The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
The AutoAdmit suit is real.
Poast new message in this thread
Date: June 12th, 2007 11:51 AM Author: bright infuriating toilet seat http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2007/06/12/students-file-suit-against-autoadmit-director-others/ (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=644106&forum_id=2#8246406) |
 |
Date: June 12th, 2007 11:52 AM Author: Sapphire newt http://youtube.com/watch?v=b714Wi4CDsQ (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=644106&forum_id=2#8246411) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 11:53 AM Author: excitant casino party of the first part holy shit fuck. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=644106&forum_id=2#8246412) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 11:54 AM Author: cheese-eating comical parlor dingle berry H.O.L.Y. S.H.I.T. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=644106&forum_id=2#8246414) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 11:59 AM Author: claret regret Someone post the complaint! (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=644106&forum_id=2#8246439) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 3:54 PM Author: pink sweet tailpipe plaza Does anyone have a complete list of the named posters?
cant find it in any links (active ones) |
Date: June 12th, 2007 11:52 AM Author: free-loading range bam. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=644106&forum_id=2#8246409) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 11:54 AM Author: effete sick pisswyrm flame. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=644106&forum_id=2#8246416) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 11:55 AM Author: Flickering personal credit line candlestick maker EVERYBODY DANCE NOW (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=644106&forum_id=2#8246422) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 12:05 PM Author: histrionic trust fund Perfectly executed. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=644106&forum_id=2#8246456) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 12:37 PM Author: obsidian tanning salon roast beef more feces (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=644106&forum_id=2#8246528) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 11:55 AM Author: Glassy Boyish Business Firm Twinkling Uncleanness http://www.qwizx.com/gssfx/usa/tpirhorns.wav (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=644106&forum_id=2#8246423) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 11:56 AM Author: Flickering personal credit line candlestick maker 180. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=644106&forum_id=2#8246426) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 11:57 AM Author: Carmine Wonderful Fat Ankles 180. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=644106&forum_id=2#8246432) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 12:00 PM Author: sticky kitchen tytyty (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=644106&forum_id=2#8246441) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 11:56 AM Author: glittery athletic conference love of her life now this could get really interesting....finally, this board has been pretty boring lately (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=644106&forum_id=2#8246428) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 11:56 AM Author: sticky kitchen thats hot (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=644106&forum_id=2#8246429) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 11:56 AM Author: know-it-all smoky shitlib 180 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=644106&forum_id=2#8246430) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 11:57 AM Author: Fuchsia crotch boistinker i think after this debacle i should quit using xoxo. i don't want to get entangled in one of these messes. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=644106&forum_id=2#8246433) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 11:58 AM Author: Vibrant ocher genital piercing pwned (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=644106&forum_id=2#8246435) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 11:58 AM Author: galvanic alcoholic incel reallifeandreallawpwn3d
|
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 11:59 AM Author: Racy Violent Step-uncle's House i guess we'll find out if there are any ip logs now (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=644106&forum_id=2#8246438) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 12:02 PM Author: excitant casino party of the first part actually, I was tracked down by my school's administration for something I said here, so yeah, probably. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=644106&forum_id=2#8246447) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 12:04 PM Author: free-loading range details? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=644106&forum_id=2#8246450) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 12:08 PM Author: claret regret Admin saw his login was used on a school's computer logged onto autoadmit which nailed him, no way they got it from autoadmit directly. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=644106&forum_id=2#8246460) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 12:10 PM Author: excitant casino party of the first part yeah, ok, I hope you're right (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=644106&forum_id=2#8246464) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 12:09 PM Author: excitant casino party of the first part (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=644106&forum_id=2#8246461) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 12:11 PM Author: Vibrant ocher genital piercing what did you say? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=644106&forum_id=2#8246467) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 12:16 PM Author: excitant casino party of the first part (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=644106&forum_id=2#8246479) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 12:19 PM Author: Vibrant ocher genital piercing That must have been fun to explain. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=644106&forum_id=2#8246490) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 12:24 PM Author: excitant casino party of the first part (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=644106&forum_id=2#8246502) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 12:40 PM Author: offensive mental disorder Threating yourself or others is one thing. There are privacy laws up the ass to protect against a faggoty civil suit. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=644106&forum_id=2#8246538) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 1:01 PM Author: amethyst puppy stead YOU = PWN3D!!!!!!!!!!1 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=644106&forum_id=2#8246591) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 1:26 PM Author: Sapphire newt That's not :D dude, look carefully. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=644106&forum_id=2#8246677) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 9:36 PM Author: amethyst puppy stead oh. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=644106&forum_id=2#8248582) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 12:00 PM Author: Insane clear national psychic *quadruple checks to make sure none of my monikers are on that list (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=644106&forum_id=2#8246442) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 12:17 PM Author: Razzle Sable Stage Marketing Idea seriously. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=644106&forum_id=2#8246483) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 12:25 PM Author: Sapphire newt first thing I did too *high five* (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=644106&forum_id=2#8246504) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 12:00 PM Author: excitant casino party of the first part (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=644106&forum_id=2#8246443) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 12:00 PM Author: snowy native now GTO can get a job! lead counsel in the matter of Rosen v. XOXO...and after his MSJ is granted...BIG PARTY on BIG CHANGES!!!! SUPPA HAPPY FUN TIME!!!! (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=644106&forum_id=2#8246444) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 12:00 PM Author: dark spot reading party more than two dozen others? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=644106&forum_id=2#8246446) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 12:04 PM Author: effete sick pisswyrm there are more than two dozen monkers listed in the other thread. i just noticed, one of the monikers is Todd Christopher. wasn't that the name of an actual person who pauliewalnuts thought he outted as drewsucksoe? |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 12:04 PM Author: sticky kitchen http://youtube.com/watch?v=4mD7n3rkus0 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=644106&forum_id=2#8246453) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 12:07 PM Author: free-loading range perfection. thanks. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=644106&forum_id=2#8246458) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 12:09 PM Author: effete sick pisswyrm i love it when yellow shirt busts out the david brent around 1:30. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=644106&forum_id=2#8246462) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 12:18 PM Author: sticky kitchen its not loading for me anymore, wtf? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=644106&forum_id=2#8246486) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 12:45 PM Author: Glassy Boyish Business Firm Twinkling Uncleanness http://youtube.com/watch?v=OHa4Pn6quLQ (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=644106&forum_id=2#8246555) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 12:05 PM Author: Carmine Wonderful Fat Ankles (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=644106&forum_id=2#8246455) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 12:06 PM Author: free-loading range aren't the pics definitely copyrighted? errrr (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=644106&forum_id=2#8246457) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 12:10 PM Author: galvanic alcoholic incel this has nothing to do with real life. you're arguing the case on its merits. the defendants will need real lawyers to make those arguments at the summary judgment and/or trial stage, and real lawyers cost real money to get to those stages. those who own homes probably have homeowners insurance and they should contact their insurers ASAP. those who are not homeowners... are screwed.
|
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 12:11 PM Author: Carmine Wonderful Fat Ankles homeowners insurance? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=644106&forum_id=2#8246469) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 12:22 PM Author: galvanic alcoholic incel homeowner policies usually include general liability coverage.
|
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 1:16 PM Author: bateful flirting bawdyhouse general liability insurance specifically excludes intentional torts. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=644106&forum_id=2#8246632) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 1:30 PM Author: appetizing garnet immigrant background story So everything in the complaint would be covered then save for IIED. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=644106&forum_id=2#8246700) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 2:33 PM Author: galvanic alcoholic incel yeah thanks but as long as portions of the complaint allege covered conduct the insurer has a duty to defend. the point is to put the insurer on notice so defense counsel can be quickly obtained.
|
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 9:55 PM Author: Jade jew circlehead Just so you know, we use lawyers from what some would call TTT's. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=644106&forum_id=2#8248654) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 2:14 PM Author: flushed shivering dilemma national security agency not for things that have nothing to do with the home. use your brain. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=644106&forum_id=2#8246945) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 2:33 PM Author: galvanic alcoholic incel i'm coverage counsel shithead. want to continue this discussion?
|
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 12:10 PM Author: claret regret Way to delete, the advice was borderline at best. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=644106&forum_id=2#8246465) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 12:12 PM Author: Carmine Wonderful Fat Ankles it was not advice. It was an overview of the claims as I saw them. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=644106&forum_id=2#8246471) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 12:12 PM Author: claret regret BTW just because you say "not legal advice" does not make it so. Someone please post the complaint. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=644106&forum_id=2#8246473) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 12:19 PM Author: Sapphire newt Of course it does. If you make clear that you're not offering legal advice, and that your communication shouldn't be relied upon as such, then no judge will find you as having the duty of a retained lawyer. THIS IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE. DO NOT RELY ON THIS. I COULD BE WRONG. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=644106&forum_id=2#8246492) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 12:31 PM Author: cheese-eating comical parlor dingle berry That's actually not always true. You can't always disclaim away liability. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=644106&forum_id=2#8246512) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 12:12 PM Author: lilac titillating really tough guy The real beauty of this case is that it will effectively out many of the above named posters, thus ensuring that their professional reputations will be shredded much as the plaintiffs' were. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=644106&forum_id=2#8246472) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 12:14 PM Author: beady-eyed opaque toaster I'm on the edge of my seat too. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=644106&forum_id=2#8246476) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 12:14 PM Author: Vibrant ocher genital piercing Credited, and I think this is the real point of the suit. No one in their right mind should contact the plaintiff's attorney. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=644106&forum_id=2#8246477) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 12:14 PM Author: Zombie-like office deer antler I suspect that is the main goal of the lawsuit. As well it should be. I support free speech 100%, but you should not be able to say those things -- completely unverified -- on a public message board about a private person. She had no opportunity to effectively respond. And just the posting was devastating, true or false. Nobody should be able to inflict harm like that without any opportunity for the person to seek redress. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=644106&forum_id=2#8246478) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 12:19 PM Author: lilac titillating really tough guy Agreed. The internet allows for all kinds of potential abuses that other media do not permit.
At the same time I feel torn because I do believe that the ability to speak freely and anonymously on the internet should be preserved. |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 12:35 PM Author: Domesticated swashbuckling wagecucks blood rage if you intentionally "google bomb" someone with the knowledge that it can be looked at by employers or others and negatively effect someone, then you're causing someone harm with your "speech" -- saying that these employers, etc. should be smart enough to not pay heed to these googlebombs is an utter cop out. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=644106&forum_id=2#8246524) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 12:20 PM Author: excitant casino party of the first part hell no what's with this vengeful eye-for-an-eye attitude, it's not very ladylike and certainly doesn't help to make BH more attractive in my eyes (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=644106&forum_id=2#8246493) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 12:23 PM Author: lilac titillating really tough guy The lawsuit appears to be the brainchild of two profs from Yale and Stanford. I suspect they determined based on some principle that the named posters were suitable candidates for this type of punishment. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=644106&forum_id=2#8246500) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 12:24 PM Author: floppy mother area Can they add more people to the list? What about witnesses? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=644106&forum_id=2#8246501) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 12:25 PM Author: excitant casino party of the first part Can I be on the list PLEASE! (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=644106&forum_id=2#8246506) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 12:31 PM Author: lilac titillating really tough guy I don't know. What would you need witnesses for? Looking over the original threads I couldn't imagine this lawsuit NOT being filed. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=644106&forum_id=2#8246511) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 12:32 PM Author: floppy mother area I'm not a law student. I don't know how this stuff works. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=644106&forum_id=2#8246515) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 1:19 PM Author: bateful flirting bawdyhouse >I couldn't imagine this lawsuit NOT being filed.
yeah, no shit. it'll be very nice to see all these morons' careers destroyed.
anonymous speech on the internet is one thing, targeting defamatory wrath on innocent people is wholly another. |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 4:55 PM Author: Cerebral hall old irish cottage " support free speech 100%, but..."
Here we go. Here's a clue for you: you support free speech ~20%. Time to retake grade school math. |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 12:30 PM Author: honey-headed well-lubricated macaca i don't have much sympathy for most of the defendants but i believe AHWIAB didn't do or say anything wrong. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=644106&forum_id=2#8246510) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 12:32 PM Author: lilac titillating really tough guy Why isn't loneleyvirgin, the loser who sent that letter to all the YLS faculty, on that list? Could they be planning to sue him separately? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=644106&forum_id=2#8246516) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 12:34 PM Author: Domesticated swashbuckling wagecucks blood rage can they just sue aznazn and we'll forget this whole thing ever happened? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=644106&forum_id=2#8246520) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 1:25 PM Author: Medicated Canary Alpha totally credited. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=644106&forum_id=2#8246664) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 12:34 PM Author: excitant casino party of the first part what's illegal about what he did? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=644106&forum_id=2#8246521) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 12:35 PM Author: lilac titillating really tough guy IIED? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=644106&forum_id=2#8246523) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 12:41 PM Author: effete sick pisswyrm i'd have to read the complaint, but the choice of posters seems to indicate they've selected a few posters who fit a certain criteria, otherwise there'd be a lot more names on the list. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=644106&forum_id=2#8246539) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 5:18 PM Author: bisexual hospital feces He seems like a good guy. I don't have much sympathy for most of the defendants, but I was horrified to AHWIAB on the complaint. I'm sad to see GTO named too, although it's not as surprising. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=644106&forum_id=2#8247674) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 9:44 PM Author: honey-headed well-lubricated macaca yeah at this point i've given up thinking about GTO for him, whatever happens will happen |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 12:36 PM Author: sticky kitchen “It’s bringing the right to protect yourself against offensive words and images into the 21st century,” said David N. Rosen. did those girls think the images were offensive when they posted them themselves? |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 12:42 PM Author: beady-eyed opaque toaster Great day to be gay and not involved in rating girls eh? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=644106&forum_id=2#8246543) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 1:19 PM Author: arousing principal's office According to the WSJ article, they are claiming that they couldn't get good summer associate positions because of the attention from this site. Now if that is in the complaint (I haven't read it yet) won't they have to prove causation there which means getting the hiring committees from all those firms on the stand to show that it was a "But For" cause or substantial factor? This is assuming they get past all the other hurdles in this case. Seems like there are a number of defenses that are glaringly obvious that the professors are missing.
I have a feeling this is going to turn out just like the Pentagon recruiting case. Every law professor thinks this has merit, but even the most liberal judges in real world law laugh them out of court.
|
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 1:20 PM Author: sticky kitchen yeah it is in the complaint. and the alternative, that they didnt get hired because they were ttts with poor skillz, was deemed a "lie" (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=644106&forum_id=2#8246647) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 1:26 PM Author: bright infuriating toilet seat The complaint doesn't have an "interference with business prospects" or anything like that, so it'll only be about special damages, I think. It won't undermine the basis of the suit if they can't show that. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=644106&forum_id=2#8246675) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 1:33 PM Author: arousing principal's office The complaint seems thin on Anthony's involvement. It just claims he didn't stop any of the threads. Since when does anyone have to step in to stop anything in this country. That's the American way. He had no duty to help these people. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=644106&forum_id=2#8246714) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 1:37 PM Author: bright infuriating toilet seat I'd agree with this, but I don't know enough about what constitutes "publication" for Web site administrators. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=644106&forum_id=2#8246744) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 1:45 PM Author: effete sick pisswyrm para. 42 they seem pissed he didn't take down the threads and instead threatened to post their emails. |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 1:49 PM Author: arousing principal's office What's wrong with posting their emails? Those are probably regarded as public information, just like their names. Especially if they used their emails to contact him. Unless they have never used their email to contact anyone and worked hard to keep it private then maybe, but still doubtful. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=644106&forum_id=2#8246816) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 1:52 PM Author: Trip Whorehouse I don't think they are particularly pissed that he threated to post the emails, but rather that when they asked for the threads to be removed, NOT ONLY did they refuse, but they ALSO threatened to post the emails. The posting threat was just the insult, but the injury was the refusal. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=644106&forum_id=2#8246831) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 1:37 PM Author: Electric fishy cumskin not getting a job is not the only harm they have alleged. intentional infliction of emotional distress seems pretty open and shut here. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=644106&forum_id=2#8246742) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 1:39 PM Author: bright infuriating toilet seat Injury's also presumed for libel and the privacy torts, I think, which means they wouldn't even have to show special damages or actual damages. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=644106&forum_id=2#8246759) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 5:07 PM Author: Curious onyx base (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=644106&forum_id=2#8247634) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 1:19 PM Author: stimulating blathering theater stage I wonder what the chick who wore underwear on her head thinks about this. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=644106&forum_id=2#8246642) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 1:25 PM Author: concupiscible hell the WSJ should interview her, with the underwear (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=644106&forum_id=2#8246667) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 1:30 PM Author: Ruddy Foreskin I didn't read these threads at the time, but the comments reproduced in the complaint are seriously disturbing. Frankly, I'm glad they brought this suit. People should be held accountable for their actions and the effects those actions have on others. What goes around comes around. |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 1:33 PM Author: appetizing garnet immigrant background story I agree that the people who made the comments -- if they are actionable IRL -- should be accountable. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=644106&forum_id=2#8246716) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 1:45 PM Author: Ruddy Foreskin I'm not saying that the comments are or should be legally actionable. I think the purpose behind this lawsuit is to nail every one of these guys to the wall by publicly exposing their identities in connection with their posts concerning these two women. Forget about employers - do you think any of these guys will date again after this becomes public? They all contributed to making the lives of these women extremely uncomfortable and this seems like perfect retribution. |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 1:56 PM Author: hyperventilating locale new version It's a good thing you're not one of the plaintiffs, what with truth being a defense to defamation claims. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=644106&forum_id=2#8246849) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 1:46 PM Author: excitant casino party of the first part it was just fucking around. Maybe it's shocking to some people, but at least 50% of the guys I've known have a sick and perverse sense of humor, and will talk like xoxo law boarders once you get to know them -- it's completely common and it means nothing. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=644106&forum_id=2#8246796) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 1:47 PM Author: excitant casino party of the first part of course, the difference is that xoxo is public space, although it doesn't always feel that way (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=644106&forum_id=2#8246801) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 1:52 PM Author: effete sick pisswyrm the problem is "fucking around" sounds a lot like "threatening to rape someone" when it's reprinted in a legal document. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=644106&forum_id=2#8246834) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 2:04 PM Author: excitant casino party of the first part yeah, taken out of context even wgwag can sound immoral (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=644106&forum_id=2#8246898) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 9:46 PM Author: honey-headed well-lubricated macaca racist? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=644106&forum_id=2#8248619) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 2:08 PM Author: amber dysfunction sandwich So true. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=644106&forum_id=2#8246913) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 1:54 PM Author: Ruddy Foreskin No - that doesn't shock me at all, but it's not relevant to this situation.
Do you really think that private locker room talk is the same as google-bombing someone with rape threats and STD allegations? Sure, guys say things all the time. Broadcasting things like this to a person's family, acquaintances and future employers is not just a case of guys being guys. They're getting exactly what they deserve.
|
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 2:03 PM Author: excitant casino party of the first part It's a little relevant, I think. Everyone of the posters, except one, did not intentionally broadcast (or "google-bomb", as you like to call it) anything to the public. Xoxohth can feel like you're in private just having fun with friends, and it's easy to forget that you're actually in public and that what you are saying is being stored.
All I'm saying is that none of the guys said anything that you won't hear from a of regular guys if you spend some time with them, including rape threats and STD allegations. |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 9:56 PM Author: Odious High-end Field This is actually a very interesting legal point that has not really been mentioned. It applies to the invasion of privacy torts. Yet another defense (actually, plaintiff has the burden of proof). This one seems very challenging for both sides--I really don't have any hunch what the legal answer is. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=644106&forum_id=2#8248661) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 2:12 PM Author: dashing ticket booth am i missing something or was cohen not named as a defendant? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=644106&forum_id=2#8246937) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 2:17 PM Author: flushed shivering dilemma national security agency he wasn't. is he cooperating with the suit? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=644106&forum_id=2#8246960) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 2:17 PM Author: Trip Whorehouse no, he wasn't (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=644106&forum_id=2#8246961) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 2:19 PM Author: bright infuriating toilet seat CDAprotectpwned (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=644106&forum_id=2#8246973) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 2:20 PM Author: dashing ticket booth ? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=644106&forum_id=2#8246978) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 4:38 PM Author: multi-colored kitty cat this is fucking stupid (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=644106&forum_id=2#8247523) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 4:44 PM Author: bat shit crazy translucent prole hissy fit this is bullshit. i wish i was a copyright lawyer i'd take this case pro boner. the yale faggot is such a douche, and so are the students. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=644106&forum_id=2#8247546) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 5:05 PM Author: burgundy slippery university hominid I love how now so many people are not so quick to say "yea, screw GTO, they all deserve this." Amazing how fast things change.
I wonder if the cool guys with cool haircuts will be next. |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 9:13 PM Author: crystalline lay wow, mark lemley is working on this. he's pretty damn good, at least as a professor, really smart. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=644106&forum_id=2#8248501) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 9:17 PM Author: Purple drunken forum is the fact that rachmiael (sp?) is not a defendant in the suit, along with the fact that the suit addresses said administrator numerous times, evidence that indeed means:
GTO = rachmiael = jarret cohen = anthony ciolli
|
|
Date: June 14th, 2007 10:37 AM Author: yapping zippy kitty haunted graveyard maybe just leveredge for getting ip addresses from him without a fight (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=644106&forum_id=2#8254141) |
|
Date: June 12th, 2007 9:59 PM Author: Motley church So, who's getting started on the amicus? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=644106&forum_id=2#8248667) |
|
Date: June 13th, 2007 12:38 AM Author: Vivacious Beta Mad Cow Disease this was my first question. i've got a good idea for part of an amicus. are people brave enough to help? am i?
This is not legal advice. I do not support xo, or the defendants. On information and belief, I have not defamed anyone or violated copyrights. |