Skadden vs. Kirkland [Chicago]
| opaque set | 02/02/07 | | Racy national security agency area | 02/02/07 | | swashbuckling slimy institution | 02/02/07 | | opaque set | 02/02/07 | | Titillating bat-shit-crazy shitlib | 08/31/07 | | opaque set | 08/31/07 | | Titillating bat-shit-crazy shitlib | 08/31/07 | | lavender famous landscape painting university | 02/02/07 | | opaque set | 02/02/07 | | Overrated mind-boggling national | 02/02/07 | | opaque set | 02/02/07 | | Overrated mind-boggling national | 02/02/07 | | turquoise business firm | 02/02/07 | | Excitant crawly theatre | 02/02/07 | | opaque set | 02/02/07 | | Autistic indecent library | 02/02/07 | | stirring magical knife | 02/02/07 | | Henna Market | 02/02/07 | | submissive razzmatazz karate masturbator | 02/02/07 | | Glittery Nursing Home Mad-dog Skullcap | 02/02/07 | | Brilliant Mother | 02/02/07 | | crystalline fortuitous meteor | 02/02/07 | | opaque set | 02/02/07 | | disgusting magenta property affirmative action | 02/03/07 | | flirting cerebral corner quadroon | 02/04/07 | | Glassy legal warrant stead | 02/06/07 | | Abusive address deer antler | 02/06/07 | | Mildly autistic mauve roast beef | 08/31/07 | | Abnormal cuck | 08/31/07 | | bateful fear-inspiring cruise ship dingle berry | 09/01/07 | | violent brunch | 06/01/08 | | scarlet sinister prole | 06/01/08 | | Supple Immigrant Sweet Tailpipe | 06/07/08 | | Haunting marvelous pozpig reading party | 02/02/07 | | opaque set | 08/31/07 | | multi-colored transparent selfie | 08/31/07 | | opaque set | 08/31/07 | | mustard heaven | 08/31/07 | | boyish macaca | 08/31/07 | | adulterous bronze theater | 08/31/07 | | opaque set | 08/31/07 | | adulterous bronze theater | 08/31/07 | | opaque set | 08/31/07 | | adulterous bronze theater | 08/31/07 | | boyish macaca | 08/31/07 | | adulterous bronze theater | 08/31/07 | | boyish macaca | 08/31/07 | | opaque set | 08/31/07 | | adulterous bronze theater | 08/31/07 | | opaque set | 08/31/07 | | carnelian theater stage | 09/01/07 | | domesticated parlour | 10/28/07 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: February 2nd, 2007 3:26 PM Author: opaque set
Of course it's hypothetical at this point, but assuming I got offers at both, where to go? Seems like both pay above market in Chicago and make you work above market hours. Thoughts?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573864&forum_id=2#7531933) |
 |
Date: February 2nd, 2007 5:49 PM Author: Overrated mind-boggling national
At this point, I think you have to at least assume that Kirkland moves to 145k, leaving a 15k gap where there used to be a 10k gap. The charts still show a slight advantage for Kirkland but really I don't think anybody knows the impact of the recent salary raise on bonuses. The partners at Kirkland have to be a little peeved after thinking they had a winner with the large bonus only to have Simpson play the ball right back at them.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573864&forum_id=2#7532812)
|
Date: February 2nd, 2007 5:38 PM Author: Autistic indecent library Subject: on writ of certiorari to the XO SCOTUS
XO SCOTUS delivered the opinion of the Court.
oneiota, the original poster ("OP"), asks whether he should "go" to the law firm of Skadden Arps ("Skadden") or Kirkland & Ellis ("Kirkland").
We first consider whether OP has standing to raise this question. “In essence the question of standing is whether the litigant is entitled to have the court decide the merits of the dispute or of particular issues.” Warth v. Seldin, 422 U.S. 490, 498 (1975). As OP does not have an offer from either firm—he in fact concedes his inquiry is "hypothetical"—OP cannot plausibly lie within the zone of interest required by our decision in Allen v. Wright, 468 U.S. 737 (1984). We therefore conclude that OP lacks standing to start this thread.
We pause to note that OP's claim also fails to demonstrate ripeness. We said in Texas v. United States that "a claim is not ripe for adjudication if it rests upon contingent future events that may not occur as anticipated, or indeed may not occur at all." 523 U.S. 296, 300 (1998). OP's request for information on offers he does not have is precisely the kind of "contingent future event" our jurisprudence has rejected as premature.
This thread is therefore dismissed with prejudice. OP may pursue any further navel-gazing he wishes not inconsistent with this opinion.
It is so ordered.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573864&forum_id=2#7532736) |
 |
Date: February 2nd, 2007 6:27 PM Author: Glittery Nursing Home Mad-dog Skullcap
Flawless. Sublime.
180
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573864&forum_id=2#7532983) |
 |
Date: September 1st, 2007 2:56 PM Author: bateful fear-inspiring cruise ship dingle berry
awesome.
did this dood do any more, or was this a one-shot schtick?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573864&forum_id=2#8586365) |
Date: February 2nd, 2007 6:57 PM Author: Haunting marvelous pozpig reading party
you shouldn't have filed in federal XO court dude. rookie mistake.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573864&forum_id=2#7533149) |
Date: August 31st, 2007 10:44 PM Author: opaque set
UPDATE: have callbacks at both. This case may SRSLY be ripe in the near future.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573864&forum_id=2#8584303) |
 |
Date: August 31st, 2007 10:49 PM Author: mustard heaven
"UPDATE: have callbacks at both."
you the man now, dog.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573864&forum_id=2#8584317) |
 |
Date: August 31st, 2007 11:00 PM Author: boyish macaca
So, we're to believe that a poster (who has barely posted a single thing in 8 months besides this horrible OP) happens to see this thread on the day it gets bumped and also just happens to have callbacks at both.
Sorry, whokebe, much easier to believe that you're an alternate moniker of a reg and came here to salvage what was left of your damaged pride.
*poop*
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573864&forum_id=2#8584349) |
Date: August 31st, 2007 10:48 PM Author: adulterous bronze theater
Chicago is a fucking hole in the wall cow town. why the fuck would you ever want to go there for 10 minutes let alone live there?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573864&forum_id=2#8584314) |
 |
Date: August 31st, 2007 10:52 PM Author: adulterous bronze theater
"hate NYC"
Translation: "couldn't last 30 seconds in NYC and couldn't get a job in NYC even if you sucked off every v100 partner in the city"
have fun in cornfield town
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573864&forum_id=2#8584326) |
 |
Date: August 31st, 2007 10:57 PM Author: opaque set
Jesus Christ you are stupid. NYC is a MUCH easier market than Chicago...ANYONE at a decent school could get a Vault firm in NYC.
And hey, good luck at St. John's OCI.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573864&forum_id=2#8584340) |
 |
Date: August 31st, 2007 10:59 PM Author: adulterous bronze theater
sorry, I'm not a lawyer. would never dream of it.
the reason the chicago market is so shitty is because every fucking TTT NU, UIUC, and rancid Chicago-Kent grad, not to mention all the loyola and dePaul mouth breathers are climbing over each other trying to get jobs.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573864&forum_id=2#8584343) |
 |
Date: August 31st, 2007 11:01 PM Author: boyish macaca
Right, and NYC doesn't have Cardozo, St John's, Fordham, NYLS...
You're a fucking moron
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573864&forum_id=2#8584351) |
 |
Date: August 31st, 2007 11:03 PM Author: opaque set
Then go to a firm where those people aren't allowed in - there's plenty.
Do you think 100 NYC firms populated with Pace, NYLS, Brooklyn, St Johns, Cardozo and Fordham grads are better?
I can see why you won't be a lawyer - your reasoning skills are shit. Back to the UG board, where you belong.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573864&forum_id=2#8584356) |
 |
Date: August 31st, 2007 11:30 PM Author: opaque set
2.5 * 0 = 0
sounds about right.
Unless you meant my future salary...for some reason I don't think you make 400k. Just a hunch.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573864&forum_id=2#8584442) |
Date: October 28th, 2007 8:46 PM Author: domesticated parlour
bump
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=573864&forum_id=2#8823887) |
|
|