The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Skadden vs. Kirkland [Chicago]
Poast new message in this thread
Date: February 2nd, 2007 3:26 PM Author: exciting national Of course it's hypothetical at this point, but assuming I got offers at both, where to go? Seems like both pay above market in Chicago and make you work above market hours. Thoughts? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573864&forum_id=2#7531933) |
 |
Date: February 2nd, 2007 3:29 PM Author: soul-stirring dark temple lettuce I know the thing about the bonuses, but isn't Kirkland's salary in Chicago still $135k? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573864&forum_id=2#7531962) |
|
Date: February 2nd, 2007 3:33 PM Author: fragrant rusted digit ratio yup. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573864&forum_id=2#7531992) |
|
Date: February 2nd, 2007 3:33 PM Author: exciting national Yeah I meant with the bonuses, Kirkland still pays above Chicago market, which is still 135 for now (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573864&forum_id=2#7531996) |
|
Date: August 31st, 2007 11:08 PM Author: Internet-worthy lodge Chicago market is CLEARLY at least 145k, if not 160. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573864&forum_id=2#8584369) |
|
Date: August 31st, 2007 11:09 PM Author: exciting national a lot has happened since Feb (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573864&forum_id=2#8584372) |
|
Date: August 31st, 2007 11:10 PM Author: Internet-worthy lodge whoa..yeah..you're right! (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573864&forum_id=2#8584376) |
|
Date: February 2nd, 2007 3:29 PM Author: French gay wizard sex offender In general I think you have more opportunities to shine when you're working at the mothership than if you're at a branch office. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573864&forum_id=2#7531963) |
|
Date: February 2nd, 2007 3:32 PM Author: exciting national why is this? I also read harder to get partnership at a branch, any truth to this? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573864&forum_id=2#7531987) |
|
Date: February 2nd, 2007 3:44 PM Author: Jet Weed Whacker One thing to think about is bonuses. While Skadden gives the entire class the same bonus, Kirkland rewards those that put in more hours than their peers with a larger bonus. So if you work more, you get paid for it, which seems fair. Skadden does provide a larger base salary but then tapers their bonus to make total compensation pretty much equal to the Chicago market. As such, Kirkland really is the only Chicago firm last year that exceeded the Chicago market by a considerable amount (and did so via large bonuses). (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573864&forum_id=2#7532059) |
|
Date: February 2nd, 2007 4:04 PM Author: exciting national Does Skadden's move to 160 change your mind? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573864&forum_id=2#7532209) |
|
Date: February 2nd, 2007 5:49 PM Author: Jet Weed Whacker At this point, I think you have to at least assume that Kirkland moves to 145k, leaving a 15k gap where there used to be a 10k gap. The charts still show a slight advantage for Kirkland but really I don't think anybody knows the impact of the recent salary raise on bonuses. The partners at Kirkland have to be a little peeved after thinking they had a winner with the large bonus only to have Simpson play the ball right back at them.
|
|
Date: February 2nd, 2007 4:06 PM Author: floppy naked elastic band kirkland should be a V5, and skadden shouldn't. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573864&forum_id=2#7532240) |
|
Date: February 2nd, 2007 9:26 PM Author: Anal Rehab i turned down offers from both. there are better firms in chicago. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573864&forum_id=2#7534171) |
|
Date: February 2nd, 2007 11:44 PM Author: exciting national link? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573864&forum_id=2#7535015) |
Date: February 2nd, 2007 5:38 PM Author: Peach misunderstood associate Subject: on writ of certiorari to the XO SCOTUS XO SCOTUS delivered the opinion of the Court.
oneiota, the original poster ("OP"), asks whether he should "go" to the law firm of Skadden Arps ("Skadden") or Kirkland & Ellis ("Kirkland").
We first consider whether OP has standing to raise this question. “In essence the question of standing is whether the litigant is entitled to have the court decide the merits of the dispute or of particular issues.” Warth v. Seldin, 422 U.S. 490, 498 (1975). As OP does not have an offer from either firm—he in fact concedes his inquiry is "hypothetical"—OP cannot plausibly lie within the zone of interest required by our decision in Allen v. Wright, 468 U.S. 737 (1984). We therefore conclude that OP lacks standing to start this thread.
We pause to note that OP's claim also fails to demonstrate ripeness. We said in Texas v. United States that "a claim is not ripe for adjudication if it rests upon contingent future events that may not occur as anticipated, or indeed may not occur at all." 523 U.S. 296, 300 (1998). OP's request for information on offers he does not have is precisely the kind of "contingent future event" our jurisprudence has rejected as premature.
This thread is therefore dismissed with prejudice. OP may pursue any further navel-gazing he wishes not inconsistent with this opinion.
It is so ordered. |
|
Date: February 2nd, 2007 5:41 PM Author: infuriating son of senegal idiot 180 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573864&forum_id=2#7532757) |
|
Date: February 2nd, 2007 5:48 PM Author: cerise jewess public bath 180 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573864&forum_id=2#7532803) |
|
Date: February 2nd, 2007 6:26 PM Author: Frisky Ruddy Institution 180 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573864&forum_id=2#7532974) |
|
Date: February 2nd, 2007 6:27 PM Author: insane market multi-billionaire Flawless. Sublime.
180 |
|
Date: February 2nd, 2007 6:31 PM Author: Gold love of her life shitlib OP should appeal to the real SCOTXO. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573864&forum_id=2#7532999) |
|
Date: February 2nd, 2007 6:33 PM Author: Cordovan business firm Bravo. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573864&forum_id=2#7533006) |
|
Date: February 2nd, 2007 11:45 PM Author: exciting national ouch (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573864&forum_id=2#7535020) |
|
Date: February 3rd, 2007 12:01 AM Author: costumed unhinged field marketing idea This is great. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573864&forum_id=2#7535122) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2007 9:18 PM Author: effete senate masturbator 180 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573864&forum_id=2#7545021) |
|
Date: February 6th, 2007 3:31 PM Author: Sable demanding regret beyond amazing. this could rival the dungeonmasTTTer in terms of shtick potential. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573864&forum_id=2#7555012) |
|
Date: February 6th, 2007 4:04 PM Author: clear beta liquid oxygen You leave my boss out of this. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573864&forum_id=2#7555222) |
|
Date: August 31st, 2007 7:07 PM Author: chrome address mood 180 bump. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573864&forum_id=2#8583713) |
|
Date: August 31st, 2007 7:49 PM Author: boyish university affirmative action tytyty. when will teh next XO SCOTUS session be? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573864&forum_id=2#8583816) |
|
Date: September 1st, 2007 2:56 PM Author: copper well-lubricated ape travel guidebook awesome.
did this dood do any more, or was this a one-shot schtick? |
|
Date: June 1st, 2008 1:23 AM Author: magical base moar (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573864&forum_id=2#9847558) |
|
Date: June 1st, 2008 1:28 AM Author: Aggressive indian lodge it was funnier in 2007. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573864&forum_id=2#9847567) |
|
Date: June 7th, 2008 11:01 AM Author: Dun School Cafeteria Trust Fund this was MTG
http://www.biglawboard.com/blb/viewThread.jsp?threadId=19797#19978 |
|
Date: February 2nd, 2007 6:57 PM Author: Mind-boggling Goyim Twinkling Uncleanness you shouldn't have filed in federal XO court dude. rookie mistake. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573864&forum_id=2#7533149) |
|
Date: August 31st, 2007 10:44 PM Author: exciting national UPDATE: have callbacks at both. This case may SRSLY be ripe in the near future. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573864&forum_id=2#8584303) |
|
Date: August 31st, 2007 10:46 PM Author: amethyst harsh bbw yfwgi (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573864&forum_id=2#8584311) |
|
Date: August 31st, 2007 10:48 PM Author: exciting national or, I asked an honest Q and got pwned, then later pwned OCI (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573864&forum_id=2#8584315) |
|
Date: August 31st, 2007 10:49 PM Author: ruby french chef hall "UPDATE: have callbacks at both."
you the man now, dog. |
|
Date: August 31st, 2007 11:00 PM Author: bossy bisexual stage So, we're to believe that a poster (who has barely posted a single thing in 8 months besides this horrible OP) happens to see this thread on the day it gets bumped and also just happens to have callbacks at both.
Sorry, whokebe, much easier to believe that you're an alternate moniker of a reg and came here to salvage what was left of your damaged pride.
*poop* |
|
Date: August 31st, 2007 10:48 PM Author: Topaz bearded hissy fit Chicago is a fucking hole in the wall cow town. why the fuck would you ever want to go there for 10 minutes let alone live there? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573864&forum_id=2#8584314) |
|
Date: August 31st, 2007 10:49 PM Author: exciting national Sorry, hate NYC and LA (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573864&forum_id=2#8584319) |
|
Date: August 31st, 2007 10:52 PM Author: Topaz bearded hissy fit "hate NYC"
Translation: "couldn't last 30 seconds in NYC and couldn't get a job in NYC even if you sucked off every v100 partner in the city"
have fun in cornfield town |
|
Date: August 31st, 2007 10:57 PM Author: exciting national Jesus Christ you are stupid. NYC is a MUCH easier market than Chicago...ANYONE at a decent school could get a Vault firm in NYC.
And hey, good luck at St. John's OCI. |
|
Date: August 31st, 2007 10:59 PM Author: Topaz bearded hissy fit sorry, I'm not a lawyer. would never dream of it.
the reason the chicago market is so shitty is because every fucking TTT NU, UIUC, and rancid Chicago-Kent grad, not to mention all the loyola and dePaul mouth breathers are climbing over each other trying to get jobs. |
|
Date: August 31st, 2007 11:01 PM Author: bossy bisexual stage Right, and NYC doesn't have Cardozo, St John's, Fordham, NYLS...
You're a fucking moron |
|
Date: August 31st, 2007 11:03 PM Author: Topaz bearded hissy fit and you probably get fucking laughed at with your 30k/yr nonprofittt job in Chicago. i would rather graduate from Cardozo an fucking work for a non vault 100 firm in NYC than skadden in Chicago any day. chicago is a fucking joke. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573864&forum_id=2#8584354) |
|
Date: August 31st, 2007 11:04 PM Author: bossy bisexual stage This post literally makes no sense. Does retardation run in your family? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573864&forum_id=2#8584359) |
|
Date: August 31st, 2007 11:03 PM Author: exciting national Then go to a firm where those people aren't allowed in - there's plenty.
Do you think 100 NYC firms populated with Pace, NYLS, Brooklyn, St Johns, Cardozo and Fordham grads are better?
I can see why you won't be a lawyer - your reasoning skills are shit. Back to the UG board, where you belong. |
|
Date: August 31st, 2007 11:19 PM Author: Topaz bearded hissy fit good thing i easily make 2.5x your salary, you fucking mouth breather (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573864&forum_id=2#8584403) |
|
Date: August 31st, 2007 11:30 PM Author: exciting national 2.5 * 0 = 0 sounds about right.
Unless you meant my future salary...for some reason I don't think you make 400k. Just a hunch. |
|
Date: September 1st, 2007 2:53 PM Author: umber thriller shrine more and more chicago owns nyc anyways. nyc = dirty ttt in decline. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573864&forum_id=2#8586342) |
|
Date: October 28th, 2007 8:46 PM Author: insanely creepy gaping milk bump (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573864&forum_id=2#8823887) |