oh wait there are none since bell

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4224874&forum_id=2#37960015)

a specific, hyperloserish white man

aside from DOCTOR david duke (who is a proper ALPHA MALE), show me an alt-right person who isn't a blubbering pussy or a fugly weeb

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4224874&forum_id=2#37960513)

The alt right attracts loserish white men like xo posters and the no shooter, guys who are the dregs of society and can't get women or $ and blame everything on women, blacks, Mexicans and/or Muslims depending on their location and personal circumstances.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4224874&forum_id=2#37960575)

i don't think the term "alt-right" even means anything anymore (and i'm not sure it ever did). are pewdiepie fans "alt-right?" were the covington kids "alt-right?" are people in seattle who are speaking out against the lib rot "alt-right?"

this group of people is necessarily only going to get larger and broader as libs get more and more insane as time goes on, until there is finally some sort of breaking point. it is inevitable whether anyone likes it or not

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4224874&forum_id=2#37959963)

You know this is actually a pretty cr post. The only thing I'd say in defense of my original point is that I wasn't referring to the big tent that the media calls the alt-right, but the 4chan edgy meme lord culture that originally popularized the term. Like, the Daily Stormer and the blogs associated with it have definitely seen better days.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4224874&forum_id=2#37960008)

Republicans did the same thing by using the world “liberal” to apply to nuts and to all Democrats at the same time. They made it a dirty word. Back in the 1980s and the 50 years prior to that, though, “conservative” was a dirty word. Now it just means “fiscally responsible.”

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4224874&forum_id=2#37960029)

i'm old enough to remember when the 4chan crowd was "liberal" and bashed conservative christians, the iraq and afghanistan wars, etc, because that was the establishment orthodoxy at the time. now that leftism is the establishment orthodoxy, they rail against that instead. that's how kids will always be. i'm not saying that their influence doesn't make a difference in the world, but that it doesn't really make sense to think of them as political/ideological actors in the same way that we think of adults as political/ideological actors

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4224874&forum_id=2#37960058)