The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Newt was right: Palestinians are an INVENTED people
Poast new message in this thread
Date: May 6th, 2013 7:19 PM Author: rusted wagecucks chapel They really didn't exist until about 1916, and even then the notion of a palestinian identity was really only theoretical. The emergence of the concept of "Palestine" was something that only happened concurrently with development the concept of Israel. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2249004&forum_id=2#23146612) |
 |
Date: May 7th, 2013 2:28 PM Author: heady french church building keepsake machete Guess we should just gas Em all? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2249004&forum_id=2#23151265) |
|
Date: May 7th, 2013 2:39 PM Author: rusted wagecucks chapel They seem even more worthless than Chechens. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2249004&forum_id=2#23151332) |
Date: May 6th, 2013 7:21 PM Author: White Plaza Shitlib hint: this is true for every political group (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2249004&forum_id=2#23146621) |
|
Date: May 6th, 2013 7:24 PM Author: galvanic snowy dog poop flame. the concept of the "palestinian people" was invented in the 1960s by arafat, not in 1916 or in concurrence with the state of israel. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2249004&forum_id=2#23146645) |
|
Date: May 6th, 2013 9:47 PM Author: rusted wagecucks chapel I was trying to be as generous as possible to the Palestinian position. But it seems that even if you give them the benefit of the doubt on every single one of their claims they still didn't exist 100 years ago. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2249004&forum_id=2#23147624) |
|
Date: May 6th, 2013 10:06 PM Author: galvanic snowy dog poop i see what you're doing. in any event, palestinians are a flame people. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2249004&forum_id=2#23147830) |
|
Date: May 6th, 2013 7:25 PM Author: Vibrant step-uncle's house Newton was fucking right about most things. Remember Willards smug "I think the speaker probably regrets that" response on this issue. Mitt really thought he was going to be POTUS and was just playing safe. Fucking faggot. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2249004&forum_id=2#23146647) |
|
Date: May 7th, 2013 2:43 PM Author: Passionate messiness yeah he was, but he was wrong about one very important thing he thought he could win with a positive campaign after he took the lead |
|
Date: May 7th, 2013 2:45 PM Author: Vibrant step-uncle's house Titcr (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2249004&forum_id=2#23151358) |
|
Date: May 6th, 2013 10:00 PM Author: Insanely creepy church national security agency The conservatives in Israel are against the two-state solution, so what is their goal, annexation and expelling the arabs, or just maintaining the status quo? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2249004&forum_id=2#23147787) |
|
Date: May 6th, 2013 10:03 PM Author: low-t old irish cottage just maintaining the status quo of subjugation of 2.5 million people in the West Bank, plus a blockade of 1.5 million in Gaza. NO PARTNER FOR PEACE LAH LAH LAH (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2249004&forum_id=2#23147810) |
|
Date: May 6th, 2013 10:10 PM Author: galvanic snowy dog poop who is israel's partner for peace? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2249004&forum_id=2#23147851) |
|
Date: May 6th, 2013 10:14 PM Author: low-t old irish cottage Abbas and Fayyad seemed plenty reasonable, but they were consistently undermined by Netanyahu's flame (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2249004&forum_id=2#23147887) |
|
Date: May 6th, 2013 10:19 PM Author: galvanic snowy dog poop even if they're reasonable, no deal they sign will ever mean jack shit.
hamas is the ruling party in gaza. and fatah doesn't even have a mandate in the west bank; the majority of them prefer hamas to fatah. |
|
Date: May 6th, 2013 10:08 PM Author: galvanic snowy dog poop the mainstream center-right isn't against a 2 state solution. they correctly realize that the PA/hamas/fatah situation is a clusterfuck and there's nobody with whom to negotiate a 2 state solution that can be enforced and have legitimacy. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2249004&forum_id=2#23147839) |
|
Date: May 6th, 2013 10:11 PM Author: Blue Stock Car Why not unilaterally grant a favorably drawn portion of the West Bank independence? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2249004&forum_id=2#23147861) |
|
Date: May 6th, 2013 10:13 PM Author: galvanic snowy dog poop why would you surrender land that's yours w/o having your enemy accept your legitimacy and promise not to kill you? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2249004&forum_id=2#23147879) |
|
Date: May 6th, 2013 10:13 PM Author: Avocado Sweet Tailpipe Because it would become a breeding ground for anti-Israeli terrorism/extremism. Also an easy place for foreign governments to funnel weapons to militants. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2249004&forum_id=2#23147881) |
|
Date: May 6th, 2013 10:14 PM Author: rusted wagecucks chapel Does this independent west bank get to have a military? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2249004&forum_id=2#23147891) |
|
Date: May 6th, 2013 10:12 PM Author: low-t old irish cottage except the center-right's vision of a "two state solution" involves:
-keeping east jerusalem -keeping troops in the jordan valley -the Palestinian state would have no military, defense, etc.
All of which seem like non-starters, especially the first two. Plus they have this weird flame that in order to begin negotiations Abbas has to recognize israel as a "Jewish state" |
|
Date: May 6th, 2013 10:17 PM Author: galvanic snowy dog poop abu mazen's vison of a "two state solution" involves
-muslims controlling the western wall
-mass deportation of hundreds of thousands of jews in yehuda and shomron
-a vulnerable israel that can be attacked from all directions the day after a "peace deal" is signed
-a "right to return" which will ensure that all of israel becomes a muslim state
etc etc. all of these are non-starters. so fuck them. |
|
Date: May 6th, 2013 10:30 PM Author: low-t old irish cottage Bro, there is no doubt Abu Mazen would let the Israelis control the Western Wall in any peace deal. Are you kidding? Your list is flame.
1) See above 2) This is not true. With land swaps, plus buyouts, there would not need to be that many. PLUS: if Jews feel the need to live in their TTT biblical homeland, they would probably be allowed to stay in their shithole PalesTTTine http://www.aspendailynews.com/section/home/135325 3) Bro, Israel is not vulnerable from a conventional attack. This is utter flame. Vulnerable to terror attacks? Yes, but PalesTTTine would have just as much an incentive now to crack down on that. 4) Wrong. There will be token refugees but not demographic altering numbers http://www.timesofisrael.com/abbas-was-willing-to-compromise-on-right-of-return/ |
|
Date: May 6th, 2013 10:32 PM Author: galvanic snowy dog poop this is all fantasy. and it's irrelevant because abu mazen has no mandate to sign a deal that can be enforced. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2249004&forum_id=2#23148067) |
|
Date: May 7th, 2013 2:35 PM Author: mind-boggling stage hominid Yes 100% Jews would be fully comfortable in a Palestinian state hell some Jews live in Palestine NOW and they don't fuck with them AT ALL in fact they're fucking rich. Meanwhile the Jews discriminate against Arabs in Israel don't even lie.
Just FORCE Israel the apartheid state to take in Palestinians NO FUCKING DEMOGRAPHIC THREAT THERE and even so it's like 50 years down the road and by that time it will be just like America Palestinians and Israelis will be voting together and and intermarrying and will love each other and NO DISCRIMINATION it will be a totally colorblind society. |
|
Date: May 7th, 2013 3:21 PM Author: mind-boggling stage hominid See Palestine should be given it's OWN FUCKING MILITARY THEY don't want to be attacked they'd HAVE to protect the Israelis it's in THEIR INTEREST TO PROTECT ISRAEL. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2249004&forum_id=2#23151541) |
|
Date: May 7th, 2013 2:31 PM Author: mind-boggling stage hominid Weird fucking flame countries must all be secular according to UN charter that shit violates international law.
Jerusalem HAS to be the capital of any Palestinian state, bro Palestinians will fight for eternity and beyond but there's 100% no way that Palestinians are ever going to give that shit up Jerusalem has to be divided ala East Berlin.
No Israeli troops in Jordan Valley has to be International UN Peacekeeping troops Israeli troops harass the Palestinians they hate them |
|
Date: May 6th, 2013 10:30 PM Author: Insanely creepy church national security agency The settlements imply there is not going to be a palestinian state, unless the settlers are forced to vacate. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2249004&forum_id=2#23148049) |
|
Date: May 6th, 2013 10:33 PM Author: galvanic snowy dog poop huh? have you looked at a map? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2249004&forum_id=2#23148087) |
|
Date: May 6th, 2013 10:36 PM Author: Translucent pocket flask (rage-filled jew dork) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2249004&forum_id=2#23148127) |
|
Date: May 7th, 2013 12:26 PM Author: galvanic snowy dog poop (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2249004&forum_id=2#23150642) |