https://missionofchrist.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/images_stones.jpg

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4312228&forum_id=2#38604565)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4312228&forum_id=2#38605104)

this chick is completely average and non-offensive

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4312228&forum_id=2#38605435)

"It turns out, the answer is no."

"[T]he top 20% of the most sexually active never-married young men have about 50-60% of the sex."

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4312228&forum_id=2#38604600)

"Measuring the number of partners instead of sexual frequency, the top 20% most promiscuous men account for about 60% of male sexual partnerings"

way to disprove the incels, Lyman!

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4312228&forum_id=2#38605893)

this is actually a fair point. young men, on whom it is often culturally the burden to be the 'gentleman' and pick up the tab or pick up the girl in his car or whatever, are a lot poorer than ever before. student loan debt and skyrocketing housing costs, etc. (which in turn ties into shitty high stress lifestyles and diets, which feeds into shittier physiques and energy levels, etc.)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4312228&forum_id=2#38604646)

Of the fastest-growing jobs, many are various types of health aides, which are about 90 percent female. When men take these so-called pink-collar jobs, they have more job security and wage growth than in blue-collar work, according to recent research. But they are paid less and feel stigmatized.

Take Tracy Dawson, 53, a welder in St. Clair, Mo. He lost several jobs, some because his employers took the work to China and Mexico and others because the workers were replaced by robots. He has heard the promises of fast-growing jobs in the health care field: His daughter trained to be a medical technician. But he never considered it.

“I ain’t gonna be a nurse; I don’t have the tolerance for people,” he said. “I don’t want it to sound bad, but I’ve always seen a woman in the position of a nurse or some kind of health care worker. I see it as more of a woman’s touch.”

Also, health aides earn a median wage of $10.50 an hour. Mr. Dawson used to earn $18 an hour making railroad traction motors. “I was a welder — that’s all I know how to do,” said Mr. Dawson, who is living on disability insurance because he has rheumatoid arthritis.

One reason is that jobs done by women, especially caregiving jobs, have always had lower pay and lower status. Yet when men, especially white men, enter female-dominated fields, they are paid more and promoted faster than women, a phenomenon known as the glass escalator.

Much of men’s resistance to pink-collar jobs is tied up in the culture of masculinity, say people who study the issue. Women are assumed to be empathetic and caring; men are supposed to be strong, tough and able to support a family.

“Traditional masculinity is standing in the way of working-class men’s employment, and I think it’s a problem,” said Andrew Cherlin, a sociologist and public policy professor at Johns Hopkins and author of “Labor’s Love Lost: The Rise and Fall of the Working-Class Family in America.”

“We have a cultural lag where our views of masculinity have not caught up to the change in the job market,” he said.

But telling working-class men to take feminine jobs plays to their anxieties and comes off as condescending, said Joan Williams, a law professor at U.C. Hastings and author of “Reshaping the Work-Family Debate: Why Men and Class Matter.”

“White working-class men’s wages have plummeted, and what happens to men in that context is anxieties about whether they’re ‘real men,’ ” she said.

lol they found a man named Tracy

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4312228&forum_id=2#38609479)

gotta be a little bit more subtle with your flame, at least in the early stages.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4312228&forum_id=2#38609510)

That makes sense. No one has sex while in school.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4312228&forum_id=2#38609035)

mgtow

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4312228&forum_id=2#38604715)

However, if a guy is looking for a serious relationship, obviously, the hooker route will not satisfy that craving.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4312228&forum_id=2#38604722)

the problem is you incels think you deserve a 9/10 and reject the 4s who match you

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4312228&forum_id=2#38608306)

Is this really this difficult to figure out?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4312228&forum_id=2#38604694)

The problem with many of these discussions is that they keep referring to sex when that's not really what an incel is truly after.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4312228&forum_id=2#38604744)

let's here more about this from Muscadine Wine, Thunder Collins, etc...

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4312228&forum_id=2#38605922)

The only folks who are truly involuntary celibate are dudes in solitary confinement at a prison or something. Heck, even a 5'6 320 pound dude who makes $7.25/hr can get a streetwalker for $35 and have sex.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4312228&forum_id=2#38604781)

It turns out, the answer is no. And of course, it isn’t! Imagine how much sex those 20% of men would have to be having! A substantial share would need to be doing two-a-days on a regular basis to maintain that kind of share. In reality, according to the GSS, the top 20% of the most sexually active never-married young men have about 50-60% of the sex.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4312228&forum_id=2#38604846)

why does this 105 IQ idiot think that the increase of unmarried incels and the large drop in marriage rates are 2 separate phenomenons? why does this guy think that 20% of men having 60% of sexual encounters is drastically different from 20% of men having 80% of sexual encounters?

this dude basically wrote up an entire article validating everything that internet incels believe, but instead acts like his essay is "debunking" these same claims. really bizarre. however bad the "incel" epidemic is for society, it can't possibly be as bad as the epidemic of unqualified "journalists" 24/7 vomiting up volumes of retarded takes on stuff they don't understand

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4312228&forum_id=2#38605127)

It reads like those fact checking cites when they apply literal readings to rhetorical flourishes or figurative language.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4312228&forum_id=2#38609969)