biglaw hours: not really that bad?
| Khaki love of her life french chef | 06/22/05 | | Startled locus newt | 06/22/05 | | Confused Stage Sandwich | 06/22/05 | | Salmon Impertinent Meetinghouse | 06/22/05 | | Confused Stage Sandwich | 06/22/05 | | Salmon Impertinent Meetinghouse | 06/22/05 | | bateful base goal in life | 06/27/06 | | disturbing blue box office juggernaut | 06/22/05 | | kink-friendly alpha site | 06/22/05 | | learning disabled hyperactive temple | 06/27/06 | | exciting weed whacker | 06/22/05 | | Curious nursing home | 06/22/05 | | boyish apoplectic den degenerate | 06/22/05 | | greedy background story school | 06/22/05 | | Confused Stage Sandwich | 06/22/05 | | bateful base goal in life | 06/27/06 | | Coral faggot firefighter | 06/22/05 | | Chocolate office rigor | 06/22/05 | | Primrose church cumskin | 06/22/05 | | Khaki love of her life french chef | 06/22/05 | | yapping sneaky criminal | 06/22/05 | | supple native | 06/22/05 | | bespoke chestnut set personal credit line | 06/22/05 | | disturbing blue box office juggernaut | 06/22/05 | | Mint fortuitous meteor puppy | 06/22/05 | | disturbing blue box office juggernaut | 06/22/05 | | Mint fortuitous meteor puppy | 06/22/05 | | disturbing blue box office juggernaut | 06/22/05 | | Mint fortuitous meteor puppy | 06/22/05 | | supple native | 06/22/05 | | Mint fortuitous meteor puppy | 06/22/05 | | supple native | 06/22/05 | | Mint fortuitous meteor puppy | 06/22/05 | | supple native | 06/22/05 | | Beady-eyed light parlor old irish cottage | 06/22/05 | | bespoke chestnut set personal credit line | 06/22/05 | | Mint fortuitous meteor puppy | 06/22/05 | | Beady-eyed light parlor old irish cottage | 06/22/05 | | Beady-eyed light parlor old irish cottage | 06/22/05 | | Mint fortuitous meteor puppy | 06/22/05 | | Silver laughsome candlestick maker public bath | 06/22/05 | | Mint fortuitous meteor puppy | 06/22/05 | | disturbing blue box office juggernaut | 06/22/05 | | Mint fortuitous meteor puppy | 06/22/05 | | supple native | 06/22/05 | | Mint fortuitous meteor puppy | 06/22/05 | | supple native | 06/23/05 | | nudist orchid home | 06/22/05 | | Mint fortuitous meteor puppy | 06/22/05 | | supple native | 06/23/05 | | Mustard casino | 06/22/05 | | Mint fortuitous meteor puppy | 06/22/05 | | Mint fortuitous meteor puppy | 06/22/05 | | Mint fortuitous meteor puppy | 06/22/05 | | Startled locus newt | 06/22/05 | | Mint fortuitous meteor puppy | 06/22/05 | | Autistic Smoky Chapel Legend | 06/22/05 | | Mint fortuitous meteor puppy | 06/22/05 | | Autistic Smoky Chapel Legend | 06/22/05 | | Mint fortuitous meteor puppy | 06/22/05 | | Autistic Smoky Chapel Legend | 06/22/05 | | Autistic Smoky Chapel Legend | 06/22/05 | | Mint fortuitous meteor puppy | 06/22/05 | | Autistic Smoky Chapel Legend | 06/22/05 | | Silver laughsome candlestick maker public bath | 06/22/05 | | Autistic Smoky Chapel Legend | 06/22/05 | | Silver laughsome candlestick maker public bath | 06/22/05 | | Autistic Smoky Chapel Legend | 06/22/05 | | histrionic mother | 06/22/05 | | Silver laughsome candlestick maker public bath | 06/22/05 | | Khaki love of her life french chef | 06/22/05 | | Silver laughsome candlestick maker public bath | 06/22/05 | | stimulating stage | 06/22/05 | | Khaki love of her life french chef | 06/22/05 | | Mint fortuitous meteor puppy | 06/22/05 | | Autistic Smoky Chapel Legend | 06/22/05 | | Spruce circlehead | 06/22/05 | | Startled locus newt | 06/22/05 | | Spruce circlehead | 06/22/05 | | Mint fortuitous meteor puppy | 06/22/05 | | Spruce circlehead | 06/22/05 | | Startled locus newt | 06/22/05 | | Spruce circlehead | 06/22/05 | | Autistic Smoky Chapel Legend | 06/22/05 | | Spruce circlehead | 06/22/05 | | Autistic Smoky Chapel Legend | 06/22/05 | | Spruce circlehead | 06/22/05 | | Autistic Smoky Chapel Legend | 06/22/05 | | Spruce circlehead | 06/23/05 | | Autistic Smoky Chapel Legend | 06/23/05 | | Mint fortuitous meteor puppy | 06/23/05 | | Spruce circlehead | 06/23/05 | | boyish apoplectic den degenerate | 06/23/05 | | Silver laughsome candlestick maker public bath | 06/23/05 | | Autistic Smoky Chapel Legend | 06/23/05 | | Silver laughsome candlestick maker public bath | 06/23/05 | | boyish apoplectic den degenerate | 06/23/05 | | supple native | 06/23/05 | | boyish apoplectic den degenerate | 06/23/05 | | Crusty drab jew incel | 06/27/06 | | Spruce circlehead | 06/23/05 | | boyish apoplectic den degenerate | 06/23/05 | | Spruce circlehead | 06/23/05 | | boyish apoplectic den degenerate | 06/23/05 | | flatulent slimy milk | 06/23/05 | | Spruce circlehead | 06/23/05 | | Narrow-minded Foreskin Voyeur | 06/23/05 | | Autistic Smoky Chapel Legend | 06/24/05 | | magical stag film famous landscape painting | 06/27/06 | | bateful base goal in life | 06/27/06 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: June 22nd, 2005 3:40 PM Author: Khaki love of her life french chef
Here's something interesting: if you look at infirmation.com's hours charts, most DC/NYC biglaw firms list their hours worked (worked, mind you ... not billed) as less than 2200. If you assume that someone works 48 weeks a year (two weeks vacation plus holidays), then this comes out to a little under 46 hours a week.
Something must be wrong here. Is it that these hours numbers are inaccurate? Or do people just exaggerate the horrors of working in a big firm? It'd be cool if only people with actual biglaw experience responded, but of course, this is probably too much to ask.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=204104&forum_id=2#3082632) |
 |
Date: June 22nd, 2005 3:54 PM Author: disturbing blue box office juggernaut
>Is it that these hours numbers are inaccurate?
Yes.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=204104&forum_id=2#3082748) |
 |
Date: June 27th, 2006 10:44 AM Author: learning disabled hyperactive temple
Those are total lies.
The midlevel associates' survey is more accurate.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=204104&forum_id=2#6082479) |
Date: June 22nd, 2005 3:57 PM Author: exciting weed whacker
Most corporate associates not doing M&A work end up working about 55 hours a week, from what I've gathered.
Litigation works more than general corporate, but M&A is the worst.
Tax works a lot too, but the hours are more stable.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=204104&forum_id=2#3082788) |
Date: June 22nd, 2005 4:10 PM Author: Curious nursing home
just like everyone exaggerates how bad law school is (it wasnt that bad, was it), everyone exaggerates how bad working at a firm is. that being said, those numbers are probably slightly inaccurate for biglaw. everyone says that lawyers work 80 hour weeks and that it is a grind. the truth is that lawyers might work an 80 hour week (or more) every once in a while, and they might work a 35 hour week (or less) every once in a while. I think its more typical to see 50-60 hour weeks that include some days that you work 14 hours and some that you work 6.
also, the view, on this board especially, is skewed by the fact that most people here are interested in the best of the best firms, where associates work the hardest. there are probably tons of firms that bring down the average.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=204104&forum_id=2#3082897) |
 |
Date: June 22nd, 2005 4:28 PM Author: greedy background story school
The guy that interviewed me for NWern worked for a big firm in a medium sized market. I mentioned something about the 9-6 and he snickered, as though its a LOT more than that. He was 35, bald, unmarried, pale, and generally pathetic looking. That image is going to cause me to REALLY research any firm I consider.
It also made me think NWern grads are chumps. Even though it was a tiny sample, you would think they'd send out more enthusiastic people.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=204104&forum_id=2#3083028) |
 |
Date: June 22nd, 2005 6:17 PM Author: Primrose church cumskin
Valen-
Where did you go undergrad?
see you next year
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=204104&forum_id=2#3083865) |
Date: June 22nd, 2005 5:10 PM Author: Khaki love of her life french chef
Wow, these responses have been so much more helpful that I expected.
And that sounds pretty similar to my small law firm experienec. In at 9, out by 6, as a paralegal ... while the lawyers seemed to work about 50-55 hours a week, except the head honcho, who worked nonstop.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=204104&forum_id=2#3083340) |
 |
Date: June 22nd, 2005 11:36 PM Author: supple native
At the firm I work at...
1800 hours = 45 hours per week (incl. lunch)
1900 hours = 45-50 hours per week (incl. lunch)
2000 hours = 50 hours per week (incl. lunch)
At the firm I work at, associates don't get involved in any committees, so most of your non-billable time is lunch, bathroom breaks, and CLE. It may take a bit more to bill that many hours. I think the thing I'm noticing is that your efficiency goes up with the more hours you work. You don't do more CLE or take another lunch just because you are working an extra two hours a day, so almost all of your additional time is billable.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=204104&forum_id=2#3086630) |
 |
Date: June 22nd, 2005 11:52 PM Author: Mint fortuitous meteor puppy
does this firm by chance recruit at cls?
yeh but denver doesn't have nyc/dc col.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=204104&forum_id=2#3086782) |
Date: June 22nd, 2005 6:45 PM Author: Silver laughsome candlestick maker public bath
In doing my research of firms i've found that for figuring out the amount of hours actually worked at a firm NALP is not particularly helpful because firms dont actually post numbers at all or they seem to make up arbitrary 2000 or 1950 or 2200, and since the numbers are always round and seem to be on the low end i cant consider them to be accurate. However i just came across a firm named Curtis, it isnt a Vault100 firm but it is a NYC firm with 180 lawyers and it pays market (125k) and they expect to hire 10 attorney's next year. They list that average hours worked for associates were 2288 and average billables were 1771. I tend to believe these numbers because they arent round. 2288 averaged out over 48 weeks is roughly 48 hours a week which isnt too bad. However it probably means a number of weeks around 55 and some closer to 40. However this kind of firm doesnt seem so bad with the hours. Is this firm atypical and what are the real drawbacks of not going to a vault 100 firm if this one pays market aside from partners not making huge salaries
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=204104&forum_id=2#3084090) |
 |
Date: June 22nd, 2005 10:30 PM Author: Mustard casino
No,they aren't lying.
In my year off i worked for a small primarily patent prosecution boutique, that only had one office of 30 lawyers. Very much a lifestyle firm. 1850 billable hours, starting at 110k + bonus. And to top it all off this was in Greenville, SC, where you can buy a 3000 sq ft house, 10 mins from downtown for 300k. My 900 sq ft, 2 yr old, 1BR apt was only $500/mo.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=204104&forum_id=2#3085987) |
 |
Date: June 22nd, 2005 7:01 PM Author: Startled locus newt
please die.
thx
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=204104&forum_id=2#3084211) |
Date: June 22nd, 2005 7:22 PM Author: Autistic Smoky Chapel Legend
The AMLAW associate survey is going to give you detailed breakdowns of self-reported hours worked and billed for practially every major firm in the country, including those outside of the major markets and VAULT100.
Some feel that the numbers are inaccurate, but I think they are by far the best and most under-publicized resource when youre trying to find out this type of info.
Ive posted this on threads in the past, you might be able to find it by searching past threads. Or google the shit, im just lazy right now.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=204104&forum_id=2#3084417) |
 |
Date: June 22nd, 2005 7:23 PM Author: Mint fortuitous meteor puppy
yeh, the people at davis WORK <50 hours per week.
right......
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=204104&forum_id=2#3084427) |
 |
Date: June 22nd, 2005 7:30 PM Author: Autistic Smoky Chapel Legend
Ok I dont know what youre talking about but:
Davis Polk Wardwell
Hours and Compensation:
· Average hours worked per week: 67.8
· Average hours billed per week: 51.6
· Average salary: $145,667
· Average bonus: $20,100
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=204104&forum_id=2#3084494) |
 |
Date: June 22nd, 2005 7:31 PM Author: Mint fortuitous meteor puppy
link
last i saw davis was reported at <50 worked
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=204104&forum_id=2#3084505) |
 |
Date: June 22nd, 2005 8:11 PM Author: Silver laughsome candlestick maker public bath
Thank you, ill check out Amlaw now
EDIT: Shit it requires a password
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=204104&forum_id=2#3084761) |
 |
Date: June 22nd, 2005 11:37 PM Author: Autistic Smoky Chapel Legend
Dearest CLStroll007,
Do you have a personality? If not, you are good to go. Youll be partner in no time!*
*Parnership track is two tiered and requires approx 2500 billables per year and at least 8 years as an associate. Results may vary.
XOXO,
YOUREANIDIOT, LLP
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=204104&forum_id=2#3086633) |
Date: June 22nd, 2005 11:44 PM Author: Spruce circlehead
I think my firm in NYC is mostly a 10am-12pm MTWTh, maybe out by 7 on Friday with weekends being rare.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=204104&forum_id=2#3086700)
|
 |
Date: June 22nd, 2005 11:49 PM Author: Mint fortuitous meteor puppy
66 hrs in 5 days sounds incredibly TTT
hth
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=204104&forum_id=2#3086748) |
 |
Date: June 22nd, 2005 11:50 PM Author: Spruce circlehead
i know.
i should look into reinterviewing.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=204104&forum_id=2#3086758) |
 |
Date: June 22nd, 2005 11:59 PM Author: Autistic Smoky Chapel Legend
The weekends thing was what I was basing my guess on. I cant imagine that Milbank associates arent getting hit at least every saturday for a small amount of hours (3-6 lets say).
Plus it seemed you wouldnt have a corp dept, bc if you did, the associates would definitely be in on weekends for certain things.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=204104&forum_id=2#3086853) |
 |
Date: June 23rd, 2005 12:13 AM Author: Autistic Smoky Chapel Legend
This question is incredibly vague, but if youre at a good firm, in house opportunities will generally present themselves. 90 percent of your class will not be there after 8 years, and a lot of them are working in corp america as counsels, compliance officers, etc. Salaries can vary widely, and hours, at least in terms of general counsels I know, is pretty close to 9 to 5, with more golfing and the like. You wont be making partner money, but youll be a hundred thousandaire.
One guy i met who I worked wiht last year took a job with Motorola in house (he was a 5th year), and he said he was home by 6 every night, no weekends, and if the firm chatter was accurate he was looking at 150 to 175K.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=204104&forum_id=2#3087016) |
 |
Date: June 23rd, 2005 12:27 AM Author: boyish apoplectic den degenerate
Depends on the company/industry. Corporate/transactional type stuff is probably useful everywhere. Tech/pharma/biotech companies will hire a lot of IP lawyers, something like a tobacco company will probably need more litigation lawyers. Retail chains might have a bigger employment law group. And so forth.
EDIT: Don't decide on a practice area based on this -- find an area you like and are good at first, and then see what opportunities present themselves.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=204104&forum_id=2#3087169) |
Date: June 23rd, 2005 12:42 AM Author: flatulent slimy milk
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=204104&forum_id=2#3087311) |
Date: June 24th, 2005 6:44 PM Author: Autistic Smoky Chapel Legend
I recommend it highly. It can only improve you as a person.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=204104&forum_id=2#3103299) |
|
|