The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Most posters here: closet racists?
Poast new message in this thread
Date: February 16th, 2006 3:40 PM Author: Arousing chad i've noticed that the whites here really, really dislike blacks and vice versa. sure, some of it is flame, but most of it is sincere hatred. do you feel that you're racist? and if so, are you a closet racist? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=361732&forum_id=2#5104663) |
 |
Date: February 16th, 2006 3:40 PM Author: Cheese-eating Stock Car Immigrant everyone in the usa is racist. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=361732&forum_id=2#5104675) |
|
Date: February 16th, 2006 3:44 PM Author: Arousing chad but its worse when its among intelligent folks, since intelligent people are 1) usually in positions of power or are poised to be -- and therefore can spread and weild their racism to a greater extent and 2) are supposed to be smart enough to be able to resist racist urges (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=361732&forum_id=2#5104722) |
|
Date: February 16th, 2006 3:46 PM Author: Sick sweet tailpipe Unlike, say, France or Rawanda. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=361732&forum_id=2#5104750) |
|
Date: February 16th, 2006 4:13 PM Author: Dun bull headed partner Rwanda dipshit. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=361732&forum_id=2#5105086) |
|
Date: February 16th, 2006 4:19 PM Author: vibrant anal codepig nibblets Might just be some woman he knows who happens to be racist. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=361732&forum_id=2#5105164) |
|
Date: February 16th, 2006 4:32 PM Author: Irate senate 165 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=361732&forum_id=2#5105335) |
|
Date: February 16th, 2006 3:44 PM Author: pearl hell Well, it's kind of hard to be an out-of-the-closet racist when the PC police will chase you down like a hungry wolf going for steak. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=361732&forum_id=2#5104723) |
|
Date: February 16th, 2006 3:46 PM Author: Arousing chad but that's a good thing because society shouldnt tolerate racism (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=361732&forum_id=2#5104757) |
|
Date: February 16th, 2006 3:53 PM Author: Sick sweet tailpipe Or any other kind of deviant thought. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=361732&forum_id=2#5104866) |
|
Date: February 16th, 2006 3:54 PM Author: pearl hell I concur. Liberals are all about free speech - unless they don't like it. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=361732&forum_id=2#5104881) |
|
Date: February 16th, 2006 4:00 PM Author: Arousing chad this is very stupid (i'm not being a flame or anything. it's really, really stupid). i hate when people make such asinine generalizations like this. it's really dumb and serves no useful purpose (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=361732&forum_id=2#5104940) |
|
Date: February 16th, 2006 4:06 PM Author: pearl hell asinine generalizations? http://www.academia.org/campus_reports/2001/march_2001_5.html
|
|
Date: February 16th, 2006 4:08 PM Author: Dun bull headed partner Yes. asinine generalizations = academia.org
That's not apparent to you from the tone of the piece? |
|
Date: February 16th, 2006 4:11 PM Author: Arousing chad he doesn't seem to understand what "bias" means (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=361732&forum_id=2#5105052) |
|
Date: February 16th, 2006 4:13 PM Author: Dun bull headed partner Well, try to imagine your own fear if faced with an "angry mob that overwhelmed the offices". (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=361732&forum_id=2#5105077) |
|
Date: February 16th, 2006 4:15 PM Author: pearl hell ok, dumbass. as if academia.org was the only source for coverage of this event:
http://magazine.uchicago.edu/0106/campus-news/report-whats.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Horowitz#Work_in_Race-Relations
http://www.thefileroom.org/documents/dyn/DisplayCase.cfm/id/347
want more? http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&q=david+horowitz+slavery+reparations+campus+ad
this was *the* big story of 2001 until 9/11.
so my original point stands. |
|
Date: February 16th, 2006 4:21 PM Author: Dun bull headed partner Yeah, among dumbfucks this was the big story for the first nine months of the year.
I'm not disputing the historical facts, I'm disputing whether that instance implicates "free speech" concerns, as your post said. You're going to have a really hard time in con law. |
|
Date: February 16th, 2006 4:29 PM Author: pearl hell Excuse me? When students burn newspapers because they don't like their contents, that doesn't implicate free speech?
Go fuck yourself. You're a waste of my time. |
|
Date: February 16th, 2006 4:33 PM Author: Dun bull headed partner Yes. The right to free speech is a right that citizens have versus the government. If I see you spouting your racist shit on the streetcorner and I come and beat the shit out of you, you can't sue me for infringing your right to free speech. If a cop does it, you can.
Enjoy law school. |
|
Date: February 16th, 2006 4:36 PM Author: pearl hell i shouldn't waste my time, but i guess i have to. at no point in this debate did i claim that the gov't is censoring anyone. all i said was that liberals are ok with free speech so long as it agrees with their thinking.
learn to read. idiot.
EDIT: here's a synopsis in case you forgot:
Date: February 16th, 2006 3:44 PM Author: TheTwo
Well, it's kind of hard to be an out-of-the-closet racist when the PC police will chase you down like a hungry wolf going for steak.
Date: February 16th, 2006 3:54 PM Author: TheTwo
I concur. Liberals are all about free speech - unless they don't like it.
Date: February 16th, 2006 4:00 PM Author: 2L
this is very stupid (i'm not being a flame or anything. it's really, really stupid). i hate when people make such asinine generalizations like this. it's really dumb and serves no useful purpose
Date: February 16th, 2006 4:21 PM Author: Ignoramus
Yeah, among dumbfucks this was the big story for the first nine months of the year.
I'm not disputing the historical facts, I'm disputing whether that instance implicates "free speech" concerns, as your post said. You're going to have a really hard time in con law.
Date: February 16th, 2006 4:29 PM Author: TheTwo
Excuse me? When students burn newspapers because they don't like their contents, that doesn't implicate free speech?
Go fuck yourself. You're a waste of my time.
now at which point did i ever mention the government you cum guzzling gutter whore. |
|
Date: February 16th, 2006 4:45 PM Author: Dun bull headed partner That's just it, you stupid fuck -- you DID NOT mention the government. Free speech is a right citizens hold against the government. Private parties telling other parties what to say does not implicate free speech. It implicates the marketplace of ideas.
Jesus. Take notes on this conversation and recite what you've learned to your conlaw professor on the first day of class. He'll be impressed. |
|
Date: February 16th, 2006 5:03 PM Author: pearl hell you are fucking stupid. holy shit. the whole point of this thread was closeted racism. i replied that liberals prevent racists from speaking their minds. at no point did i ever couch it in terms of "free speech," i.e., citizen v. government: you did. this isn't the point of this thread and your asinine attempts to belittle me based on your perceived misunderstanding on my part makes you look like the idiot you are. it seems that the others reading this thread understood my point. but you're so fuckin dense you can't. i used the term "free speech" to allude to suppression of speech by liberals, not the gov't. this is plainly obvious to everyone but you. you lost the original argument and are now quibbling over whether i know that, constitutionally speaking, free speech implies gov't censorship. believe me, i know this.
and please stop with your inane references to my con law prof. i received an A- first semester and an A the second. i'll be doing directed research with him next semester, and he'll be writing an enthusiastic letter of rec. for me for clerkships. |
|
Date: February 16th, 2006 5:31 PM Author: Dun bull headed partner I really doubt you'll get any of those clerkships.
But I guess it's possible that your non-xoxo thinking is clearer than what you've demonstrated here. |
|
Date: February 16th, 2006 5:52 PM Author: pearl hell Well thanks for the vote of confidence. if you don't think i'll get one, then i'm sure to get one. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=361732&forum_id=2#5106174) |
|
Date: February 16th, 2006 4:10 PM Author: Arousing chad if citing websites were the metric, this game would never end.
http://www.antiwar.com/blog/comments.php?id=1820_0_1_0_C
http://reclaimdemocracy.org/weekly_2003/conservatives_honor_free_speech.html |
|
Date: February 16th, 2006 4:00 PM Author: lascivious corner cuckold Liberals don't want GOVERNMENT to regulate speech. They're entitled to pressure people whose speech they find offensive, just like everyone else. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=361732&forum_id=2#5104944) |
|
Date: February 16th, 2006 4:06 PM Author: pearl hell Yeah ok... pressure is fine. But when conservatives pressure people to keep their mouth shut the ACLU goes rabid. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=361732&forum_id=2#5104992) |
|
Date: February 16th, 2006 4:08 PM Author: Dun bull headed partner Example?
Edit: I guess I proved the point. Dumbass. |
|
Date: February 16th, 2006 4:16 PM Author: pearl hell Wait one, shithead. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=361732&forum_id=2#5105120) |
|
Date: February 16th, 2006 4:18 PM Author: Dun bull headed partner I can't wait for this. Prepare for me to analytically destroy any example you come up with, you pathetic fuck. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=361732&forum_id=2#5105158) |
|
Date: February 16th, 2006 4:19 PM Author: pearl hell Can you stop crying for one second and have some patience? Geez. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=361732&forum_id=2#5105171) |
|
Date: February 16th, 2006 4:28 PM Author: pearl hell My Original Post: When conservatives pressure people to keep their mouth shut the ACLU goes rabid.
You asked for proof, here it is: In December 2005 the New York Times published an article describing the president's domestic spying program. When conservatives objected, saying that the publication hurt national security, the ACLU came out with this tidbit:
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/12/20/politics/20fbi.html?ex=1140238800&en=14fedaf7293369bb&ei=5070
Point proven. Try harder you stupid fuck.
EDIT: Before you say that this article is irrelevant, consider that the original domestic spying program didn't allege any spying on domestic groups. It was only after the NYT was criticized that the ACLU got involved and started claiming all sorts of crazy, conspiracy, black helicopter over their house shit. The point? To keep the story alive.
|
|
Date: February 16th, 2006 4:32 PM Author: Arousing chad what does this prove, exactly? conservatives go apeshit when libs try to "pressure" people to stfu. it cuts both ways. the fact that you can't see that is what makes you a fucking ass.
(damn it. i promised myself I wouldn't curse on this thread like you morons. fuck.) |
|
Date: February 16th, 2006 4:35 PM Author: pearl hell Learn to read. My original response to ignorant fuck was that pressure is fine and all, but when conservatives pressure others to keep quiet the ACLU goes rabid. he asked me to prove it, i did. obviously it cuts both ways. i'm not defending anyone here. but he wanted me to show him how the ACLU goes rabid when conservatives try to prevent someone from releasing damaging info. i proved it. now he'll find some point of criticism with it. luckily, i've decided to ignore him b/c he seems like a pimply sixteen year old with his dick on his hand, pumping furiously. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=361732&forum_id=2#5105363) |
|
Date: February 16th, 2006 4:37 PM Author: Arousing chad well, as long as you recognize that hypocrisy isn't particular to one political party (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=361732&forum_id=2#5105379) |
|
Date: February 16th, 2006 4:39 PM Author: pearl hell of course not. politics is politics, whether it's practiced by one party or another. i happen to agree with one side, that's all. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=361732&forum_id=2#5105410) |
|
Date: February 16th, 2006 4:42 PM Author: Dun bull headed partner Did you post the right link, you ignorant fuck? Or maybe you were trying to PWN me by forcing me to read something completely irrelevant.
All I see here is that the NYT attempted some free press, some conservatives said that it hurt the country, and the ACLU said that free press is a good thing. This says nothing about your original point.
You're really going to hate law school, because it involves rigorous thought. |
|
Date: February 16th, 2006 4:47 PM Author: pearl hell jesus h. fucking christ, you are dense.
you have the memory span of a fucking ant.
my original post:
Date: February 16th, 2006 4:06 PM Author: TheTwo
Yeah ok... pressure is fine. But when conservatives pressure people to keep their mouth shut the ACLU goes rabid.
Your reply:
Date: February 16th, 2006 4:08 PM Author: Ignoramus
Example?
Edit: I guess I proved the point. Dumbass.
Your latest reply: "All I see here is that the NYT attempted some free press, some conservatives said that it hurt the country, and the ACLU said that free press is a good thing. This says nothing about your original point."
my original reply, AGAIN: "But when conservatives pressure people to keep their mouth shut the ACLU goes rabid."
you asked me to give you proof that the ACLU goes berserk when conservatives seek to pressure others to keep their mouth shut. your own fucking post proves that i did so. are you honestly this stupid or just completely devoid of intellectual honesty?
|
|
Date: February 16th, 2006 5:08 PM Author: Dun bull headed partner You are a true idiot. The story has nothing to do with the ACLU going "berserk when conservatives seek to pressure others to keep their mouth shut." The conservatives were reacting against the free press exercised by NYT, and the ACLU said, "hey, this is free press." ACLU did not say, "conservatives, you're a bunch of assholes for telling NYT what to do."
I guess what it comes down to is that you don't understand the state action problem. Hopefully your TTT can explicate it to you more clearly. |
|
Date: February 16th, 2006 5:17 PM Author: pearl hell oh ok... so basically the reason i'm an idiot is because i say that the ACLU goes berserk, whereas you say that the ACLU simply says, "hey, this is free press."
you are one hilarious motherfucker. eat shit and die. |
|
Date: February 16th, 2006 5:32 PM Author: Dun bull headed partner You're acting like a sullen child now.
I spanked you. Now clean up your toys and go to bed. |
|
Date: February 16th, 2006 5:51 PM Author: pearl hell lol. right. you lost the argument, but proved to me that free speech involves the gov't, even though the government was absolutely not a factor in anything i said. yeah you won, big boy. you won. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=361732&forum_id=2#5106167) |
|
Date: February 16th, 2006 3:45 PM Author: Sick sweet tailpipe It's mainly just a few minorities, and a few whites. They just make a lot of noise.
However, it mainly seems to grow out of resentment with AA, which is, of cousre, a form of discrimination in itself. It's not surprising that such preferences would foster greater intolerance and division. |
|
Date: February 16th, 2006 3:49 PM Author: Arousing chad is it really true that AA fosters the racism on this board or is that just another excuse to get rid of it. i mean, just because a black guy supposedly got into a school because of AA doesn't mean whites have to call him an AA nigger. i think the more reasonable view is that the racism was there before AA, and would be there without it. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=361732&forum_id=2#5104792) |
|
Date: February 16th, 2006 3:49 PM Author: Cheese-eating Stock Car Immigrant aa is a spark to ignite some underground racism (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=361732&forum_id=2#5104803) |
|
Date: February 16th, 2006 3:53 PM Author: Arousing chad i don't think that's true. racism hardly needs to be "sparked" to manifest itself. in any case, even in the absence of AA, there'd be a substitute "spark." (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=361732&forum_id=2#5104871) |
|
Date: February 16th, 2006 4:09 PM Author: Cheese-eating Stock Car Immigrant i disagree. i think many suburbanites live their whole sheltered lives without a spark, but have a low grade underlying racism. its just they're never aware of it, never have to confront inequality, or these issues. spark merely brings out what's already there. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=361732&forum_id=2#5105026) |
|
Date: February 16th, 2006 3:52 PM Author: Sick sweet tailpipe I honestly don't see people on this kind of board even thinking about racial distinctions without the existence of AA.
there was certainly racism before AA, but it has undoubtedly increased it in certain groups, especiall in those groups where it has actual effects, like people competing for law school slots. To claim otherwise is simply irrational. |
|
Date: February 16th, 2006 3:58 PM Author: Arousing chad it seems like you've manufactured this theory to get rid of AA: AA engenders racism, and therefore, it needs to go. sure, it seems "rational," but the premise is faulty. you're saying that AA has "reinforced" racism; or amplified it in effect. this is untrue because racism has noticeably diminished in the last 25 or 30 years (25 or 30 years ago being the assumed inception point of AA) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=361732&forum_id=2#5104923) |
|
Date: February 16th, 2006 4:11 PM Author: Supple hideous private investor set AA is just an excuse that people who were already racist use to try to justify their racism.... Racism existed before AA and it will exist after AA; plain and simple.... Also, most (probably all) of the racists on xoxo are white and Asian.... HTH. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=361732&forum_id=2#5105040) |
|
Date: February 16th, 2006 4:18 PM Author: Dun bull headed partner Rational Thought, you have got to be one of the top four stupidest posters on this board.
If indeed AA is what triggered your racism, why do you lash out at the beneficiaries of AA, as opposed to the white people who created the program? The direction of your animus belies your bullshit excuse, except in the case that you are a fucking retard, whereby I can understand how you have misplaced your anger.
You wouldn't have done well in law school anyway. |
|
Date: February 16th, 2006 4:22 PM Author: Arousing chad a bit harsh; but i agree: Rational Thought is by far one of the least intelligent posters here. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=361732&forum_id=2#5105205) |
|
Date: February 16th, 2006 4:24 PM Author: Dun bull headed partner I have a bad habit of jumping right to DefCon 4 with these stupid fucks.
Stick around long enough and it'll be hard for you to resist. |
Date: February 16th, 2006 3:47 PM Author: Hot brilliant den headpube Yes. EVERYONE here is a fucking racist. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=361732&forum_id=2#5104772) |
|
Date: February 16th, 2006 4:00 PM Author: burgundy chest-beating casino I'm probably racist, but no more so than average. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=361732&forum_id=2#5104935) |
|
Date: February 16th, 2006 4:06 PM Author: Dun bull headed partner I'm not. That's maybe the primary reason I hang around xoxo -- to call these cocksuckers out on their ignorance. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=361732&forum_id=2#5104990) |
|
Date: February 16th, 2006 4:07 PM Author: Irate senate To be a closet racist, your racism should be at least somewhat hidden. That is not the case for any poster here. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=361732&forum_id=2#5105000) |
|
Date: February 16th, 2006 4:11 PM Author: contagious idiot i <3 niggers (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=361732&forum_id=2#5105049) |
|
Date: February 16th, 2006 4:12 PM Author: Irate senate http://www.tshirthell.com/store/product.php?productid=145 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=361732&forum_id=2#5105059) |
|
Date: February 16th, 2006 4:18 PM Author: contagious idiot *niggerlove* (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=361732&forum_id=2#5105150) |
|
Date: February 16th, 2006 4:12 PM Author: Supple hideous private investor set Exactly.... I am one of the least racist xoxoers.... (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=361732&forum_id=2#5105060) |
|
Date: February 16th, 2006 4:14 PM Author: Irate senate This is patently false. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=361732&forum_id=2#5105095) |
|
Date: February 16th, 2006 4:18 PM Author: Arousing chad i agree. #$% or whatever is clearly a racist. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=361732&forum_id=2#5105147) |
|
Date: February 16th, 2006 4:21 PM Author: Supple hideous private investor set How is that patently false? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=361732&forum_id=2#5105194) |
|
Date: February 16th, 2006 4:23 PM Author: Arousing chad because like it or not you're racist. you just don't realize it. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=361732&forum_id=2#5105217) |
|
Date: February 16th, 2006 4:25 PM Author: Supple hideous private investor set EVERYONE is racist to some extent.... However, I am indeed ONE of the LEAST racist posters on xoxo.... HTH. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=361732&forum_id=2#5105248) |
|
Date: February 16th, 2006 4:27 PM Author: Arousing chad you seem convinced of that. just know that you're wrong, and we'll leave it at that. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=361732&forum_id=2#5105275) |
|
Date: February 16th, 2006 4:14 PM Author: Arousing chad poignant observation, but i think i meant that to say that they're closet-racists in real life -- for in real life, racism isn't tolerated to the degree it's tolerated here (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=361732&forum_id=2#5105090) |
|
Date: February 16th, 2006 4:17 PM Author: Cheese-eating Stock Car Immigrant poignant? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=361732&forum_id=2#5105136) |
|
Date: February 16th, 2006 4:20 PM Author: contagious idiot for some reason i laughed (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=361732&forum_id=2#5105175) |
|
Date: February 16th, 2006 4:20 PM Author: Arousing chad as in relevant; to-the-point. she picked up on something very important to the discussion. what else does poignant mean (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=361732&forum_id=2#5105181) |
|
Date: February 16th, 2006 4:29 PM Author: Arousing chad so was it a bad word choice dood (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=361732&forum_id=2#5105299) |
|
Date: February 16th, 2006 4:38 PM Author: Thriller Messiness Institution yes they are. Like serial killers, racists are almost always white/jew men. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=361732&forum_id=2#5105386) |
|
Date: February 16th, 2006 5:20 PM Author: Amber razzle gaping french chef jews are racist but less racist than the average regular white...i know. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=361732&forum_id=2#5105851) |
|
Date: February 16th, 2006 4:44 PM Author: Up-to-no-good bronze yarmulke Subject: most people alive: closet racists? better question (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=361732&forum_id=2#5105459) |
|
Date: February 16th, 2006 4:52 PM Author: transparent abusive antidepressant drug marketing idea pass that pencil, nigga! (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=361732&forum_id=2#5105555) |
|
Date: February 16th, 2006 5:52 PM Author: bistre soggy library double fault i am not a closet racist. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=361732&forum_id=2#5106181) |
|
Date: February 16th, 2006 5:53 PM Author: Aphrodisiac Crackhouse New Version I just don't like people. Any people. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=361732&forum_id=2#5106194) |