\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

Mattress girl Emma Sulkowicz's alleged rapist has suit against Columbia dismisse

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-new-york-columbia-matt...
burgundy queen of the night
  03/13/16
probably a good decision. i wish judges dealing with Title I...
Mint hissy fit dilemma
  03/13/16
The purpose of title ix, which was to fuck over men, cannot ...
rose legal warrant
  03/13/16
I thought it was about there needing to be as many women's v...
burgundy queen of the night
  03/13/16
yep. that's the rationale.
razzle umber death wish house
  03/13/16
...
greedy big-titted abode digit ratio
  03/13/16
any one have a link to the ruling?
embarrassed to the bone jet business firm water buffalo
  03/13/16
Miltenberg, who's somehow convinced the press that he's &quo...
chartreuse overrated halford
  03/13/16


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: March 13th, 2016 5:15 PM
Author: burgundy queen of the night

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-new-york-columbia-mattress-idUSKCN0WE00U

Columbia University on Friday won the dismissal of a lawsuit by a graduate over the school's decision to allow a student who accused him of rape to carry a mattress around campus in protest, even though Columbia had cleared him of the allegation.

U.S. District Judge Gregory Woods in Manhattan said Paul Nungesser failed to show that Columbia discriminated against him based on his gender by allowing and condoning conduct during the 2014-2015 academic year by his accuser, Emma Sulkowicz.

"While we're disappointed with the judge's ruling today, we believe that this is a very strong case and we will continue in our pursuit of justice for Mr. Nungesser," Andrew Miltenberg, a lawyer for Nungesser, said in an email.

Nungesser had sued Columbia, its president Lee Bollinger, and visual arts professor Jon Kessler, who oversaw Sulkowicz's senior thesis "Mattress Performance (Carry That Weight)," in which she drew national attention by carrying a mattress around the campus in Manhattan's Morningside Heights.

Sulkowicz had accused Nungesser of raping her in a dormitory in August 2012. Nungesser had said the sex was consensual. The university ultimately decided not to discipline him.

Nungesser said that by letting Sulkowicz protest, including in an October 2014 "Carry That Weight National Day of Action" on-campus rally that she helped organize, Columbia violated Title IX, which bans gender discrimination by schools that receive federal money.

The plaintiff said the unwanted attention hurt his academic experience, made him fear for his safety, and forced him to return to his native Germany after graduation to find a job.

In his decision, Woods said he did not suggest that Nungesser's final year at Columbia was "pleasant or easy."

But he said Nungesser's position would stretch Title IX too far, and could permit any students accused of sexual assault to sue their schools, so long as the schools knew of the allegations and failed to silence the accusers.

"Neither the text nor the purpose of Title IX supports this conclusion," Woods wrote.

The judge said Nungesser could replead his Title IX claim and some other claims, including under a New York state human rights law.

Columbia, in a statement, said the decision "brings us closer to the point that this litigation, addressing issues understandably difficult for many, can be concluded."

Sulkowicz was not named as a defendant. She has also graduated from Columbia.

The case is Nungesser v. Columbia University et al, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, No. 15-03216.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3163571&forum_id=2#30048472)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 13th, 2016 5:17 PM
Author: Mint hissy fit dilemma

probably a good decision. i wish judges dealing with Title IX made similar decisions when the victim was a woman.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3163571&forum_id=2#30048489)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 13th, 2016 5:18 PM
Author: rose legal warrant

The purpose of title ix, which was to fuck over men, cannot be stretched to aid men, said the judge

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3163571&forum_id=2#30048501)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 13th, 2016 7:06 PM
Author: burgundy queen of the night

I thought it was about there needing to be as many women's varsity teams as men's teams

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3163571&forum_id=2#30049220)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 13th, 2016 7:07 PM
Author: razzle umber death wish house

yep. that's the rationale.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3163571&forum_id=2#30049227)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 13th, 2016 7:56 PM
Author: greedy big-titted abode digit ratio



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3163571&forum_id=2#30049550)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 13th, 2016 7:11 PM
Author: embarrassed to the bone jet business firm water buffalo

any one have a link to the ruling?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3163571&forum_id=2#30049249)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 13th, 2016 7:30 PM
Author: chartreuse overrated halford

Miltenberg, who's somehow convinced the press that he's "the guy" for these Title IX suits, is a terrible lawyer. Read the briefs he files in connection with these suits. They're copy and paste garbage. He's just churning these cases and losing left and right.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3163571&forum_id=2#30049343)