review assessing 19 studies that evaluated premalignant or malignant lung lesions in persons 18 years or older who inhaled marijuana concluded that observational studies failed to demonstrate statistically significant associations between marijuana inhalation and lung cancer after adjusting for tobacco use.[8] |
|
Date: January 19th, 2014 1:26 PM Author: Bisexual potus Yes, and the one study that did provide statistically significant results.
A pooled analysis of three case-cohort studies of men in northwestern Africa (430 cases and 778 controls) showed a significantly increased risk of lung cancer among tobacco smokers who also inhaled Cannabis.[5] |
|
Date: January 19th, 2014 1:28 PM Author: Motley station clown so its like the very first thing they say on the page "A number of studies have yielded conflicting evidence regarding the risks of various cancers associated with Cannabis use" is what they are showing how weird (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2472398&forum_id=2#24860274) |
|
Date: January 19th, 2014 1:29 PM Author: Bisexual potus Yes, so for Obama to say that is unscientific and irresponsible. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2472398&forum_id=2#24860285) |
|
Date: January 19th, 2014 1:31 PM Author: Motley station clown please link to where obama said smoking marijuana doesnt have the potential to be associated with any increase in cancer risk
he compared it to smoking fucking cigarettes |
|
Date: January 19th, 2014 1:32 PM Author: Bisexual potus Link to Obama calling it as safe as alcohol is above (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2472398&forum_id=2#24860304) |
|
Date: January 19th, 2014 1:41 PM Author: Motley station clown psa, alcohol is associated with increased cancer risks (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2472398&forum_id=2#24860347) |
|
Date: January 19th, 2014 1:43 PM Author: Bisexual potus Link to FDA-approved clinical trials comparing the long-term effects of weed and beer? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2472398&forum_id=2#24860359) |
|
Date: January 19th, 2014 1:22 PM Author: Vibrant lay brethren (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2472398&forum_id=2#24860246) |
|
Date: January 19th, 2014 12:56 PM Author: chartreuse fantasy-prone sweet tailpipe (virgin obsessed with gay sex) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2472398&forum_id=2#24860101) |
|
Date: January 19th, 2014 12:56 PM Author: Bisexual potus (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2472398&forum_id=2#24860105) |
|
Date: January 19th, 2014 12:52 PM Author: Citrine house haunted graveyard 180 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2472398&forum_id=2#24860072) |
|
Date: January 19th, 2014 12:54 PM Author: Supple Volcanic Crater *gets stoned, eats doritos* 108....no wait 810....shit..... |
|
Date: January 19th, 2014 1:05 PM Author: Talking Rehab (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2472398&forum_id=2#24860150) |
|
Date: January 19th, 2014 12:57 PM Author: Wonderful Garrison Skinny Woman 180. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2472398&forum_id=2#24860111) |
|
Date: January 19th, 2014 1:04 PM Author: hideous crackhouse 180 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2472398&forum_id=2#24860141) |
|
Date: January 19th, 2014 1:14 PM Author: Primrose geriatric corner good luck getting a GOP House to amend the CSA
|
|
Date: January 19th, 2014 1:16 PM Author: Vibrant lay brethren LOL, i guess it'll just go state-by-state then. GOP did so well in Colorado in 2012. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2472398&forum_id=2#24860212) |
|
Date: January 19th, 2014 1:17 PM Author: Primrose geriatric corner yeah, the CSA still trumps though just bc Obama wont enforce it doesnt mean the next POTUS wont |
|
Date: January 19th, 2014 1:18 PM Author: Talking Rehab i doubt President Warren will make arresting marijuana users a priority (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2472398&forum_id=2#24860222) |
|
Date: January 19th, 2014 1:22 PM Author: Impertinent olive property milk Easiest Democratic Campaign Ever. Vote for Hillary because the other guy will make your marijuana illegal again! (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2472398&forum_id=2#24860245) |
|
Date: January 19th, 2014 1:23 PM Author: Vibrant lay brethren lol reptiles are fukt (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2472398&forum_id=2#24860251) |
|
Date: January 19th, 2014 1:31 PM Author: Bisexual potus Hey voters. Don't eat GMOs. They're evil. You can smoke weed though. They're totally safe.
-the "science" party |
|
Date: January 19th, 2014 1:34 PM Author: Primrose geriatric corner (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2472398&forum_id=2#24860314) |
|
Date: January 19th, 2014 1:51 PM Author: Spruce native (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2472398&forum_id=2#24860406) |
|
Date: January 19th, 2014 1:56 PM Author: Talking Rehab (irate reptile flailing impotently) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2472398&forum_id=2#24860440) |
|
Date: January 19th, 2014 1:31 PM Author: Primrose geriatric corner Marijuana doesn't remotely meet the definition of schedule I in this day and age (maybe it did in 1970?):
Schedule I substances are those that have the following findings:
The drug or other substance has a high potential for abuse. The drug or other substance has no currently accepted medical use in treatment in the United States. There is a lack of accepted safety for use of the drug or other substance under medical supervision.[25]
No prescriptions may be written for Schedule I substances, and such substances are subject to production quotas by the DEA. |
|
Date: January 19th, 2014 1:50 PM Author: Appetizing brilliant ladyboy newt " But when it comes to federal law, marijuana remains a schedule 1 controlled substance - a drug with high potential for abuse but no accepted medical use - and the White House has said that Obama doesn’t support changing that status."
|
|
Date: August 14th, 2014 6:15 PM Author: carnelian charismatic stage LOL Obama conned you: http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2014/07/28/response-new-york-times-editorial-marijuana-legalization |
|
Date: August 14th, 2014 6:19 PM Author: Cream space of course he did. it's a bet that reptiles wont swing the other way, and he knows that those voters in his base that care about this issue are too brainwashed to ever vote reptile in response to obama's being a little bitch about this.
rand paul might just be the dark horse on getting fed decriminalization/legalization |
|
Date: September 25th, 2014 2:15 PM Author: carnelian charismatic stage http://www.vox.com/2014/9/25/6842187/us-drug-schedule-marijuana-justice-department-eric-holder (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2472398&forum_id=2#26395323) |
|
Date: September 25th, 2014 2:24 PM Author: Cream space it's not up to the DOJ to decide CSA scheduling (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2472398&forum_id=2#26395383) |
|
Date: September 25th, 2014 2:27 PM Author: bright party of the first part damn schedule 2 is worse than schedule 1 re: dangerousness (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2472398&forum_id=2#26395412) |
|
Date: September 25th, 2014 2:31 PM Author: Cream space schedule 1 means no accepted medical use, whereas schedule 2 drugs have accepted uses. so if weed goes to schedule 2, it's still very much a controlled substance, which fucks dispensaries et al with 280E, etc., but it will create a medical defense for federal criminal defendants - while this seem promising for consumers, most if not all federal crim defendants are large producers or distributors, rather than end users, and so it will be tough and likely impossible to argue the caregiver route without being licensed to do so (a la pharma). (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2472398&forum_id=2#26395436) |
|
Date: September 25th, 2014 2:47 PM Author: carnelian charismatic stage The DEA, US Department of Health and Human Services, or a public petition initiate a review. The DEA requests HHS to review the medical and scientific evidence regarding a drug's schedule. HHS, through the FDA, evaluates the drug and its schedule through an analysis based on eight factors. Among the factors: a drug's potential for abuse, the scientific evidence for a drug's pharmacological effects, and the scientific evidence for a drug's medical use. HHS recommends a schedule based on the scientific evidence. The DEA conducts its own review, with the HHS's determination in mind, and sets the final schedule ---- It's pretty lulzy/terrifying the DEA gets to decide whether they keep their job or not. |
|
Date: November 4th, 2015 3:36 PM Author: carnelian charismatic stage http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/bernie-sanders-marijuana-ban_563a3e21e4b0b24aee4858ae?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=facebook (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2472398&forum_id=2#29109877) |