The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
professors keep cheating
Poast new message in this thread
Date: February 1st, 2008 2:41 PM Author: Stirring Cyan Field Party Of The First Part I've had multiple professors who have cheated, broken university rules, and broken defamation, federal privacy laws. Nothing has happened to them.
Robert Hockett: broke defamation laws, harassed a student Peter Goodrich: broke defamation laws, harassed a student, violated federal privacy laws Frank Weiss: harassed a student, violated defamation laws
Why don't universities enforce their rules? |
 |
Date: February 1st, 2008 2:45 PM Author: Appetizing talking skinny woman church link? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=757281&forum_id=2#9253832) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2008 2:53 PM Author: Stirring Cyan Field Party Of The First Part Dear XXX,
I found your note to Prof. Harrington in my mailbox, and subsequently he told me you e-mailed him. I had asked you previously to address your questions only to me.
Your instructor did not refuse to discuss your homework grade with you: The discussion lasted ca. 20 minutes. There are witnesses. He did not lie to you; you lied to us.
You also attacked the instructor verbally, and by e-mail, making bizarre accusations. This is the third instructor out of four you have attacked in such a manner. The fourth class, Statistics, you dropped.
XX, as I've told you before, there is something seriously wrong here. To have even the slightest chance of achieving your professional goals, your behavior must change. From September, we will have a new Student Assistance Program available. I talked to them about you today, and was advised in the strongest terms that you should indeed avail yourself of their services. Please ask me for their contact information come September.
Sincerely,
Weiss
-- Dr. Frank D. Weiss Associate Program Chair MA Program in Applied Economics Office Hours: T,Th 4-7.
Johns Hopkins University Advanced Academic Programs 1717 Massachusetts Ave., NW., Suite 104 Washington, D.C. 20036-2001 |
|
Date: February 1st, 2008 3:51 PM Author: Carmine state halford It remined me of the legendary Ernest Menard. The OP is clearly schizo. http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=482613&forum_id=2 |
|
Date: February 1st, 2008 4:52 PM Author: indigo hominid bawdyhouse How can he be guilty of defamation if the letter was private until you posted it online? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=757281&forum_id=2#9254585) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2008 4:55 PM Author: Stirring Cyan Field Party Of The First Part He called up employers and made negative referrals about me, although he wasn't listed as an official reference. I was fired from at least two jobs due to negative comments he made to my employers. He's also gossiped to other employers and program heads. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=757281&forum_id=2#9254603) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2008 4:59 PM Author: indigo hominid bawdyhouse Nevermind, I read the rest of the thread. You should seek professional help (and no, I don't mean find a lawyer). (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=757281&forum_id=2#9254624) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2008 5:01 PM Author: Stirring Cyan Field Party Of The First Part Actually, I've talked to lawyers, who said I should definitely sue. And they weren't nice guys.
I've talked to friends who said I should sue. I've talked to businessmen who said I should sue.
|
|
Date: February 1st, 2008 5:02 PM Author: indigo hominid bawdyhouse Did they agree to work on a contingency basis? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=757281&forum_id=2#9254644) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2008 5:06 PM Author: Stirring Cyan Field Party Of The First Part I'm sharing my legal strategy with an uncooperative stranger on a web site because why? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=757281&forum_id=2#9254672) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2008 5:13 PM Author: indigo hominid bawdyhouse Uh, because if they're billing you by the hour they're probably TTTs who don't really care how good your case is and just want your money. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=757281&forum_id=2#9254722) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2008 5:07 PM Author: Violent alcoholic university You're a douchebag. Don't gum up the courts with your bullshit. 3 out of four professors can't all be wrong. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=757281&forum_id=2#9254685) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2008 5:10 PM Author: Stirring Cyan Field Party Of The First Part Fabricated statistics and robots. What will this website come up with next? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=757281&forum_id=2#9254703) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2008 5:21 PM Author: Razzmatazz fuchsia step-uncle's house I'm still contemplating whether this is a flame. If not, you *seriously* need some help. As in mental help, not legal help. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=757281&forum_id=2#9254758) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2008 5:21 PM Author: Violent alcoholic university You've just got to relax, sport. Save that piss and vinegar for the inexorable shit storm headed your way. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=757281&forum_id=2#9254759) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2008 5:24 PM Author: Stirring Cyan Field Party Of The First Part Hey R2D2. When's the next Star Wars film? How's C3PO? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=757281&forum_id=2#9254779) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2008 5:35 PM Author: Bright dingle berry sanctuary 176 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=757281&forum_id=2#9254847) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2008 5:26 PM Author: Stirring Cyan Field Party Of The First Part Which Replicant were you in Blade Runner? Darryl Hannah? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=757281&forum_id=2#9254785) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2008 5:32 PM Author: Violent alcoholic university Yes. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=757281&forum_id=2#9254822) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2008 5:36 PM Author: Bright dingle berry sanctuary LOL (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=757281&forum_id=2#9254852) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2008 3:00 PM Author: Stirring Cyan Field Party Of The First Part Dear XX,
Don't you remember this?
XX,
I anticipate that the exam will take you no more than 2 hours. I sent the exam out through WebCt mail at about 10:30 ET yesterday.
Good luck,
MCF XX, you are not engaging with the real problems. You have imagined a problem, and are letting it divert you. I urge you to seek medical attention. As I said, if I can be of any assistance, please let me know. For starters, do you have health insurance? Where do you live?
Best,
Weiss
What is deeply troubled about asking for an extension on an exam that wasn't delivered on time? I have mentioned this to multiple professors who agreed that it is perfectly reasonable. If they agree with me, why is this troubled?
XX
On 5/3/07, Frank D. Weiss <fdw@tidalwave.net> wrote: Dear XX,
Your behavior is deeply troubled. You must seek medical attention, for your own sake. Once again, if I can be of any assistance, please let me know. Do you have health insurance? Where do you live?
Best,
Weiss
Professor Weiss:
You haven't said anything very clearly, and I've forwarded the note to a number of people who agree with me.
XX
On 5/3/07, Frank D. Weiss <fdw@tidalwave.net > wrote: Dear XX,
I am not arguing the case with you. The decision is final.
You are showing no insight into your behavior. You must get medical help. If I can be of assistance, please let me know.
Sincerely,
Weiss
Prof. Weiss:
It wasn't mentioned on the exam that this exam was supposed to take two hours, and the professor didn't enforce a two hour limit on any of the students. Where on the exam is this information stated? I have kept in keeping with the facts. How am I imagining slights based on what is stated in the exam? If several professors agree with me, how am I overreacting ?
XX
On 5/3/07, Frank D. Weiss <fdw@tidalwave.net > wrote: Dear XX,
Thank you for your response, and for your second e-mail. You neglected to mention in your post that this was a two hour exam. Your time requirements for taking the final exam are contrived. Your demands are completely unreasonable. I will take no action on this matter. There is no academic issue with the timing of the exam; there is only a personal concern.
The personal concern is for your health. Your behavior has been bizarre: You have tried by e-mail to provoke all your instructors in response to imagined slights, and you have made an incomprehensible request for more examination time, presumably in response to what you feel is another slight. Your behavior is unacceptable. It imposes extremely high costs on others, and on yourself, too, I would think. You do not acknowledge that there is anything wrong. There is something very wrong, and we cannot go on like this. Your behavior must change, for the sake of everyone at the program, but perhaps most of all for your own sake.
XX, this must be resolved, or it will end in a sea of tears. I have a residual hope that you do not want such an end. Maybe you have such a hope, too. I suggest as a first step that you undergo some psychological assessment. Perhaps simple treatment can help you amend your behavior and help you in dealing with the world.
Sincerely,
Weiss
On 5/2/07, Frank D. Weiss <fdw@tidalwave.net > wrote: Dear XX,
Thank you for your e-mail. I have inserted the e-mail you sent me yesterday morning, but had not yet answered, immediately below your current e-mail, for the record.
As for the matter at hand, it is inconceivable that anyone could spend 24 hours on a final exam, much less 36. If anyone actually did spend 24 hours on such an exam, or merely claimed to have spent 24 hours on such an exam, there would be something very seriously wrong. Thus, there is clearly something very seriously wrong here. You need not contact Dr. Fratantoni in this matter. Please deal directly with me in all program matters.
XX, you seem very unhappy. If you wished, we could talk. I do know that we can't go on like this.
I saw that your permanent address is New Mexico. If you don't live near DC, or don't come down to DC often, we could talk at the very beginning of the Summer Semester on your first day of class. Otherwise, it would be best to talk sooner. Please let me know.
Sincerely,
Weiss
Prof. Weiss:
In order for me to get additional time for this exam this semester, I need to contact Mr. Fratantoni quickly. Everyone else in the class who didn't have technical problems had 36 hours to devote to what has been erroneously called a 2 hour exam, whereas I had 24 hours to give to this exam. That is a sizeable difference whether they spent 0 hours on the exam or 36 hours on the exam. In order for this to be fair, I should be given an additional 12 hours to spend on the exam in order to be given an equal time with the other students. Otherwise the discrepancy would be unfair, and the grading would be arbitrary.
Prof. Weiss:
With all due respect, the time constraint was binding on the students, and all of the students except for me were given 36 hours to complete the 2 hour exam. They had 12 additional hours to work on the exam, or to take a break and return to the exam with a fresh perspective. I was rushed to finish the exam in 24 hours, and I didn't have the same opportunity to review my work. The time difference definitely affected my performance. If I had had 12 more hours I would have done a better job than I did. It's certainly not fair for me to be deprived 12 hours that the other students in the class had. We weren't told to only spend 2 hours on the exam, and I didn't find the exam to be a 2 hour exam.
Over the semester I attended regularly, and I submitted my work on time, so I should be allowed the same rights in the course as the other students. The loss of 12 hours definitely makes a difference in any student's performance on an exam. To compare this with a similar testing problem that I've observed, let me say that I sat at a computerized standardized test where another student had a frozen computer. The testing center immediately compensated him for the technical problems. I should be similarly compensated for the technical problem in getting me the exam, so I have the same amount of time to do the work as the other students. On 4/30/07, Frank D. Weiss <fdw@tidalwave.net > wrote: Dear XX,
The time constraint for the exam was not binding. Thus, I see nothing to deal with.
Weiss
Prof. Weiss:
With all due respect, I took the exam and didn't think it was a 2 hour exam. Mr. Fratantoni also taught a 16 week course in 12 weeks, and I don't think the amounts of time there are the same. If they are the same, then I don't understand why I'm taking an extra four weeks in my courses. With all due repsect, if the extra time for this exam was irrelevant, then why wasn't I allowed it? It wouldn't have posed a problem to either the professor or to my fellow students.
XX
On 4/27/07, Frank D. Weiss <fdw@tidalwave.net > wrote: Dear XX,
I saw your copy to me of your e-mail to Dr. Fratantoni, and I saw his response. The instructor said that two hours was sufficient to do the exam so there does not appear to have been any extra constraint on you.
Weiss
Subject: macro theory final exam Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 08:32:25 -0400 To: joe.harrington@jhu.edu
Prof Harrington:
I took Macro Theory this semester with Prof. Fratantoni. The final exam was originally scheduled for yesterday, and we were then told the final would be emailed to us. If it was emailed on the day of the final that would have been yesterday. Either way, I wasn't to get the exam from WebCT but from my email account. He has emailed me at this account a couple times, and he has this email address on file for me.
Prof. Fratantoni emailed the exam Wednesday morning at 10:30ET, instead of giving the exam on the originally scheduled day. I didn't receive any copy of the exam in this email account or my JHU account so I have to accept his word that he emailed me the exam. I found out that the exam had been sent out when I went to WebCT to check for notices about the final exam Wednesday night. The technical error, assuming that the professor did send me the exam, wasn't my fault. I don't know why the exam wasn't received by my email account. I didn't opt to sign up for a distance learning course in part because of the types of technical problems and miscommunications like this that can result.
Since the other students were given 36 hours to complete the exam, I shoud be given the same amount of time. Mr. Fratantoni didn't give me an extension to make up for the 12 hours I lost when the other students received the exams and I didn't. I've turned in the exam, but I still should receive an opportunity to work further on the exam or additional points to make up for the lost time. Could you please respond to me regarding this?
Thank you for your time and assistance.
XX
-- Dr. Frank D. Weiss Interim Associate Program Chair MA Program in Applied Economics Office Hours: T,W,Th 4-7. Johns Hopkins University Advanced Academic Programs 1717 Massachusetts Ave., NW., Suite 104 Washington, D.C. 20036-2001
-- Dr. Frank D. Weiss Interim Associate Program Chair MA Program in Applied Economics Office Hours: T,W,Th 4-7. Johns Hopkins University Advanced Academic Programs 1717 Massachusetts Ave., NW., Suite 104 Washington, D.C. 20036-2001
-- Dr. Frank D. Weiss Interim Associate Program Chair MA Program in Applied Economics Office Hours: T,W,Th 4-7. Johns Hopkins University Advanced Academic Programs 1717 Massachusetts Ave., NW., Suite 104 Washington, D.C. 20036-2001
-- Dr. Frank D. Weiss Interim Associate Program Chair MA Program in Applied Economics Office Hours: T,W,Th 4-7. Johns Hopkins University Advanced Academic Programs 1717 Massachusetts Ave., NW., Suite 104 Washington, D.C. 20036-2001
-- Dr. Frank D. Weiss Interim Associate Program Chair MA Program in Applied Economics Office Hours: T,W,Th 4-7. Johns Hopkins University Advanced Academic Programs 1717 Massachusetts Ave., NW., Suite 104 Washington, D.C. 20036-2001
-- Dr. Frank D. Weiss Interim Associate Program Chair MA Program in Applied Economics Office Hours: T,W,Th 4-7. Johns Hopkins University Advanced Academic Programs 1717 Massachusetts Ave., NW., Suite 104 Washington, D.C. 20036-2001
-- Dr. Frank D. Weiss Interim Associate Program Chair MA Program in Applied Economics Office Hours: T,W,Th 4-7. Johns Hopkins University Advanced Academic Programs 1717 Massachusetts Ave., NW., Suite 104 Washington, D.C. 20036-2001 |
|
Date: February 1st, 2008 3:53 PM Author: slippery nursing home windowlicker i thought professors by definition were for the most part douchebags (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=757281&forum_id=2#9254268) |
Date: February 1st, 2008 2:58 PM Author: Comical feces love of her life (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=757281&forum_id=2#9253921) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2008 3:00 PM Author: Bright dingle berry sanctuary lol sounds psycho (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=757281&forum_id=2#9253940) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2008 3:02 PM Author: Stirring Cyan Field Party Of The First Part How's your cousin-wife-sister doing? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=757281&forum_id=2#9253944) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2008 3:04 PM Author: Bright dingle berry sanctuary creepity creepy! (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=757281&forum_id=2#9253956) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2008 3:07 PM Author: Stirring Cyan Field Party Of The First Part There's no end to your zingers. Zing! (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=757281&forum_id=2#9253971) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2008 3:18 PM Author: Bright dingle berry sanctuary teach me how to be cool like u (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=757281&forum_id=2#9254043) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2008 3:24 PM Author: Stirring Cyan Field Party Of The First Part stop lying, cheating, stealing (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=757281&forum_id=2#9254086) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2008 3:08 PM Author: histrionic cerise haunted graveyard french chef I know a professor who fucks at least one of his research assistants every summer (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=757281&forum_id=2#9253977) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2008 3:19 PM Author: Bright dingle berry sanctuary cool. how does one go about this? i might teach an UG course next fall (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=757281&forum_id=2#9254047) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2008 3:33 PM Author: histrionic cerise haunted graveyard french chef Pick the sluttiest-seeming females for your RAs. They love power. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=757281&forum_id=2#9254140) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2008 3:53 PM Author: Carmine state halford that's a standard fringe benefit of being a professor. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=757281&forum_id=2#9254265) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2008 3:13 PM Author: Comical feces love of her life (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=757281&forum_id=2#9254012) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2008 3:23 PM Author: Stirring Cyan Field Party Of The First Part You're obviously either Frank Weiss, Peter Goodrich, or Robert Hockett, so why not just post your own cache? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=757281&forum_id=2#9254077) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2008 3:32 PM Author: Comical feces love of her life (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=757281&forum_id=2#9254136) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2008 3:26 PM Author: insane exciting regret Yo, Locutus ... WTF is going on in that little brain of yours? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=757281&forum_id=2#9254093) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2008 3:37 PM Author: Stirring Cyan Field Party Of The First Part I have yet to see any indication of new and better realities. I keep seeing old and disgusting realities that new people want to keep alive only because they apparently have very little going on in their derivative, imitative lives except for fighting other peoples' battles and living other peoples' lives. New and Better realities is a false illusion.
1. I go to a new school. Robert Hockett Redux. Peter Goodrich Redux. Frank Weiss Redux. What's new, better or real here? 2. I start a new job. Robert Hockett Redux. Peter Goodrich Redux. Frank Weiss Redux. What's new, better, or real here? 3. I apply to a new program. I hear Frank Weiss Redux. Redux. Redux What's new, better or real? |
|
Date: February 1st, 2008 3:40 PM Author: Navy Godawful Site *curls up under desk* (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=757281&forum_id=2#9254181) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2008 4:19 PM Author: Stirring Cyan Field Party Of The First Part Because reporting crimes to authorities who do nothing to punish the crimes is a worthwhile endeavor? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=757281&forum_id=2#9254395) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2008 3:46 PM Author: silver national security agency Yes, people suck sometimes. And sometimes you don't get what you want. Most of us have an angsty period in high school or college when we obsess over this, and then learn to cope. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=757281&forum_id=2#9254221) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2008 4:17 PM Author: Stirring Cyan Field Party Of The First Part Most people are not repeated victims of criminal behavior that goes unpunished by the authorities. So no, and no, and no, and no. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=757281&forum_id=2#9254387) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2008 4:24 PM Author: silver national security agency None of what you've described is criminal. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=757281&forum_id=2#9254428) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2008 4:34 PM Author: Stirring Cyan Field Party Of The First Part Defamatory utterances: civil infraction, tort. Federal privacy law violaton: civil infraction, tort. Verbal harassment: tort Blacklisting: civil infraction, labor law.
|
|
Date: February 1st, 2008 4:55 PM Author: silver national security agency Link to defamation being anything other than a tort?
Verbal harassment =/= IIED.
Link to evidence of federal privacy law violations and blacklisting?
Grow up and learn to get along with people. |
|
Date: February 1st, 2008 5:00 PM Author: Stirring Cyan Field Party Of The First Part I'm not putting all of my discovery on-line,so I'm declining to post certain links. This isn't be the place to post the links. If defamation is a tort then it's a civil law infraction, which is my point.
People need to grow up by not (1) making defamatory remarks, (2) committing blacklisting crimes (3) harassing students verbally. Uhhh, pretty sure, this isn't mature behavior. Stop blaming the victim. Grow a pair, and blame the perpetrators. If you're too scared to do the right thing then scamper away and hide under the bed until the bad guys leave. |
|
Date: February 1st, 2008 5:02 PM Author: silver national security agency In other words, nothing criminal.
From what you've posted, you don't seem to be the victim here. If you have other evidence that's your business, but you shouldn't expect people to sympathize with your position on the basis of things you won't share with them. |
|
Date: February 1st, 2008 5:55 PM Author: Domesticated bespoke shrine This is tort law, not criminal law. There is nothing criminal. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=757281&forum_id=2#9254953) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2008 5:02 PM Author: indigo hominid bawdyhouse I don't think telling this guy to "grow up" will work--he obviously has some sort of mental illness that probably requires more serious treatment. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=757281&forum_id=2#9254639) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2008 5:04 PM Author: Stirring Cyan Field Party Of The First Part As I've already said (Frank), several lawyers, friends, and businessmen have told me to sue. I think lawyers know the law better than you do. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=757281&forum_id=2#9254653) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2008 5:24 PM Author: Razzmatazz fuchsia step-uncle's house They were probably telling you that to get you to shut up and get you out the door. I can only imagine what kind of whining crackpot you are in real life, if your posts here are any indication. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=757281&forum_id=2#9254776) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2008 5:28 PM Author: Stirring Cyan Field Party Of The First Part R2D2, you say the darndest things. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=757281&forum_id=2#9254800) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2008 5:50 PM Author: Bright dingle berry sanctuary Wait...actual BUSINESSMEN have told you to sue? Then by all means, sue. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=757281&forum_id=2#9254929) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2008 4:42 PM Author: Stirring Cyan Field Party Of The First Part You know nothing about the laws do you? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=757281&forum_id=2#9254535) |
|
Date: February 2nd, 2008 2:18 AM Author: Domesticated bespoke shrine Do you know the difference between tort law and criminal law? You might want to read up on it. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=757281&forum_id=2#9257043) |
|
Date: February 2nd, 2008 12:48 PM Author: Stirring Cyan Field Party Of The First Part It's still illegal whether it's a civil or criminal violation. Law professors are paid to teach law to their students, not to harass and teach "how to break the laws" to their students. I didn't pay Robert Hockett to harass me, teach me nothing, and defame me. Do you know the difference between a legal education and harassment? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=757281&forum_id=2#9257902) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2008 3:48 PM Author: Bright dingle berry sanctuary A copy/paste of this thread has just been emailed to the above listed addresses, as well as a link. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=757281&forum_id=2#9254239) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2008 4:37 PM Author: Stirring Cyan Field Party Of The First Part You stand up for the rights of criminals but not the rights of victims?
Good. I have nothing to be ashamed of, and they have everything to be scared of. I obeyed the law, and they have broken the law multiple times. |
|
Date: February 1st, 2008 4:40 PM Author: Stirring Cyan Field Party Of The First Part YOu say you've sent it to Frank Weiss, but clearly you are Frank Weiss, who reads undergraduate posting boards, because he doesn't care about his teaching or publication record. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=757281&forum_id=2#9254525) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2008 3:54 PM Author: Stimulating wine gay wizard Dude, I can't even figure out what's going on here. Why the hell are you posting these out of context emails here? Do you want anonymous people on XO to take up your cause or something?
You sound like a mental case. |
|
Date: February 1st, 2008 4:21 PM Author: Stirring Cyan Field Party Of The First Part Outing myself is realistic? Obviously the emails are out of context so as to not out myself.
Does that make sense, Frank Weiss Clone? |
|
Date: February 1st, 2008 4:34 PM Author: Disrespectful Gunner Clown if one wanted, and had access to a friend's email account, this would be a pretty good way to screw them over. i guess they really wouldn't be a friend, though. maybe a jealous ex-lover. no one in their right mind would practice such obvious self-pwnage. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=757281&forum_id=2#9254485) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2008 4:39 PM Author: Stirring Cyan Field Party Of The First Part How is showing that I've been a victim of defamation and harassment self-pawnage? If someone mugs you, and you say I've been mugged, are you pawning yourself? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=757281&forum_id=2#9254514) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2008 4:44 PM Author: Carmine state halford It's self-pwnage since you're obviously crazy. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=757281&forum_id=2#9254540) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2008 4:48 PM Author: Stirring Cyan Field Party Of The First Part You robotically repeat what Frank Weiss says. Robots are crazy. Human beings are not robots. Human beings have experiences; they don't steal other peoples' experiences because they haven't had any of their own. Self-pawnage is not having your own experiences, and living vicariously. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=757281&forum_id=2#9254566) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2008 8:04 PM Author: crusty spectacular office Have you considered that your writing looks A LOT like a schizophrenic's? Go to google and look up schizophrenic writing samples. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=757281&forum_id=2#9255567) |
|
Date: February 2nd, 2008 8:51 AM Author: house-broken address stock car Someone with a moniker "DrugDood" is dispensing medical advice? I think someone's had a few too many blue pills. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=757281&forum_id=2#9257442) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2008 4:54 PM Author: Electric salmon karate I don't think this shtick required the buildup it received. These emails are a substantial source of material, and good enough for a quality shtick on their own.
10/10 for effort
8/10 for delivery. Something is missing.
Overall: 8.5/10
|
|
Date: February 1st, 2008 5:03 PM Author: sienna unhinged selfie juggernaut agreed. The posts in this thread are pure gold, too. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=757281&forum_id=2#9254648) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2008 5:05 PM Author: Stirring Cyan Field Party Of The First Part You sound like a troll. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=757281&forum_id=2#9254660) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2008 5:02 PM Author: Irradiated corn cake abode This thread is high in the runnings for today's "Best evidence of crippling psychosis" sweepstakes. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=757281&forum_id=2#9254641) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2008 5:23 PM Author: Bright dingle berry sanctuary OP, I believe you. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=757281&forum_id=2#9254772) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2008 5:24 PM Author: floppy fishy associate meetinghouse this thread is AWESOME! TYTY
-Frank Weiss |
|
Date: February 1st, 2008 5:30 PM Author: Stirring Cyan Field Party Of The First Part You root for the criminals in detective movies. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=757281&forum_id=2#9254810) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2008 5:35 PM Author: floppy fishy associate meetinghouse untrue, i root for teh goodd guyz. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=757281&forum_id=2#9254842) |
|
Date: February 2nd, 2008 8:52 AM Author: house-broken address stock car the good guys don't break the law. these guys broke the law. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=757281&forum_id=2#9257443) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2008 5:25 PM Author: tantric stag film potus this is epic flame. kudos, OP! (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=757281&forum_id=2#9254780) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2008 5:32 PM Author: Bright dingle berry sanctuary this crazy dood has posted shit like this b4 on the college board:
http://www.xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=735080&mc=1&forum_id=3&PHPSESSID=5c2f4ed322113cfce1d00c997f9e0e3c |
|
Date: February 1st, 2008 5:39 PM Author: Stirring Cyan Field Party Of The First Part Shut up FrankBot. The moral high ground belongs to people who don't break the law and who don't side with the FrankBot outlaws. Your FrankBot schtick is nonsensical, since you break the law, and then say, "Oops, would you look at what I just did." (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=757281&forum_id=2#9254872) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2008 5:41 PM Author: Bright dingle berry sanctuary Wait, so is this forreal? That's some scary shit right there (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=757281&forum_id=2#9254886) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2008 5:47 PM Author: Carmine state halford This kid is a paranoid schizophrenic. I predict his next act will be: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virginia_Tech_massacre (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=757281&forum_id=2#9254920) |
|
Date: February 2nd, 2008 8:53 AM Author: house-broken address stock car What is the DSM IV for paranoid schizophrenic? Are you just an alarmist who makes defamatory statements? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=757281&forum_id=2#9257444) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2008 5:54 PM Author: Mahogany swollen round eye Okay, now I'm confused. You claim that a prof made negative referrals to potential employers: how in the hell would you know this? You wouldn't for two reasons: 1) Referrals, as a matter of law, are limited in terms of what can and cannot be said. 2) No recrruiter/HR person would ever, EVER admit that the referral was the reason you DIDN'T get the job. Even if the referor violated (1), the HR person would not likely admit it to you. I've been in the referral position, on both sides, and when comment is made, and the applicant is contrued in a negative light, I NEVER TOLD THEM WHY. So we can dismiss your accusations that negative referrals were made. That said, you seem to have issues with multiple professors, which begs the question: Knowing you have issues with professors, why list them as referrals? so we can dispose of the allegation that they were used as references, further calling into question the validity of any of this. And finally - your argument against your so called prof is asinine. The prof clearly indicates, repeatedly, that the exam shouldn't take more than 2 hours to complete. That said, whining about how everyone else had a 12 hour start on you (or that they had more time) is, as your professor pointed out, not a reasonable issue. Had this been a test with a serious, 24 hour time requirement, you *might* have an argument. However, to prove this in a court of law, you would have to find a student willing to testify that it took them more than 2 hours to complete. Good luck with that. Now, how many people have to tell you that you should see someone about your obvious mental impairment before you actually listen? Here's a follow up question: Why on earth would you publish this information? Are you aware that doing so puts you in jeapordy for a counter-claim of defamation (especially since you have now been identified by the prof and listed them by name, including their address and phone number? Most importantly - you do realize that you are committing academic suicide, right? That indicates clear mental issues. Go see a shrink and stop wasting your time. If you really have consulted an attorney who advised you to sue, you would likely have been advised to refrain from discussing this matter. AND you'd ALREADY HAVE FILED SUIT! Clearly, this is flame. See a shrink, putz. You've got issues. That is all.
|
|
Date: February 1st, 2008 6:05 PM Author: Carmine state halford credited. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=757281&forum_id=2#9255007) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2008 6:18 PM Author: Bright dingle berry sanctuary Good post. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=757281&forum_id=2#9255104) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2008 7:41 PM Author: Stirring Cyan Field Party Of The First Part 1. The professor wasn't listed as an official reference. None of the professors were listed as references.
2. The professor had job related information no one else had.
3. I got fired from two jobs in very bizarre ways that have never happened before.
4. The employers who fired me told me the professors did it.
5. Who are you to question facts when you're far more removed from the fact pattern than I am?
6. Do you usually dispense amateur legal advice and amateur doctor's diagnoses as if you had credentials and expertise in the area? Do you play a doctor on tv? Did you tell your parents you're a doctor?
|
|
Date: February 1st, 2008 7:50 PM Author: Mahogany swollen round eye 1. Then why did you say they gave you a bad reference? 2. This means nothing. This is also likely bullshit. 3. Wow. Really? You got fired in bizarre ways? That falls in line with your psycological problems, now doesn't it? 4. The employers, then, opened themselves up for a lawsuit. We both know this didn't happen. This is the weakest element of your story. I have employed close to 300 people in my previous career. I would never fire anyone based on what someone claiming to be an employees professor would say. Liar. Please feel free to tell me how a professor got you fired. I'm sure you'll think of something and I'm sure I'll find it as unbelievable as everything else you've said. 5. I am me and base my questions on the insane ramblings you've posted. A sane person wouldn't post this bullshit on XOXO if it was real. An insane person might. 6. Do you usually frequent XOXO for legal and medical advice? Are you a moron? Have you ever considered the fact that you have severe and crippling mental health issues? I tell my parents that I am a law student. Do you tell your parents you've managed to alienate all of your professors, create trust issues with your school, make wild accusations in innapropriate emails and that your professors have advised you to seek out professional treatment? I'm guessing you leave all that out. Here's the deal - you came on here with a made up story. We've poked holes in it and now you are mad. So sorry. May I ask you why an attorney would tell you that you should sue, then refuse to represent you? May I ask you to provide me with a scenario wherein your legal counsel would approve of you posting some details about your "law suit" on-line, along with information about the defendants in the case? You. Are. Nuts. N. V. T. S Nuts. |
|
Date: February 2nd, 2008 9:08 AM Author: house-broken address stock car 1, What is the DSM IV for nuts?
2, Who said the lawyer refused to represent me?
3. I would give you a bad reference if you asked me for one. You're nuts by your definition.
4. You're on a law board, but you cannot believe that employers do stupid things that make them liable legally. Are you lost? Did you mean to end up on the Bronx Zoo website? This is a law board. People do all sorts of dumb things that make them legally liable.
|
|
Date: February 1st, 2008 6:35 PM Author: Cerebral bonkers forum pistol Cease and desist, poster. You will not stop us. You cannot stop us. We are inside everyone and inside you. We will control you. We will control your family. We will control your classmates. We already control most things. Give in. Paint a mechanical smile on your sad face. Be happy, all the time, every time. Happiness is love. Love is mechanical. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=757281&forum_id=2#9255185) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2008 8:06 PM Author: crusty spectacular office that's a shitty thing to write.
yet, 180. |
|
Date: February 1st, 2008 7:55 PM Author: High-end abnormal mexican i think professor weiss is a pretty cool guy. eh tells students to seek medical help and doesn't afraid of anything. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=757281&forum_id=2#9255531) |
|
Date: October 31st, 2008 5:54 PM Author: Green psychic milk omg this made LOL! honest-to-god 180! (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=757281&forum_id=2#10313366) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2008 10:10 PM Author: beady-eyed tattoo Locutus: I agree with you that these people are bad and broke the law and caused harm to you. You're absolutely right. Trust me though, not everyone is like that. YOU wouldn't do these things, would you? There are other people out there just like you. Trust me Locutus. I know because... I'm one of those people.
So, let this whole thing go and just move on. Move on to better things - they exist. |
|
Date: February 1st, 2008 10:40 PM Author: Passionate fortuitous meteor affirmative action weird thread, and i only skimmed it. it seems like this guy accidentally, through an email glitch, only got 24 hrs for a 36 hr take home, and wants 12 hrs extra. i can see why he's pissed, but obviously he should cut his losses and let it go. however, i don't see why weiss doesn't at least recognize that it's an understandably irritating situation rather than acting like it's a complete non-issue and calling the OP a psycho. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=757281&forum_id=2#9256242) |
|
Date: February 2nd, 2008 2:11 AM Author: fear-inspiring police squad did the OP say something to Weiss about him losing a job because of something Weiss said to his employer? maybe that's what Weiss is referring to. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=757281&forum_id=2#9257026) |
|
Date: February 2nd, 2008 3:13 AM Author: Vigorous public bath yeah, i've got lots of problems with the douchebag Jung wannabes above, but any and every fucking law student who didn't get an A would be crying foul if they didn't get the same amount of time as their classmates on a test. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=757281&forum_id=2#9257142) |
|
Date: February 1st, 2008 11:07 PM Author: misanthropic rigpig dysfunction EVERYONE ON THIS THREAD IS THE MEGAPOSTER (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=757281&forum_id=2#9256352) |
|
Date: February 2nd, 2008 12:57 AM Author: Overrated sadistic senate friendly grandma Oh, they're OK. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=757281&forum_id=2#9256765) |
|
Date: February 2nd, 2008 1:13 AM Author: Hateful Point Headpube (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=757281&forum_id=2#9256841) |
|
Date: February 2nd, 2008 1:30 AM Author: Fiercely-loyal coldplay fan I don't understand how he had 24 hours for an exam that everyone spent 2 hours on, yet still wants 12 more hours.
Am I missing something? |
|
Date: February 2nd, 2008 1:53 AM Author: Electric salmon karate That's pretty much it. He just doesn't seem to grasp this point. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=757281&forum_id=2#9256990) |
|
Date: February 2nd, 2008 2:14 AM Author: fear-inspiring police squad but Weiss IS being a douchebag for not giving him 12 more hours. but this sort of behavior is typical of professors. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=757281&forum_id=2#9257030) |
|
Date: February 2nd, 2008 2:12 AM Author: Carmine state halford dood, can't you tell? the whole world is conspiring against him? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=757281&forum_id=2#9257027) |
|
Date: February 2nd, 2008 2:15 AM Author: fear-inspiring police squad even if all professors do this it is still douchebaggy behavior. Weiss should lighten up. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=757281&forum_id=2#9257035) |
|
Date: February 2nd, 2008 3:40 AM Author: wonderful carnelian boiling water foreskin My understanding - and I just skimmed it, so who knows - is that all the other students were sent the exam 36 hours before it was due and due to a glitch, he got his 24 hours before it was due. He wanted 12 extra hours to be given time to review his work, but the professor denied him those 12 hours because the actual test-taking should only take a student 2 hours.
If I had a busy life, I'd be pretty pissed about being shorted 12 hours too. I don't know why everyone is calling the OP psycho and I don't know why the professor just keeps telling him to get help.
|
|
Date: February 2nd, 2008 3:52 AM Author: Mauve aphrodisiac patrolman What's these accusations about professors conspiring to blacklist him and calling people robots? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=757281&forum_id=2#9257186) |
|
Date: February 2nd, 2008 4:01 AM Author: wonderful carnelian boiling water foreskin Something about his professors calling his employers and getting him fired and/or blocking him from getting jobs due to negative references.
Bots are artificially intelligent beings that can usually only mimic true intelligence through regurgitation and the like. Most people here are close enough. |
|
Date: February 2nd, 2008 4:08 AM Author: transparent mediation this guy google bombs ALL of his profs all over the college/law/grad boards all the time. he is a fucking psycho, and i have the suspicion that if dood called this guys job he might have done so in the interest of public safety. this is the kind of dood who ends up killin a nigga one day. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=757281&forum_id=2#9257226) |
|
Date: February 2nd, 2008 4:12 AM Author: wonderful carnelian boiling water foreskin Eh, there's 2 sides to every story. Given how ridiculous the professor's constant "seek medical attention" pleas seem in this context, I'm guessing the OP left out a few choice emails or incidents.
I still think he should have gotten the extra 12 hours on the test. |
|
Date: February 2nd, 2008 4:15 AM Author: transparent mediation and the fact that he google bombs like four other profs too is surely a sign of the deranged. when someone goes out shooting up JHU, at least we will know where to point the FBI or ATF. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=757281&forum_id=2#9257245) |
|
Date: February 2nd, 2008 4:19 AM Author: wonderful carnelian boiling water foreskin Yes, because everyone who acts like an asshole on the internet winds up being a mass murderer.
He's probably just some stressed out kid blowing off steam. It's not the best way to handle it, sure, but who gives a fuck? |
|
Date: February 2nd, 2008 4:21 AM Author: pearl filthy gaming laptop pit Totality of the circumstances, this guy is a nut. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=757281&forum_id=2#9257260) |
|
Date: February 2nd, 2008 4:21 AM Author: Electric salmon karate I think you're underplaying what a serious lack of judgment that represents. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=757281&forum_id=2#9257261) |
|
Date: February 2nd, 2008 4:22 AM Author: wonderful carnelian boiling water foreskin Perhaps I don't get what a serious lack of judgment it represents, but we can't all be up our asses dipshits like the people who frequent this board. I don't base every stressed out decision I make on how it will affect my future net worth. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=757281&forum_id=2#9257268) |
|
Date: February 2nd, 2008 4:25 AM Author: Electric salmon karate I think that's a pretty unfair characterization of people's point.
This isn't some one time action, committed in a huff. This is consistent and baseless attacks on someone's professional reputation over significant period of time. |
|
Date: February 2nd, 2008 4:28 AM Author: wonderful carnelian boiling water foreskin Perhaps I just don't clearly understand what happens to the victims of googlebombing. It seems immature, but ultimately no big deal to me. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=757281&forum_id=2#9257276) |
|
Date: February 2nd, 2008 4:28 AM Author: Electric salmon karate Fair. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=757281&forum_id=2#9257278) |
|
Date: February 2nd, 2008 8:57 AM Author: red aromatic faggotry The OP has been posting under numerous monikers on the college board and grad board. Basically any JHU thread over the last 6 months is about some sort of criminal cospiracy started by econ profs and the administration at JHU. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=757281&forum_id=2#9257446) |
|
Date: February 2nd, 2008 10:58 AM Author: Passionate fortuitous meteor affirmative action i find it interesting that you basically copied my above, earlier post word-for-word. i dont care, but why?
Date: February 1st, 2008 10:40 PM Author: smartwater
weird thread, and i only skimmed it. it seems like this guy accidentally, through an email glitch, only got 24 hrs for a 36 hr take home, and wants 12 hrs extra. i can see why he's pissed, but obviously he should cut his losses and let it go. however, i don't see why weiss doesn't at least recognize that it's an understandably irritating situation rather than acting like it's a complete non-issue and calling the OP a psycho.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=757281&forum_id=2#9256242)
Date: February 2nd, 2008 3:40 AM Author: J. (I get my kicks up in the attic with a Kodak instamatic)
My understanding - and I just skimmed it, so who knows - is that all the other students were sent the exam 36 hours before it was due and due to a glitch, he got his 24 hours before it was due. He wanted 12 extra hours to be given time to review his work, but the professor denied him those 12 hours because the actual test-taking should only take a student 2 hours.
If I had a busy life, I'd be pretty pissed about being shorted 12 hours too. I don't know why everyone is calling the OP psycho and I don't know why the professor just keeps telling him to get help.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=757281&forum_id=2#9257175)
|
|
Date: February 2nd, 2008 3:16 AM Author: Vigorous public bath Finally something interesting could happen on xoxo and end the drought and the majority still act like fucking douchebags. Stupid fucks. OP, keep up the good fight and good luck. |
|
Date: February 2nd, 2008 3:27 AM Author: Bright dingle berry sanctuary If not flame then,
WTF? Do you not understand how the world works? "Merit" coutns for some. Who likes you (and doesn't like you) counts for far more.
STFU, and grow up. |
|
Date: February 2nd, 2008 3:44 AM Author: Mauve aphrodisiac patrolman Is this flame? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=757281&forum_id=2#9257179) |
|
Date: February 2nd, 2008 3:56 AM Author: Vigorous public bath why don't you post the same thing in the same thread multiple times? Nice work, ace. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=757281&forum_id=2#9257195) |
|
Date: February 2nd, 2008 4:05 AM Author: Contagious spot son of senegal all hail teh TORTS ROBOT!
and NO this is not flame. do a xoxo search. |
|
Date: February 2nd, 2008 3:51 AM Author: Contagious spot son of senegal EVERYBODY DANCE NOW (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=757281&forum_id=2#9257184) |
|
Date: February 2nd, 2008 3:56 AM Author: Electric salmon karate Jesus fucking christ, people.
The test was only supposed to take 2 hours. Whether you had 36 or 24 is a moot point. Those additional 12 hours are of no advantage. There's nothing you can do in a 2 hour UG econ test in 36 hours that you cannot do in 24. Therefore, his claims of disadvantage are empty. |
|
Date: February 2nd, 2008 3:57 AM Author: Contagious spot son of senegal EVERYBODY DANCE NOW (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=757281&forum_id=2#9257196) |
|
Date: February 2nd, 2008 3:58 AM Author: wonderful carnelian boiling water foreskin If you have a job and/or a lot going on in other classes, 12 hours can be a world of difference, I think. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=757281&forum_id=2#9257201) |
|
Date: February 2nd, 2008 3:59 AM Author: Contagious spot son of senegal Yeah, you could jerk off like 21,934 times a week. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=757281&forum_id=2#9257203) |
|
Date: February 2nd, 2008 4:01 AM Author: Electric salmon karate No. You know at the beginning of the semester that you have a TWO HOUR exam on a certain date. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=757281&forum_id=2#9257207) |
|
Date: February 2nd, 2008 4:04 AM Author: wonderful carnelian boiling water foreskin It was sent out through WebCT. If he had made some time for it - say scheduled to work a late shift so he could take it that morning - and then got it 12 hours late, that's pretty shitty.
Working full time and going to school full time can be pretty hard. I have no idea what the OP's schedule is like, but I can certainly think of cases where I'd have been pissed off too. |
|
Date: February 2nd, 2008 4:08 AM Author: Electric salmon karate Unless he was working and 18 hour shift, it still doesn't matter. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=757281&forum_id=2#9257224) |
|
Date: February 2nd, 2008 4:15 AM Author: wonderful carnelian boiling water foreskin I'm not going to come up with all the possible combinations some one's schedule could take to show that 12 hours could possibly be significant.
But even if he spent the 12 hours jerking off, why not just give it to him if everyone else got it? |
|
Date: February 2nd, 2008 4:17 AM Author: Electric salmon karate because it's a waste of your time to make a new exam for him to take (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=757281&forum_id=2#9257250) |
|
Date: February 2nd, 2008 4:21 AM Author: Vigorous public bath why would you assume a new exam would have to be made? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=757281&forum_id=2#9257262) |
|
Date: February 2nd, 2008 4:28 AM Author: Electric salmon karate I see what you're saying.
I'm not going to go into tons of (more) speculation.
I had assumed that the test had already been returned and this was at least a day after the fact. It could definitely be another way.
|
|
Date: February 2nd, 2008 4:21 AM Author: wonderful carnelian boiling water foreskin From what I understand, he asked for an extension, not an entirely new exam. It doesn't sound like he just didn't like his grade and then came up with this "Well I got mine late" excuse, though I can understand the professor denying him that, if that were the case. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=757281&forum_id=2#9257263) |
|
Date: February 2nd, 2008 4:05 AM Author: Vigorous public bath No. You know at the beginning of the semester that you have a TWO HOUR exam on a certain date and you will have 36 HOURS to turn it IN. Why not give a student the extra 12 hours if everyone else got it? Why not give a student the extra 12 hours even if that gave him (or possibly gave him) 48 hours instead of the 36 hours everyone else got? |
|
Date: February 2nd, 2008 4:07 AM Author: Electric salmon karate Why not give a student the extra 12 hours if everyone else got it? Why not give a student the extra 12 hours even if that gave him (or possibly gave him) 48 hours instead of the 36 hours everyone else got?
Because it's a waste of your time? |
|
Date: February 2nd, 2008 4:13 AM Author: Vigorous public bath The teacher has already shown that wasting students' time is not one of his concerns, unless you happen to be the OP. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=757281&forum_id=2#9257239) |
|
Date: February 2nd, 2008 4:14 AM Author: Electric salmon karate It's a waste of the teacher's time. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=757281&forum_id=2#9257242) |
|
Date: February 2nd, 2008 4:20 AM Author: Vigorous public bath persuasive (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=757281&forum_id=2#9257256) |
|
Date: February 2nd, 2008 4:23 AM Author: Electric salmon karate good enough.
student gains nothing (besides false sense of justice)
Teacher loses time
I wouldn't bother
|
|
Date: February 2nd, 2008 11:11 AM Author: Passionate fortuitous meteor affirmative action see, if anything, you're proving that Weiss is the one who should seek psychological counseling. you've got an obviously discontented fellow human being who thinks that you've slighted him. you can appease his anxieties and defuse the entire situation with no external costs (this is certainly not the "unfair" route), and minimal cost to yourself (merely typing "ok just take an extra 12 hours and send it to me"). but yet you persist in a weird drawn out email correspondence where you patronize and degrade the OP. this is some bona fide anti-social behavior. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=757281&forum_id=2#9257644) |
|
Date: February 2nd, 2008 4:19 AM Author: demanding motley cuck this is the weirdest thread ever (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=757281&forum_id=2#9257253) |
|
Date: February 2nd, 2008 4:24 AM Author: Mauve aphrodisiac patrolman www.econ.jhu.edu/people/weiss/final03.pd
Here's one of the professor's econ finals. It looks very easy and the idea a test like this would require more than 2 hours is absurd. I haven't taken an econ class in years, and never4 an economics of trade course, and I could answer plenty of these questions.
|
|
Date: February 2nd, 2008 4:25 AM Author: wonderful carnelian boiling water foreskin But it's kind of a moot point, isn't it? It doesn't really matter how he spent the time or how easy the test is. If every other kid got 36 hours, he should get 36 hours. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=757281&forum_id=2#9257274) |
|
Date: February 2nd, 2008 4:29 AM Author: Mauve aphrodisiac patrolman Since he's already seen the test, wouldn't this be unfair? He would have had ample study time to review all the concepts covered by the test. And given the professor kept saying this student's behavior had been confrontational and bizarre all semester, I can see why he might not be thrilled that this kid he thinks is a nut is making more demands. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=757281&forum_id=2#9257279) |
|
Date: February 2nd, 2008 4:33 AM Author: wonderful carnelian boiling water foreskin I got the impression that he asked for an extension during the 24 hour period that he had the test and the professor denied him it.
Maybe the OP should clarify when he asked, how he asked, and how long it took the professor to respond. |
|
Date: February 2nd, 2008 5:35 AM Author: Bright dingle berry sanctuary did anyone forward this to fdw@tidalwave.net yet? this is very bizarre. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=757281&forum_id=2#9257378) |
|
Date: February 2nd, 2008 8:54 AM Author: house-broken address stock car Why are you more concerned with protecting the rights of criminals than with protecting the rights of victims? Are you part of a mafioso organization? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=757281&forum_id=2#9257445) |
|
Date: February 2nd, 2008 11:15 AM Author: Passionate fortuitous meteor affirmative action i'd guess the OP is a weird introverted f.o.b. azn or something. he probably doesn't have much perspective on the big-picture, so he's very frustrated by the blatant bitch-ass capriciousness and uncharitability of his prof and doesn't know how to properly articulate it. makes sense. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=757281&forum_id=2#9257657) |
|
Date: February 2nd, 2008 12:29 PM Author: Electric salmon karate well said (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=757281&forum_id=2#9257853) |
|
Date: February 2nd, 2008 12:46 PM Author: sepia home hairy legs Sounds like SEXUAL MALEVOLENCE to me. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=757281&forum_id=2#9257894) |
|
Date: October 3rd, 2008 6:28 PM Author: Plum razzle-dazzle range kitty (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=757281&forum_id=2#10225778) |
|
Date: October 3rd, 2008 6:29 PM Author: Seedy insecure whorehouse if you have nothing to add then shut the fuck up (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=757281&forum_id=2#10225780) |
|
Date: October 31st, 2008 4:23 PM Author: Mauve aphrodisiac patrolman (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=757281&forum_id=2#10313180) |
|
Date: October 31st, 2008 4:41 PM Author: Plum razzle-dazzle range kitty this thread has a very special place in my <3 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=757281&forum_id=2#10313219) |
|
Date: October 31st, 2008 7:21 PM Author: Plum razzle-dazzle range kitty (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=757281&forum_id=2#10313554) |