\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

RATE this DLA piper lawyer's suit

http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2013/03/25/suit-offers-a-peek-at...
Fragrant Station Affirmative Action
  03/26/13
That's the business owner that's suing them.
Autistic beady-eyed dilemma travel guidebook
  03/26/13
And his suit is hideous.
embarrassed to the bone degenerate
  06/02/14
i realize this but i wanted people to click on this thread
Fragrant Station Affirmative Action
  03/26/13
Hey man that's not the lawyer its the business owner who's s...
motley double fault
  03/26/13
It says more about your desperate trolling attempts than it ...
crusty shivering puppy
  05/23/13
Almost as bad as his comb-over
concupiscible church building
  05/23/13
dla piper is one the worst firms to do discovery shit with, ...
180 pale crackhouse useless brakes
  05/23/13
The matter was being handled by a seventh year associate who...
exciting turdskin legal warrant
  05/23/13
bro seriously. was there discovery shit in front of the magi...
180 pale crackhouse useless brakes
  05/23/13
What's the alternative, that one of the recipients of the sm...
exciting turdskin legal warrant
  05/23/13
let's say you're an associate sending them email. the receiv...
180 pale crackhouse useless brakes
  05/23/13
Bro I really have no idea what you're talking about here but...
exciting turdskin legal warrant
  05/23/13
you seriously think they would admit to the email's existenc...
180 pale crackhouse useless brakes
  05/23/13
Dude, again, I'm not a lit masterman, but the fucking articl...
exciting turdskin legal warrant
  05/23/13
...
180 pale crackhouse useless brakes
  05/23/13
how come one of the stripes just disappears?!?
Opaque police squad
  05/23/13
on their logo?
180 pale crackhouse useless brakes
  05/23/13
oh, i guess that's where 2 pieces were joined. looks weird a...
Opaque police squad
  05/23/13
want to venture a guess at my question above?
180 pale crackhouse useless brakes
  05/23/13
sorry bro, i don't see what you're talking about
Opaque police squad
  05/23/13
in the article the quotes from assocs about churning hours t...
180 pale crackhouse useless brakes
  05/23/13
bro i thought we were talking about suits. i don't work i...
Opaque police squad
  05/23/13
...
Thriller wild round eye
  06/02/14


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: March 26th, 2013 9:34 PM
Author: Fragrant Station Affirmative Action

http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2013/03/25/suit-offers-a-peek-at-the-practice-of-padding-a-legal-bill/?hp

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2214652&forum_id=2#22886198)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 26th, 2013 9:34 PM
Author: Autistic beady-eyed dilemma travel guidebook

That's the business owner that's suing them.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2214652&forum_id=2#22886208)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 2nd, 2014 7:36 PM
Author: embarrassed to the bone degenerate

And his suit is hideous.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2214652&forum_id=2#25675233)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 26th, 2013 9:36 PM
Author: Fragrant Station Affirmative Action

i realize this but i wanted people to click on this thread

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2214652&forum_id=2#22886217)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 26th, 2013 9:37 PM
Author: motley double fault

Hey man that's not the lawyer its the business owner who's suing DLA.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2214652&forum_id=2#22886230)



Reply Favorite

Date: May 23rd, 2013 4:09 PM
Author: crusty shivering puppy

It says more about your desperate trolling attempts than it ever could about the wearer.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2214652&forum_id=2#23256254)



Reply Favorite

Date: May 23rd, 2013 4:13 PM
Author: concupiscible church building

Almost as bad as his comb-over

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2214652&forum_id=2#23256273)



Reply Favorite

Date: May 23rd, 2013 4:21 PM
Author: 180 pale crackhouse useless brakes

dla piper is one the worst firms to do discovery shit with, epsecially e-discovery. these emails must've been turned over by earl or another disgruntled former assoc right? no fucking way did dla piper turn these over in some rfp "all emails relating to billing plaintiff."

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2214652&forum_id=2#23256324)



Reply Favorite

Date: May 23rd, 2013 4:33 PM
Author: exciting turdskin legal warrant

The matter was being handled by a seventh year associate who probably had a bunch of ther shit going on and decided to mail it in on this matter because it wasn't billable. Whoops.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2214652&forum_id=2#23256414)



Reply Favorite

Date: May 23rd, 2013 4:35 PM
Author: 180 pale crackhouse useless brakes

bro seriously. was there discovery shit in front of the magistrate? i can't imagine they held onto this on their server. you think the other side won a motion to get a forensic comp sci dork in their building to look for emails with certain search terms?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2214652&forum_id=2#23256430)



Reply Favorite

Date: May 23rd, 2013 4:52 PM
Author: exciting turdskin legal warrant

What's the alternative, that one of the recipients of the smoking gun emails emailed them in to the plaintiff? They're all lawyers and they could all seriously fuck themselves for having done so.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2214652&forum_id=2#23256548)



Reply Favorite

Date: May 23rd, 2013 4:53 PM
Author: 180 pale crackhouse useless brakes

let's say you're an associate sending them email. the receiver finds you after the suit is filed and says "bro, i deleted my email, you took it out of your sent file, right?"

what happens?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2214652&forum_id=2#23256558)



Reply Favorite

Date: May 23rd, 2013 5:00 PM
Author: exciting turdskin legal warrant

Bro I really have no idea what you're talking about here but maybe that's because I'm not a litigation masterman. Given the stuff i've read, the most likely explanation to me was that DLA tossed this at an associate on partner track, he mailed it in and decided to do a document dump that ended up fucking him in the ass. And yes, I do think DLA would have had these emails on their server. I know my firm would have. So all it would have taken was a doc request with the relevant attorneys' names and dates. I think that's more plausible than one of the recipients, who presumably no longer works there, knowing about the suit and sending these incriminating emails to the plaintiff.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2214652&forum_id=2#23256622)



Reply Favorite

Date: May 23rd, 2013 5:02 PM
Author: 180 pale crackhouse useless brakes

you seriously think they would admit to the email's existence and not say "RFP 12) attached find 4,651 emails to and from john smith containing the term "widgets 123?"

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2214652&forum_id=2#23256636)



Reply Favorite

Date: May 23rd, 2013 5:05 PM
Author: exciting turdskin legal warrant

Dude, again, I'm not a lit masterman, but the fucking article itself says the emails were included in 250,000 pages of docs turned over by DLA.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2214652&forum_id=2#23256663)



Reply Favorite

Date: May 23rd, 2013 4:26 PM
Author: 180 pale crackhouse useless brakes



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2214652&forum_id=2#23256351)



Reply Favorite

Date: May 23rd, 2013 4:38 PM
Author: Opaque police squad

how come one of the stripes just disappears?!?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2214652&forum_id=2#23256457)



Reply Favorite

Date: May 23rd, 2013 4:41 PM
Author: 180 pale crackhouse useless brakes

on their logo?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2214652&forum_id=2#23256472)



Reply Favorite

Date: May 23rd, 2013 4:44 PM
Author: Opaque police squad

oh, i guess that's where 2 pieces were joined. looks weird as fuck with the wide guido stripes.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2214652&forum_id=2#23256486)



Reply Favorite

Date: May 23rd, 2013 4:45 PM
Author: 180 pale crackhouse useless brakes

want to venture a guess at my question above?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2214652&forum_id=2#23256492)



Reply Favorite

Date: May 23rd, 2013 4:48 PM
Author: Opaque police squad

sorry bro, i don't see what you're talking about

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2214652&forum_id=2#23256515)



Reply Favorite

Date: May 23rd, 2013 4:50 PM
Author: 180 pale crackhouse useless brakes

in the article the quotes from assocs about churning hours the plaintiff is using as evidence.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2214652&forum_id=2#23256528)



Reply Favorite

Date: May 23rd, 2013 4:56 PM
Author: Opaque police squad

bro i thought we were talking about suits.

i don't work in lit so i'm not sure how jewy dla is w/ discovery.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2214652&forum_id=2#23256583)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 2nd, 2014 7:34 PM
Author: Thriller wild round eye



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2214652&forum_id=2#25675228)