The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
SWeet email from PEnn dean RE: Wash. Post article.
Poast new message in this thread
Date: March 8th, 2007 4:59 PM Author: marvelous affirmative action trailer park To: Penn Law School Community From: Dean Michael Fitts Dean Gary Clinton
As you many of you recognize, the rise and pervasiveness of the Internet has raised a number of important and novel issues regarding free speech, legal regulation, and one's legal and professional obligations to society and to the professional and Internet communities. The Internet holds great opportunity, but there are also grave risks. In the not too distant past, offhand comments or written observations quickly dissipated over space and time. Today, the comments made on discussion boards, blogs, group websites and other web postings can have permanent and lasting consequences for the subjects as well as the speaker.
While we understand the right of every citizen to engage in spirited debate, we also believe we all have a moral and professional obligation to engage in that debate in a responsible manner. Posts made on the web may well be permanent and may have serious consequences. Things said on discussion boards and blogs can travel around the world instantly, and become something that can define the writer now or at any future point. Statements made now, in jest or between what the writer assumes to be a small group of friends, may come back to haunt one in the future.
In recent weeks, significant attention has been focused on a discussion board co-owned by a Penn law student, as well as other, independent sites that have been linked to it. These sites contain anonymous postings, which we have no reason to believe came from the owner, and which the great majority of thinking people would find beneath the standards of human decency. They remain posted because of laws governing free speech and the board manager's regretful practice of rarely deleting threads when asked. As a matter of law, and under the University's own policies on speech, we feel we have no basis for disciplinary action against the co-owner, though we have had numerous discussions with him about the board and its very unfortunate impact when ad hominem attacks are made against defenseless individuals. While these activities are outside the purview of the Law School, they may well be subject to laws governing libel and defamation brought by individuals subjected to the personal attacks one sees online, and they may increasingly become the subject of concern by bar admissions committees.
Let us give you a few other examples. In the summer of 2005, we became aware of an incident in which comments made by a student on a blog were read by his employer when the employer Googled her own name and discovered what the student had said about her. Result: instant termination of employment. Many recent stories in the press and on TV have said that it is becoming increasingly frequent - and will soon be the norm - for employers to Google the names of potential hires, to see what they may learn about them. We know of cases in which potential employers have seen some very intemperate postings and have questioned the desirability of hiring the individual. And similarly, we know of a young attorney who was fired one day after accidentally sending firm-wide, rather than deleting as she'd intended, an inflammatory and personally abusive email directed at a member of her firm's support staff.
The same caution holds true for the owners of websites, where the language used by others may well reflect negatively on the site's owners, no matter how well-intentioned the site may be. The well-publicized Senate confirmation hearings of Justice Roberts made us all aware of the importance written words can have, even those written decades ago. His writings, the thoughtful and well-considered work-product of an attorney, are mild compared to some of the postings which people put on their blogs or in other postings these days. It is a certainty that some contemporary postings, done for friends or for unknown readers out in cyberspace and in tones that are presented as jests or as sarcastic provocations, will look far different when viewed in the light of an employment review or a Senate confirmation hearing. What is said now as a joke or a flame under cover of supposed anonymity, may well come back to haunt the writer in later years.
The web continues to provide new opportunities, new uses, new challenges, AND new ways to make major life-altering errors. We are writing to you now as a reminder to give some thought to what you write and send out into the world at large. Freedom of speech is an overarching value to all of us. But the use of self-restraint is no assault on that freedom. PLEASE KEEP THIS IN MIND: you are at the start of your professional career. We urge you to take the long view and the adult view of what you write about yourself and about others. THINK about the words you send out into the world, and imagine what they would look like when you - and surely some of you will -find yourself under review at a confirmation hearing or a job interview for a professional position you dearly desire. There is no do-over on the net. Be careful and be professional in what you post about yourself or about others. |
 |
Date: March 8th, 2007 5:03 PM Author: bronze pontificating parlour queen of the night "they may increasingly become the subject of concern by bar admissions committees" (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=592156&forum_id=2#7726110) |
|
Date: March 8th, 2007 5:04 PM Author: very tactful ticket booth nibblets "What is said now as a joke or a flame"
A flame? There are rumors.. on the internets..
Also the GTO bashing is nice. Bravo. |
|
Date: March 8th, 2007 5:20 PM Author: bronze pontificating parlour queen of the night where is the GTO bashing? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=592156&forum_id=2#7726168) |
|
Date: March 8th, 2007 5:28 PM Author: Racy Haunting Rehab Faggot Firefighter In recent weeks, significant attention has been focused on a discussion board co-owned by a Penn law student, as well as other, independent sites that have been linked to it. These sites contain anonymous postings, which we have no reason to believe came from the owner, and which the great majority of thinking people would find beneath the standards of human decency. They remain posted because of laws governing free speech and the board manager's regretful practice of rarely deleting threads when asked. As a matter of law, and under the University's own policies on speech, we feel we have no basis for disciplinary action against the co-owner, though we have had numerous discussions with him about the board and its very unfortunate impact when ad hominem attacks are made against defenseless individuals. While these activities are outside the purview of the Law School, they may well be subject to laws governing libel and defamation brought by individuals subjected to the personal attacks one sees online, and they may increasingly become the subject of concern by bar admissions committees. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=592156&forum_id=2#7726202) |
|
Date: March 8th, 2007 5:38 PM Author: Out-of-control red ape state Also,
"The same caution holds true for the owners of websites, where the language used by others may well reflect negatively on the site's owners, no matter how well-intentioned the site may be." |
|
Date: March 8th, 2007 5:07 PM Author: umber mood step-uncle's house "What is said now as a joke or a flame under cover of supposed anonymity, may well come back to haunt the writer in later years."
Are you lecturing the Heide Iravanis out there in the world to put on clothes before posing for the pictures they post on myspace and facebook? |
|
Date: March 8th, 2007 5:15 PM Author: Talented goyim Translation: If you're a fucking retard, you get what you deserve. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=592156&forum_id=2#7726149) |
|
Date: March 8th, 2007 5:20 PM Author: Out-of-control red ape state Classy. Nothing like encouraging others to take legal action against one of your students in the same breath you are admitting he did not participate in the flaming.
Also, nice saying "yeah, we are a law school, and we realize this may be legal, and we cannot stop it, but even though it's legal, it's wrong, and it's wrong because I say it's wrong"
Does he publicly opine on every legal issue he disagrees with that may affect students? |
|
Date: March 8th, 2007 5:22 PM Author: Out-of-control red ape state Also classy sending an email publicly when it is so obviously directed at one person. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=592156&forum_id=2#7726176) |
|
Date: March 9th, 2007 12:41 AM Author: Vigorous stag film legal warrant Please tell me this is flame. No professor, dean, or self-respecting human should write this badly. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=592156&forum_id=2#7727865) |
Date: March 8th, 2007 5:07 PM Author: Wonderful dead hairy legs generalized bond regrettful. lol. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=592156&forum_id=2#7726125) |
|
Date: March 8th, 2007 5:12 PM Author: histrionic magical pisswyrm brunch i'm feeling regrettable about all this. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=592156&forum_id=2#7726139) |
|
Date: March 8th, 2007 5:07 PM Author: concupiscible corner "beneath the standards of human decency" should really be the new motto for xoxohth (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=592156&forum_id=2#7726126) |
|
Date: March 8th, 2007 5:39 PM Author: disturbing milk LOL. Seconded. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=592156&forum_id=2#7726242) |
|
Date: March 8th, 2007 8:17 PM Author: stimulating ultramarine gunner there should be a list of mottos like this that get displayed at random each time you load the page (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=592156&forum_id=2#7726761) |
|
Date: March 8th, 2007 10:37 PM Author: navy station place of business titcp (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=592156&forum_id=2#7727451) |
|
Date: March 8th, 2007 10:37 PM Author: marvelous affirmative action trailer park added to sig (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=592156&forum_id=2#7727456) |
|
Date: March 8th, 2007 5:16 PM Author: drunken orchestra pit boiling water I enjoyed reading this. It was very well written and I think he makes a very good point. Maybe there should there be a policy that any postings that can be connected to someone on Google by either their real name/picture/blog/MySpace should be deleted upon request. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=592156&forum_id=2#7726152) |
|
Date: March 8th, 2007 5:16 PM Author: Flickering Dashing Shitlib Hahaha. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=592156&forum_id=2#7726153) |
|
Date: March 8th, 2007 5:20 PM Author: histrionic magical pisswyrm brunch i don't think he makes a good point. he is sanctimoniously stating the obvious--you shouldn't attack people in writing. moreover, beyond the memorialization of expression, he doesn't offer any reason that this forum is different from, say, a rowdy poker game. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=592156&forum_id=2#7726170) |
|
Date: March 8th, 2007 5:23 PM Author: bronze pontificating parlour queen of the night i didnt realize rowdy poker games can be googled for future reference (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=592156&forum_id=2#7726177) |
|
Date: March 8th, 2007 5:38 PM Author: histrionic magical pisswyrm brunch did you even bother to interpret the post? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=592156&forum_id=2#7726235) |
|
Date: March 8th, 2007 5:24 PM Author: Wonderful dead hairy legs generalized bond its also a passive aggressive dig on GTO - almost childish whining that "we cant stop GTO, leave us alone." (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=592156&forum_id=2#7726180) |
|
Date: March 8th, 2007 5:32 PM Author: Aromatic School And, like ICE mentioned above, "We can't do anything, but maybe bar committees can, or if you take legal action yoursleves..." (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=592156&forum_id=2#7726217) |
|
Date: March 8th, 2007 5:32 PM Author: Flickering Dashing Shitlib That was pretty much the sole purpose of the email. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=592156&forum_id=2#7726218) |
|
Date: March 8th, 2007 7:48 PM Author: Talented goyim No. The policy should be that outtings based on public info available on the internet are perfectly fine.
If you're so stupid as the think that the internet isn't public, you deserve what you get.
Jesus fucking Christ, people, you're well over 20 years old. Pull your head out of your ass. |
|
Date: March 8th, 2007 5:26 PM Author: Spectacular toaster "They remain posted because of laws governing free speech"
lolz. |
|
Date: March 8th, 2007 5:27 PM Author: marvelous affirmative action trailer park How unfortunate. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=592156&forum_id=2#7726198) |
|
Date: March 8th, 2007 5:31 PM Author: concupiscible corner Crafty 1st Amendment...always screwing people over! (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=592156&forum_id=2#7726213) |
|
Date: March 8th, 2007 5:34 PM Author: crimson massive nowag filthpig the 1st amendment...decadent or merely shrewd? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=592156&forum_id=2#7726225) |
|
Date: March 8th, 2007 8:13 PM Author: claret erotic genital piercing Unappreciated. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=592156&forum_id=2#7726739) |
|
Date: March 8th, 2007 5:29 PM Author: Irate Crackhouse The sad part is that people who volunteer to take part in C&F committees are probably the buffoons who think GTO is doing something wrong by not censoring whatever he deems inappropriate. To the Dean of Penn, a notoriously bad public law school not even in NYC, I say this: ppppplllllllllllb |
|
Date: March 8th, 2007 5:42 PM Author: Apoplectic glittery box office codepig (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=592156&forum_id=2#7726253) |
|
Date: March 8th, 2007 5:49 PM Author: Trip half-breed The portion of the message directed at GTO is passive aggressive. The Dean obviously disagrees with him and his course of conduct, but does not directly state that GTO should stop or alter his conduct. The tone is annoying and akin to someone sighing loudly rather than voicing their actual complaint.
However, the larger message to all students is sensible. |
|
Date: March 8th, 2007 5:50 PM Author: startling slate elastic band This is the worst attempt at damage control I've seen. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=592156&forum_id=2#7726285) |
|
Date: March 8th, 2007 5:59 PM Author: Chestnut soggy cumskin i wonder if anyone's been fired for admitting gto. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=592156&forum_id=2#7726315) |
|
Date: March 8th, 2007 6:57 PM Author: sickened forum I would think the mentally unstable law student who SHOT someone over a stupid argument would be a better reason to fire an adcomm. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=592156&forum_id=2#7726495) |
|
Date: March 8th, 2007 10:26 PM Author: Cerebral rigor Two strikes against Penn (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=592156&forum_id=2#7727407) |
|
Date: March 8th, 2007 6:08 PM Author: Spectacular toaster How the hell did Deeh get ahold of this?
I'm certain he's too stupid to write this as flame... |
|
Date: March 8th, 2007 6:32 PM Author: Hairless Preventive Strike I was thinking exactly the same thing. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=592156&forum_id=2#7726398) |
|
Date: March 8th, 2007 6:34 PM Author: Aromatic School No joke - :D's got a SWeet hookup. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=592156&forum_id=2#7726403) |
|
Date: March 8th, 2007 7:49 PM Author: Talented goyim Maybe he's not a fucktard from Texas. He's a fucktard from somewhere else. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=592156&forum_id=2#7726662) |
|
Date: March 8th, 2007 6:16 PM Author: Lavender cracking chapel people who are hurt Alternative thread title: Just in case any of you really seriously considering attending Penn... (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=592156&forum_id=2#7726357) |
|
Date: March 8th, 2007 6:24 PM Author: motley filthy parlor goal in life Perhaps xoxo will make Penn's 115% employment rate at graduate go down to a paltry 105%? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=592156&forum_id=2#7726372) |
|
Date: March 8th, 2007 7:13 PM Author: Flickering Dashing Shitlib I doubt it. At most I see Penn's employment rate to drop 3 points, to 112%. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=592156&forum_id=2#7726549) |
|
Date: March 8th, 2007 7:27 PM Author: low-t legend Expect increases now that Penn has changed the way it calculates the employment rate in order to improve reliability. From this year on, students with biglaw offers will be doublecounted since they put in two 40 hour "work weeks" per week. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=592156&forum_id=2#7726582) |
|
Date: March 8th, 2007 7:29 PM Author: Mischievous Stage Digit Ratio TITCR. Anything under 150% employment would be dissapointing to the school. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=592156&forum_id=2#7726589) |
|
Date: March 8th, 2007 9:59 PM Author: beady-eyed volcanic crater pit Yes it should.
Andrew Furlow is the man!
|
|
Date: March 8th, 2007 6:39 PM Author: Pink voyeur incel yet another idiot law school dean, shocking (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=592156&forum_id=2#7726422) |
|
Date: March 8th, 2007 7:53 PM Author: stirring school cafeteria I can't believe he used the word "flame."
I thought that was an xoxo thing. |
|
Date: March 8th, 2007 7:59 PM Author: swashbuckling space Why didn't you keep your word about retiring? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=592156&forum_id=2#7726688) |
|
Date: March 8th, 2007 8:04 PM Author: stirring school cafeteria I did.
Didn't you read my retirement post? |
|
Date: March 8th, 2007 8:31 PM Author: Chrome national Funny.
Dear Penn:
Was all of the controversy really worth it for an admit with a 165 LSAT? |
|
Date: April 17th, 2007 9:16 PM Author: autistic theater gaping subtle 9th amendment troll. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=592156&forum_id=2#7951464) |