The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
 71 posters qualify.
You have 0 points. Copying this list does not send funds. Paste it on Disperse, then connect your wallet there. |
Ghetto Poors dance down the aisle for their wedding
Date: July 26th, 2009 2:41 AM Author: fuchsia telephone menage http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4-94JhLEiN0 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350037) |
 |
Date: July 26th, 2009 2:44 AM Author: jet-lagged puppy casino ginger's blazing the poor trail (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350054) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 2:46 AM Author: out-of-control lake tanning salon tyft (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350064) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 2:48 AM Author: lime bateful library ladyboy why is everyone so ugly (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350082) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 2:50 AM Author: bright deranged crackhouse psychic Ugly people have ugly friends. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350088) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:01 AM Author: frozen red field volcanic crater they were from MN (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350173) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:10 AM Author: contagious brethren space your soul is ugly (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350242) |
Date: July 26th, 2009 2:47 AM Author: jet-lagged puppy casino they're blasting chris brown at a wedding ceremony after his name has become synonymous with domestic abuse. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350074) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 2:48 AM Author: fuchsia telephone menage How would xoxo see this video if the people in here were black? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350081) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 2:50 AM Author: hairless beady-eyed elastic band church "Ghetto poor niggers dance down the aisle for their wedding"
It would be like a COMPLETELY DIFFERENT THREAD OMG |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 2:52 AM Author: irradiated costumed trust fund parlor except then it would be racist.
but this thread isnt because le chic is trying to make a point instead of be a stuck up racist cunt. |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 2:53 AM Author: fuchsia telephone menage somebody's brain is fried.
I'm not le chic. |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 2:54 AM Author: hairless beady-eyed elastic band church loooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooolooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooool tyft (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350115) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 2:56 AM Author: fuchsia telephone menage ok... (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350133) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 2:53 AM Author: hairless beady-eyed elastic band church flame
le chic is not capable of being racist or being a stuck up cunt because she is a beautiful young woman both inside and out
stfu EARRRRLLL |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 2:57 AM Author: fuchsia telephone menage xoxo's racists would come out of the woodwork to talk about classless blacks... (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350142) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:42 PM Author: bat shit crazy hairraiser dog poop legend We would have seen it as a much better display of dancing skills. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12353291) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 2:51 AM Author: concupiscible dopamine public bath Catholics everywhere are appalled. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350100) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 2:54 AM Author: comical avocado dysfunction Indeed, this is just embarassing. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350114) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 2:55 AM Author: Cordovan forum No way this took place in a Catholic church (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350126) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 2:57 AM Author: concupiscible dopamine public bath That's not what I meant. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350140) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 2:58 AM Author: Cordovan forum What did you mean?
It's not like this would have taken place in an Orthodox synagogue either |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:00 AM Author: comical avocado dysfunction I read it as meaning that this is going to be horrifying to anyone who's used to ultra-traditional weddings, which generally includes Catholics.
The Church has kind of a Catholic look to it, but at the end it appears they're being married by a woman. |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:03 AM Author: Cordovan forum It's not Catholic looking at all
At least not to me, a Catholic
Looks extremely Lutheran |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:00 AM Author: concupiscible dopamine public bath Roman Catholic weddings are long and boring with their numerous archaic rituals.
People having fun in Church goes against everything they're taught to believe in. |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:05 AM Author: Cordovan forum depends
two Catholics--there is a Nuptial Mass, that can take a while
one Catholic, one Christian--5 minute ceremony is all that's required |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:06 AM Author: bright deranged crackhouse psychic Catholics are Christian. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350211) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:08 AM Author: Cordovan forum context: One Catholic, one [other denomination] Christian (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350222) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:09 AM Author: bright deranged crackhouse psychic I think the word you're looking for is Protestant. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350229) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:18 AM Author: razzmatazz hunting ground parlour What about Restorationists? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350315) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:21 AM Author: bright deranged crackhouse psychic They don't marry outside their kind. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350341) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:24 AM Author: Cordovan forum You may be surprised to learn that Protestants are not even in the majority of non-Catholic Christians
so my statement is more correct |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:29 AM Author: bright deranged crackhouse psychic ? "one Catholic, one Christian--5 minute ceremony is all that's required" This statement wouldn't make sense with "Orthodox" or anything else but "Protestant". |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:32 AM Author: Cordovan forum yeah it does
You don't do a Mass in an Orthodox/Catholic wedding |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:42 AM Author: bright deranged crackhouse psychic The Orthodox Church is as big on lengthy rituals as Catholics are. Protestants are the only ones who are hugely lax on ceremony. That's what I thought you meant. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350536) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:45 AM Author: Cordovan forum oh, I was talking about a valid Catholic wedding. Sorry. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350548) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:08 AM Author: frozen red field volcanic crater eh, kinda not really. one worships mary, the other does not (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350227) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:10 AM Author: bright deranged crackhouse psychic Catholics don't worship Mary. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350238) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:10 AM Author: hairless beady-eyed elastic band church catholics don't worship mary smart guy, they believe that mary is a saint who is in heaven and who can therefore intervene on their behalf up there if they pray to her for help. catholics are big on the whole "going through intermediary channels instead of asking god directly" (see: confession, praying to saints, etc.) because they see it as a sign of humility before a presence as awesome and inexplicable as God, but that doesn't mean they "worship" priests or saints or mary.
stfu |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:11 AM Author: irradiated costumed trust fund parlor dont try to justify your heathen beliefs papist. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350249) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:11 AM Author: hairless beady-eyed elastic band church i'm not a catholic, im just not an ignorant dipshit who doesn't know anything about the basic tenents of the world's most popular and influential christian religon either
hth |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:11 AM Author: frozen red field volcanic crater praying is not worshipping? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350255) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:12 AM Author: comical avocado dysfunction No, the prayers tend to be requests for the saint to pray for you. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350266) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:13 AM Author: frozen red field volcanic crater what about praying, offering sacrifices to and making representations of a saint? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350272) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:15 AM Author: comical avocado dysfunction As I said, the praying is actually structured as asking the saint to pray for you. People have representations of all kinds of figures who they don't worship.
Offering sacrifices...? Do you mean lighting a candle? |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:18 AM Author: frozen red field volcanic crater I disagree that praying for someone to "pray" or intercede for you is not worshipping. Whatever.
But catholics (and the church) routinely deify these saints--let us act like the Virgin Mary, Mother Theresa, etc.
Offering sacrifices=pay $$$ for St. XXXX's festival., donate in St. XXXX's name for XXXX cause |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:20 AM Author: comical avocado dysfunction Using someone as a model of behavior, you mean? I don't consider that worship, since we do that all the time in secular life.
That's not all that common, and also isn't worship. If I offer to pay for a party celebrating your retirement or donate to charity in honor of my dead relative, is that worship? |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:23 AM Author: frozen red field volcanic crater Ah, but the Church encourages you to worship a small group of people. They regularly invoke their name in their sermons & festivities. Plus, they refer to them as saints. We in the secular world never call people this.
btw: You are taking what I am saying and just making comparisions to everyday life. You are not addressing the substantive issue. |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:31 AM Author: Cordovan forum so do Orthodox, so do Anglicans and so did everyone from the day the first martyr died up until 1500
if you believe in Christianity at all, you might as well discard the ridiculous pretense that Martin Luther "rediscovered" true Christianity. |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:14 AM Author: hairless beady-eyed elastic band church no, saying praying to mary = worshipping mary is kind of like saying that calling up your long time trusted family dentist and asking for a referral to a good orthodontist is the same thing as "going to your dentist to get braces." it's a gross and very misleading oversimplification that no one who is knowledgable would ever make. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350286) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:20 AM Author: frozen red field volcanic crater So if I start an organization that prays to a dead person to do something on my behalf, I am not worshipping them? What about if I put representations of this person throughout the building? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350339) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:23 AM Author: hairless beady-eyed elastic band church k i think we're done here mostly because I'm not actually Catholic so frankly I don't give a shit, but for the record you seem like a very cool and edgy guy; it must be super hard to poke holes at the tenents of Catholicism on the internet, I've never seen it done before.
(We get it, religion is a crock and there is no God and Logical Reasoning is all that matters, etc.) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:25 AM Author: frozen red field volcanic crater No, I am actually a WASP who was raised Presbyterian. I do think it is fair to say that Catholics worship people. At the very least, they deify them. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350381) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:36 AM Author: Cordovan forum sorry about your tiny pink religion (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350498) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:27 AM Author: Cordovan forum So you disagree with Catholics, Orthodox, and Anglicans and pretty much the entire history of Christianity from day one until Calvin
|
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:28 AM Author: frozen red field volcanic crater I have no idea what you are trying to say. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350420) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:35 AM Author: Cordovan forum the idea that some dude in 1500 found out that people had been doing Christianity all wrong from the very beginning is about as believable as Joseph Smith being a prophet
if Christianity is right, then praying to Saints is ok |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:51 AM Author: dashing mad cow disease "from the very beginning" Can I get a biblical citation for this whole saints business? |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 10:18 PM Author: Orchid fantasy-prone friendly grandma How about when Christ said he would see the "good thief" that day in heaven [traditionally known as St. Dismas, the first saint]. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12356632) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 2:53 AM Author: cerise lascivious heaven halford I don't understand the popularity of this video. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350105) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 2:54 AM Author: concupiscible dopamine public bath White people don't usually dance. And especially not in church.
Add the two together and you have a once in a lifetime occurrence. |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 2:55 AM Author: out-of-control lake tanning salon young people having fun doing something relatively creative during a very special occasion. wtf, are you dead inside? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350122) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:19 AM Author: razzmatazz hunting ground parlour This seems like the appropiate response. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350329) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 2:54 AM Author: Cordovan forum This took place in a Catholic church?? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350118) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 2:57 AM Author: comical avocado dysfunction It looks like one, but then at the end it appears they're being married by a woman, which makes me think not. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350145) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:03 AM Author: Cordovan forum It doesn't look like a catholic church at all
I don't see a Crucifix. I don't see any statues, I don't see icons, I don't see any stations of the cross. Look at the cross. There is no corpus.
It's extremely plain in style plus it's Minnesota. Dollars to donuts, it's Lutheran.
What made you think this was a Catholic church? |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:08 AM Author: comical avocado dysfunction I was looking at the stained glass and the altar. Some of the newer churches have the statues and such in the corners. But you're right on the cross, I didn't notice that. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350221) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:09 AM Author: Cordovan forum I think besides that you are right that a woman could never officiate in a Catholic church
In addition, the whole spectacle would never have been allowed |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:14 AM Author: comical avocado dysfunction I'd be shocked if anyone but a priest was allowed to officiate.
And yes, the dancing would not have been allowed. |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:37 AM Author: Flatulent Dun Laser Beams uh, it does? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350500) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 1:34 PM Author: chartreuse fortuitous meteor Maybe that was the bride's retarded second cousin who was up there to do a reading (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12352260) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 2:54 AM Author: comical avocado dysfunction Wtf. Also, why is the wedding party like 20 people? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350121) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:14 AM Author: fuchsia telephone menage yes. way too many people (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350283) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 2:57 AM Author: Cordovan forum How embarrassing for them
although I don't see this as a ghetto or poor thing |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 2:57 AM Author: fuchsia telephone menage it would be if they were black. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350147) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:01 AM Author: cerise lascivious heaven halford Then it wouldn't be in St. Paul, MN. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350172) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:03 AM Author: fuchsia telephone menage okay... (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350189) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:01 AM Author: Vibrant Naked Gas Station Chad if you have anything negative to say about this video you are a joyless piece of shit.
i hope this does help. |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:02 AM Author: out-of-control lake tanning salon this (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350180) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:02 AM Author: contagious brethren space seriously, it's fucking adorable. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350181) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:03 AM Author: titillating slippery hall haunted graveyard Wrong. Americans are too quick to cheapen everything they can get their hands on. There's something to be said about formality, observing tradition. Keep your fucking hands at your sides when you're being married.
*cravath walks* |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:06 AM Author: hairless beady-eyed elastic band church This is actually credited, weddings are NOT and never have been primarily for the people getting married - weddings are really for the friends and family of the lucky couple, especially the older ones who want to see their beloved youngsters get hitched and pop a few out already so they can die in peace feeling like their lives had meaning and content in knowing that their bloodlines will live on.
Seeing as how most old people like traditional things done in traditional ways, I think for most young couples this would be a pretty fucked up thing to do at their wedding. Maybe this couple was the rare exception, but I think in general it would really bother old people and cheapen the experience for them, and seeing as how they are the real audience that the wedding is being done for that's pretty fucked. |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:08 AM Author: concupiscible dopamine public bath Dude, the olds in the front two rows were having a great time.
|
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:16 AM Author: hairless beady-eyed elastic band church "Maybe this was the rare exception"
hth?
my g-parents would not be very amused if I did this at my wedding, and they are far from being joyless old meanspirited republican fucks or something |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:21 AM Author: razzmatazz hunting ground parlour No, they're joyless. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350344) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 12:53 PM Author: Slate Adventurous Associate Clown It sounds like your grandparents are horrible selfish people. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12351918) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:08 AM Author: titillating slippery hall haunted graveyard Exactly. If I were that girl's father I would make her sorry for the quiet insult felt by at least half the people there. It's selfish, crass and not even full throated. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350225) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:10 AM Author: Stirring native fuck you and the horse you rode in on. NO ONE LIKES WEDDINGS except for the bride and the mother of the bride. HTFH, broad. Kudos to people who try to make it slightly less miserable for everyone in attendance. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350239) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:11 AM Author: titillating slippery hall haunted graveyard STFU, weddings are the balls. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350248) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:12 AM Author: Stirring native no, they suck dick. have you been to one? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350262) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:14 AM Author: titillating slippery hall haunted graveyard I go to weddings every other weekend. You sit pretty for an hour then get sauced and dance. What's not to like. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350281) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:15 AM Author: Stirring native nothing at all. you watch your friends perform a funny dance to celebrate their wedding. what's not to like? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350296) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:15 AM Author: Vibrant Naked Gas Station Chad So you're saying you do the YMCA about twice a month? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350300) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:11 AM Author: comical avocado dysfunction Old people love weddings. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350259) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:14 AM Author: Stirring native so what? that video is stupid fun. you have to be a joyless cunt to look at it and BAWWWWWWW TRADITIONS!!!! wtf, who gives a fuck. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350280) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:18 AM Author: hairless beady-eyed elastic band church are you a fucking idiot?
OLD PEOPLE LOVE TO SEE THEIR GRANDCHILDREN/GREAT GRANDCHILDREN/GRAND NEPHEWS/GRAND NIECES/ETC ETC get married.
You must seriously, honest to god be a fucking Aspbergers case not to know that. Everyone who knows anything about IRL and The Real World knows who and what weddings are for: the bride and her mom, but most importantly A TON OF OLD PEOPLE ON BOTH SIDES.
And by and large, old people like tradition and are set in their ways and don't like to see pop-locking going on during a "sacred", once-in-a-lifetime (hopefully) proceeding. This is not rocket science genius, pointing out that the old people in this particular video seemed into it doesn't really refute that very well. |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:22 AM Author: Vibrant Naked Gas Station Chad Yeah, but some old people actually enjoy life. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350349) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:25 AM Author: hairless beady-eyed elastic band church yfwgi
I'm sure you'll be blazing phat bowls at the afterparty and your awesome grandma will be toking next to you, etc, man I wish I were cool like you, etc, etc. |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:27 AM Author: razzmatazz hunting ground parlour You lose. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350414) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:29 AM Author: hairless beady-eyed elastic band church Of course, I'm dumb and you're smart.
For the record tho, maybe you'll do a poor dumb like me favor and give me a ballpark estimate of what % of olds in this country are "cool" enough to enjoy seeing their own granddaughter boogie down the aisle at her wedding. 60%? 70%? 80%? |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:31 AM Author: razzmatazz hunting ground parlour "I'm dumb and you're smart."
Yes.
|
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:32 AM Author: hairless beady-eyed elastic band church Thanks for answering the question faggot.
I wonder why you declined?
(yfwgi) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:39 AM Author: razzmatazz hunting ground parlour You're boring. I don't want to participate in a boring sub-thread about estimating how many old people are as boring as you are. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350514) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:43 AM Author: hairless beady-eyed elastic band church weddings are for olds: not up for argument.
olds are, by and large, boring and traditionalist: you concede.
QED, the wedding ceremony should be kept boring and traditionalist for the olds most of the time.
The problem appears not to lie in my logic, but in your fucking faggotry my good man. |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 1:50 PM Author: chartreuse fortuitous meteor Plus the olds will fuck off and go to sleep around 8 or so, so you can have a better party after they're gone (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12352341) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:35 AM Author: Vibrant Naked Gas Station Chad Not everyone had your strict Asian upbringing.
People in Minnesota are pretty fucking cool, they voted Jesse Ventura for governor.
Perhaps all the old people you've seen are joyless and dull, but some actually have great senses of humor and enjoy life. |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 4:10 PM Author: Wonderful silver hospital also michelle bachman :( (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12353440) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:11 AM Author: Vibrant Naked Gas Station Chad LOL, you must be azn. You'd be scared about what your grandmother who came all the way from Taiwan would think.
These are well adjusted American white people who just enjoy life. |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:13 AM Author: titillating slippery hall haunted graveyard Make sure you bring cash to your next wedding. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350268) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:14 AM Author: Vibrant Naked Gas Station Chad ? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350288) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:14 AM Author: Stirring native tcr. xo can not compute people who enjoy life and fun. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350290) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:21 AM Author: hairless beady-eyed elastic band church Yeah all white people are like "fuck what grandma thinks, old fucking biddy."
Or, you know, some white people actually love their family and appreciate that the ceremony = for the olds, the reception = for the youngs, and act accordingly.
You sound like a dumb fuck. |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:23 AM Author: razzmatazz hunting ground parlour You could have just said "you're right." (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350359) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:25 AM Author: Vibrant Naked Gas Station Chad They're probably fun, laidback, and not too religious. Old people like this do exist. They're not all boring old-people stereotypes like your grandparents. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350380) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:27 AM Author: hairless beady-eyed elastic band church yeah, and very smart and educated and non-violent and sophisticated black people exist.
...yet you niggerthread on the internet and regularly stereotype African Americans.
I guess we all have our flaws. |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:29 AM Author: razzmatazz hunting ground parlour Stop posting. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350436) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:33 AM Author: hairless beady-eyed elastic band church Great rebuttal. You lose. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350475) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:31 AM Author: Vibrant Naked Gas Station Chad Aah, so you have nothing more to say so you decide you want to attack me? Ding faggot, I am flawless.
I have been a huge proponent of Chris Rock's "Black People vs. Niggers" routine. I believe that niggerism, which is a mentality of willful ignorance, is a social disease.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s7b2oCYgfik
|
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:33 AM Author: hairless beady-eyed elastic band church nonresponsive, lol (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350480) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:35 AM Author: Vibrant Naked Gas Station Chad what do you want a response to? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350491) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:23 AM Author: razzmatazz hunting ground parlour This also seems right. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350353) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:20 AM Author: razzmatazz hunting ground parlour "especially the older ones who want to see their beloved youngsters get hitched and pop a few out already so they can die in peace"
Then why don't they pay for it?
|
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:28 AM Author: hairless beady-eyed elastic band church Why doesn't everyone who has a birthday dinner pay for all their guests since they are the one who wants those guests to be there?
You seem kind of dumb no offense |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:31 AM Author: razzmatazz hunting ground parlour Argument by interrogatory is one of the refuges of the dull. That's particularly true where universal terms like "everyone" are used. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350456) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:44 AM Author: hairless beady-eyed elastic band church argument by "lol u lose i win" and "stop posting" is one of the refuges of the STFU FAGGOT HTH. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350544) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:06 AM Author: ocher shitlib whorehouse i totally share this view generally. and i have no respect for these people. but viewed in extreme isolation, it is pretty cute. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350213) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:04 AM Author: concupiscible dopamine public bath But they told all the guests beforehand what was going to happen! A genuine surprise would have been awesome (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350196) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:06 AM Author: frozen red field volcanic crater I wold have to be tanked to do that. If someone asked me to be a groosmen and do that, I would turn them down (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350209) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:08 AM Author: out-of-control lake tanning salon to be fair, you sound like no one would ask you in the first place (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350223) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:09 AM Author: frozen red field volcanic crater tyft. I have twice turned down offers bc they conflicted w/ TX football games. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350232) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:12 AM Author: out-of-control lake tanning salon uh, what kind of stupid friends do you have that would get married on a SATURDAY during CFB? that's fucking stupid. Your friends suck. hth (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350264) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:14 AM Author: frozen red field volcanic crater you do not have many friends. fall weddings are popular. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350282) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:15 AM Author: out-of-control lake tanning salon oh i have plenty of guy friends, all HUGE fans of our CFB, and despite 6 weddings so far NONE have married during the season. I suspect the rest one either. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350293) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:07 AM Author: Cordovan forum I would never get married that way.
Tradition has its place; this is embarrassing. Not everyone has to get married in morning dress, but please
Call me old fashioned, but crip walking in a church turns my stomach. |
|
Date: July 29th, 2009 1:22 PM Author: appetizing pisswyrm it's weird that you're so snobby about some things and not about others, yet you always think your point of view is the only correct one (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12376408) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:05 AM Author: ocher shitlib whorehouse this has literally all the indicia of something i would completely despise. yet somehow i came away feeling pretty touched. even more inexplicably, i think this may have something to do with the choice of 'forever'. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350202) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:06 AM Author: frozen red field volcanic crater weddings are for the family; after parties are for the friends. This changes that. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350214) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:09 AM Author: hairless beady-eyed elastic band church fucking cr 100%, and by and large family = old people, and most old people don't like or appreciate this shit. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350230) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:10 AM Author: frozen red field volcanic crater yeah, the woman was not walked down the woman by her father. weird. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350236) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:11 AM Author: concupiscible dopamine public bath Being "given away" by your father is a pretty silly concept (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350256) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:15 AM Author: frozen red field volcanic crater maybe, but its tradition dates back hundreds of years (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350294) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:18 AM Author: Stirring native so is Jesus. Doesnt mean it isnt fucktarded (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350318) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:24 AM Author: frozen red field volcanic crater I see what you did there (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350370) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:32 AM Author: hairless beady-eyed elastic band church /*\ COOL GUY POSTS EDGY INDICTMENT OF "JESUS" ON THE INTERNET /*\ (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350463) |
|
Date: July 28th, 2009 10:41 PM Author: violet range 180 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12372629) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:11 AM Author: Stirring native stfu (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350257) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:39 AM Author: frozen red field volcanic crater not bad (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350513) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:19 AM Author: Vibrant Naked Gas Station Chad ROFL at your strict AZN grandparents (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350331) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:13 AM Author: concupiscible dopamine public bath This thread is a classic example of XOers having their head too far up their ass.
The reason this video is such a huge sensation and this couple appeared on the Today Show: America fucking loved it.
|
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:16 AM Author: ocher shitlib whorehouse yeah but seriously america is a country full of dumbs that generally like retarded dumb shit. see, e.g., reality tv shows. but on the merits i do appreciate the video. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350303) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:17 AM Author: Stirring native no, america is country full of dumbs who mindlessly cling to pointless traditions and behavioral norms. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350313) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:19 AM Author: Vibrant Naked Gas Station Chad credit (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350326) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:24 AM Author: ocher shitlib whorehouse pointless traditions and norms are the basis for all civilized societies.
it could be that the same mass mentality fueling this video's popularity also drives faggots to believe that click-clacking around in flip-flops is ok. but really i think people like the video because it's actually charming. |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 8:53 AM Author: Supple Submissive Sneaky Criminal NEWSFLASH: America is a fucking TTT piece of shit where only 33% of adults have college degrees. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12351114) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:15 AM Author: fuchsia telephone menage I'm waiting for people to tie this to the race of the people in the video. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350295) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:24 AM Author: cerise lascivious heaven halford LOL, racist faggot. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350372) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:27 AM Author: fuchsia telephone menage I'm racist? You're the guy who, after someone made a racist remark to me, defended him. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350415) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:24 AM Author: curious underhanded corner pocket flask they're clearly middle class and educated. if blacks did it, there would be people screaming, it would be in a storefront baptist church, and it would be shot on a camera phone with mumbled narration from cousin rary-ray, fresh out the pen. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350376) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:26 AM Author: fuchsia telephone menage They are clearly middle class and educated?
I missed the part where they flashed their University of Minnesota diplomas and their tax returns.
"if blacks did it, there would be people screaming, it would be in a minimall baptist church, and it would be shot in a camera phone with mumbled narration from cousin rary-ray, fresh out the pen."
Right. You're racist. Thanks. |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:29 AM Author: curious underhanded corner pocket flask "I missed the part where they flashed their University of Minnesota diplomas and their tax returns."
lol, the black guy wants to see some ID. it's pretty weird though how sometimes through obvious social signaling and other indicators that you can tell if somebody is poor, middle class, or wealthy without even needing to see some paper credentials. it happens, every once in a while at least.
"Right. You're racist. Thanks."
lulz, you're too easy dipshit. |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:30 AM Author: fuchsia telephone menage "lol, the black guy wants to see some ID. it's pretty weird though how sometimes through obvious social signaling and other indicators that you can tell if somebody is poor, middle class, or wealthy without even needing to see some paper credentials. it happens, every once in a while at least."
The only thing you saw was white people. |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:35 AM Author: curious underhanded corner pocket flask question: you see a black wedding ceremony - can you make some very reasonable inference about the economic standing of the majority of those in attendance base on what you see?
take your time, sonny jim. |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:43 AM Author: fuchsia telephone menage let me walk you through this, tard. You see nothing in the video but white people acting like clowns on their wedding day. That, in and of itself, is a severe departure from white middle class norms. Also, you see extremely cheap looking clothing. Her dress looks like it was second hand. The bridesmaids dresses look very cheap as well. The groom is wearing a 3 dollar outfit. His friends' suits were probably half that.
The church looked run-down. There was minimal decoration. It looked sad.
Yet, you somehow get middle class and educated. Not sure where you pull that from. Also, you're a bigot for allowing white middle class and educated folk to have a wedding of this nature, but if they were black, they must be ghetto trash.
You're clearly flame, but you're stupid flame. Get lost; you got your ass rhetorically kicked. Respond with more racist drivel. |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:47 AM Author: curious underhanded corner pocket flask okay le chic, i will substantively respond to every point you think you're making in that post if you answer the question i originally asked instead of spending 600 words dodging it:
"question: you see a black wedding ceremony - can you make some very reasonable inference about the economic standing of the majority of those in attendance base on what you see?"
answer that, and i'll happily rebut everything you said. |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:50 AM Author: fuchsia telephone menage You can't rebut a thing. Moreover, you don't dictate conversation to me. Last, your question is irrelevant to your racist post supra. Answer your own fucking question, bigot. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350582) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:53 AM Author: curious underhanded corner pocket flask "You can't rebut a thing."
yes i can, very easily, actually.
"Moreover, you don't dictate conversation to me."
lol le chic, are you afraid to answer the question or what?
"Last, your question is irrelevant to your racist post supra. Answer your own fucking question, bigot."
the question has nothing to do with race - it's about the simple ability to make class observations (which, by the way, you said i couldn't possibly make from the video though you proceeded to do the same exactly one post later) based on obvious signals and cues. i stipulated a black wedding since i assume it's what you're most experienced with, but you can make it anybody's wedding if you like.
go on, answer the question and i'll happily rebut. why are you afraid? |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:58 AM Author: fuchsia telephone menage "yes i can, very easily, actually."
No, you can't.
"lol le chic, are you afraid to answer the question or what?"
Not le chic.
"the question has nothing to do with race - it's about the simple ability to make class observations (which, by the way, you said i couldn't possibly make from the video though you proceeded to do the same exactly one post later) based on obvious signals and cues. i stipulated a black wedding since i assume it's what you're most experienced with, but you can make it anybody's wedding if you like."
I was knocking down your position that they were "obviously educated and middle class." I have no clue; but there was much in that video to suggest that they were poor. Unless there is something obvious, like a cheap ass wedding look, you can't tell based on such scant evidence.
"go on, answer the question and i'll happily rebut. why are you afraid?"
Answer your own fucking question. I don't cooperate with posters who say racist shit in one post, and then make a black joke about ID. So, yah, answer your own fucking question. |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 4:06 AM Author: curious underhanded corner pocket flask LMFAO - i see you took the liberty of editing out your comment to the effect of, "it's impossible for you to make any judgments about their class from that video."
how low can you go, le chic? jesus, i actually chortled out loud when i saw that.
"No, you can't."
sure i can, i'll do it right after i finish this post since you went back and edit, and yet are still inexplicably dodging my simple question in a most pathetic fashion.
"I have no clue"
really? because you labeled them ghetto poors and went on to offer your observations as to why this is the case.
"but there was much in that video to suggest that they were poor. Unless there is something obvious, like a cheap ass wedding look, you can't tell based on such scant evidence."
lulz, i'll just address this by rebutting your joke of a post. nice to see you already slowly backpedaling from your earlier stance though.
"Answer your own fucking question. I don't cooperate with posters who say racist shit in one post, and then make a black joke about ID. So, yah, answer your own fucking question."
completely pathetic - how many excuses will you make to dodge this? you can interact with a clear brutal and unrelenting racist such as myself this long, but answering a simple, simple question is beyond the pale? le chic, how can we make progress as a nation unless we can work together, especially on the internet?
|
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 4:13 AM Author: fuchsia telephone menage "LMFAO - i see you took the liberty of editing out your comment to the effect of, "it's impossible for you to make any judgments about their class from that video." how low can you go, le chic? jesus, i actually chortled out loud when i saw that."
I never passed judgment on their socio economic status.
"really? because you labeled them ghetto poors and went on to offer your observations as to why this is the case."
You're clearly stupid. I called them "ghetto poors" not because I thought they were actually ghetto and poor, but because if the same video was posted, but the people in the video were black, they would have been described as "ghetto poors".
"lulz, i'll just address this by rebutting your joke of a post. nice to see you already slowly backpedaling from your earlier stance though."
What backpeddling?
"completely pathetic - how many excuses will you make to dodge this? you can interact with a clear brutal and unrelenting racist such as myself this long, but answering a simple, simple question is beyond the pale? le chic, how can we make progress as a nation unless we can work together, especially on the internet?"
I'll talk to a racist for a little while, but stupid people get ignored. You have shown yourself to be completely dumb, so I don't think you'll be getting much attention after this. |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 4:17 AM Author: Vibrant Naked Gas Station Chad ghetto poors is redundant. obviously someone described as ghetto also qualifies as a poor.
if it was black people who indeed looked ghetto, then they would have been described as ghetto blacks.
|
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 4:18 AM Author: fuchsia telephone menage I don't have the bigot lingo down as well as you obviously do. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350716) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 4:21 AM Author: curious underhanded corner pocket flask so rather than actually responding to your repeated pwnings you're just going to cry racism after every post? pretty pathetic.
and also: http://autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050523&mc=3&forum_id=2#12350679
might want to get some of your sock-puppet accounts in there to dispute the results that are shaping up. |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 4:53 AM Author: fuchsia telephone menage You didn't pwn me. I don't get pwn3d. It's been made clear that you couldn't back up your statement that they were clearly educated and middle class. Your own thread shows that most people were in doubt. I described a competing narrative to explain their SES. You were wrong. Pwn3d! (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350846) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 4:58 AM Author: curious underhanded corner pocket flask "You didn't pwn me. I don't get pwn3d."
lmao, le chic would never say a thing like that?
"It's been made clear that you couldn't back up your statement that they were clearly educated and middle class."
the video says they met at college you idiot. they're white people in minnesota with college educations - without even seeing the video we can assume there's about a 90% likelihood that they're middle class. the video just confirms it.
"Your own thread shows that most people were in doubt"
how does almost everybody agreeing that they're educated and not "ghetto poors" in any way suggest doubt?
"I described a competing narrative to explain their SES"
you suggested that the church was not 'aesthetically pleasing' and then refused to say why this was the case. that's not a competing narrative - that's a stupid person flailing for words.
"You were wrong. Pwn3d!"
you're embarrassing yourself worse than usual le chic, not that i don't enjoy the effort.
|
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 5:03 AM Author: fuchsia telephone menage "the video says they met at college you idiot. they're white people in minnesota with college educations - without even seeing the video we can assume there's about a 90% likelihood that they're middle class. the video just confirms it."
Dude, you're stupid. You said there was something in the video to state that they were "clearly" educated and middle class. What they say in an interview that is unrelated to the 5 minute clip is irrelevant, stupid.
"how does almost everybody agreeing that they're educated and not "ghetto poors" in any way suggest doubt?"
Stupid. We weren't arguing if they were "ghetto poors". stupid. We were arguing if they were "clearly educated and middle class" stupid. Do you have proof of that? You still haven't given any.
"you suggested that the church was not 'aesthetically pleasing' and then refused to say why this was the case. that's not a competing narrative - that's a stupid person flailing for words."
Dude, I gave a long list which you quoted before, stupid. Now I said nothing else, stupid? Nice try, stupid.
"you're embarrassing yourself worse than usual le chic, not that i don't enjoy the effort."
You enjoy getting ripped to shreds? You should as it happens often I bet. Pwn3d! |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 5:05 AM Author: razzmatazz hunting ground parlour I would say that "clear" and "certain" are very different concepts. For instance, in legal usage "clear and convincing" isn't even as strong as "beyond reasonable doubt," which itself isn't even as strong as "certain."
|
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 5:09 AM Author: fuchsia telephone menage "It's "clear" that Jim is tall."
That means that Jim is not only tall, but how could you act as if he isn't... |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 5:25 AM Author: curious underhanded corner pocket flask how did you manage to actually escape law school?
i said it's clear - clear to me - what they are.
|
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 5:30 AM Author: fuchsia telephone menage Don't try to change your statements now. that's just sad. take it like a man. im sure you take it often. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350957) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 5:33 AM Author: curious underhanded corner pocket flask how is that a change of statement - it's exactly what i said in the post.
"take it like a man. im sure you take it often."
as an opponent of racism, don't you think it's bad idea to publicize the fact that because of their deeply backwards cultural leanings and religiously bigoted nature, american blacks tend to be deeply homophobic? it's an issue that has a very negative impact on your community - for shame! |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 5:35 AM Author: fuchsia telephone menage There's nothing wrong with being gay. There is something wrong with getting pwn3d though. You're my slave.
You changed your statement. That much is "clear" LMAO. Before you said it was "clearly" meaning to anyone. If this was a personal thing why not just say its clear to me in the begining? cause thats not what you meant.
pwn3d! |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 5:49 AM Author: curious underhanded corner pocket flask "There's nothing wrong with being gay"
then why do you use it as an insult, le chic? we always knew you were bigoted, but usually you're a little less obvious about things.
"There is something wrong with getting pwn3d though. You're my slave."
more classic le chic. you're like a little kid.
"You changed your statement. That much is "clear" LMAO"
are you actually attempting to argue that there's a substantive rhetorical difference between 'clear' and 'clearly?' this is how low you'll sink to pretend you didn't make an ass of yourself here? wow.
"If this was a personal thing why not just say its clear to me in the begining? cause thats not what you meant."
how can you really know what my intention was from my post? how can you be sure? i am arguing that you can't possibly know that simply from what i wrote. pwn pwn pwn, you are my slave, etc.
see how you're devolving further and further into self-parody here? well, probably you don't, but trust me, it's happening.
"pwn3d!"
one more time for good measure eh? do you actually feel better when you type that in? like a coping mechanism?
|
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 2:02 PM Author: fuchsia telephone menage Dude, you have been a rhetorical embarrassment in this entire thread. You have been switching your statements, acting as though probably =/ clearly. You're just a mess. And you know you're wrong too. That's why you incessantly reply back to someone you think is soooo stupid. Well I just ripped you a new one. Get lost, bitch. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12352413) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 5:12 AM Author: curious underhanded corner pocket flask most everybody who responded agrees with me, not you:
http://autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050523&mc=13&forum_id=2#12350824
|
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 5:14 AM Author: fuchsia telephone menage You said they were "clearly educated and middle class". The people in that thread express doubt. Probably =/ clearly. And since that is your proof that you were right, and it backs up my position, not yours, I guess you were the one who just lost.
Pwn3d! |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 5:22 AM Author: curious underhanded corner pocket flask for the sake of argument, le chic, what is the evidence that they're poor and uneducated?
we can safely assume they're not wealthy (i mean, what with that rundown church that doesn't even have decorations!), so they're either middle class or poor. we already know they're educated, and so i'll say that the dress of the guests, the fact that most college-educated white people from the st. paul aren't "poors," the fact they enjoy a hipster sensibility, and the fact that their families paid for a decently-sized church wedding are all indicators that we're not dealing with white trash.
i'd also note that virtually everybody in that thread agree with me.
if they're not middle class and i'm wrong - then what are the obvious signals that they're poor? they're one or the other, so please make the case that these people are poor.
we know that you were disappointed that there we no 'decorations' in the church, but do you have anything else to point to? disprove that they're middle-class and educated kids. |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 5:27 AM Author: fuchsia telephone menage "i'd also note that virtually everybody in that thread agree with me."
No they didn't. You said clearly. I said they were not clearly. Most people in that said they were not clearly educated and middle class. I never said what their socio economic status was. You did.
"we know that you were disappointed that there we no 'decorations' in the church, but do you have anything else to point to? disprove that they're middle-class and educated kids. "
Don't try to move the goal posts. It's clear that you're a beaten man. You got pwn3d. I know it hurts. But I never said what they were. I honestly don't care. You said they were clearly educated and middle class. Your own thread proves my point that there was enough doubt. You were wrong. You got pwn3d. I pwn people often.
Also, I'm not le chic. |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 5:45 AM Author: curious underhanded corner pocket flask "No they didn't."
yes, they did. they said yes or probably in almost every case, meaning they see the same obvious social indicators.
"I said they were not clearly"
you also argued that there was good evidence that they're poor at several points. people in the thread agreed that observable evidence indicates they're not poor, but what's your take? they're poor or middle class - which is it? why do you keep dodging this?
"Don't try to move the goal posts."
why are you dodging my question? that has nothing to do with goalposts. why are you evasive every time i ask you to answer a simple a question?
*awaits pathetic excuse about interacting with racists followed by another 500 word post in which you interact with an accused racist*
"It's clear that you're a beaten man. You got pwn3d. I know it hurts"
saying as such doesn't make it so, but we've established by way of example that you think like a child, so wish away.
"But I never said what they were. I honestly don't care"
now you are in fact moving the uprights, again. you're arguing against my assertion, but attempting to claim some point of victory over having not stated their class explicitly. the funny thing is, you did do this by proxy, you're just too dumb to understand it. you made the argument that there are signs of poorness - if they're not middle class, they're poor - and you're dumb.
"You said they were clearly educated and middle class"
i did indeed. most everybody else agreed with me.
"Your own thread proves my point that there was enough doubt"
in what way does one guy asking where they're from indicate any consensus of doubt?
"You were wrong"
my assertion that they were educated was directly proven correct - the rest is a 99% likelihood - they could be wealthy and just modest, so i leave that 1% possibility.
"You got pwn3d. I pwn people often."
this thread has been you performing a clinic in how not to pwn.
"Also, I'm not le chic."
yeah, uh, le chic, word to the wise - the childish need to proclaim how hard you're pwning after every post doesn't exactly help make your megaposting less obvious. |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 2:08 PM Author: fuchsia telephone menage "yes, they did. they said yes or probably in almost every case, meaning they see the same obvious social indicators."
You said they were clearly educated and middle class. The people in your thread said "probably." They expressed doubt. You didn't. I was arguing there was nothing in the video that necessarily meant they were educated and middle class. The people sided with me.
"you also argued that there was good evidence that they're poor at several points. people in the thread agreed that observable evidence indicates they're not poor, but what's your take? they're poor or middle class - which is it? why do you keep dodging this?"
Stupid, do you still not see the argument we were having. It's like you don't even know what the point of this was. You said they were "clearly middle class and educated." I made the argument so as to offer a plausible scenario that they weren't, stupid. This "counter narrative" could put doubt in people's head. After seeing the video, it would make them say they were not clearly educated but something less than that; they'd use a word expressing doubt, stupid. Which the people in this thread did, stupid.
"i did indeed. most everybody else agreed with me."
THE PEOPLE EXPRESSED DOUBT WHICH IS INCONGRUOUS WITH CLEARLY, STUPID!!!!!! lmao I'll repeat. THE PEOPLE EXPRESSED DOUBT WHICH IS INCONGRUOUS WITH CLEARLY, STUPID!!!!!!
"in what way does one guy asking where they're from indicate any consensus of doubt?"
that was meant to be a link to the entire thread.
PWN3D AGAIN!!! |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 4:21 AM Author: Vibrant Naked Gas Station Chad Stop being jignorant. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350724) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 4:31 AM Author: curious underhanded corner pocket flask "I never passed judgment on their socio economic status."
classic. let's examine your words, yet again:
"You see nothing in the video but white people acting like clowns on their wedding day. That, in and of itself, is a severe departure from white middle class norms. Also, you see extremely cheap looking clothing. Her dress looks like it was second hand. The bridesmaids dresses look very cheap as well. The groom is wearing a 3 dollar outfit. His friends' suits were probably half that. The church looked run-down. There was minimal decoration. It looked sad."
so basically, you argue that they're having a cheap wedding because, in your estimation, the clothes and church look shabby and cheap.
"Yet, you somehow get middle class and educated"
so, since we agree they're probably not especially wealthy, we believe they're either lower class poors, or regular middle class and educated, which i assert. your above comment clearly indicates that you think its unreasonable to believe they're middle class, meaning you actually do think they're a bunch of poors carrying on. obviously you wouldn't have been as adamant about this point had you known that they met in college when you made the post, but you've already self-pwned enough that i don't need to rub it in.
"I called them "ghetto poors" not because I thought they were actually ghetto and poor, but because if the same video was posted, but the people in the video were black, they would have been described as "ghetto poors"."
funny that you state this after making an argument that they are in fact poor.
and as to the primary point, we would not have assumed they were poor from the dancing - that would have been laughed at as typical black hijinks. we would have assumed they were poor because they were black. the majority of black people in the US are poor - it's a very reasonable assumption.
"What backpeddling?"
the gentle thudding footfall of you creeping away from your angry assertion that i couldn't possibly make any accurate appraisal of their social class from the video - which you subsequently edited.
"I'll talk to a racist for a little while, but stupid people get ignored. You have shown yourself to be completely dumb, so I don't think you'll be getting much attention after this."
you only fuel racist leanings when you use it as an excuse to dodge the points that suit you. intellectually lazy and cowardly - doesn't say much for you le chic.
|
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 4:50 AM Author: fuchsia telephone menage "so basically, you argue that they're having a cheap wedding because, in your estimation, the clothes and church look shabby and cheap."
Oh god, you're stupid. I said their wedding looked cheap. That could very well lead one to conclude that they might be poor. Yet, you stated conclusively that they were both educated and middle class. I never said that they were poor. I was arguing against your conclusory statement that you could ascertain their SES just from 5 minutes of dancing in a raggedy ass church.
I would respond point by point to your post, but its filled with poor reasoning skills similar to the one above. I'm too tired for this. |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 5:03 AM Author: curious underhanded corner pocket flask "I said their wedding looked cheap"
lulz - your exact comment was that the wedding party's clothing looked cheap and informal and that the church was "rundown." you have repeatedly stated that there is obvious evidence that they're poor, yet all you can come up with is you don't think their clothes looked right and some vague notion that the church wasn't up to snuff.
"Yet, you stated conclusively that they were both educated and middle class"
the bride and groom are educated - this is confirmed. middle class is a feature of a large church wedding, white people in the midwest, and the fact that they met at college.
"I was arguing against your conclusory statement that you could ascertain their SES just from 5 minutes of dancing in a raggedy ass church."
yet in nearly every post you have argued that you can somehow see obvious indicators that they're "ghetto poors." your lack of self-awareness is stunning, truly stunning.
"I would respond point by point to your post, but its filled with poor reasoning skills similar to the one above. I'm too tired for this."
objective reality translation: "i'm getting pwned and i don't know what to say, so i'll just excuse myself from further humiliation by saying i'm too tired."
thanks le chic - entertaining, as always, when you apply your tiny brain to an argument. |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 5:04 AM Author: fuchsia telephone menage "yet in nearly every post you have argued that you can somehow see obvious indicators that they're "ghetto poors." your lack of self-awareness is stunning, truly stunning."
Where did I argue that they were ghetto poors. SHow me stupid.
Dude, you're getting your arguments conflated. You're making up arguments when they were never proffered. You're getting flustered because you're being anally raped. |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 5:16 AM Author: curious underhanded corner pocket flask Date: July 26th, 2009 4:33 AM Author: XOXO Racism Issue Spotter (You are now blessed)
There was plenty of evidence to suggest they were ghetto poors.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350774)
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:43 AM Author: XOXO Racism Issue Spotter (You are now blessed)
That, in and of itself, is a severe departure from white middle class norms. Also, you see extremely cheap looking clothing. Her dress looks like it was second hand. The bridesmaids dresses look very cheap as well. The groom is wearing a 3 dollar outfit. His friends' suits were probably half that.
The church looked run-down. There was minimal decoration. It looked sad.
Reply
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:43 AM Author: XOXO Racism Issue Spotter (You are now blessed)
let me walk you through this, tard. You see nothing in the video but white people acting like clowns on their wedding day. That, in and of itself, is a severe departure from white middle class norms. Also, you see extremely cheap looking clothing. Her dress looks like it was second hand. The bridesmaids dresses look very cheap as well. The groom is wearing a 3 dollar outfit. His friends' suits were probably half that.
The church looked run-down. There was minimal decoration. It looked sad.
Yet, you somehow get middle class and educated.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350541)
|
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 5:20 AM Author: fuchsia telephone menage Yes, stupid. The whole point of all of my posts, was to show your stupid stupidity stupid ass stupid self, that you could not say that they "clearly were educated and middle class." One could, as I did, point out stuff which would put doubt in a person's head as to the SES of the wedding party.
Guess what -- other people had doubt too. Lucky for me, someone created a thread. Here it is: http://autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050523&mc=13&forum_id=2"#12350820
therein, many people say they can't clearly determine the education and income levels of the wedding participants. Lucky ME! I win! |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 5:31 AM Author: curious underhanded corner pocket flask "was to show your stupid stupidity stupid ass stupid self"
le chic, did you forget that you're attempting to disguise the fact that you're a female when you use this moniker?
"that you could not say that they "clearly were educated and middle class"
but clearly, they are. we know they're educated. there are obvious signals that they're middle class. any reasonable person agrees with this. you're making an argument bordering on the philosophical that some things can never truly be known based on observable evidence.
here's a thought - i see a bird get sucked into a jet engine during a plane's takeoff. now, i didn't see the bird come out the other end nor did i see what happened in the jet engine - do i really know that the bird died in there? no, i guess i can't say with 100% heisenberg-proof certainty that it died. but i can be pretty fucking certain based on all common sense and reasonable experience.
"Guess what -- other people had doubt too. Lucky for me, someone created a thread. Here it is: http://autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050523&mc=13&forum_id=2"#12350820"
lulz, so one guy asked what part of minnesota they were from, and rowan noted that just because a wedding was in st. paul doesn't mean they're all from saint paul. your level of desperation here is actually kind of satisfying to me.
"therein, many people say they can't clearly determine the education and income levels of the wedding participants. Lucky ME! I win!"
uh, no. they all say the same thing - probably. why? because they're seeing the same shit i am.
you lose, again. |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 5:33 AM Author: fuchsia telephone menage "but clearly, they are. we know they're educated. there are obvious signals that they're middle class. any reasonable person agrees with this. you're making an argument bordering on the philosophical that some things can never truly be known based on observable evidence."
You were wrong, dumbass. Your own thread shows there was doubt.
"uh, no. they all say the same thing - probably. why? because they're seeing the same shit i am."
LMAO. I love the world you live in where probably=clearly. Are there unicorns there and flying penises? I think thats why you stay there so often. |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 6:06 AM Author: curious underhanded corner pocket flask "You were wrong, dumbass. Your own thread shows there was doubt."
no, in fact they all said i was probably correct.
"LMAO. I love the world you live in where probably=clearly. Are there unicorns there and flying penises? I think thats why you stay there so often"
here is an interesting example of le chic simultaneously displaying a very weak conceptual command of words (perhaps conflating them?) and further homophobia. colorful imagery though. |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 2:18 PM Author: fuchsia telephone menage Your logic skills are atrocious. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12352575) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 4:18 AM Author: curious underhanded corner pocket flask "You see nothing in the video but white people acting like clowns on their wedding day."
This is a hilarious way to open your statement, since you go on to observe quite a bit more than that and render judgment based on these observations. Apparently you have the ability to see what other can't. Impressive.
"That, in and of itself, is a severe departure from white middle class norms."
Hmm - so a departure from standard social norms. Well shit, such a thing has never been heard of, particularly not in educated white society. I suppose that's why non-poor white people never, ever have non-traditional weddings of any sort. I hadn't ever considered this potent piece of information.
"Also, you see extremely cheap looking clothing. Her dress looks like it was second hand. The bridesmaids dresses look very cheap as well. The groom is wearing a 3 dollar outfit. His friends' suits were probably half that."
They're hipsters you raving moron. Some of them are wearing aviators too - are they all pilots and state troopers? The look is intentional. Take a look at the people sitting in the pews if you want an indication of the actual social class of the wedding's participants.
"The church looked run-down. There was minimal decoration. It looked sad."
LOL - what evidence did you see that the church was "run-down?" Go ahead, show me some specifics le chic. How exactly was this place visibly dilapidated?
It's very standard Methodist/Lutheran Minnesota church, nothing more, nothing less, and the VAST majority of people attend those churches are nice middle class white folks with public college educations and wholesome midwestern lifestyles.
And decorations? This is white a wedding in Minnesota Le Chic - they don't put streamers up in the fucking church.
"Yet, you somehow get middle class and educated. Not sure where you pull that from."
There is vastly more evidence to suggest this than "ghetto poors."
"Also, you're a bigot for allowing white middle class and educated folk to have a wedding of this nature, but if they were black, they must be ghetto trash."
Lulz, allowing? These are regular middle class white people thumbing their noses at tradition and having fun with it - I do think it's goofy, and I'd say the same for blacks. The point of the matter is that nobody would be that surprised to see black people doing this, but it's remarkable that white's did it. That's not exactly racist as the assumption is made by your OP.
"You're clearly flame, but you're stupid flame. Get lost; you got your ass rhetorically kicked. Respond with more racist drivel."
ahh le chic - you try so hard, and succeed so rarely. |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 4:33 AM Author: fuchsia telephone menage "This is a hilarious way to open your statement, since you go on to observe quite a bit more than that and render judgment based on these observations. Apparently you have the ability to see what other can't. Impressive."
The statement was right. You saw nothing in that video to conclusively say their socioeconomic status and their education level. If you said that you thought they were educated and middle class, that's another thing. But you had no proof.
"Hmm - so a departure from standard social norms. Well shit, such a thing has never been heard of, particularly not in educated white society. I suppose that's why non-poor white people never, ever have non-traditional weddings of any sort. I hadn't ever considered this potent piece of information."
You're stupid. People dancing to Chris Brown at a wedding is pretty buffoonish. Middle class folk don't typically act like buffoons at their weddings. Way to conflate the two.
"They're hipsters you raving moron. Some of them are wearing aviators too - are they all pilots and state troopers? The look is intentional. Take a look at the people sitting in the pews if you want an indication of the actual social class of the wedding's participants."
Who the fuck cares if they are hipsters? The aviators point is moronic as is looking to the people in the pews. We were talking about the wedding party moron.
"It's very standard Methodist/Lutheran Minnesota church, nothing more, nothing less, and the VAST majority of people attend those churches are nice middle class white folks with public college educations and wholesome midwestern lifestyles."
That is a very cheap looking church; a middle class family would have opted for a more aesthetically pleasing place to have their ceremony.
"And decorations? This is white a wedding in Minnesota Le Chic - they don't put streamers up in the fucking church"
I'm glad you know what white folk in Minnesota do at their weddings.
"There is vastly more evidence to suggest this than "ghetto poors.""
There was plenty of evidence to suggest they were ghetto poors.
"Lulz, allowing? These are regular middle class white people thumbing their noses at tradition and having fun with it - I do think it's goofy, and I'd say the same for blacks. The point of the matter is that nobody would be that surprised to see black people doing this, but it's remarkable that white's did it. That's not exactly racist as the assumption is made by your OP."
Re-read your post your racist prick. Ray-ray out of jail. camera phones, it was nothing but racist drivel.
"ahh le chic - you try so hard, and succeed so rarely. "
Fucking pwn3d.
|
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 4:53 AM Author: curious underhanded corner pocket flask "The statement was right. You saw nothing in that video to conclusively say their socioeconomic status and their education level. If you said that you thought they were educated and middle class, that's another thing. But you had no proof."
the statement was hilariously contradictory with your previous comments, dummy. and i saw plenty to suggest that, and it was more or less confirmed by the video link. i can't 100% conclusively evaluate everything from a video, but i can be pretty damn sure.
i ask you again (and you'll dodge again): if you see wedding footage of a black wedding, can you usually make some reasonably certain assumptions about class level? particularly between "poor/ghetto" and standard middle class?
"You're stupid. People dancing to Chris Brown at a wedding is pretty buffoonish. Middle class folk don't typically act like buffoons at their weddings."
the point is to be ironic and irreverent - and, once again, you're arguing that they're not middle class after repeatedly asserting that there is no way to tell what their class is one way or the other. jesus.
"Who the fuck cares if they are hipsters? The aviators point is moronic as is looking to the people in the pews. We were talking about the wedding party moron."
1. the fact they're hipsters explains the style of their clothing, stupid
2. the aviators are further evidence that they're not taking it seriously and having fun, as hipsters are wont to do, stupid
3. the people in the pews are important because their dress and style is very indicative of social class, more so than the wedding party, stupid
"That is a very cheap looking church; a middle class family would have opted for a more aesthetically pleasing place to have their ceremony."
EXPLAIN why its cheap looking. it looks exactly like a million other suburban lutheran churches all over the midwest. it's probably one of their family churches. are you actually suggesting that people only getting married in churches because they're aesthetically pleasing? lol, starting to think you're just flame because that too dumb to be credible.
but in the event that you're not, offer specifics about why that church is so egregiously rundown and gross looking.
"I'm glad you know what white folk in Minnesota do at their weddings."
as a white person from the midwest, i do indeed claim some authority of experience here.
"There was plenty of evidence to suggest they were ghetto poors."
no, there really wansn't. guess what - everybody agrees with me: http://autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050523&mc=13&forum_id=2
"Re-read your post your racist prick. Ray-ray out of jail. camera phones, it was nothing but racist drivel."
racist drivel meant to bait your impossibly stupid ass, and it worked like a fucking charm. lol at your life.
"Fucking pwn3d."
that's really all you could come up with le chic? don't get me wrong, you're really really stupid, but normally you make some kind of sassy remark that trumpets your own perceived superiority. again, just so lazy on your part. |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 4:59 AM Author: fuchsia telephone menage "the statement was hilariously contradictory with your previous comments, dummy. and i saw plenty to suggest that, and it was more or less confirmed by the video link. i can't 100% conclusively evaluate everything from a video, but i can be pretty damn sure."
No they weren't. I never said what they were. I was knocking down your statement that they were "clearly middle class and educated." You have yet to supply proof of that.
Now you're not 100% sure. You're clearly backpeddling here now that you've been caught flatfooted and obviously wrong.
"1. the fact they're hipsters explains the style of their clothing, stupid
2. the aviators are further evidence that they're not taking it seriously and having fun, as hipsters are wont to do, stupid
3. the people in the pews are important because their dress and style is very indicative of social class, more so than the wedding party, stupid"
They weren't clearly hipsters, stupid.
There was debate below as to whether they were, stupid.
The people in the pews are likely family, stupid.
Family members are likely to be significantly better off than young kids who are getting married, stupid.
"no, there really wansn't. guess what - everybody agrees with me: http://autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050523&mc=13&forum_id=2"
No, stupid. This doesn't back up your post. You said "clerly." As in not in doubt. The people in your thread express doubt, stupid.
"racist drivel meant to bait your impossibly stupid ass, and it worked like a fucking charm. lol at your life."
Dude, you were the one baited. This entire thread was bait. You fell for it, stupid. lol at your stupid life. Stupid.
"that's really all you could come up with le chic? don't get me wrong, you're really really stupid, but normally you make some kind of sassy remark that trumpets your own perceived superiority. again, just so lazy on your part."
50 posts later, you still can't support your "clearly" charge. stupid. |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 5:59 AM Author: curious underhanded corner pocket flask "No they weren't. I never said what they were. I was knocking down your statement that they were "clearly middle class and educated." You have yet to supply proof of that.
Now you're not 100% sure. You're clearly backpeddling here now that you've been caught flatfooted and obviously wrong."
backpedaling from what? i still say they're CLEARLY middle class and educated. a bunch of people openly agreed with me. their status as educated is 100% confirmed. anything else?
"They weren't clearly hipsters, stupid."
yes, they clearly were, and again multiple people agree with this. it was also, again, even more thoroughly confirmed by the second video.
"There was debate below as to whether they were, stupid."
yes, between me and rowan, and she agreed that they were hipsters. nice one!
"The people in the pews are likely family, stupid."
oh, right, i forgot, family is a very poor indicator of social class and origin. they would be a terrible reference point for someone's background, as would the other people attending their wedding. you really got me there. (note that the previous statement assumes you understand sarcasm, which is somewhat in doubt at the moment).
"No, stupid. This doesn't back up your post. You said "clerly." As in not in doubt. The people in your thread express doubt, stupid."
lulz - they expressed no doubt as to education, and almost universally said 'probably' as to their income level. you know, they'd say that they probably won't get hit by a bus tomorrow as well. they're pretty fucking sure that won't happen, but they can't be certain. your childish insistence that any fraction of doubt is the same as sever doubt is essentially all you have there, and it's a risible argument.
"Dude, you were the one baited. This entire thread was bait. You fell for it, stupid. lol at your stupid life. Stupid."
you really sound "classy" when you go off on these chirping insult laden rants, le chic. the thread was meant to make some point about racism. the only thing it demonstrated was your abject lack of intelligence.
"50 posts later, you still can't support your "clearly" charge. stupid."
lulz, look at how angry you are, 50 posts later. it's supported - it's clear to me and others. the thread demonstrated that. you're arguing due your trademark insanity right now, not any kind of concrete point. i'm happy to keep watching you flame out. |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 2:17 PM Author: fuchsia telephone menage "backpedaling from what? i still say they're CLEARLY middle class and educated. a bunch of people openly agreed with me. their status as educated is 100% confirmed. anything else?"
Nothing in the four corners of the video proved that they were middle class and educated. The people in your thread expressed doubt, when you had none. In a argument where we debating if there should have been doubt, I win. You lose.
"yes, they clearly were, and again multiple people agree with this. it was also, again, even more thoroughly confirmed by the second video."
No they weren't. There was debate about whether they were hipsters below. So that isn't "clear." People don't have debates about clear things. How many times have people discussed if Micheal Jordan was black?
"oh, right, i forgot, family is a very poor indicator of social class and origin. they would be a terrible reference point for someone's background, as would the other people attending their wedding. you really got me there. (note that the previous statement assumes you understand sarcasm, which is somewhat in doubt at the moment)."
Dude, you said the people in the pews would be a better indicator than the actual people. Actually, it wouldn't. Now you're attacking a straw man. I never said it would be a "terrible reference." You're stupid.
"lulz - they expressed no doubt as to education, and almost universally said 'probably' as to their income level. you know, they'd say that they probably won't get hit by a bus tomorrow as well. they're pretty fucking sure that won't happen, but they can't be certain. your childish insistence that any fraction of doubt is the same as sever doubt is essentially all you have there, and it's a risible argument. "
Probably is doubt you fucking moron!!! You can't turn clearly into probably no matter how hard you try.
"you really sound "classy" when you go off on these chirping insult laden rants, le chic. the thread was meant to make some point about racism. the only thing it demonstrated was your abject lack of intelligence."
Classier than your racist drivel. And it's proving that you're getting pwn3d; that you're stupid; and that even with a punctuation moniker, you keep coming back to get your ass whooping must say you're embarrassed.
"lulz, look at how angry you are, 50 posts later. it's supported - it's clear to me and others. the thread demonstrated that. you're arguing due your trademark insanity right now, not any kind of concrete point. i'm happy to keep watching you flame out."
You're the angry one. I proved my point. And I like to keep hammering it home.
|
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 4:18 AM Author: razzmatazz hunting ground parlour "you somehow get middle class and educated."
The video posted below says they met at college.
http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350446 |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 4:20 AM Author: fuchsia telephone menage yes, I saw that. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350722) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 4:22 AM Author: curious underhanded corner pocket flask clearly, you didn't (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350728) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 4:25 AM Author: fuchsia telephone menage You don't understand logic clearly. There was nothing in that video that dictated they were middle class and educated. Just because they apparently went to college (not sure which and I don't know their income level) that doesn't necessarily mean that there were enough markers to make your claim -- that they were "obviously middle class and educated", right. You were patently wrong. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350741) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 4:27 AM Author: razzmatazz hunting ground parlour "that doesn't necessarily mean"
Why do you hate inductive reasoning? |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 4:33 AM Author: curious underhanded corner pocket flask wait, so i can't judge any social indicators, so that makes me patently wrong? at best doesn't that make me potentially wrong?
le chic, please don't attempt to work with concepts you don't really understand. you're just going to end up conflating yourself all over the place with all the conflated conflations. |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 4:37 AM Author: fuchsia telephone menage Dude, you're stupid. "they're obviously educated and middle class." They were not. You supplied no proof to say what they obviously were based on that 5 minute clip. You had suggestions that led you in one direction. There were suggestions that could have led one in the opposite direction. Again, you were wrong. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350784) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 4:39 AM Author: razzmatazz hunting ground parlour So you're all hot and bothered about the word "obviously"? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350793) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 4:41 AM Author: fuchsia telephone menage I didn't get hot and bothered. I said from the start that he couldn't say they were "obviously" (he actually said "clearly" which is the same thing) based on the video. What I said was truth. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350798) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 4:42 AM Author: razzmatazz hunting ground parlour What a fucking waste of time. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350802) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 4:44 AM Author: fuchsia telephone menage Indeed. He should have admitted that he couldn't substantiate his statement and wanted to correct himself. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350811) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 5:11 AM Author: curious underhanded corner pocket flask my statement was partly substantiated by the video and it's 95% substantiated by observable and demographic evidence.
and guess what - others agree. sorry, you lose: http://autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050523&mc=13&forum_id=2#12350824 |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 5:13 AM Author: fuchsia telephone menage 95%? LMAO just picking random numbers now. You said they were "clearly educated and middle class". The people in that thread express doubt. Probably =/ clearly. And since that is your proof that you were right, and it backs up my position, not yours, I guess you were the one who just lost.
Pwn3d!
|
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 6:04 AM Author: curious underhanded corner pocket flask "95%? LMAO just picking random numbers now"
they're white, college-educated people in suburban minnesota - 95% is probably a conservative guess as to the likelihood of them being middle class.
"You said they were "clearly educated and middle class."
they are.
"The people in that thread express doubt"
leaving room for uncertainty =/= doubt. if i ask a man if the sun will rise tomorrow and he says probably, that doesn't mean he has serious doubts about whether it's going to happen.
"Probably =/ clearly"
functionally, it very much did. it was clear to me, and it was clear to all the people who agreed with me.
"And since that is your proof that you were right"
aside from the direct confirmation that they're college educated, right? you mean no proof beyond that?
"and it backs up my position"
your position is that i can't be 100% certain of anything. this is true. but i can be 100% certain that it is CLEARLY the case that these people are educated and at least middle class.
"I guess you were the one who just lost.
Pwn3d!"
an enraged black woman congratulates herself for an imagined victory on the internet. why? |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 1:59 PM Author: fuchsia telephone menage "they're white, college-educated people in suburban minnesota - 95% is probably a conservative guess as to the likelihood of them being middle class."
95% of whites in minn are not educated. let's not try to move the goal posts.
"they are."
They are not "clearly". You supplied no proof that it was so obvious as to render doubt silly. Your own thread shows that there was doubt.
"functionally, it very much did. it was clear to me, and it was clear to all the people who agreed with me."
No, they didn't. You said clearly. They did not agree with you. How dumb are you?
"aside from the direct confirmation that they're college educated, right? you mean no proof beyond that?"
Again, stupid. You said based off of the video, they were clearly "middle class and educated". You can't use an interview to prove your claims. You can only prove you point using the four corners of the wedding video. How dumb are you? |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 2:23 PM Author: fuchsia telephone menage clear⋅ly  [kleer-lee] Show IPA Use clearly in a Sentence –adverb 1. in a clear manner: It is difficult to explain complex matters clearly. *****2. without equivocation; decidedly: It is clearly out of the question to drop the case. ******
prob⋅a⋅bly  [prob-uh-blee] Show IPA Use probably in a Sentence –adverb ******in all likelihood; very likely: He will probably attend.*****
They don't mean the same thing. lmao |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 2:27 PM Author: thriller henna cruise ship party of the first part You've been concerned with this tangent for about 12 hours. Why? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12352677) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 2:31 PM Author: fuchsia telephone menage This guy is clearly a nut as he cares this much even while using a punctuation moniker. He changes arguments, conflates words, so it's fun prodding him. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12352717) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 4:38 AM Author: fuchsia telephone menage http://autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050523&mc=11&forum_id=2#12350787
Your own thread best supports the position of "probably." Again, you were wrong. HTH |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 8:56 AM Author: Supple Submissive Sneaky Criminal Did they disclose which college? Most of them are shit. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12351120) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 8:54 AM Author: Supple Submissive Sneaky Criminal "Educated" people would at least opt for tuxedos. This was straight prole, through and through. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12351116) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:26 AM Author: bright deranged crackhouse psychic I expected them to be black, not because you called them ghetto poors, but because white folk are joyless and inexpressive. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350402) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:27 AM Author: contagious brethren space hahaha (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350417) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:15 AM Author: curious underhanded corner pocket flask 1. embarrassing when my fellow whites try to dance
2. lol hipsters
3. that chick is the reason brides are supposed to wear a veil. eesh. |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:17 AM Author: Vibrant Naked Gas Station Chad cute face w/ a big ol butt (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350310) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:22 AM Author: painfully honest buff generalized bond i don't see any hipsters dood, are you a science grad from a cornfield college? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350347) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:23 AM Author: comical avocado dysfunction I think it's been firmly established that no one on the board knows what a hipster is. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350361) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:26 AM Author: painfully honest buff generalized bond O I didn't know it was established. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350392) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:26 AM Author: curious underhanded corner pocket flask i can spot a hipster even when its not wearing its uniform. the chicks haircuts, the dude's beards, the ironic yet heartfelt use of hip-hop dance to subvert and amplify a traditional wedding - trust me, they were blasting the national and chugging PBRs at the reception, which they chose to have at the american legion hall purely for kitsch value. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350399) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:28 AM Author: comical avocado dysfunction I seriously doubt hipsters would play Chris Brown at their wedding. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350422) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:30 AM Author: curious underhanded corner pocket flask have you ever met a hipster? they love basking in cliched and goofy r&b and hip-hop. see pitchforkmedia's fetish treatment of dumbasses like lil' wayne for example 101, then go hit a williamsburg dive bar at 3:00 AM and listen to the shit people start dancing to.
or do you think all those chubby bearded white guys from st. paul and their hipster-cutted bridesmaids in the aviators listen to chris brown all the time because that's just their cup of tea, and so they naturally chose him for the wedding?
jesus rowan, you have too many fucking pale ales tonight or what? |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:34 AM Author: comical avocado dysfunction Obviously hipsters like hip hop, but that particular song, which is more pop than anything else?
St. Paul's full of chubby, beared white guys, and has been since well before the hipster thing became popular. And yeah, I got the impression that all of those people like to go out to cheesy clubs and dance to Chris Brown. |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:39 AM Author: curious underhanded corner pocket flask you're being pretty ridiculous - so just to be clear - you think all these people and particularly the bride and groom actually really dig this song song and chose it for reasons having nothing to do with irony and a sense of whimsy?
riiiiiiiiight.
hipsters listen to all kinds of standard 'uncool' music just for kicks and the explicit ironic amusement of it, not just raw hip-hop. honestly, get out of the house more, go see what the young people are up to these days!
and obviously they're not hardcore art district hipsters living twelve to a loft, but they're a fine minnesota iteration of casual people who nejoy many hipsterish things. look at the chick's haircuts if you need some girly point of reference. |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:41 AM Author: comical avocado dysfunction Eh, I was trying to view this in the more favorable light of people who genuinely liked both the song and that kind of dancing, I guess. It's less obnoxious that way. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350531) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:44 AM Author: curious underhanded corner pocket flask that approach never even crossed my mind - second the music started playing and the first dude came out, i knew what the deal was.
IMO, the kind of people that enjoy chris brown in a serious level and would want that shit played at the reception, let alone the ceremony, are the type who would take this shit super seriously and never trample tradition. this is like an earth shattering day for poors and the mothers would be weeping in the aisles if they stepped on jesus's feelings.
trying to turn your wedding into a jokey r&b throw down with a sentimental age stinks of educated, mild, middle class kids trying to throw some irony and fun into it, i.e. hipsterish folks having their way. |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:47 AM Author: comical avocado dysfunction Ok, you're definitely right about these two, but there are indeed people who would play that song (though probably not dance to it) in their wedding ceremony in all seriousness. I was in a wedding about 10 years ago where we all walked down to the Titantic song. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350565) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 1:01 PM Author: Slate Adventurous Associate Clown Clearly these people are theater nerds, not your traditional hipsters. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12351993) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:36 AM Author: comical avocado dysfunction Actually, you're right, now that I see a video of the dude on MSNBC. I like this even less now that it's hipster irony. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350494) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:40 AM Author: curious underhanded corner pocket flask thanks for keeping an open mind dude. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350522) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:41 AM Author: painfully honest buff generalized bond The dude isn't dressed like a hipster. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350527) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:42 AM Author: comical avocado dysfunction That sweater's an odd enough choice that I can buy that these people are whatever the Minnesota version of hipster is. He, at minimum, doesn't look like someone who's actually a Chris Brown fan. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350538) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:45 AM Author: painfully honest buff generalized bond If you see argyle on a dude, that's a fashion laggard. That came and went. The dude is just a straight up nerd, I've known plenty who look and dress like him. The chick is harder to pin down, but that's just because the dress doesn't say a lot. They are obviously both dressed unconventionally though. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350552) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:49 AM Author: Flatulent Dun Laser Beams edit: nm, found it. no way that guy is a nerd. he is a straight-up midwestern hipster. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350577) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 4:00 AM Author: painfully honest buff generalized bond Nah. Another thing: there's no such thing as "midwestern hipster".
Part of the phenomenon is its startling lack of geographical variance. No hipster I know would wear that vest, and especially not that tie with that vest. Further, the style is beyond outre, it's just awful, and not in the ironic sense that many seem to take (improperly in many cases) as the sine qua non of hipsterdom.
The guy and probably the girl are just work hard play hard college nerd types with a propensity for mistaking the gaudy for the inventive. |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 4:04 AM Author: Flatulent Dun Laser Beams You are incorrect. There are MANY midwestern hipsters, and they largely reside in the Twin Cities and Chicago.
Watching more of the video, I had my doubts, but a midwestern hipster would certainly consider wearing this. KEEP IN MIND that this is for a television appearance when said hipster has been called out on his ridiculous wedding ceremony and is probably being paid. Hipsters are barristas and shit. They will do NE THING for money, and then tell jokes about it later while drinking PBR. |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 4:10 AM Author: painfully honest buff generalized bond What you're thinking of is more generally likened to "Stuff White People Like" than hipsters. I've known plenty of people that dress like the above, and would be silly enough to at least have that wedding dance idea cross their minds.
I've been to the Twin Cities and Chicago lately. I've been to the bars in St. Paul and I've been to Wicker Park. They dress like the same people from Williamsburg, West Queen West (Toronto, where I'm from), and the Mile End (Montreal). They ALL dress the same. Even the cuff of the guy's pants gives him away.
Given your second paragraph I'm going to assume you're flame and go to bed. |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 4:13 AM Author: Flatulent Dun Laser Beams uh, isn't stuff white people like = hipster?
Wait, so you are saying they were not hipsters? |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 4:15 AM Author: Flatulent Dun Laser Beams i think you have been editing liberally as you've gone along. i will do the same and head to bed.
most hipsters i know would do all sorts of shit for money and laugh at it later. i do not actually mean that they would do anything; they would go on the today show or whatever, act legit, then laugh their asses off afterward. |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 4:21 AM Author: painfully honest buff generalized bond Anyone with a mote of self-awareness would laugh an appearance on one of those shows for that off afterward.
lol @ editing liberally |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 4:32 AM Author: Flatulent Dun Laser Beams i may very well have not read carefully enough previously, but i saw stuff i missed the first time in any case (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350769) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:40 AM Author: Vibrant Naked Gas Station Chad dude, they're probably midwest hipsters, different from ny hipster. generally less pretentious. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350521) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:41 AM Author: curious underhanded corner pocket flask they are indeed - made this same point just above. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350532) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:48 AM Author: Vibrant Naked Gas Station Chad I think you make interesting points about hipsters.
However, have you considered that sometimes hipsters can genuinely enjoy things that they mock ironically? |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:50 AM Author: Flatulent Dun Laser Beams credited (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350581) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:58 AM Author: curious underhanded corner pocket flask i am sure they do enjoy it on some level - i only made the distinction because rowan didn't understand that there was a strong element of irony to the selection. it's not like they came out doing posed dances and reciting spoken word poetry andrew bird - they tried to recreate some hip-hop dance steps to a teen-pop/R&B club song. i'm sure they've blasted it at 4:00 and wasted off their asses many a night, and nothing wrong with that. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350625) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 4:00 AM Author: comical avocado dysfunction Yeah, and I concede that you're right. I assumed the other way because I've seen lots of slightly-trashy white people weddings where cheesy pop was played during the ceremony without any irony intended. Though in retrospect, these folks all look a little older than the people I'm thinking of, which I should have picked up on. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350633) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:46 AM Author: Flatulent Dun Laser Beams holy shit, i did not even realize. this is hipsterdom gone OUT OF CONTROL (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350556) |
|
Date: July 29th, 2009 1:22 PM Author: Ivory Deer Antler Therapy American Legion? Eh. VFW at 29th and Lyndale in Uptown MPLS ftw. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12376407) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:16 AM Author: painfully honest buff generalized bond I thought this was going to be brutal, it was in a way, but it made me smile. I can't be cynical about this. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350308) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:19 AM Author: Stirring native ty (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350328) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:20 AM Author: painfully honest buff generalized bond np now would u like to double my pleasure/fun (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350335) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:22 AM Author: out-of-control lake tanning salon you would have a totally different opinion if they were black. do you find that odd? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350348) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:23 AM Author: painfully honest buff generalized bond no, because it would be typical (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350355) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:28 AM Author: out-of-control lake tanning salon ray cyst (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350427) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:30 AM Author: concupiscible dopamine public bath Here's the video of the couple on the Today Show:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/07/24/amazing-wedding-ceremony_n_244241.html (halfway down)
The seem like really cool people. And she's considerably more attractive than she appeared in the wedding video.
|
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:30 AM Author: impertinent maroon station ITT: faggot ghetto poors defending the actions of faggot ghetto poors (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350450) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:37 AM Author: hairless beady-eyed elastic band church cr
Also ITT: Arrogant Asperger's patients who don't "get" the social purpose of tradition mock it for "not being rational" and because they "don't care what grandma thinks because she's not paying"/"my grandma is cool and wouldn't care anyway" as they think they are awesome for posting EDGY shit about how much Jesus sucks and how organized religion is all a total crock.
Meanwhile, at the next wedding they attend IRL, they will be the ostracized and awkward wallflowers relegated to the very edge of the dancefloor, where they will spend the night looking down and shifting uncomfortably from foot to foot as they pathetically try to 'dance' offbeat next to a large and unattractive girl who will not be paying attention to them at all before going home (sober) early and spending the rest of the night posting scathing indictments of "niggers" on XOXO. Fucking rebellious man! |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:41 AM Author: impertinent maroon station fuck you, why you have to h8? these people are EDGY N WITTY. THEY ARE DANCING TO CHRIS BROWN ON THEIR WEDDING. WHO WOULD HAVE THOUGHT OF THAT?
Plus, they're wearing shitstain suits. Wouldn't have thought of that either. |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:41 AM Author: frozen red field volcanic crater how can we utterly disagree on one point then agree on another (this one.) I am confused, challenged and unsurprisingly, stimulated. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350529) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:41 AM Author: ocher shitlib whorehouse fwiw, the two non-traditional weddings i've been to have been for very posh couples. one on a beach, one in manhattan with a quirky dress code. and i'm talking about the ceremony not the reception. not that these people in the video aren't white trash. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350530) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:46 AM Author: hairless beady-eyed elastic band church While this may be true and while I would never say that there is no place in this world for non-traditional weddings, somehow I doubt that all the people busy posting "lol fuck grandma and jesus i do what i want" ITT are just super cool cutting edge posh hipster suburbanites. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350558) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:49 AM Author: razzmatazz hunting ground parlour WTF is wrong with your grandmother? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350574) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:56 AM Author: ocher shitlib whorehouse yeah and people arguing the other way don't strike me as old guard high society types either. the way i see it, this couple's wedding would have been tacky regardless. at least this way they get their 15 min and the 6m youtube hits. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350618) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:45 AM Author: razzmatazz hunting ground parlour ITT: A joyless Asian feels oppressed by the weight of centuries of deeply ingrained collectivism and Confucian filial piety and attempts to massage away the cognitive dissonance by denying that others might not be so burdened.
Moron.
|
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:46 AM Author: impertinent maroon station sorry about your ttt faggot poor family. enjoy dancing down the isle with your ugly fat fuck spouse in your shitstain suits. you should dance to "find me in the club" (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350555) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:49 AM Author: lime bateful library ladyboy titcr only white trash would defend this wedding so vehemently |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:51 AM Author: razzmatazz hunting ground parlour I see you've marshalled your sock puppet army.
|
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:53 AM Author: hairless beady-eyed elastic band church Date: July 26th, 2009 3:50 AM Author: . . ... .. . .. . . . .. . . .. .... . . . ..
I'm sorry your grandmother is a dumb whore
---
I see you have as well |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:55 AM Author: lime bateful library ladyboy lol, only one person thinks this wedding was tacky, that's it. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350613) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:50 AM Author: Bearded Kitchen Juggernaut I'm sorry your grandmother is a dumb whore (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350589) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:50 AM Author: hairless beady-eyed elastic band church lol u r cool man, you should talk about my tiny yellow penis next
(im not asian...but you are trash) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:39 AM Author: Cordovan forum Weddings should be joyous, but that doesn't mean they should be farcical. It's a serious occasion as well as a joyous one. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350516) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:42 AM Author: frozen red field volcanic crater (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350535) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:43 AM Author: Cordovan forum yes, the ceremony itself shouldn't be a joke (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350542) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:45 AM Author: comical avocado dysfunction I kind of agree with that. If you're not actually religious, I think the better way to handle it is just to have a very, very brief ceremony and then get to the reception, where there's a lot more room for creativity. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350550) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:50 AM Author: razzmatazz hunting ground parlour Why is that "better"?
It's as though you think you have some sort of unjustified monopoly on the nature of the tradition. |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:51 AM Author: comical avocado dysfunction Just my personal aesthetic preference. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350592) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:52 AM Author: razzmatazz hunting ground parlour How wonderful. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350598) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:44 AM Author: impertinent maroon station very credited. good post (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350547) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:47 AM Author: razzmatazz hunting ground parlour I like how you naively think the nature of a wedding is akin to an immutable law of nature. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350566) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:52 AM Author: hairless beady-eyed elastic band church Where did he say that
Jesus Christ you're dumb |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 12:21 PM Author: Cordovan forum if don't think getting married is serious, that's fine, but you'd probably be better off not getting married (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12351713) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:45 AM Author: impertinent maroon station By the way, fuck you op, I posted this two days ago and didn't get a single response.
http://www.xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=1049146&mc=2&forum_id=2 |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:47 AM Author: Bearded Kitchen Juggernaut I'd much sooner hang out with one of these so called midwest hipsters than some of you faggots bashing them ITT. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350561) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:48 AM Author: impertinent maroon station of course, nobody doubts that. we all know you're a fucking pathetic TTT poor from a midwest shithole. why wouldn't you hang out with them? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350568) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:50 AM Author: curious underhanded corner pocket flask i wasn't even bashing, i think it's alright, i was just asserting that they are in fact hipsters and not a bunch of poors actually trying to tear it up, which the retard who made the OP doesn't understand. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350584) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:58 AM Author: hairless beady-eyed elastic band church You would also much sooner stay home and post on an anonymous internet messageboard than go hang out with real people in the real world on a mid-Summer Saturday night, so somehow I don't think this is a huge loss for anyone. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350622) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 4:00 AM Author: Flirting iridescent son of senegal rigpig FATALITY
FWIW, This can be applied to everyone ITT except for me cause I just got home and I'md runk as fuck |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:48 AM Author: frozen red field volcanic crater the bride looks jewish and the priest was a woman. I doubt this is a catholic deal. On second thought, maybe it was one of those "open-minded" weddings. Cool. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350573) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:52 AM Author: impertinent maroon station OMMFG SO OPEN MINDED AND EDGY.
Honestly, I don't give a fuck about tradition, respect for grandparents, and all that. I just think the execution is pathetic and trashy. Sure, it's their wedding, they can do whatever the fuck they want. Doesn't mean it's not fucking pathetic and trashy. |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:50 AM Author: milky black woman stage This was ADORABLE (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350590) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:54 AM Author: impertinent maroon station FACT: no matter what you think about the idea, the execution just looks fucking trashy. The idea is cute, "open-minded", whatever the fuck, sure. But it just comes out looking stupid and trashy. I call it when I see it.
They don't give a fuck what I think, and I don't give a fuck what they think either. If they post this shit on fucking youtube I have a right to bash the fuck out of it. |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:56 AM Author: razzmatazz hunting ground parlour Take your irrelevant rights-talk back to 9th grade where it belongs. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350617) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 4:04 AM Author: impertinent maroon station Take your fucking dumbass back to LSD you fucking dumbshit nigger 0L (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350656) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 4:07 AM Author: razzmatazz hunting ground parlour That cut pretty deep. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350671) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:59 AM Author: razzmatazz hunting ground parlour ITT: People incapable of being happy resent the happiness of others. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350628) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 4:00 AM Author: Bearded Kitchen Juggernaut /thread (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350634) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 4:01 AM Author: impertinent maroon station ITT: Ghetto faggot poors DESPERATELY defending their ghetto faggot poor antics. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350640) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 4:04 AM Author: ocher shitlib whorehouse what does ghetto poor have to do with it? how would having shitty rental tuxes and walking out to bridal march have made them any more wealthy? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350655) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 4:06 AM Author: impertinent maroon station no, it has mainly to do with the entirely execution. it's fucking trashy pathetic antics that can only come from ghetto poors.
sorry about your family background. i'm sure you'll do fine in life though |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 4:10 AM Author: ocher shitlib whorehouse you seem excessively fixated on status. it's not healthy. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350686) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 4:13 AM Author: razzmatazz hunting ground parlour If your sole purpose in life is to ascend an imagined social prestige ladder, you must attempt to precisely locate yourself at all times so as to avoid any missteps. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350693) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 4:06 AM Author: Flirting iridescent son of senegal rigpig poor does not necessarily imply ghetto
you can be a poor striver, or a ghetto poor
these are the latter
lol im drunk |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 4:04 AM Author: lime bateful library ladyboy i'm glad they're happy, enjoyed their wedding and wish them well but i still think the wedding was trashy. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350654) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 4:05 AM Author: impertinent maroon station exactly. it is trashy. I don't know why the white trash on this board can't accept it. or maybe I do (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350659) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 4:07 AM Author: razzmatazz hunting ground parlour "it is trashy."
So what? |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 4:08 AM Author: impertinent maroon station So I can call it trashy. What do you mean so what? What the fuck do you post on XOXO for? You're fucking moron.
*States retarded opinion*
*When other people state theirs, ask "so what"*
Fucking dumbshit retard. Just shut the fuck up and eat your mom's nigger cunt
|
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 4:06 AM Author: razzmatazz hunting ground parlour Assuming it was trashy, so what? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350662) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 4:07 AM Author: impertinent maroon station So I can call it trashy. What do you mean so what? What the fuck do you post on XOXO for? You're fucking moron.
*States retarded opinion* *When other people state theirs, ask "so what"*
Fucking dumbshit retard. Just shut the fuck up and eat your mom's nigger cunt |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 4:08 AM Author: razzmatazz hunting ground parlour Your opinion is noted.
Your purpose in posting is fulfilled.
|
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 4:09 AM Author: impertinent maroon station ty
now i'm out |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 4:03 AM Author: bright deranged crackhouse psychic I'm pleased with any thread that gets to "your grandmother is a whore" in under 250 posts. Well done, everyone. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350649) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 4:20 AM Author: Garnet rigor I found it amusing, not sure why it could possibly stir up negative feelings in anyone. Anyway, it linked to this video which is trashier, more cliched but has a much hotter bride with nice cleavage dancing to "Baby Got Back". YWIA
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vqiw-Kqtlr0 |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 4:21 AM Author: razzmatazz hunting ground parlour "not sure why it could possibly stir up negative feelings in anyone"
See http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350628
|
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 4:24 AM Author: useless spectacular box office corn cake some of my friends do this shit at their receptions too. i think it's a waste of time. sometimes i have to sit / stand there and watch them perform for 10 minutes to show off. for what? why can't we just move on, at least to the speeches or something?
unless the song "baby got back" has special meaning to their relationship or to their friends, the whole performance bothers me because it's just showy for no reason.
that's why i hate weddings sometimes. the striver tendencies tend to all come out. |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 4:26 AM Author: razzmatazz hunting ground parlour What *wouldn't* you hate? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350746) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 4:28 AM Author: useless spectacular box office corn cake ?
just a normal first dance. I don't get the purpose of spending months choreographing a dance to show off at your reception.
Suppose your friends tell you "hey, my bf and I chreographed a dance to the song "baby got back". We're performing tonight. Want to come?" I'd go, but I'd think it's pointlessly showy.
That doesn't change just because they insert it at the reception.
If you're not going to discuss and are just going to pick fights, i'm not interested. |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 4:31 AM Author: razzmatazz hunting ground parlour Do you "get" the purpose of a typical first dance?
I'll tell you what I don't get. I don't get what the purpose of your criticism is. Is it to enlighten us? Is it to reduce the number of weddings and receptions you don't like? What is it? |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 4:37 AM Author: useless spectacular box office corn cake actually, I also don't get the purpose of your criticism of mine. Is it to enlighten me? is it to reduce the number of opinions you don't like? which one is it? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350786) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 4:38 AM Author: razzle-dazzle faggotry nice (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350789) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 4:38 AM Author: razzmatazz hunting ground parlour I'll tell you: It's to get you to lighten up and make the world a very slightly better place. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350790) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 4:41 AM Author: useless spectacular box office corn cake so you think the world would be a very slightly better place if I am more tolerant of other people's different viewpoints (e.g., thinking that doing a 10 minute performance dance at your wedding reception is acceptable), right?
have you ever considered that you can start by being more tolerant of my viewpoints, rather than forcing me to be tolerant of those of others?
I say one thing that I don't like about other people, and you immediately jumped in to change my viewpoint. how pathetically hypocritical. |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 4:43 AM Author: razzle-dazzle faggotry twice. nice. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350805) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 4:50 AM Author: razzmatazz hunting ground parlour http://www.coldforged.org/images/Spikechester1.jpg
You're the little one. |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 4:48 AM Author: razzmatazz hunting ground parlour I'm not forcing anything. And I'm not motivated by tolerance. I'm motivated by a general preference for liberty and a disdain for those who would undermine it with misguided social pressure.
Moreover, were they relevant, your allegations of hypocrisy would be impotent. Nothing I've claimed rests upon my character or actions. |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 4:50 AM Author: useless spectacular box office corn cake Funny, are you the same person who posted this?
"Date: July 26th, 2009 3:56 AM Author: Jesse Sitzpinkler
Take your irrelevant rights-talk back to 9th grade where it belongs.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350617)" |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 4:50 AM Author: impertinent maroon station lol (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350835) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 4:56 AM Author: razzmatazz hunting ground parlour You have a strange sense of humor. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350862) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 4:51 AM Author: razzmatazz hunting ground parlour That's perfectly consistent. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350838) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 4:55 AM Author: useless spectacular box office corn cake it has nothing to do with "social norms". I just don't like it when people needlessly show off.
if someone comes up to me and say "hey, check out my new montblac pen. Nice huh?" I'd think it is needlessly showy.
I think the same way about people who choreograph a 10-minute dance to "baby got back" and then perform at their wedding.
I don't know why it is so objectionable that I judge people whom I think are needlessly showy. |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 5:00 AM Author: razzmatazz hunting ground parlour You think the pen comment is an attempt to lower your relative position in the social hierarchy.
You think the "showy" dance is an attempt to lower your relative position in the social hierarchy.
[edit - I suppose your mere prediction of that effect would work even if it isn't a conscious attempt.]
I was absolutely correct here http://www.xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350779 |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 5:03 AM Author: useless spectacular box office corn cake this makes no sense at all. it is people who needlessly show off what they have / can do, for no particular reason. i don't feel "threatened". I just don't understand the purpose of the showing off.
your forced argument about "relative position in social hierarchy" is completely off.
this is clearly a waste of time. i regret ever responding to you. continue fighting the good fight and "upsetting the social order".
clearly you feel threatened because you feel that my articulate arguments is an attempt to lower your relative position in the social hierarchy. that would explain why you insist on coming back with more and more absurd arguments just to make you think that you have won. |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 5:06 AM Author: razzmatazz hunting ground parlour So this is all about your confusion? You oppose things you don't understand. Is that it? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350896) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 5:09 AM Author: useless spectacular box office corn cake yfwgi (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350903) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 5:11 AM Author: razzmatazz hunting ground parlour That's an accepted concession on this board. Good night. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350907) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 5:13 AM Author: useless spectacular box office corn cake as is claiming "that counts as you lose. you lost!"
good move |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 2:29 PM Author: thriller henna cruise ship party of the first part He doesn't like being confused. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12352701) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 7:41 AM Author: Abusive french coldplay fan ape "hypocricy"
you seem RULL SMARRRT
lol faggit you got pwned ITT, plz retire tyia |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 4:34 AM Author: Garnet rigor Keep in mind, some people really enjoy dancing. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350776) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 4:28 AM Author: Garnet rigor Yeah, I was just saying she has nice boobs.
Weddings are generally a license for the bride to be a complete narcissist for the weeks and sometimes months leading up to the ceremony. Some people take that license more seriously than others.
However, the bride and groom are "supposed" to do a first dance where everyone else just watches, so I don't think it's fair to come down on them too hard. |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 4:28 AM Author: useless spectacular box office corn cake "Weddings are generally a license for the bride to be a complete narcissist for the weeks and sometimes months leading up to the ceremony."
very credited. |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 4:39 AM Author: Bearded Kitchen Juggernaut If someone invites you to an event with unlimited free booze, fancy steak dinner, and near certain opportunity to get laid with her former roommate whom youll never see again, the least you can do is watch their stupid 10 minute dance.
Of course it's showy. their wedding day is supposed to call attention to themselves. |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 4:42 AM Author: useless spectacular box office corn cake "If someone invites you to an event with unlimited free booze, fancy steak dinner, and near certain opportunity to get laid with her former roommate whom youll never see again, the least you can do is watch their stupid 10 minute dance."
Actually, it is more like poor, chewy steak dinner, and a night that you have to pay $200 for. Maybe you don't give gifts for weddings, but I do. |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 4:49 AM Author: bright deranged crackhouse psychic I watched a few of the related vids. Gags like this only work when the couple is hot and young. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350830) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 4:35 AM Author: razzmatazz hunting ground parlour I think the dour people in this thread are also threatened by the prospect of an upset of the established order. If things change, they think, then they will be pressured to compete in a game of creativity that they won't win. Instead, they'd prefer to stick to the traditional script that is much harder to fuck up.
Their fears are misplaced. They can have a traditional wedding. Few people will think less of them for it. |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 4:45 AM Author: useless spectacular box office corn cake you've made your point. i doubt anyone here cares because it is a poor attempt at dressing an insult in the form of an explanation.
now feel free to resort to insulting me |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 4:48 AM Author: lime bateful library ladyboy titcr (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350826) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 5:06 AM Author: Exhilarant antidepressant drug In a way, I feel bad for Le Chic. She clearly felt that she could make biting articulation about the irrational nature of racism and hold it to the collective nose of XO.
Instead, as per her usual, she came off looking like a psychotic race-obsessed moron who spends her later Saturday evening hopelessly megaposting.
|
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 5:41 AM Author: Cracking ruddy sex offender how about WHY THE FUCK DO YOU FUCKING DOUCHEBAGS FUCKING CARE???????????????/ (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350983) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 5:44 AM Author: useless spectacular box office corn cake why do you care why douchebags care or not care about? drawn to your kind? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350988) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 5:45 AM Author: Cracking ruddy sex offender yep exactly (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12350991) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 7:43 AM Author: Abusive french coldplay fan ape Well one things for certain
This thread is full of fail |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 10:35 AM Author: embarrassed to the bone meetinghouse I can't even hate on this.
Weddings are fun. Let these folk have fun
This is more appropriate for introducing folks at a reception, but if they want to do it at the wedding ceremony, fine, let them. I wouldn't do this, but if they want to, fair. |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 12:30 PM Author: Cordovan forum the question isnt whether to 'let' them do this, it's whether or not it's trashy, farcical, inappropriate, etc
the point of the thread is to give your opinion, not to rule on whether further such weddings should be allowed |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 12:37 PM Author: embarrassed to the bone meetinghouse The wedding party makes the rules for their own wedding. Therefore, it can't be "inappropriate." I don't think it's trashy. A trashy wedding would be one with no dress code, people drinking during the wedding ceremony, a pregnant wife with five kids already, etc.
Look, I wouldn't do this because I think it's incredibly cheesy, but that's the only crime here IMO. |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 12:49 PM Author: Cordovan forum there are also the expectations of the guests (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12351887) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 11:22 AM Author: impertinent maroon station (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12351410) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 11:29 AM Author: chartreuse fortuitous meteor I'm having a very prestigious wedding (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12351445) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 12:42 PM Author: Cordovan forum http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ate_Gy36Vyk (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12351828) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 12:32 PM Author: wine boltzmann I wouldn't mind going to weddings if people did shit like this. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12351761) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 12:33 PM Author: Navy demanding locus place of business this may have started an ugly trend. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12351769) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 12:40 PM Author: wine boltzmann why?
i don't think weddings should be serious and solemn. they should be fun...everyone in that video looked like they were having fun to me. I would definitely have been pleased if I went to a wedding expecting the pachebel canon and got Chris Brown instead.
now i guess it'll be kind of sad if a slew of people try to recreate the fun and fail. |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 12:43 PM Author: Navy demanding locus place of business I think the video is great and pretty original. However, there will be mostly subpar copycats. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12351836) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 12:51 PM Author: Cordovan forum a wedding is a serious occasion right? dont you think getting married is serious?
The problem with this video is that it's a symptom of not taking marriage seriously enough in this country |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 1:02 PM Author: wine boltzmann There's a difference between approaching a wedding seriously and approaching a marriage seriously, dipshit.
Serious weddings are revolting. I have no idea where people get off thinking that their marriage to one another is such a big fucking deal to the rest of us that they have to throw tons of money and fancy shit into it.
In the off chance I ever get married, it will be in a courthouse or drive thru. |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 1:10 PM Author: lemon mind-boggling lodge background story why are you such a pathetic insufferable faggot? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12352057) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 1:16 PM Author: Navy demanding locus place of business she is correct. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12352103) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 2:23 PM Author: thriller henna cruise ship party of the first part I agree. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12352633) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 2:13 PM Author: diverse crimson cuck Your bashing J as being pathetic and insufferable for NOT complaining about the wedding. I just want to illuminate that for everyone. |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 1:26 PM Author: Cordovan forum a wedding doesn't have to be fancy to be serious
but it shouldn't be a joke either
Getting married by a judge is fine |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 1:29 PM Author: Navy demanding locus place of business having a good time doesn't make it a joke (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12352225) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 1:35 PM Author: Vibrant Naked Gas Station Chad titcr (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12352265) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 1:08 PM Author: Slate Adventurous Associate Clown These people will not be getting divorced, unlike the 50% of people who have "serious" weddings. If you can't see that from the video you are retarded. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12352044) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 1:27 PM Author: Cordovan forum statement makes an unjustified assumption of a causal relationship (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12352208) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 2:25 PM Author: thriller henna cruise ship party of the first part You likely improperly inferred a claim of causation. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12352658) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 2:10 PM Author: diverse crimson cuck Serious doesn't mean solemn you stupid redneck. You can take a vow with a smile on your face. I would actually argue people like you who are so caught up in pomp and circumstance of the wedding are the ones devoting less thought to the marriage itself. |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 2:22 PM Author: thriller henna cruise ship party of the first part A wedding is whatever type of occassion they want it to be. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12352620) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 2:48 PM Author: Vibrant Naked Gas Station Chad for real. the nerve of these people trying to make it JOYOUS! (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12352892) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 1:05 PM Author: provocative chest-beating step-uncle's house there's nothing wrong with this wedding other than the titless bitches (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12352021) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 1:08 PM Author: Navy demanding locus place of business 180 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12352037) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 1:38 PM Author: Onyx alcoholic pit I envy the divorce attorney who gets this case. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12352276) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 2:16 PM Author: cerebral khaki knife dragon enjoyable....i was especially impressed by the short, thick guy who popped into the handstand with relative ease (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12352538) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 2:25 PM Author: motley gold electric furnace what so special about this? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12352659) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 2:28 PM Author: thriller henna cruise ship party of the first part Nothing to see here, sir. Move along. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12352689) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 2:29 PM Author: Vibrant Naked Gas Station Chad just people enjoying life, dooder (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12352704) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 4:08 PM Author: motley gold electric furnace i appreciate that but why is this getting so much pub? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12353430) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 2:33 PM Author: Swashbuckling yapping shrine lettuce You've got to be a pretty big asshole to get all worked up over someone else's harmless fun. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12352740) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 2:33 PM Author: chartreuse fortuitous meteor the reception is the time for all the fun stuff
ceremony should be solemn (except when I laugh during the glass-breaking part) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 2:36 PM Author: Swashbuckling yapping shrine lettuce Sorry about your tiny pink confines of tradition. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12352784) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 2:40 PM Author: Vibrant Naked Gas Station Chad enjoy your solemn life (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12352831) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 2:45 PM Author: chartreuse fortuitous meteor I think it would be more fun if they just fucked in front of everybody the first time (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12352874) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 2:47 PM Author: Vibrant Naked Gas Station Chad too many kids, but I like the way you think (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12352888) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 2:51 PM Author: Swashbuckling yapping shrine lettuce Is that what you're planning for your marriage to your Old Man Nursing Home? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12352912) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 2:52 PM Author: chartreuse fortuitous meteor don't I wish (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12352916) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:46 PM Author: tan spot Whoever says that they "hate" it is probably being ridiculous unless they're just a traditionalist or something.
But whoever says that it was "touching" for those trolls to make some piss poor efforts at "dancing" to an utterly forgettable Top 50 pop song is a fucking classless mouth breather and should be killed.
|
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 4:00 PM Author: wine boltzmann Forever is catchy as shit. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12353398) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:48 PM Author: cocaine farts teh autism is strong ITT (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12353332) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:50 PM Author: Big hairy legs cumskin (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12353342) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 3:59 PM Author: Balding Electric Ticket Booth Candlestick Maker ITT, a bunch of joyless lawyers (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12353395) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2009 4:15 PM Author: Wonderful silver hospital as soon as the board is done and i don't have a reason to procrastinate anymore i'm done.
this place is full of sociopaths |
|
Date: July 28th, 2009 10:34 PM Author: marvelous degenerate Hi! I am the most cynical unforgiving fuck, (qualification: who has slept with a woman or two) on this board, and even I thought this was pretty happy. So the rest of you really need to fucking think about some adjustments.
tyia. |
|
Date: July 28th, 2009 10:42 PM Author: Supple Submissive Sneaky Criminal So I hear the groom is a soon-to-be 1L. Chances he finds this site and sees this thread? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12372648) |
|
Date: July 28th, 2009 10:57 PM Author: flesh fragrant striped hyena university 1. i came ITT expecting blacks.
1a. fyi, le chic, if blacks had pulled off a dance routine that hit the spot between classy/fun like this one did, nobody would have been racist. well, not many people would have been.
2. bride looks much hotter on the today show.
3. the video was awesomely fun to watch. fuck you joyless, cynical fucks.
4. most of them were pretty good dancers |
|
Date: July 28th, 2009 11:30 PM Author: Cyan infuriating market reading party Good dancers? You obviously haven't seen how we xo'ers get down. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12373149) |
|
Date: July 29th, 2009 12:11 PM Author: Aromatic azure center internal respiration ahh so this is the video that's all the talk on xo. sure, it's KINDA *lower middle class* to act this way, but honestly these people seem young, fun, & they don't take themselves seriously like the rest of you xo autists. who says a wedding has to be bland & devoid of any personality? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12375885) |
|
Date: July 29th, 2009 12:17 PM Author: Vibrant Naked Gas Station Chad Joyless xoxo faggots who will end up drinking themselves to death. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12375917) |
|
Date: July 29th, 2009 12:18 PM Author: Aromatic azure center internal respiration i hope the OP will be single AND a virgin for the rest of his life. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12375924) |
|
Date: July 29th, 2009 12:20 PM Author: grizzly bawdyhouse ratface fuck you this shit was idiotic (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12375933) |
|
Date: July 29th, 2009 1:18 PM Author: chartreuse fortuitous meteor 1.) You can personalize so much about the ceremony already 2.) you can do your dancing at the reception |
|
Date: July 29th, 2009 1:29 PM Author: histrionic unhinged stag film 1.) So the fuck what? Does that preclude personalizing it in some other way?
2.) You can dance at a disco, you can dance in a bar, you can dance in the fucking hallways if you want to. . .What does any of that have to do with whether or not you can dance at your wedding ceremony.
IT'S THEIR FUCKING WEDDING - HOW THEY CHOOSE TO HONOR THAT IS UP TO THEM
|
|
Date: July 29th, 2009 1:04 PM Author: appetizing pisswyrm My thoughts:
1)Playing Chris Brown at a wedding these days is kinda tacky, considering.
2)Why not just save this for the reception?
Whatever though. |
|
Date: July 29th, 2009 1:08 PM Author: Ultramarine trailer park I thought it was fine until I saw the bride dance down the aisle.
(1) She has small saggy titties
(2) She knew she'd be doing a dance that would make them bounce
(3) She wore a dress with flimsy silk over her bosom
YET
(4) she didn't wear a bra
W...T...F... |
|
Date: July 29th, 2009 1:31 PM Author: razzle point PROTIP: Your thoughts and feelings don't matter.
For the record, it's a good memory for them and they, and the audience, including the seniors, all look to be having fun. What the fuck is your problem? |
|
Date: August 17th, 2009 3:58 PM Author: Brilliant set (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12525401) |
|
Date: August 17th, 2009 4:20 PM Author: Vibrant Naked Gas Station Chad I think this thing has around 20 million views (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12525512) |
|
Date: August 17th, 2009 4:23 PM Author: Fiercely-loyal Cuckold fack the hate, this is awesome. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12525525) |
|
Date: August 17th, 2009 4:24 PM Author: Soul-stirring chapel ceo Concur. First time I've seen this shit. You find a girl who is cool enough to have that be her wedding entrance = you found a girl who can chill. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12525538) |
|
Date: August 17th, 2009 4:26 PM Author: Fiercely-loyal Cuckold plus the fact you need chill FRIENDS in order to pull this off successfully. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12525552) |
|
Date: August 17th, 2009 4:50 PM Author: Vibrant Naked Gas Station Chad indeed. problem is that a lot of XOXOers don't enjoy life, so they expect the same attitude from everyone. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12525759) |
|
Date: August 17th, 2009 5:00 PM Author: Pink selfie i think it's funny to watch people act like idiots
|
|
Date: August 17th, 2009 5:05 PM Author: chartreuse fortuitous meteor same (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12525827) |
|
Date: August 17th, 2009 5:04 PM Author: glittery roast beef tattoo That was awesome. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12525823) |
|
Date: August 17th, 2009 5:09 PM Author: umber address messiness Lol at all the fats and gingers. When their kids ask them about their wedding they can proudly boast that they had a modern-day minstrel show. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12525848) |
|
Date: August 17th, 2009 5:22 PM Author: magenta vigorous principal's office After a few viewings, I have come around to the "this is joyful, fuck the haters" side. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12525943) |
|
Date: August 17th, 2009 5:45 PM Author: passionate hyperactive gaming laptop church building 1. That is not even close to a Catholic Church
2. Trashy Wedding "Ceremony" (must Pop Culture invade every space of our lives. I also don't want to hear your stupid music blaring while I am fishing/ camping.
3. That dood looks 100% hipster on Today Show interview |
|
Date: August 17th, 2009 5:52 PM Author: Vibrant Naked Gas Station Chad The nerve of some people who actually view weddings as joyous celebrations. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12526151) |
|
Date: October 8th, 2009 10:18 PM Author: concupiscible dopamine public bath The Office bump (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12941202) |
|
Date: October 9th, 2009 4:18 PM Author: Brilliant set (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#12947759) |
|
Date: July 21st, 2010 7:48 PM Author: curious underhanded corner pocket flask lol, i never noticed that le chic came back to this thread like 10 hours later to 'pwn' me some more
|
|
Date: February 14th, 2011 2:30 PM Author: Jade odious cuckoldry lol why did tbf get so mad itt (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#17283483) |
|
Date: February 14th, 2011 2:32 PM Author: vivacious impressive national security agency xoxo is full of aspies who hatefully clutch at shadows of the happiness that proles enjoy in daily life. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#17283500) |
|
Date: October 7th, 2011 10:13 PM Author: canary factory reset button senate (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1050490&forum_id=2#19123859) |