The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Should LL Get A 2nd Round Spot When Guy With Bye WDs? #tennis
| purple cowardly senate party of the first part | 08/15/18 |
| floppy wild center brethren | 08/15/18 |
| purple cowardly senate party of the first part | 08/15/18 |
| floppy wild center brethren | 08/15/18 |
| purple cowardly senate party of the first part | 08/15/18 |
| floppy wild center brethren | 08/15/18 |
| purple cowardly senate party of the first part | 08/15/18 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: August 15th, 2018 12:57 PM Author: purple cowardly senate party of the first part BG debates someone's interesting proposal that the highest 1st round loser should get the open spot.
https://twitter.com/Steve_Lederman/status/1029562326062718976 |
Date: August 15th, 2018 1:03 PM Author: floppy wild center brethren Ljl at the dumb bitch suggesting the highest seeded first round loser should be able to pop back up on the other side of the draw. Just do completely diminish the impact of first round upsets. It's fine the way it is but the player with the bye should be required to withdraw by Tuesday morning for the two highest ranked players that lost in the last round of qualifying can play in the first round. The way it is now is fine though since the LL doesn't get any points unless he wins a match (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4052573&forum_id=2#36621067) |
 |
Date: August 15th, 2018 9:04 PM Author: purple cowardly senate party of the first part >>the player with the bye should be required to withdraw by Tuesday morning for the two highest ranked players that lost in the last round of qualifying can play in the first round.
interesting. so a LL vs LL play-in match for the 2nd round spot? this would be fair.
but what if the seed w the bye doesnt withdraw in time? it happens. |
|
Date: August 15th, 2018 9:36 PM Author: floppy wild center brethren Then the seeded player loses his prize money and a LL takes his place as it is done currently (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4052573&forum_id=2#36623794) |
|
Date: August 15th, 2018 9:38 PM Author: purple cowardly senate party of the first part what else can you do? just sucks that the 4th or 5th lucky loser gets a bye and has to play guys who played the day before and can then win one match and get r16 points in a masters (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4052573&forum_id=2#36623809) |
|
Date: August 15th, 2018 9:47 PM Author: floppy wild center brethren When's the last time one actually did? Can't remember it happening. It's not that great an injustice anyway. No one cares when a qualifier or lucky loser gets a retirement after 3 games in the first round but now you have tards proposing that players who lost IN THE MAIN DRAW get a second chance in the tournament. That would completely cheapen every tournament where that happened (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4052573&forum_id=2#36623861) |
|
Date: August 15th, 2018 9:51 PM Author: purple cowardly senate party of the first part agree that guys who lose in the main draw cant get a 2nd chance. that's like saying a walkover in the final shouldnt happen and the SF loser should advance to the final so the fans get to see a final.
LL winnign a r32 match has happened plenty (esp w the new penalties for showing up injured and playing) but cant name an example. remember in a masters, the cutoff is usually around #48. the LL will prob be ~#50-60. not a stretch that he beats an unseeded opponent in the r32. |