Richard Perle

Paul Wolfowitz

Douglas Feith

Edward Luttwak

Henry Kissinger

Dov Zakheim

Kenneth Adelman

I. Lewis Libby

Robert Satloff

Elliott Abrams

Marc Grossman

Richard Haass

Robert Zoellick

Ari Fleischer

James Schlesinger

David Frum

Joshua Bolten

John Bolton

David Wurmser

Eliot Cohen

Mel Sembler

Michael Chertoff

Steve Goldsmith

Adam Goldman

Joseph Gildenhorn

Christopher Gersten

Mark Weinberger

Samuel Bodman

Bonnie Cohen

Ruth Davis

Daniel Kurtzer

Cliff Sobel

Stuart Bernstein

Nancy Brinker

Frank Lavin

Ron Weiser

Mel Sembler

Martin Silverstein

Lincoln Bloomfield

Jay Lefkowitz

Brad Blakeman

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=95424&forum_id=2#1503069)

This is still good advice.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=95424&forum_id=2#1520540)

You've taken the LSAT, right? Percentages vs. Total numbers can result in highly different conclusions, Skippy. I'm interested to see what percentage this list constitutes of the total number of foreign policy aides.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=95424&forum_id=2#1503219)

BLOODKAKKE!!

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=95424&forum_id=2#1512932)

then, she erased it realising she's a fucking moron.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=95424&forum_id=2#1513898)

The list includes ex-advisors, people who worked for Nixon, and a columnist for National Review.

EDIT: gotta remember to read the dates on these things.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=95424&forum_id=2#4473179)

Right, and OJ really was innocent, wasn't he?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=95424&forum_id=2#5023032)

i erased it b/c it was being misconstrued by you mental midgets

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=95424&forum_id=2#5023073)

and even so that doesnt diminish the truth of the contents

typical attack the messenger not the message

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=95424&forum_id=2#5023182)

JEWS ARE NOT A RACE YOU MORON

and even if they were i was complaining about an imbalance of a jew-arab ratio in the bush admininstration so that we cannot appear neutral in the middle east and hence a vote for kerry was necessary for people who wanted change in the middle east. this was a thread spawned off of a different discussion

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=95424&forum_id=2#5023064)

CampaignsMagazineCreative ResistanceOrders Information

A slap in the face

War Porn

World War IV

Why won't anyone say they are Jewish?

Corporate Crackdown

Is the Left dead?

Robin Rhode: Art at street level

Subscribe to Adbusters

Why won't anyone say they are Jewish?

en français

Friends help each other out. That’s why the US sends billions of dollars every year to Israel. In return, Israel advances US strategic interests in the Middle East. But despite this mutual back scratching, Israeli-American relations are enduring a rough patch. Last December, a senior State Department official blasted Israel for having “done too little for far too long” to resolve the conflict with its Palestinian neighbors. Indeed, President Bush himself had scolded Israel a month earlier with his demand that “Israel should freeze settlement construction, dismantle unauthorized outposts, end the daily humiliation of the Palestinian people and not prejudice final negotiations with the building of walls and fences.”

Harsh words, but is it all just window-dressing? This was not the first time Bush criticized Israel and he has made numerous calls for a “viable” Palestinian state during his presidency. Nevertheless, he has never concretely punished Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon for ignoring US directives and shrugging off his commitment to the peace process. It’s also worth noting that diplomatic admonitions are the responsibility of the State Department which has been on the losing end of the policy wars in Bush’s White House. One wonders what Israeli-American relations, and indeed what American relations with the rest of the world would look

like if the neocon hawks who control Rumsfeld’s Defense Department were also in charge at State.

A lot of ink has been spilled chronicling the pro-Israel leanings of American neocons and fact that a the disproportionate percentage of them are Jewish. Some commentators are worried that these individuals – labeled ‘Likudniks’ for their links to Israel’s right wing Likud party – do not distinguish enough between American and Israeli interests. For example, whose interests were they protecting in pushing for war in Iraq?

Drawing attention to the Jewishness of the neocons is a tricky game. Anyone who does so can count on automatically being smeared as an anti-Semite. But the point is not that Jews (who make up less than 2 percent of the American population) have a monolithic perspective. Indeed, American Jews overwhelmingly vote Democrat and many of them disagree strongly with Ariel Sharon’s policies and Bush’s aggression in Iraq. The point is simply that the neocons seem to have a special affinity for Israel that influences their political thinking and consequently American foreign policy in the Middle East.

Here at Adbusters, we decided to tackle the issue head on and came up with a carefully researched list of who appear to be the 50 most influential neocons in the US (see above). Deciding exactly who is a neocon is difficult since some neocons reject the term while others embrace it. Some shape policy from within the White House, while others are more peripheral, exacting influence indirectly as journalists, academics and think tank policy wonks. What they all share is the view that the US is a benevolent hyper power that must protect itself by reshaping the rest of the world into its morally superior image. And half of the them are Jewish.

Kalle Lasn

From the March/April 2004 issue of Adbusters magazine.

http://canadiancoalition.com/adbusters01/

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=95424&forum_id=2#5023250)

I think you overstate the committment to israel because of religious/ethnic reasons of the neocons in bush's cabinet.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=95424&forum_id=2#5102839)

http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1143498911316&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=95424&forum_id=2#5649956)

fucking jews.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=95424&forum_id=2#5650141)

show me one neocon arab (LOL) with credentials please who has been passed over.

"they voted for bush over gore in 2000."

which is relevant post-9/11/01 how?

"(note how old this thread is)"

doesn't make you any less of a bigot.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=95424&forum_id=2#8442407)

You are an idiot and a bigot.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=95424&forum_id=2#8442428)

the point of this thread was to show the one sidedness in the representation of people of middle east decent in the bush administration. the point was to say that bush would have no credibility in bringing peace to the middle east since could not be seen as an unbiased arbitrator. this is not bigotry

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=95424&forum_id=2#8442433)

No, the point of this thread was to call out Jews. And as I've already noted, please let me know of all the credentialed Arabs lining up to work for a neocon administration.

"the point was to say that bush would have no credibility in bringing peace to the middle east since could not be seen as an unbiased arbitrator."

a) Bush has no credibility in the Middle East because of Iraq, not because of Jews in his administration.

b) Who's claiming to be unbiased?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=95424&forum_id=2#8442457)