The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
NZ shooting reminds me of indians fighting white settlers invading their lands
Poast new message in this thread
Date: March 15th, 2019 11:53 AM Author: mewling splenetic institution i took a US history class in college and i wrote a paper on native american resistance to US settlers taking over their land in the 1800s. my thesis was that the only reason why white settlers were able to so easily displace the indians over time is because of the cucks within the indian tribe "leadership" who kept trying to placate the white invaders instead of simply driving them off or killing them
the US government broke its "legal" "promises" with tribes over and over. they would sign a "legal agreement" with the tribes saying that they weren't going to settle on their land, but then white settlers would move there anyway, and tribes would say whoa wtf and start trying to drive them off. then white people would start crying about how "innocent" women and children were being harmed, and the US government sent in the army to start killing the "evil" indians. this happened over and over and over again, you can look it up yourself if you don't believe me
over and over again, there would be idiot cuck indian "leaders" who would say that this time was different - this time the US government really was going to keep its promises! other warriors and chieftains would say hey, this is obvious bullshit, we have to fight back. but the US government and white settlers were able to successfully bribe, trick, and set the indians against each other enough to prevent any sort of effective unified resistance in most cases (sound familiar?)
the tribes who did fight back lasted much longer in their homelands than the ones who cucked out. it's a common misconception that the indians were hopelessly outmatched by the US military, but this is totally false. actually, the US military was limited in resources and strung very thin during this time, and indian tribes were able to give them some resounding defeats when they offered organized resistance. the real reason why whites succeeded in driving indians out of their lands was their success in setting them against each other and manipulating/bribing the cucked indian "leadership"
how do we remember the indians today? as weak, stupid, primitive, and savage. but actually they were none of these things, and in reality they just got sold out by a bunch of backstabbing cucks. this will be the same way that white people will be remembered if we don't organize and defend ourselves |
Date: March 15th, 2019 11:54 AM Author: Mind-boggling Sepia Lay Ape Tbf, with small pox they were on borrowed time. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4221609&forum_id=2#37936109) |
|
Date: March 15th, 2019 11:55 AM Author: Passionate mediation (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4221609&forum_id=2#37936111) |
|
Date: March 15th, 2019 11:56 AM Author: drunken peach party of the first part Interesting.
Do you think if the Indians (or at least some big tribes) had played things differently, they would have been able to end up with an actual independent country today somewhere in North America? |
 |
Date: March 15th, 2019 12:05 PM Author: mewling splenetic institution at least for a while, yes. after the civil war the US military was in a pretty weakened state. in many cases, it appears that the US government did actually ostensibly intend on keeping its promises with indian tribes - they just didn't have the means to prevent settlers from moving to indian territory out of their own volition
once these settlers and indians started clashing, the white settlers would demand help from the US government, which put them in a tough spot - abandon their own citizens and their own kind, or help them "defend" themselves? there were some times when they were unwilling/unable to help these white settlers, and the indians successfully drove them out |
|
Date: June 7th, 2019 12:24 PM Author: harsh spectacular sneaky criminal (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4221609&forum_id=2#38354222) |
|
Date: March 15th, 2019 11:56 AM Author: Provocative unholy school cafeteria crotch https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2396760/How-Comanche-Indians-butchered-babies-roasted-enemies-alive.html
Enjoying the slow torture of captives was something most tribes did. You don't negotiate with people like that- you exterminate them. |
|
Date: March 15th, 2019 12:01 PM Author: Rough-skinned senate this guy gets it There's a reason why they're called savages |
|
Date: March 15th, 2019 12:06 PM Author: mewling splenetic institution there's a pretty easy way to avoid getting tortured and killed: don't invade someone's homeland against their will (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4221609&forum_id=2#37936155) |
|
Date: March 15th, 2019 12:07 PM Author: Mind-boggling Sepia Lay Ape Or pull a trigger (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4221609&forum_id=2#37936160) |
|
Date: March 15th, 2019 1:21 PM Author: Provocative unholy school cafeteria crotch Do you think boundaries were set down by God? They exist because at some point someone obtained the land by force. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4221609&forum_id=2#37936592) |
|
Date: March 15th, 2019 12:02 PM Author: diverse fantasy-prone garrison They only had horses and guns bc Euros gave them such things. In a real war, with natives cooperating and aligned against whites, and whites the same (no cucking in either side), how would natives even supply themselves? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4221609&forum_id=2#37936138) |
|
Date: March 15th, 2019 1:19 PM Author: mewling splenetic institution (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4221609&forum_id=2#37936580) |
|
Date: June 7th, 2019 12:16 PM Author: mewling splenetic institution (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4221609&forum_id=2#38354183) |