Stephen Miller

Ezra Cohen-Watnick, who worked for the NSC and risked his career by informing trump of the illegal Susan Rice unmasking. he also helped devin nunes enormously. he was fired by globalist mcmaster for disloyalty, and he recently went to go work for jeff sessions.

Mencius moldbug/Curtis yarvin, the founder of neoreactionary thought. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Curtis_Yarvin

What others can you think of?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4049776&forum_id=2#36601038)

Helped get execution from Rosenbergs

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4049776&forum_id=2#36601066)

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ayn_Rand

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4049776&forum_id=2#36601100)

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mickey_Kaus

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4049776&forum_id=2#36601125)

In 1955, von Neumann became a commissioner of the AEC. He accepted this position and used it to further the production of compact hydrogen bombs suitable for Intercontinental ballistic missile delivery. He involved himself in correcting the severe shortage of tritium and lithium 6 needed for these compact weapons, and he argued against settling for the intermediate-range missiles that the Army wanted. He was adamant that H-bombs delivered into the heart of enemy territory by an ICBM would be the most effective weapon possible, and that the relative inaccuracy of the missile wouldn't be a problem with an H-bomb. He said the Russians would probably be building a similar weapon system, which turned out to be the case.[137][138] Despite his disagreement with Oppenheimer over the need for a crash program to develop the hydrogen bomb, he testified on the latter's behalf at the 1954 Oppenheimer security hearing, at which he asserted that Oppenheimer was loyal, and praised him for his helpfulness once the program went ahead.[18]

Shortly before his death from cancer, von Neumann headed the United States government's top secret ICBM committee, which would sometimes meet in his home. Its purpose was to decide on the feasibility of building an ICBM large enough to carry a thermonuclear weapon. Von Neumann had long argued that while the technical obstacles were sizable, they could be overcome in time. The SM-65 Atlas passed its first fully functional test in 1959, two years after his death. The feasibility of an ICBM owed as much to improved, smaller warheads as it did to developments in rocketry, and his understanding of the former made his advice invaluable.[139]

Mutual assured destruction

Operation Redwing nuclear test in July 1956

Von Neumann is credited with developing the equilibrium strategy of mutual assured destruction (MAD). He also "moved heaven and earth" to bring MAD about. His goal was to quickly develop ICBMs and the compact hydrogen bombs that they could deliver to the USSR, and he knew the Soviets were doing similar work because the CIA interviewed German rocket scientists who were allowed to return to Germany, and von Neumann had planted a dozen technical people in the CIA. The Russians considered that bombers would soon be vulnerable, and they shared von Neumann's view that an H-bomb in an ICBM was the ne plus ultra of weapons; they believed that whoever had superiority in these weapons would take over the world, without necessarily using them.[140] He was afraid of a "missile gap" and took several more steps to achieve his goal of keeping up with the Soviets:

He modified the ENIAC by making it programmable and then wrote programs for it to do the H-bomb calculations verifying that the Teller-Ulam design was feasible and to develop it further.

Through the Atomic Energy Commission, he promoted the development of a compact H-bomb that would fit in an ICBM.

He personally interceded to speed up the production of lithium-6 and tritium needed for the compact bombs.

He caused several separate missile projects to be started, because he felt that competition combined with collaboration got the best results.[141]

Von Neumann's assessment that the Soviets had a lead in missile technology, considered pessimistic at the time, was soon proven correct in the Sputnik crisis.[142]

Von Neumann entered government service primarily because he felt that, if freedom and civilization were to survive, it would have to be because the United States would triumph over totalitarianism from Nazism, Fascism and Soviet Communism.[52] During a Senate committee hearing he described his political ideology as "violently anti-communist, and much more militaristic than the norm". He was quoted in 1950 remarking, "If you say why not bomb [the Soviets] tomorrow, I say, why not today? If you say today at five o'clock, I say why not one o'clock?"[143]

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4049776&forum_id=2#36601530)

not responsive to their perspective/argument/data

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4049776&forum_id=2#36606619)