The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Abolish child support, replace it with welfare payments.
| Greedy amber garrison idea he suggested | 05/29/12 |
| Greedy amber garrison idea he suggested | 05/29/12 |
| rebellious snowy pistol sweet tailpipe | 05/29/12 |
| Greedy amber garrison idea he suggested | 05/30/12 |
| salmon mentally impaired windowlicker | 05/30/12 |
| Misanthropic soul-stirring trailer park striped hyena | 05/30/12 |
| Greedy amber garrison idea he suggested | 05/30/12 |
| Misanthropic soul-stirring trailer park striped hyena | 05/30/12 |
| Greedy amber garrison idea he suggested | 05/30/12 |
| Unholy Tank House | 05/30/12 |
| Greedy amber garrison idea he suggested | 05/30/12 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: May 29th, 2012 7:20 AM Author: Greedy amber garrison idea he suggested Make them in-kind so that the child receives the benefit.
It would save a ton of money. |
Date: May 29th, 2012 11:23 AM Author: Greedy amber garrison idea he suggested (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1958951&forum_id=2#20786075) |
|
Date: May 29th, 2012 11:34 AM Author: rebellious snowy pistol sweet tailpipe Can we abolish children too, while we're at it? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1958951&forum_id=2#20786142) |
 |
Date: May 30th, 2012 12:32 AM Author: Greedy amber garrison idea he suggested The abortionists are already on the case. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1958951&forum_id=2#20790791) |
|
Date: May 30th, 2012 12:35 AM Author: salmon mentally impaired windowlicker i'm not a sex haver, so i hate this plan (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1958951&forum_id=2#20790808) |
|
Date: May 30th, 2012 12:36 AM Author: Misanthropic soul-stirring trailer park striped hyena why would anyone be in favor of this?
child support: decide when and if to have kids, only support your kids
welfare payments: contribute to supporting EVERYONE's kids
wtf? |
|
Date: May 30th, 2012 12:39 AM Author: Greedy amber garrison idea he suggested Because you end up paying more in taxes trying to enforce the first one, hth. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1958951&forum_id=2#20790831) |
|
Date: May 30th, 2012 12:41 AM Author: Misanthropic soul-stirring trailer park striped hyena i dunno there is just something satisfying about making people take care of their own children
even if it were more practical i dont think people would want to switch to welfare payments. also there's stigma attached... it's not fair to force women and children to go on welfare just because the marriage ends. |
|
Date: May 30th, 2012 12:49 AM Author: Greedy amber garrison idea he suggested The children get worse care and taxpayers pay more. Your satisfaction looks petty. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1958951&forum_id=2#20790880) |
|
Date: May 30th, 2012 12:40 AM Author: Unholy Tank House file this one under worst idea ever thunked up by a faggot. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1958951&forum_id=2#20790837) |
|
Date: May 30th, 2012 12:49 AM Author: Greedy amber garrison idea he suggested yfwgi (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1958951&forum_id=2#20790885) |