http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=795732&mc=8&forum_id=2

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=796367&forum_id=2#9599751)

April 10

http://thechicktionary.com/post/31401668

Lena Chen: Hmm, we've been having really sweet sex lately.

Patrick Hamm: Yeah, I know. I haven't tied you up in like a week.

April 9

http://thechicktionary.com/post/31293008

Lena Chen: HURRY UP AND DO YOUR WORK so you can come over and i can maul you.

Patrick Hamm: maul?

Lena Chen: yeah.

Patrick Hamm: do i want to be mauled?

Lena Chen: yes. what do you expect? to be caressed? lust is a violent emotion dude.

April 8

http://thechicktionary.com/post/31204220

Lena Chen: You should start a blog.

Patrick Hamm: Why? What's interesting about my life?

Lena Chen: Who you're fucking.

http://thechicktionary.com/post/31203819

Lena Chen: Did I tell you the name my friends call me?

Patrick Hamm: Whore whore slut?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=796367&forum_id=2#9609056)

April 11

"Obviously, you are just a small Asian woman with no mind of her own who will acquiesce to my sexual desires and let me treat her like my personal Real Doll."

—Patrick Hamm, greeting Lena Chen in bed with stuff reporters and commenters have said about me.

http://thechicktionary.com/post/31107176

"I was always under the impression that if someone writes about you, they have to check with you first."

—Patrick Hamm, who clearly needs to meet the Internet

http://thechicktionary.com/post/31509157

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=796367&forum_id=2#9616906)

http://thechicktionary.com/post/31421763

"I am a light shade of olive. He is … translucent. Also, who wears black sunglasses with a black tshirt on the first sunny day of the year?

I’m dating a vampire."

Patrick Hamm and Lena Chen in bed together...

http://thechicktionary.com/post/30905381

Patrick Hamm and Lena Chen get high together

http://thechicktionary.com/post/30591193

This is especially interesting, since there's a media report of a "Patrick Hamm" getting arrested in a drug bust in 2007

http://www.masscops.com/forums/showthread.php?p=215244

Boxer caught up in New Bedford drug sweep

By Brian Fraga

Standard-Times staff writer

September 06, 2007 6:00 AM

NEW BEDFORD — Nearly two dozen suspects, including two SouthCoast men with previous drug-dealing records and former boxer Scott Pemberton, were arrested in an early-morning narcotics sweep Wednesday, busting up what court documents called "a major drug distribution operation."

At least six other individuals were arraigned Wednesday in New Bedford District Court on a variety of drug charges related to the sweep. They were: Dennis Stefanini, 38, of Fairhaven; John Leshyk, 36, of Fairhaven; Mr. Pemberton, 40, of South Dartmouth; Ana Cabral, 45, of 88 Rounseville St. in New Bedford and Patrick Hamm, no age or address given.

Major lulz if it's the same "Patrick Hamm" :D

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=796367&forum_id=2#9621784)

Patrick Hamm: ... go to my place, get tied up, get pleasured and fucked for hours, sleep.

http://thechicktionary.com/post/30328217

Lena Chen: Does it bother you that a bunch of strangers online think you're a rapist?

Patrick Hamm: No, not at all. I don't give a shit. It might bother me if I were actually a rapist and I were found out.

http://thechicktionary.com/post/30056776

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=796367&forum_id=2#9621796)

On a side note, Kori is so much better looking than Lena.

From Zaba Search:

P HAMM

99 CHARLES ST

BOSTON, MA 02114

(617) 248-0945

(617) 240-0945

This would be in line with posts previous which describe looking at the view on the other side of the river, and also would fit with the swankiness of the apartment, needing to take the train to get there, etc.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=796367&forum_id=2#9624731)

Robert J. Sampson (Sociology Department Head)

http://www.wjh.harvard.edu/soc/faculty/sampson/index.html

Christopher Winship (Director of Graduate Studies)

http://www.wjh.harvard.edu/soc/faculty/winship/index.html

I'm sure they'd love to know about Patrick Hamm's exploitation of his students.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=796367&forum_id=2#9851544)

Lena Chen nude

http://www.upload.mn/view/kx789li7q5i6xfam9adi.jpg

http://www.upload.mn/view/s1rodp04t39or7lc67yn.jpg

Has anyone uploaded this to 4chan yet?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=796367&forum_id=2#9636869)

http://thechicktionary.com/post/32440732

3:42:12

He came in at 3:42:12 (and didn’t look too shabby crossing the finishline despite having run 26.2 miles). I’m now waiting for him to finish the walk through the post-run tents.

A quick search indeed tells the tale

http://www.bostonmarathon.org/2008/cf/public/ResultsSearch.cfm?mode=entry

22697 Hamm, Patrick 28 M

Boston MA USA GER

Finish 3:42:12

April 22

http://thechicktionary.com/post/32525734

Conversation in the Shower

Lena Chen: You realize I'm only dating you for the water pressure, right?

Patrick Hamm: Yeah. And I'm only dating you because you're Asian.

Lena Chen: That's what I thought.

April 26

http://thechicktionary.com/post/32914507

I started a blog entry for Sex and the Ivy two weeks ago and I’m still working on it. It’s a blog entry about writer’s block. Some grand irony there, eh?

In the interim, the title changed from “I don’t want to write about you” to “I don’t write anymore,” as it became more and more apparent that it wasn’t just the Guy I couldn’t write about. I kind of can’t write about anything remotely important anymore.

That’s the thing: it’s easy to write about party habits and press mentions and ridiculous sex and what or who I did last Friday. It’s not so easy to write about how terribly insecure I sometimes get when it comes to the serious stuff, like my inability to come clean with my mother about my blog.

When I took a break from daily postings on Sex and the Ivy, I didn’t think that I’d also take a break from examining my life critically. But I kind of have. Putting things down in writing affirms that I feel a certain way at a certain point in time. It makes me deal with my insecurities. Not writing means that I can ignore problems and fears for much longer stretches, but that’s really just postponing resolution, and in doing so, postponing life. That’s why I’m forcing myself to write right now. I want to stop waiting and start living.

So, the list of Things I Cannot Write About In A Meaningful Way includes: 1) My mother, 2) the Guy [Patrick Hamm], and 3) the fact that I cannot write about things in a meaningful way.

Fuck. This is not going to be an easy piece to finish.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=796367&forum_id=2#9695797)

I requested oral sex when Patrick Hamm asked me what I thought he should eat for lunch.

http://thechicktionary.com/post/34033826/i-requested-oral-sex

Sometimes in bed, I’ll ask Patrick Hamm to talk dirty to me in German....If someone asked me to speak — or worse, SING — Chinese to them, I’d probably bite their dick off (this also assumes that I am capable of speaking Chinese well, which I’m not). And can you imagine if he referred to me as his “Asian lover”? Holy hell.

LOL...hilarious how blind she is to his Asian fetish. Why ELSE does she think he's with her? Her *personality*?!

lol

April 11 LiveJournal

ETA: HAHAHA, but at least I'm not as white as Patrick Hamm, whose email signature I recognize from a mile away, as it clogs up my inbox all too frequently. Patrick Hamm's our grad student association president. Not really a bad guy. Just a shining example of the damage that Teutonic blood has done to the decency of this world.

ETA again: AAAAND like every awesomely white dude, Patrick Hamm has an Asian fetish: he's apparently dating infamous "whore whore slut" Lena Chen. Who said nothing exciting ever happens at Harvard!

Oh wait, I did.

http://justdandy.livejournal.com/346819.html

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=796367&forum_id=2#9851346)

Sex lives are like pets: infinitely more interesting to their owners than to anyone else. Yet Lena Chen and her fascination with all things genitally-related are getting her notice once again. Gawker yesterday gleefully linked to a photo she posted more than a week ago showing the after-effects of Patrick Hamm's messy hummer on Lena's face (NSFW, duh).

http://thechicktionary.com/post/35640310/he-kissed-me-right-after-this-yes-with-tongue

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=796367&forum_id=2#9845895)

http://thechicktionary.com/post/35610502/on-the-living-room-floor

May 21

On the living room floor.

Patrick Hamm came back to the apartment after five hours’ absence, pulled me to his lap, lifted up my dress, and spread my legs. While Patrick Hamm probed and licked and watched and listened, I writhed and squirmed and moaned and squeaked. At first, I pulled away. I couldn’t handle the sensations. Then I couldn’t get enough. Afterward, juices ran down his wrist and his watch. If Patrick Hamm hadn’t help me up, I would’ve stayed crumpled up on his living room floor for the rest of the evening.

http://thechicktionary.com/post/35144560/me-feeling-post-sex-thrusts-while-on-top

May 17

Lena Chen (feeling post-sex thrusts while on top): Again?

Patrick Hamm: It's not my fault you can only come once per seating.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=796367&forum_id=2#9848730)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=796367&forum_id=2#9851563)

bareback proof:

http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=796367&forum_id=2#9636869

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=796367&forum_id=2#9851574)

Protagonist Hiro then proceeded to send me the following two, thoughtfully crafted emails:

#1

Subject line: ethics, eh?

something tells me your yale education left you a little short, buddy. far as I know, fucking undergrads is grounds for getting your ass kicked out, and the evidence is on the internet. any comment?

#2

Subject line: undergrad pussy

so now we know how that chick keeps up her gpa. what's your excuse? forgot to check the ad board rules?

I responded with the following email, which has since been posted on NowPublic and autoadmit/xoxoth (and subsequently deconstructed by the– excuse my political incorrectness – alarmingly retarded user “Good Stuff! Keep atop of it!”):

Something tells me that you're the one who should be questioning the quality of your education (wherever you may have obtained it). If you had actually taken the time to read Harvard's regulations, you would have noticed that they are very specific on the implications of instructors getting romantically or sexually involved with current students (i.e. disciplinary investigation), but when it comes to relationships that take place outside the instructional context, they simply warn that such relationships may "lead to difficulties" without threatening any sort of formal action. I'm glad you prefaced your comment with "far as I know", since it seems that you really don't know too much at all. Also, assuming that you possess even a modicum of intelligence, you must realize that a graduate student dating an undergrad is hardly an uncommon sight at any university.

Which gets us to what you consider "evidence on the internet" – material that Lena deliberately posted on her blog, knowing full well that there's nothing illegal or even unethical about sleeping with me.

Then you also make the presumptuous claim that you now "know how that chick [Lena] keeps up her GPA". Lena and I didn't start going out until months after our last class together, and while I have no intention to divulge her academic record, I can assure you that her performance in my classes was far from stellar.

Now on to you. Bracketing the fact that you lack the balls to send me these messages from your personal email account, one has to wonder why you care enough about the lives of complete strangers to contact them with your moralizing crap. You can barely put together a complete sentence (yes, I realize this is an ad hominem attack), yet you feel entitled to ask me for an "excuse" for behavior that doesn't even concern you, and that, more importantly, you are in no position to understand or evaluate. I don't know you personally, so I can only speculate about your motivations for writing me, but here are some possible explanations that come to mind:

1. You know either me or Lena and hold some kind of personal grudge against one of us (in which case you're simply a pathetic coward for not confronting us directly).

2. You are bored and frustrated with your own (sex) life, and hence feel resentful or jealous toward others who seem to have more fun with theirs (in which case the sending of anonymous, implicitly threatening emails again makes you a pathetic coward).

3. You are pathologically opinionated and like to have a moral judgment on everything (in which case you may very well be a Harvard student).

Again, these are pure speculations on my part, but the bottom line remains: this is none of your fucking business, and you should probably consider getting a life. By the way, I'm not your buddy.

Patrick Hamm

Protagonist Hiro replied with another linguistic achievement:

Here in America, Patrick, you're not supposed to force sex on undergrads that you teach, get them fake ID's, get high with them, tell them what clothes to wear, need I go on?

You're 28. She's 20. And she's blogged plenty about her mental issues. You're abusing your power for easy sex . . . Ethics? My hairy fucking asshole.

[partial and out-of-context reproduction of Lena’s blog entry at http://sexandtheivy.com/2008/03/21/nights-and-mornings/]

My reply (not posted anywhere yet, as far as I can tell):

Your lesson on American ethics comes off as somewhat insincere, given that your preferred leisure activity seems to be the anonymous dissemination of defamatory allegations about total strangers.

I suppose I don't need to alert you to the fact that in your most recent email you chose to completely ignore my reply to your prior message, and move on to a different issue. (I take this to mean that you have nothing to say in defense of your unsubstantiated earlier claims.) As for your new accusations, you have established that there is an age difference between Lena and me, and that she has previously blogged about depression and mental health therapy. So far, so good. Then you go ahead and present what you consider evidence of me "abusing [my] power for easy sex" – a passage from one of Lena's blog entries (posted March 21), detailing an episode of sexual role-play involving Lena and me. In addition to taking said passage completely out of context, you fail to mention that the original entry was prefaced by the following disclaimer, which makes it perfectly clear that the activities described do not constitute sexual assault:

"Disclaimer: The following is completely consensual. It is not rape. I do not endorse rape. The guy in the following entry does not endorse rape. There is a difference between aggressive sex and sexual assault. I really do not think a disclaimer is necessary for this to be clear, but since so many commenters have expressed concern for my well-being, I thought I'd assure everyone that I'm not being abused on a regular basis."

In response to additional concerns on the part of readers, Lena furthermore posted the following entry on March 29:

"Look, guys. Quit equating aggressive sex with rape. I am used to having my bedroom conduct judged (even though no one is in any position to judge me), but I do not appreciate the implication that I'm encouraging anything but consensual intercourse.

The safe word is "elephant". If I had wanted him to stop, I would've used it."

Now maybe you simply didn't see the disclaimer and subsequent explicatory post; given the thoroughness with which you have otherwise "researched" your smear campaign, however, this seems exceedingly improbable. Maybe you did read the disclaimers but felt that they could not be trusted, given Lena's allegedly unstable mental health; even if the latter were the case (which it most certainly is not), as someone who clearly possesses no professional background in mental health, your allegations would amount to no more than the speculations of an unqualified layperson. This leaves one remaining explanation: complete ineptitude on your part, coupled with the specific intent to harm my reputation and career. This would explain why you decided to send emails to my professors and friends on the graduate student council, when doing so clearly amounts to libel. Limited intelligence and malicious intent would also illuminate why, if you actually gave a rat's ass about Lena's well-being, you didn't simply send her an email along the lines of: "I'm a concerned reader of your blog. Are you in an abusive relationship?" My earlier suspicion that you might be a Harvard student was premature at any rate.

With that, I would like to remind you again that my relationship with Lena is none of your business, and moreover urgently advise you to stop spreading defamatory information on the internet and among my professors and friends.

Patrick Hamm

Lena’s Tumblr entries (www.thechicktionary.com) of the past weeks – people here have clearly read them in detail – should make it perfectly and unmistakably clear that my involvement with Lena is in no way abusive. Now some of you might object to what Lena and I do in the bedroom and the fact that she chooses to blog about it. This is your prerogative. You may even go so far as to wish that I “burn in Hell after Lena kills [me] in a murder/suicide” (email from truth033003@aol.com on June 5). But this does not entitle you to take passages from Lena’s blog out of context, misinterpret and change them, ignore explicit disclaimers, fabricate facts and then allege power abuse and sexual assault.

The defamation of my name in obscure web forums is a somewhat annoying but ultimately benign affair (especially if conducted with such utter incompetence) – deliberately spreading false information that could harm my reputation and career is libel. Protagonist Hiro, for one, was not wise enough to conceal the sender’s IP address in his (I judge from the hairy ass reference that we’re dealing with a male) emails, and is presumably also unaware that a simple court order would force his ISP to release his identity. However, given the level of intellectual depth displayed in his emails, I suppose this shouldn’t come as a surprise to anyone.

I’m sure at least one of you tools will now feel the urge to carry out another witty (read: moronic) line-by-line dissection of my post. I suggest you save yourselves the time and mental energy (your supply of the latter seems limited enough as it is) and leave me alone from now on.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=796367&forum_id=2#9865030)

I did read the part about ISP addresses. I would have to guess the individual he is referring to is not an XO poster.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=796367&forum_id=2#9906391)