The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
ITT: list the top 4 heroic female xoxo posters
Poast new message in this thread
Date: February 1st, 2010 2:10 PM Author: Supple shrine chad (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#13981107) |
Date: February 1st, 2010 2:11 PM Author: pungent old irish cottage CAC Clarissa world wary terrain |
 |
Date: February 1st, 2010 2:20 PM Author: Supple shrine chad I don't even recognize the last two, but infrequent xoxo posting is probably a good proxy for female heroism. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#13981170) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2010 2:24 PM Author: pungent old irish cottage they both are older chicks with good jobs (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#13981203) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2010 3:26 PM Author: Supple shrine chad OCWGJ OCWGJ OCWGJ (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#13981801) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2010 7:02 PM Author: racy ape haunted graveyard Wow, tyft, I think. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#13983952) |
|
Date: February 18th, 2010 4:57 PM Author: Cocky Mahogany Son Of Senegal (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#14162674) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2010 2:21 PM Author: razzmatazz national cuckoldry tbtp (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#13981171) |
|
Date: July 14th, 2010 10:50 PM Author: Splenetic Ticket Booth Dysfunction LOL (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#15509780) |
|
Date: July 15th, 2010 1:54 PM Author: Stirring disgusting church building antidepressant drug lol (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#15514253) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2011 3:21 PM Author: Bateful submissive lodge volcanic crater l0l (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#17190373) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2010 2:23 PM Author: frisky brilliant home SYA (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#13981190) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2010 2:54 PM Author: chocolate beta ceo hunting ground (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#13981456) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2010 2:31 PM Author: concupiscible drab messiness location CAC, Rowan, five alive, small titted landbeast, twist (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#13981243) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2010 2:34 PM Author: Spectacular field mad cow disease Stop this slandering immediately. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#13981259) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2010 2:36 PM Author: concupiscible drab messiness location you feel you are non-heroic? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#13981271) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2010 2:36 PM Author: Spectacular field mad cow disease No. Just being lulzy. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#13981277) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2010 2:41 PM Author: concupiscible drab messiness location ok well save it for another thread. we are discussing serious matters ITT.
hth. |
|
Date: February 1st, 2010 2:47 PM Author: Spectacular field mad cow disease Aw, sorry man. You know me, still same ol' G. Heroic as ever.
(Minus the religious stuff.)
(And not from a prestigious family.)
(And not educated from a prestigious university.) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2010 2:34 PM Author: Supple shrine chad flame
also, twist was a female poster? |
|
Date: February 1st, 2010 2:36 PM Author: concupiscible drab messiness location twist has been known to be sexually ambiguous. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#13981273) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2010 2:38 PM Author: disturbing hyperventilating coffee pot Twist is the hottest fucking chick on this intertweets, hth. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#13981287) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2011 3:28 PM Author: Red lascivious native cr (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#17190450) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2011 3:30 PM Author: Supple shrine chad (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#17190465) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2011 3:33 PM Author: soggy kitchen (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#17190491) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2010 2:38 PM Author: Lake Area I reject the concept of female heroism as sexist, and worse, pensivish. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#13981291) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2010 2:40 PM Author: concupiscible drab messiness location so do i, but i do recognize that it exists as a concept, and you, my friend seem pretty heroic. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#13981298) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2010 2:42 PM Author: Lake Area Thank you, then. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#13981317) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2010 2:42 PM Author: alcoholic institution hooking up with male xo BV's for NSA sex seems pretty heroic (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#13981320) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2010 2:43 PM Author: concupiscible drab messiness location what's a BV? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#13981328) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2010 2:41 PM Author: Supple shrine chad bloodacre's list looks like it was intended to subvert the common xoxo understanding of heroism, so you should be pleased (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#13981312) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2010 2:42 PM Author: Lake Area Yes, I take it as a compliment. I am only skeptical of whether the idea can be rehabilitated or whether it should perhaps be retired instead. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#13981316) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2010 2:47 PM Author: Supple shrine chad lol, that comes off as officious
anyway, in what way do you see pensive's concept of heroism sexist? i thought it applied to both genders. |
|
Date: February 1st, 2010 2:51 PM Author: Lake Area Although pensive does seem to hold himself to the same standards, he's only ever used the term to describe women. Moreover, he theoretically judges women's heroism not only by their sexual conduct, but by the quality of the men they're involved with. This does not appear to extend to men, as pensive has dated several women who he acknowledges were unheroic and poor choices, but that does not seem to taint his vision of himself as a good dating partner.
The way his standards are applied in practice are also troubling. The actual examples he's chosen tend to be female celebrities whose presence he admires and women he's met IRL who have responded favorably to him. In many cases, he knows little about the woman in question and nothing of her sexual history. A heroic woman is, in short, a woman who likes pensive or who reminds pensive of other women who have liked him in the past. Making such far reaching character judgments based on individual sexual chemistry strikes me as vaguely sexist, though it's primarily egotistical, of course. |
|
Date: February 1st, 2010 2:54 PM Author: Supple shrine chad few would disagree that pensive is a hypocrite. and I don't think that he could really qualify as heroic after his Carleton episodes. but I don't see either of those facts undermining the heroism concept. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#13981445) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2010 2:56 PM Author: Lake Area I don't think pensive's blind spot about himself is mere hypocrisy. I think that his idea of heroism is primarily a way of judging and rating women, with a few token gestures made towards including men. His heroism trolling has even seeped into political converastions, with his odd example of Michelle Obama as a heroic woman. Have you ever seen him do the same with Barack, or with any other man in public life? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#13981485) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2010 2:59 PM Author: Supple shrine chad But he uses heroism primarily to judge and rate women because he is more interested in heroic women than heroic men because he is presumably seeking a heroic woman. And anyway, pensive's attempts to apply the concept can be separated from his (and the rest of the board's) theoretical musings on the concept. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#13981521) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2010 3:03 PM Author: Lake Area That could account for a disproportionate interest in heroic women. I have never, ever seen him refer to a man as heroic, however, while he regularly talks about female heroism when discussing celebrities and other women he will never meet. I submit that no such thing as a heroic man exists.
I don't think it exists as an independent concept. A heroic woman is essentially a woman who likes pensive or who pensive thinks would like him, nothing more. The board itself values women with little sexual experience and the capacity to be loyal and loving, of course, but the definition there is too different for me to relate the two ideas. |
|
Date: February 1st, 2010 3:14 PM Author: Supple shrine chad I know that pensive has referred to heroic men in the abstract (and characteristics of heroic men). Insofar as a man has those characteristics, a heroic man would exist, yes?
Even if you limited your source text to pensive you would find a conceptual construction of the heroic woman that could be applied independent of pensive's thoughts and experiences (e.g., a woman who pursues casual sex is not heroic, regardless of what pensive might feel about her). Moreover, in board usage the term "heroic" usually refers to the abstract ideal as first articulated by pensive, not to pensive's preferences. Your attempt to leverage some sort of etymological prescriptivism to destroy the term looks more like more of an Orwellian play to mold thought through language than an objective engagement of board parlance. But that's a big part of critical theory projects such as feminism, right? |
|
Date: February 1st, 2010 3:31 PM Author: Lake Area Yet somehow we've never seen one mentioned, even in his political trolling, and somehow no one else here ever applies the term to men.
I don't think that posters here have an idea of it beyond pensive's personal sexual obsessions, although he seems to claim the concept is larger without ever elaborating on it.
In any case, others may of course continue to use the term and/or subscribe to the ideas behind it. I reject its use in relation to me, as I think it's the product of sexist thought on the part of someone who I believe is mentally disturbed. |
|
Date: February 1st, 2010 3:47 PM Author: Supple shrine chad "I don't think that posters here have an idea of it beyond pensive's personal sexual obsessions"
So disingenuous. You were the one to tacitly acknowledge (what you perceive to be) the board-wide definition of "heroic": "The board itself values women with little sexual experience and the capacity to be loyal and loving, of course."
Although I would define it somewhat differently, that's the basic concept invoked when poasters use the term. Virtually no one uses it to mean "would pensive like this woman?" (besides pensive, of course, who may do so unwittingly).
"others may ... subscribe to the ideas behind it"
Here you acknowledge that the term in xoxo parlance has a conceptual foundation; it is more than a test of whether pensive likes a woman. But you have not acknowledged that you acknowledge it, which is awkward, because you have also denied it.
"I reject its use in relation to me, as I think it's the product of sexist thought on the part of someone who I believe is mentally disturbed."
That's an entirely different question. Maybe you don't want a term applied to you because you don't like something that the person who coined the term thinks, but it's dishonest to misdefine the term in an attempt to defeat it. |
|
Date: February 1st, 2010 4:02 PM Author: Lake Area I think you're ignoring the extent to which the term relates to pensive's obsession with black women and foreign women. The board has other ways it describes chaste women that aren't similarly loaded.
Besides, if the idea of heroism does have independent meaning on the board, it's even more clearly sexist, since no one other than pensive has even acknowledged the existence of heroic men.
I don't like it because it's sexist, because I don't like being wrapped up in another poster's sexual fetishes (and I don't think it's sufficiently distinct from pensive to avoid that), and because I generally dislike judging people as worthy or unworthy in a binary way (I also dislike "broken"). |
|
Date: February 1st, 2010 4:19 PM Author: Supple shrine chad "I think you're ignoring the extent to which the term relates to pensive's obsession with black women and foreign women"
The term "heroic" preexisted pensive's turn to dwelling on black/foreign women, and already had a meaning independent of pensive by then. No one thinks that the term has a specific relation to black/foreign women--unless maybe pensive is involved.
"The board has other ways it describes chaste women that aren't similarly loaded."
Any term used to described "chaste" women--including "chaste" itself--is loaded. The nice thing about "heroic" is that it provides a modern counterpoint to "slut," etc.
"it's even more clearly sexist, since no one other than pensive has even acknowledged the existence of heroic men"
I reject the idea that a term can be sexist. Perhaps the use of a term can be sexist, but who is at fault for that? Perhaps the women of xoxo should be faulted for not using the term enough to describe heroic men. Anyway, the bare term "sexist" without further explanation means almost nothing. Since men and women are different in some ways, everything is sexist from one perspective or another: either because it doesn't acknowledge the differences or because it does.
"I don't like being wrapped up in another poster's sexual fetishes (and I don't think it's sufficiently distinct from pensive to avoid that)"
Again, it has currency beyond pensive. The distaste you feel because pensive coined the term has no bearing on the term itself outside your personal sphere.
"I generally dislike judging people as worthy or unworthy in a binary way"
This is also a dishonest reason to misdefine a term. But anyway, there's room in the conceptual space of "heroic" for a sliding scale--"more heroic" or "less heroic"--just as someone can be taller or shorter but we still may refer to him as "tall" if he passes a certain threshold. |
|
Date: February 1st, 2010 4:38 PM Author: Lake Area It's a set of standards for how women can behave, and that can be sexist. I reject the claim that men and women are different in this particular way, and am not generally fond of traits defining women into categories based on their sexual behavior.
It's still deeply tied to an individual's particular sexual tastes and fantasies. However reaching you claim it is, it's basically pensive's term, which is used by a handful of other people as well.
No one here has used it as a sliding scale, least of all pensive. Above, you even admitted that a woman who has had casual sex once does not qualify as heroic. |
|
Date: February 1st, 2010 4:49 PM Author: Supple shrine chad "and that can be sexist"
As I said above, everything is sexist in the sense it will either treat the sexes differently or fail to account for their differences. To limit sexism, you must claim that something is also harmful (or more harmful than good) which is ultimately going to be a cultural value judgment. So you might as well articulate the particular value judgment rather than using the smokescreen of "sexism."
"I reject the claim that men and women are different in this particular way."
You're wrong; men applying the term to women but not vice versa shows different aggregate preferences regarding heroism in the opposite sex.
"it's basically pensive's term"
This is an empty assertion after our foregoing discussion. He coined the term but you provided a pensive-independent definition for it. If a term that can be defined without reference to pensive is "basically pensive's term" because he coined it, and if a term being "basically pensive's" means that "it's...deeply tied to [his] particular sexual tastes and fantasies," then you may be onto something. Otherwise, you're at a dead end here.
"No one here has used it as a sliding scale, least of all pensive."
Wrong. Here's an example from pensive himself: http://www.xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=1058634&forum_id=#12454202
"Above, you even admitted that a woman who has had casual sex once does not qualify as heroic."
Wrong. I said "a woman who pursues casual sex is not heroic," not "a woman who has had casual sex once is not heroic." |
|
Date: February 1st, 2010 4:58 PM Author: Lake Area No, something is not sexist if it properly treats people the same in areas where they are the same, and differently in areas where they are different. This means there will always be discussion of whether things are sexist, but not that the label is useless. I think it's fairly obvious that I think that men's and women's sexual behavior should be treated equally and that a wide range of behavior should be accepted, but can articulate it if you wish.
Not all preferences are equally morally acceptable. I believe men and women are much the same in their sexual behavior and sex drive, and that preferences are the result of ideas about controlling women from periods where they were viewed as chattel and when access to birth control was limited. Your beliefs may differ.
Note that his only exception is a man, himself. Do you have a link where he applies it to the primary target of the judgment?
What about a woman who has pursued casual sex once? What if she is currently pursuing it, then marries and is faithful to her husband? Do you think the fact that the originator of the theory would roundly condemn both women is irrelevant? |
|
Date: February 1st, 2010 5:18 PM Author: Supple shrine chad "properly"
That's the rub. Whatever cultural values underlie "properly" are what's really at stake.
"but not that the label is useless"
Only because "sexism" communicates the domain of concern that you're talking about. It is next to useless as an analytical tool from that point on.
"I believe men and women are much the same in their sexual behavior"
"Not all preferences are equally morally acceptable. I believe men and women are much the same in their sexual behavior"
A tacit acknowledgement that preferences differ between the sexes immediately followed by a claim that their respective behavior is "much the same." But the behavior is different. A preference for a heroic partner will translate into the behavior of seeking a heroic partner.
"preferences are the result of ideas about controlling women from periods where they were viewed as chattel and when access to birth control was limited"
This doesn't explain why women have any sexual preferences regarding their partner's sexual attitudes, activities, preferences, or histories.
"Note that his only exception is a man, himself. Do you have a link where he applies it to the primary target of the judgment?"
LOL. You went from "no one, least of all pensive, has never applied it to a man" and "no one has used it as a sliding scale--least of all pensive" to pretending that this proves your point. But I do have a link of pensive applying the sliding scale model to a woman: http://www.xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=1058634&forum_id=#12454202 That's right--the same link! Pensive is comparing his heroism to J.'s heroism on a sliding scale. And J. is the primary target of his judgment in that comment.
"What about a woman who has pursued casual sex once? What if she is currently pursuing it, then marries and is faithful to her husband?"
What if, what if? Heroism is difficult to define so strictly, and different poasters are bound to take different views, including pensive. |
|
Date: February 1st, 2010 5:23 PM Author: Lake Area I'm not talking about mate preferences. Women's participation in casual sex differs little from men's. There's no reason society should support attitudes that reward one gender's participation and condemn another's.
Women's sexual preferences were also formed during those times, when they were compelled to seek out men to protect them. Many of these preferences are also archaic and unfair, and we should work towards discarding them.
What I'm asking for is a case where you have labeled a woman as medium heroic, not differentiations where a woman is unheroic and you (because you are special) are only slightly unheroic. |
|
Date: February 1st, 2010 5:38 PM Author: Supple shrine chad "There's no reason society should support attitudes"
This isn't about enforcing societal norms. People are interested in heroism to find a good individual match. But, as you mention below, you want to re-engineer their individual preferences.
"Women's sexual preferences were also formed during those times, when they were compelled to seek out men to protect them. Many of these preferences are also archaic and unfair, and we should work towards discarding them."
You want to revert sexual preferences to what--a certain time period? A "natural" state? The genders' sexual preferences have developed through both culture and evolution. You could engineer people's sexual preferences to create your shitty utopia, but you can't revert them to some Garden of Eden state.
"labeled a woman as medium heroic"
LOL. |
|
Date: February 1st, 2010 5:43 PM Author: Supple shrine chad By the way, here's a link of some poaster evaluating a woman with a sliding scale of heroism: http://www.xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=1189426&forum_id=2#13798029 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#13983121) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2010 5:01 PM Author: Lake Area Wait, why the fuck do you have a bunch of links to that freak's posts? If this is pensive, I think the conversation is over. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#13982668) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2010 5:20 PM Author: Supple shrine chad Wait, why the fuck have you never heard of Google? And why the fuck didn't you think to search before claiming that "nobody, least of all pensive" had ever used the term in that way? And why the fuck haven't you admitted that you were wrong? Why the fuck are you, instead, accusing me of being pensive? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#13982876) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2010 5:24 PM Author: Lake Area I have, but I realized that the extensive quotes and writing style are yours when I reflected on the link.
Because I'm looking for a case of medium heroism or one where a woman has had sexual transgressions but not been utterly condemned, not a case where you condemn a woman and then label yourself as slightly less bad. |
|
Date: February 1st, 2010 5:29 PM Author: Supple shrine chad "I have, but I realized that the extensive quotes and writing style are yours when I reflected on the link."
LOL, that's not what happened you dumb fuck. "Wait, why the fuck do you have a bunch of links to that freak's posts? If this is pensive..." implies that the only way I could have found that post is if I had saved the link (which would imply that I'm pensive, because who else would save and remember such a boring pensive link?). Then I point out the obvious (that I googled it) and you, like the disingenuous dumbass that you are, revise history that you *actually* "figured out" that I'm pensive based on "writing style" and "extensive quotes." I'm not pensive, but you could have posted this dumbass trash under any moniker and it would be instantly recognizable as typical dishonest Rowan revisionism. |
|
Date: February 1st, 2010 5:31 PM Author: Lake Area You have an odd access to things that should be hard to find, plus you write just like him, plus you have his tendency to quibble about the inane forever.
Good afternoon. |
|
Date: February 1st, 2010 5:34 PM Author: Supple shrine chad Remember, in Rowan's world:
* the second Google result = "odd access to things that should be hard to find"
* using extensive quotations when dealing with a dumbfuck revisionist illogical poster who can't follow a line of argument gives away a uniquely identifiable writing style
* "quibbling about the inane forever" is something that others do, not Rowan
LOL |
|
Date: February 2nd, 2010 1:07 PM Author: Supple shrine chad Date: February 1st, 2010 5:31 PM Author: Joelle Van Dyne
You have an odd access to things that should be hard to find, plus you write just like him, plus you have his tendency to quibble about the inane forever.
Good afternoon.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#13982988) |
|
Date: February 2nd, 2010 2:29 PM Author: provocative house rowan is dumb. always has been, always will be. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#13991772) |
|
Date: February 2nd, 2010 2:35 PM Author: Bespoke chest-beating station rowan thinks that if she tells a poster to do something, that poster has to do it (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#13991815) |
|
Date: February 2nd, 2010 2:37 PM Author: provocative house *is rowan*
see "stuff." but see "other stuff." accord "things." contra "other things." |
|
Date: July 14th, 2010 10:48 PM Author: seedy headpube background story (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#15509757) |
|
Date: July 14th, 2010 10:49 PM Author: mauve bat-shit-crazy base fanboi (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#15509766) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2010 5:31 PM Author: Supple shrine chad Date: February 1st, 2010 5:01 PM Author: Joelle Van Dyne
Wait, why the fuck do you have a bunch of links to that freak's posts? If this is pensive, I think the conversation is over.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#13982668) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2010 2:42 PM Author: concupiscible drab messiness location don't talk about me like i'm not here, bro. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#13981319) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2010 2:49 PM Author: Supple shrine chad sorry dood, but if i take official notice of subversive elements it may tend to legitimate them (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#13981394) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2010 3:02 PM Author: Hyperactive zombie-like business firm corn cake PENSIVE FLAME REACHES THE MAINSTREAM ... MAD PROPS TO MY DAWG PENSIVE ... KEEPIN THE BIOTCHES DOWN (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#13981554) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2010 3:03 PM Author: stimulating den I am heroic (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#13981571) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2010 3:15 PM Author: pungent old irish cottage asians can't be heroic (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#13981684) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2010 3:18 PM Author: Supple shrine chad lol (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#13981712) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2010 4:25 PM Author: Sienna disrespectful rigor principal's office but they can be magical. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#13982360) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2010 3:14 PM Author: Nighttime Navy Chapel are there four female poasters who DON'T fuck niggers? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#13981678) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2010 3:23 PM Author: Supple shrine chad are there four female posters? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#13981761) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2010 3:27 PM Author: jet-lagged vigorous address wow what's with the anti-bel trolling itt. not that i care but i am arguably the most heroic person here. i've only dated one guy (who's not tall), i'm a virgin, & i've never done anything beyond innocent oral sex. hth (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#13981810) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2010 3:30 PM Author: Supple shrine chad "innocent oral sex"
lol @ the 90s
HEROIC WOMEN DON'T PARTICIPATE IN RAINBOW PARTIES |
|
Date: February 1st, 2010 4:05 PM Author: pungent old irish cottage attention whores can't be heroic (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#13982155) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2010 4:26 PM Author: Sienna disrespectful rigor principal's office 4? LOL. tyft. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#13982367) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2010 4:51 PM Author: curious twinkling uncleanness giraffe endless lulz @ thread (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#13982578) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2010 5:39 PM Author: Supple shrine chad prescient (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#13983070) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2010 6:55 PM Author: Supple shrine chad bump this instant classic (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#13983889) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2010 7:19 PM Author: Alcoholic Pontificating Meetinghouse Mood Bottlecap seems heroic from what I read about her poasts.
I'd nominate myself if I wasn't so much of a materialistic, worthless cunt. |
|
Date: February 1st, 2010 7:22 PM Author: Supple shrine chad do you have any other monikers? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#13984188) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2010 7:29 PM Author: disturbing hyperventilating coffee pot Come on, p_c. Don't be ridiculous.
You can't nominate yourself. |
|
Date: February 1st, 2010 7:38 PM Author: Alcoholic Pontificating Meetinghouse Mood I'm only half-joking, although I wonder what Pensive makes of my dating habits (aversion to casual sex) coupled with my overall way of life (shallow, materialistic, urban etc.).
Since his main bugaboo is with casual sex I'm fairly curious as to how I'd stack up using his criteria. |
|
Date: February 1st, 2010 7:21 PM Author: filthy idea he suggested Why aren't I on anyone's list? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#13984169) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2010 7:22 PM Author: curious twinkling uncleanness giraffe i will put you on a list. which list would you like to be on? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#13984187) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2010 7:23 PM Author: Chartreuse national security agency why would pensive, or any other guy, judge men to the same level as women? We date women. we don't care how men behave. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#13984193) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2010 7:28 PM Author: Supple shrine chad Because while we should accept "a wide range of behavior" according to people's sexual preferences, we should identify and re-engineer people's sexual preferences if they result in any statistical differentiation between the sexes in the aggregate because the sexes are "naturally" identical with regards to sexual preferences. (Rowan) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#13984254) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2010 7:29 PM Author: Bespoke chest-beating station Mandy Medea LauraM TexASS |
|
Date: February 1st, 2010 9:29 PM Author: Histrionic umber stage knife h. ryder five alive! clevergirl chicagoadchick / shiveringjenny |
|
Date: February 1st, 2010 9:35 PM Author: Supple shrine chad CAC is shiveringjenny? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#13985604) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2010 9:35 PM Author: Histrionic umber stage knife i meant their tied (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#13985607) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2010 9:36 PM Author: Sienna disrespectful rigor principal's office we always have the same list (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#13985619) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2010 9:37 PM Author: Histrionic umber stage knife when we goin to sweden mang (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#13985631) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2010 9:41 PM Author: Sienna disrespectful rigor principal's office has to be in the summer. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#13985686) |
|
Date: February 2nd, 2010 3:31 AM Author: azure glittery indian lodge pocket flask Mandy x4
|
|
Date: February 2nd, 2010 3:18 PM Author: Supple shrine chad yhaoatttsbhtf (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#13992135) |
|
Date: February 18th, 2010 4:10 PM Author: Supple shrine chad http://www.xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=1226818&forum_id=2 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#14162273) |
|
Date: February 18th, 2010 4:14 PM Author: talking white hospital patrolman Dr. Troy Shivering Jenny Clarissa BlondieLaw Bel Law433
That's 6, but I'm fat so whatever. |
|
Date: February 18th, 2010 4:14 PM Author: Exhilarant Gay Wizard BlondieLaw? yfwgi (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#14162301) |
|
Date: February 18th, 2010 4:15 PM Author: talking white hospital patrolman I like her because she's a fatd00d appreciator. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#14162314) |
|
Date: February 18th, 2010 4:16 PM Author: Exhilarant Gay Wizard she's certainly not heroic (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#14162322) |
|
Date: February 18th, 2010 4:17 PM Author: talking white hospital patrolman What did she do that's not heroic? Giving fatd00ds a chance is pretty HEROIC IMO.
BTW what does the acronym in your initial response mean? |
|
Date: February 18th, 2010 4:17 PM Author: cowardly adventurous wagecucks center it always seems like you're running for office or something (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#14162330) |
|
Date: February 18th, 2010 4:18 PM Author: talking white hospital patrolman What do you mean? Umad that I didn't list you? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#14162337) |
|
Date: February 18th, 2010 4:20 PM Author: cowardly adventurous wagecucks center you're always counting your supporters and lobbying for more
i'm well-known here for being one of the more heroic females, so yeah, i'm a bit offended |
|
Date: February 18th, 2010 4:21 PM Author: talking white hospital patrolman I'm sorry d00dette, I just don't know you at all, and the only exchanges I remember between us have been your snarky remarks toward me. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#14162365) |
|
Date: February 18th, 2010 4:22 PM Author: cowardly adventurous wagecucks center it's cool. was i snarky toward you? i don't remember us interacting, but sorry if i was. sometimes i get in these moods, you know. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#14162373) |
|
Date: February 18th, 2010 4:25 PM Author: talking white hospital patrolman Same here d00dette, nothing personal and I hope to interact with you moar in the future. If you turn out to be as heroic as you claim, I will append my list to include you. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#14162388) |
|
Date: February 18th, 2010 4:26 PM Author: Charismatic Maniacal Faggotry Stead lol (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#14162398) |
|
Date: February 18th, 2010 4:27 PM Author: talking white hospital patrolman I like you as a poaster and person, but the whole chokefucking thing takes you out of the running for heroic poaster. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#14162407) |
|
Date: February 18th, 2010 4:27 PM Author: cowardly adventurous wagecucks center awww ty ;) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#14162402) |
|
Date: February 18th, 2010 4:50 PM Author: Titillating Pink Blood Rage Half-breed TY! (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#14162601) |
|
Date: February 18th, 2010 4:19 PM Author: Charismatic Maniacal Faggotry Stead Bitchasses. I'm sure some of the people you've listed have gone further than oral on first dates. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#14162355) |
|
Date: February 18th, 2010 4:22 PM Author: Supple shrine chad This is for the most heroic female posters. On a board with first date BSDM porn creators, the bar is pretty low. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#14162374) |
|
Date: February 18th, 2010 4:25 PM Author: Charismatic Maniacal Faggotry Stead Right, so I'm unheroic for being naive enough to let someone take a two-minute video of me that could only be considered pornographic under the most lenient definitions? Not following. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#14162384) |
|
Date: February 18th, 2010 4:33 PM Author: Exhilarant Gay Wizard tbtp: BDSM-style "forced-looking" oral sex isn't pornography master idiot woman (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#14162440) |
|
Date: February 18th, 2010 4:33 PM Author: Charismatic Maniacal Faggotry Stead You guys seem to have some incorrect ideas as to what exactly was featured in this video. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#14162443) |
|
Date: February 18th, 2010 4:33 PM Author: Supple shrine chad "that could only be considered pornographic under the most lenient definitions?"
LOL, this characterization makes you even less heroic. |
|
Date: February 18th, 2010 4:34 PM Author: Charismatic Maniacal Faggotry Stead You guys are deluded as fuck.
I may not be in the top four, but I'm sure many of the people listed before me have done much worse than I have, relative to relationship with partner. |
|
Date: February 18th, 2010 4:36 PM Author: Exhilarant Gay Wizard
- when we got to my dorm room, told me that i had a choice: either i could give myself to him completely or he'd leave. he wouldn't let me kiss him as i stalled, asking if he'd respect that i don't want to lose my virginity.
- eventually promised that he wouldn't fuck me yet (beta?) and asked if i wanted to suck his dick. wrapped his belt around my neck and choked me as i... yeah you don't need details. there are marks on my neck from the buckle lol. also spit on me periodically, which got eye makeup in one of my eyes and made it all red and irritated. i didn't think he noticed but he later said that it was hot.
- took a video of me leaning back to choke myself, with eyeliner streaming down my face from when i cried from gagging.
- came in my mouth/on my face.
- makes me call him "daddy".
- says i'm "JAPpy and annoying". BUT he promised that he liked me as a person. i was like, "you just like me b/c i'm young and submissive. would you hang out with me if i were a guy?" and he laughed and said "no, that'd be weird" and i said "okay how about if i were a lesbian?" and he said "yeah, i would. i'd text you. i don't have friends."
- his "number" is 34. he had chlamydia at one point and thinks he has HPV.
- says he never uses a condom and that he's really good at pulling out. i was like "WTF HAVE YOU HEARD OF PRECUM?" and he was all, "that's not worth worrying about."
****NOT HEROIC***** |
|
Date: February 18th, 2010 4:38 PM Author: Charismatic Maniacal Faggotry Stead Right--there was nothing pornographic (nudity/sexual-interaction-wise) in the video. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#14162482) |
|
Date: February 18th, 2010 4:37 PM Author: Lake Area This is why this heroic stuff is garbage. Why do you care? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#14162480) |
|
Date: February 18th, 2010 4:40 PM Author: Supple shrine chad LOL! A concept is worthless if people ever disagree when applying it! (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#14162502) |
|
Date: February 18th, 2010 4:42 PM Author: Charismatic Maniacal Faggotry Stead It's kind of annoying that people are implicitly (and explicitly) calling me slutty.
Compare me to most girls in my peer group. Let's look at my friends, who are normal, bright, nice girls. They hook up with strangers at frat parties regularly; for example, at the party at which I got drunk and ended up at the ER, one of them made out hardcore with 2-3 guys on the dance floor, then slept in the last one's room (not sure if they had sex). Another not only made out with some guy on the dance floor, but let him pull down her shirt and suck on her tits. In a corner, sure, but out in the open. These girls engage in these activities regularly.
In addition, I'm one of few virgins in my group of close female friends (and one is a lesbian, so she doesn't count). |
|
Date: February 18th, 2010 4:44 PM Author: Supple shrine chad "They hook up with strangers at frat parties regularly; for example, at the party at which I got drunk and ended up at the ER, one of them made out hardcore with 2-3 guys on the dance floor, then slept in the last one's room (not sure if they had sex). Another not only made out with some guy on the dance floor, but let him pill down her shirt and suck on her tits. In a corner, sure, but out in the open."
Not heroic. |
|
Date: February 18th, 2010 4:44 PM Author: Charismatic Maniacal Faggotry Stead Right, but I think this is representative of the average female college freshman's experience. Correct me if I'm wrong! (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#14162537) |
|
Date: February 18th, 2010 4:48 PM Author: Supple shrine chad In your circle, clearly. There are some serious discontinuities, though.
It's plausible that the median female college freshman is unheroic. Not sure why that matters, though. Being at the median is often not a good sign. |
|
Date: February 18th, 2010 4:49 PM Author: Charismatic Maniacal Faggotry Stead Fair. If the median is slutty, then MAYBE I'm slutty. I consider the term relative, and I clearly define it differently from you. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#14162592) |
|
Date: February 18th, 2010 4:52 PM Author: Supple shrine chad Heroism is a higher standard than non-sluttiness anyway. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#14162629) |
|
Date: February 18th, 2010 4:53 PM Author: Charismatic Maniacal Faggotry Stead I don't know if I've made this clear, but I'm not just talking about this thread, here. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#14162633) |
|
Date: February 18th, 2010 4:59 PM Author: Supple shrine chad oh okay (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#14162689) |
|
Date: February 18th, 2010 4:57 PM Author: Lake Area Again, maybe it's not worth caring so much what this relatively disturbed, unhappy group of people thinks of you. Comparing yourself to your friends is healthier, and so would seeking out their good opinion instead of that of people here. And if your friends aren't behaving to your standards, you may even want to cultivate additional ones who are virgins. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#14162664) |
|
Date: February 18th, 2010 5:00 PM Author: Charismatic Maniacal Faggotry Stead Fair, ty. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#14162723) |
|
Date: February 18th, 2010 5:07 PM Author: Supple shrine chad LOL, Rowan. Crying about the subtle linguistic implications that a term coined to express some people's preferences might have by virtue of failing to include you in highest admiration at one moment, broadly calling those who disagree with you a "disturbed, unhappy group of people" at another. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#14162795) |
|
Date: February 18th, 2010 5:10 PM Author: Lake Area That refers to my FRIENDS as well. The board as a whole is not the healthiest or happiest place. Anyone with even a little perspective can see that. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#14162831) |
|
Date: February 18th, 2010 5:15 PM Author: Supple shrine chad You gotta speak for yourself. The board itself may not be especially healthy (particularly for some people), but I for one am a very happy dood. I suspect many others are as well.
I think the people who take the board more seriously and treat it like IRL are more likely to be unhappy. I would probably killself if I came here taking it at all seriously. |
|
Date: February 18th, 2010 4:42 PM Author: Supple shrine chad Why should she care whether you care whether she cares? Heroism is one way of looking at the world. Unless you insist that she embrace the nihilism that she is always on the edge of, you're really adding nothing here. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#14162520) |
|
Date: February 18th, 2010 4:37 PM Author: Supple shrine chad Heroism isn't necessarily about what you've done; it is more about aspects of your character that lead you to do one thing or another. Your "relationship" with Lucky, and the circumstances surrounding it, sends a pretty strong signal. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#14162481) |
|
Date: February 18th, 2010 4:45 PM Author: Charismatic Maniacal Faggotry Stead Whatever.
Anyone who feels the need to be so judgmental of others' decisions is probably pretty insecure him- or herself, so I guess I don't really care. |
|
Date: February 18th, 2010 4:47 PM Author: Exhilarant Gay Wizard i dont care i will just argue about it on xoxohth because i need validation tee hee (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#14162568) |
|
Date: February 18th, 2010 4:47 PM Author: Charismatic Maniacal Faggotry Stead Profound and insightful! You're a great poster! (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#14162576) |
|
Date: February 18th, 2010 4:48 PM Author: Charismatic Maniacal Faggotry Stead Also, you sort of self-pwned here, because you are "argu[ing] about it on xoxohth", too. So I guess you either care or need validation! ;) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#14162584) |
|
Date: February 18th, 2010 4:50 PM Author: Exhilarant Gay Wizard i'm not poasting away trying to prove i don't care. you are. htfh. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#14162598) |
|
Date: February 18th, 2010 4:50 PM Author: Supple shrine chad I just like discussing this stuff. I'm open minded although I have a pretty strong opinion on these matters.
Also, you sort of self-pwned here. So I guess you are probably pretty insecure of yourself! ;) |
|
Date: February 18th, 2010 4:52 PM Author: Charismatic Maniacal Faggotry Stead EXPLAIN where/how I'm being judgmental of others.
And yeah, I'm obviously pretty insecure; congrats on realizing this! |
|
Date: February 18th, 2010 4:54 PM Author: Supple shrine chad You were judging me (or others?) as "insecure" because I like talking about this stuff on xoxo. You then reassured yourself that it was okay that I might regard you as unheroic because since I am "insecure" you can dismiss what I say.
Calling you out as insecure was just making a joke about what you said to MPP. |
|
Date: February 18th, 2010 4:58 PM Author: Charismatic Maniacal Faggotry Stead The distinction between that sort of judgment and that to which I was referring should be clear, so I'm not going to bother to address it. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#14162676) |
|
Date: February 18th, 2010 4:59 PM Author: Supple shrine chad The difference is that the judgment you made is more self-serving because you deploy it when you feel attacked rather than in a moment of cool judgment. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#14162702) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2011 3:25 PM Author: Red lascivious native lol @ you're life (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#17190411) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2011 3:28 PM Author: coiffed odious spot water buffalo (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#17190444) |
|
Date: February 18th, 2010 4:36 PM Author: sinister bawdyhouse devotchka, twist, SchooledYourAss, sarcaschick (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#14162473) |
|
Date: February 18th, 2010 4:39 PM Author: bossy cumskin (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#14162501) |
|
Date: April 28th, 2010 12:44 PM Author: fragrant offensive sanctuary (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#14848379) |
|
Date: February 18th, 2010 4:43 PM Author: Aromatic locale black woman i don't know what being heroic is, but i certainly feel like shit for being left out of this list. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#14162526) |
|
Date: February 18th, 2010 4:44 PM Author: Supple shrine chad How do you feel about casual sex? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#14162539) |
|
Date: February 18th, 2010 4:47 PM Author: Exhilarant Gay Wizard you're ruskie rite (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#14162572) |
|
Date: February 18th, 2010 4:58 PM Author: stimulating den i'm heroic but fat. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#14162688) |
|
Date: February 18th, 2010 5:00 PM Author: Exhilarant Gay Wizard rly (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#14162710) |
|
Date: February 18th, 2010 5:16 PM Author: racy ape haunted graveyard I <3 this thread, mostly because I can ctrl f my name (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#14162887) |
|
Date: February 18th, 2010 6:00 PM Author: up-to-no-good balding senate PROTIP: try not to get so much validation from teh internets (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#14163248) |
|
Date: February 18th, 2010 6:02 PM Author: racy ape haunted graveyard But, but, but, where else will I get it? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#14163265) |
|
Date: February 18th, 2010 6:03 PM Author: up-to-no-good balding senate If you're good looking, from IRL. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#14163273) |
|
Date: February 18th, 2010 6:04 PM Author: racy ape haunted graveyard You do realize I was kidding, right?
And, if I'm listed as heroic, maybe I'm not good looking.
Also, I like your moniker. |
|
Date: February 18th, 2010 5:55 PM Author: magenta school generalized bond bel! (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#14163198) |
|
Date: February 18th, 2010 6:03 PM Author: mentally impaired mildly autistic degenerate pensive-approved! (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#14163272) |
|
Date: February 18th, 2010 6:04 PM Author: up-to-no-good balding senate I think bel is the only cr. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#14163288) |
|
Date: February 18th, 2010 6:09 PM Author: magenta school generalized bond yep (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#14163326) |
|
Date: October 1st, 2011 5:13 PM Author: Well-lubricated Fat Ankles lol brother (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#19080607) |
|
Date: February 18th, 2010 6:20 PM Author: Appetizing Outnumbered Rehab how come i'm not on a list? i go out with quality men i dont fuck (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#14163448) |
|
Date: February 18th, 2010 6:22 PM Author: Supple shrine chad What are your attitudes towards love, sex (including casual sex), and relationships? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#14163461) |
|
Date: February 18th, 2010 6:25 PM Author: Appetizing Outnumbered Rehab what do you mean my attitude towards love and relationships? i think they are good things. i think about sex a lot, i dont have casual sex (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#14163478) |
|
Date: February 18th, 2010 6:25 PM Author: light domesticated step-uncle's house bbw cool story bro! (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#14163482) |
|
Date: April 28th, 2010 12:29 PM Author: Supple shrine chad (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#14848268) |
|
Date: April 28th, 2010 12:39 PM Author: Contagious jap property what's the consensus on whether the lisa rowe character is a guy? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#14848330) |
|
Date: April 28th, 2010 12:43 PM Author: Supple shrine chad i dunno (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#14848365) |
|
Date: April 28th, 2010 12:44 PM Author: Contagious jap property have you ever been useful in any way at any point in your life? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#14848382) |
|
Date: April 28th, 2010 1:21 PM Author: Supple shrine chad of course (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#14848698) |
|
Date: April 28th, 2010 12:47 PM Author: ivory arrogant mental disorder Nobody's stupid enough to post the shit she does after being outed, so I think some innocent girly somewhere is now linked to her moniker. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#14848408) |
|
Date: April 28th, 2010 12:49 PM Author: violent electric garrison psychic I think it would only be that black girl who went to MIT. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#14848424) |
|
Date: April 28th, 2010 12:54 PM Author: curious twinkling uncleanness giraffe lulz @ this elaborate flame concept (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#14848463) |
|
Date: July 14th, 2010 10:50 PM Author: diverse theatre scourge upon the earth every time a pensive meme gets some traction a part of my soul dies (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#15509782) |
|
Date: July 14th, 2010 10:53 PM Author: Maize thriller therapy The fact that you losers can't come to grips with the reality that no women post here is pathetic. If this thread goes over 200 posts I'm out. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#15509806) |
|
Date: July 15th, 2010 2:46 PM Author: coiffed odious spot water buffalo 433, CAC, Clarissa, prob. Rina (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#15514778) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2011 3:26 PM Author: Titillating Pink Blood Rage Half-breed 180 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#17190435) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2011 3:27 PM Author: coiffed odious spot water buffalo lol at my rudolphian prediction
i mean look upthread we also called LH and the box heroic |
|
Date: February 1st, 2011 3:20 PM Author: Lemon talented reading party nibblets (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#17190367) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2011 3:44 PM Author: Supple shrine chad ty (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#17190623) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2011 3:22 PM Author: coiffed odious spot water buffalo lol at a lot of this (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#17190387) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2011 3:33 PM Author: deranged dashing gunner organic girlfriend me (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#17190505) |
|
Date: February 6th, 2011 3:15 AM Author: Well-lubricated Fat Ankles cr (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#17222234) |
|
Date: February 6th, 2011 3:16 AM Author: soggy kitchen titcrcr (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#17222238) |
|
Date: February 6th, 2011 3:17 AM Author: Well-lubricated Fat Ankles tbf,
extremely credited co-sign |
|
Date: February 6th, 2011 3:20 AM Author: soggy kitchen man i only co-sign the most credited of statements (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#17222255) |
|
Date: February 6th, 2011 3:20 AM Author: Well-lubricated Fat Ankles 177, brother (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#17222257) |
|
Date: February 6th, 2011 3:18 AM Author: Titillating Pink Blood Rage Half-breed who is love triangle (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#17222248) |
|
Date: February 6th, 2011 3:20 AM Author: soggy kitchen those who have ears to hear will recognize her (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#17222256) |
|
Date: February 6th, 2011 3:21 AM Author: Well-lubricated Fat Ankles 433 mad as fuck (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#17222259) |
|
Date: February 6th, 2011 3:21 AM Author: Titillating Pink Blood Rage Half-breed i spend most of my day irl or with bf. can u just tell me (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#17222261) |
|
Date: February 6th, 2011 3:25 AM Author: soggy kitchen holy fuck 180 neg
girl's got some mad negging skills
|
|
Date: February 6th, 2011 3:26 AM Author: Well-lubricated Fat Ankles doesnt seem that heroic tho (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#17222274) |
|
Date: February 6th, 2011 3:25 AM Author: poppy unholy international law enforcement agency rigpig lol nigga please the only thing i make love to is my hand and you still manage to out-poast me (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#17222273) |
|
Date: February 6th, 2011 3:27 AM Author: soggy kitchen you don't need your hands to make love to another human being man (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#17222277) |
|
Date: February 6th, 2011 3:28 AM Author: Well-lubricated Fat Ankles all you need is one asian man and 50 white girls (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#17222279) |
|
Date: February 6th, 2011 3:28 AM Author: soggy kitchen so so fucking true (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#17222281) |
|
Date: February 6th, 2011 3:29 AM Author: Titillating Pink Blood Rage Half-breed heehee :) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#17222284) |
|
Date: February 7th, 2011 1:57 AM Author: Well-lubricated Fat Ankles lots of bpm trolls tonight (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#17229006) |
|
Date: February 7th, 2011 7:54 AM Author: Bespoke chest-beating station How many of these females still poast here? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#17229505) |