We also have the fact that I was foolish enough to give you a thoughtful answer to your trolling question in the other thread. Rather than respond, you made this thread instead. I guess that does make me a bit dumb for taking you seriously, so lesson noted.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3533086&forum_id=2#32673745)

And you're just parroting Trump verbatim now. How was it a disaster for me to say I still read Coates?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3533086&forum_id=2#32673770)

EDIT: to address your edit, your thread itself was a disaster, not just my contribution.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3533086&forum_id=2#32673800)

Feel free to make 4 new threads about this interaction, shitlib.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3533086&forum_id=2#32673834)

But that's not where we are.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3533086&forum_id=2#32673921)

He's also a noted fan of ta-nashi coates' intellect.

I love that my poasting inspires such reactions from these types of people.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3533086&forum_id=2#32673820)

2. Coates is an important writer.

3. I often try to figure out if you're a real person.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3533086&forum_id=2#32673830)

you cant attack everyone here lawman, this isnt that kind of place. we are chill here.

although i do get attacked myself and attack others, but i TRY to be chill -- and im ESPECIALLY careful to be chill with QUALITY posters. although, if its a pumo attacking me, how the fuck do i know what kind of quality it is, so i cant be chill with them.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3533086&forum_id=2#32673840)

This shitlib OP has been making callout threads about me for months if not years. You'll note that I never made one about him, or anyone, because shitlibbery isn't my style.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3533086&forum_id=2#32673858)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3533086&forum_id=2#32673883)

Maybe one day you'll admit "cuck" is a real and accurate term, lol.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3533086&forum_id=2#32673904)

If he's actually 17 that explains so much. He'll probably turn out okay even. I assumed he was like a 30 year man child.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3533086&forum_id=2#32673841)

it doesn't matter

lawman8 lacks intellectual firepower

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3533086&forum_id=2#32673917)

http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3532903&mc=35&forum_id=2#32672391

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3533086&forum_id=2#32673942)

Doubtful, however, since they are fueled by your wishful thinking. We know how that tends to turn out.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3533086&forum_id=2#32674016)

http://www.infowars.com/the-mcveigh-tapes-a-fairy-tale-designed-to-demonize-the-patriot-movement/

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3533086&forum_id=2#32674043)

Don't you have some more poasting to do complaining about being cucked by your wife? Both a political and an actual cuck, LOL.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3533086&forum_id=2#32674056)

He read an article in the Washington Times about how if you assume there are six major moral concerns (a logical fallacy) then only conservatives value all six and libs are most motivated by alleviating the suffering of others. I'm paraphrasing a little, but yada yada yada McVeigh cared about the people the government killed at Waco and since he doesn't love his country yada yada yada attacked the AMERICAN government yada yada yada McVeigh was liberal. Also, he felt sad when he killed an Iraqi.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3533086&forum_id=2#32674053)

He's just a young and inexperienced conturd with a lot more reading left to do but in truth he'd be better off L-I-V-I-N-G, man, so that he can apply some experiences to his political framework.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3533086&forum_id=2#32674082)

It took some time to write out that comment. It took 5 minutes to Google what I knew I was looking for and another 10 to explain it.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3533086&forum_id=2#32674120)

Both of you are held in similar regard.

And your logical error w/r/t my "disappearance" all but confirms a low IQ.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3533086&forum_id=2#32674143)

And I guess that's just one big difference between us in that I know I am not going to win an argument on the internet and I'm not trying to show off for liberal friends on here. The biggest lib poasters on here are awful poasters for the same reason your poasting lacks a certain panache. I'm certainly not going to change your mind about politics by posting anything here or ever and I'm not even trying to do that. The reason I interact with you so often is that I find you fascinating as a human being and so when I ask you simple questions I'm really just trying to kind of understand how your brain works and not trying to cause any kind of panic.

So the tough guy thing you do where you retreat to safe ground is interesting to me and sort of confirms you are insecure about your views and are really young and inexperienced in life.

Also, I like Julia. She's fine.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3533086&forum_id=2#32674199)

Like all shitlibs, you are more concerned with being smug and presenting the appearance of haughtiness than actually addressing substance.

For example, the substance here is a very stupid mistake in assuming I "disappeared" for 15 minutes. Rather than address that, you made this wall of text that is completely nonresponsive, along with a prior poast that was similarly nonresponsive.

And I answered your question. I believe you have a piece of paper that states that when you were a child, your IQ was scored in the 130s, but like Julia, you have little practical wisdom. Your logical error in my "disappearance" is simply a manifestation of that. Based on your articulate writing style, I'd peg you at a 120-125 IQ.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3533086&forum_id=2#32674237)

I had read this book and it does a great job concretely explaining the difference. Doesn't matter what anyone says with no support, because then the response is too easy to dismiss.

I had also previously read about McVeigh, and when I read about his motivations I knew he was a liberal.

That's the thought process.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3533086&forum_id=2#32674087)