Comparing Utah and Wisconsin (college football)
| Submissive Jade Market | 10/27/04 | | trip temple incel | 10/27/04 | | Submissive Jade Market | 10/27/04 | | trip temple incel | 10/27/04 | | vigorous costumed trailer park | 10/27/04 | | territorial reading party fortuitous meteor | 10/27/04 | | territorial reading party fortuitous meteor | 10/27/04 | | Submissive Jade Market | 10/27/04 | | territorial reading party fortuitous meteor | 10/27/04 | | territorial reading party fortuitous meteor | 10/28/04 | | laughsome giraffe | 10/27/04 | | narrow-minded business firm double fault | 10/27/04 | | laughsome giraffe | 10/27/04 | | exciting judgmental step-uncle's house regret | 10/27/04 | | vigorous costumed trailer park | 10/27/04 | | Submissive Jade Market | 10/27/04 | | vigorous costumed trailer park | 10/27/04 | | Peach Roommate | 10/27/04 | | vigorous costumed trailer park | 10/28/04 | | territorial reading party fortuitous meteor | 10/27/04 | | navy zombie-like dingle berry nibblets | 10/27/04 | | Submissive Jade Market | 10/27/04 | | navy zombie-like dingle berry nibblets | 10/27/04 | | Submissive Jade Market | 10/27/04 | | navy zombie-like dingle berry nibblets | 10/27/04 | | Submissive Jade Market | 10/27/04 | | navy zombie-like dingle berry nibblets | 10/27/04 | | laughsome giraffe | 10/28/04 | | Abnormal Cruise Ship Wagecucks | 10/27/04 | | rose irradiated space | 10/27/04 | | territorial reading party fortuitous meteor | 10/28/04 | | Cruel-hearted state gaming laptop | 10/28/04 | | territorial reading party fortuitous meteor | 10/28/04 | | Cowardly Plaza Mental Disorder | 10/28/04 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: October 27th, 2004 11:51 AM Author: Submissive Jade Market
Utah:
@Arizona -- W 23-6
UNLV -- W 63-28
Wisconsin:
@Arizona -- W 9-7
UNLV -- W 18-3
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=99623&forum_id=2#1555652) |
 |
Date: October 27th, 2004 12:50 PM Author: trip temple incel
That doesn't mean anything. First, Wisconsin played those games at the start of the season (games 2 and 3) when they were missing some of their most important offensive players. If you saw the games, you'd know that Wisconsin's defense really stuffed the other teams.
Utah played UNLV last weekend - when the offense was in full swing. They gave up a lot to UNLV. Wisconsin's defense shut down those two teams. Utah can't say the same.
Utah is a good team, but I bet that Wisconsin would be able to shut down the Utah offense, too. Scoring points isn't the most important thing in football. If you never give up points, you won't ever lose. Utah is more vulnerable defensively.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=99623&forum_id=2#1555915) |
 |
Date: October 27th, 2004 12:52 PM Author: Submissive Jade Market
"That doesn't mean anything."
It doesn't mean everything, but it certainly means something, which is why the Utes are currently doing so well in the computer rankings.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=99623&forum_id=2#1555930) |
 |
Date: October 27th, 2004 1:18 PM Author: trip temple incel
Right now, Utah gets a bit of a boost in the computers and Strength of Schedule. I don't expect Wisconsin to finish undefeated. I do expect Utah to finish undefeated - it's competition really sucks. There's too much of an emphasis on lack of losses.
People figure that Utah's schedule is better because Texas A&M turned out not to be so shitty - and pulled a few more wins than people expected. Of course, it was the first game of the season - so I don't think that it should count so much. Utah benefits from the fact that the teams in its conference play such weak schedules so that their W-L make them look better tha nthey are.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=99623&forum_id=2#1556015) |
 |
Date: October 27th, 2004 2:15 PM Author: territorial reading party fortuitous meteor
Not so sure on Iowa-Wisconsin.
I give Wisconsin maybe 60-40 odds of finishing undefeated. I think MSU could also possibly present a barrier.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=99623&forum_id=2#1556231) |
 |
Date: October 27th, 2004 1:58 PM Author: territorial reading party fortuitous meteor
On the COMPUTER rankings? No, it doesn't. It's actually a rule. The computer formulae aren't allowed to take into account margin of victory.
To quote you above: "It doesn't mean everything, but it certainly means something, which is why the Utes are currently doing so well in the computer rankings."
See, for instance: http://maps.signonsandiego.com/sports/college_football/20020626-9999_1s26bcs.html
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=99623&forum_id=2#1556158) |
Date: October 27th, 2004 12:45 PM Author: laughsome giraffe
Wisconsin is still superior. And non-Mormon!
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=99623&forum_id=2#1555899) |
Date: October 27th, 2004 1:47 PM Author: vigorous costumed trailer park
If utah had to play a Big Ten schedule, it would be lucky to go 5 - 3.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=99623&forum_id=2#1556114) |
 |
Date: October 27th, 2004 1:50 PM Author: Submissive Jade Market
Wisconsin's Big 10 schedule:
Penn State
Illinois
@Ohio State
@Purdue
Northwestern
Minnesota
@Michigan State
@Iowa TBA
I bet that Utah goes at least 6-2 with this schedule, maybe 8-0. Probably 7-1.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=99623&forum_id=2#1556123) |
 |
Date: October 27th, 2004 1:52 PM Author: vigorous costumed trailer park
Would lose to Purdue and Iowa. Minnesota is a toss-up. OSU is having a terrible year but they would normally crush utah. If Mich were on the sked, utah would lose to them, too.
There are no BCS busters. If Utah (or any of the other "mid-major" schools) played a big 10, big 12, acc, or sec schedule, they wouldn't have a chance at going undefeated. Even if they were in the Pac-10 they would lose to USC and Cal.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=99623&forum_id=2#1556130) |
 |
Date: October 27th, 2004 1:56 PM Author: territorial reading party fortuitous meteor
I could see either 6-2 or 5-3, possibly 7-1 if they got lucky against both Iowa and Minnesota. If they'd played MSU late in the season (as Wisconsin will have to do) I think that could also be trouble for Utah.
But mostly, I really doubt Utah could beat Purdue.
In any case, one loss on that schedule (which you admit would most likely happen) and they're out of the race.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=99623&forum_id=2#1556148) |
Date: October 27th, 2004 2:24 PM Author: navy zombie-like dingle berry nibblets
first of all margin of victory don't mean a damn thing, wisconson's a defense oriented conservative team, of course they're not going to put up a shit load of points against teams
That said, I think Utah's better than Wisonson, I think in a one game showdown, Utah would beat them
I don't think Utah go through the Big Ten unbeaten either, but they're a damn good team, and remember Wisconson hasn't gone through the conference unbeaten yet either
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=99623&forum_id=2#1556269) |
 |
Date: October 27th, 2004 2:27 PM Author: Submissive Jade Market
Margin means something. Wisconsin may be a ball control team, but they were a late, easy missed FG away from losing at Arizona.
Besides, Utah rushed it 46 times against UNLV.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=99623&forum_id=2#1556275) |
 |
Date: October 27th, 2004 2:30 PM Author: navy zombie-like dingle berry nibblets
means something, not much though
Wisconson's not gonna put up 60 on anyone, that doesn't mean a whole lot though
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=99623&forum_id=2#1556280) |
 |
Date: October 27th, 2004 2:32 PM Author: Submissive Jade Market
Utah rushed 46 times against UNLV and passed 22 times.
Wisconsin rushed 44 times against UNLV and passed 24 times.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=99623&forum_id=2#1556289) |
 |
Date: October 27th, 2004 2:35 PM Author: navy zombie-like dingle berry nibblets
so?
Nebraska used to do nothing but rush the ball and they'd put up 60, they weren't overally conservative
Wisconson's just not a big scoring offense
how many of those runs were up the middle for Utah, how many were up the middle for wisconson? they're just different offenses with different goals
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=99623&forum_id=2#1556296) |
 |
Date: October 27th, 2004 2:49 PM Author: navy zombie-like dingle berry nibblets
first of all, I agreed that Utah is a better team
second of all, even if they have a better offense that doesn't mean their a better team, Wisconson is a defensive team, for all we know they're d would shuit down Utah, it shut down Purdue, who had a pretty good offense too, a better offense than Wisconson did for sure
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=99623&forum_id=2#1556356) |
Date: October 27th, 2004 5:27 PM Author: Abnormal Cruise Ship Wagecucks
Thu. Sep. 2 7:30 p.m. ET at Utah 21-41 L Recap | Box
Sat. Sep. 11 3:30 p.m. ET Wyoming 31-0 W Recap | Box
Sat. Sep. 18 7:00 p.m. ET Clemson 27-6 W Recap | Box
Sat. Oct. 2 7:00 p.m. ET Kansas St. 42-30 W Recap | Box
Sat. Oct. 9 7:00 p.m. ET at Iowa St. 34-3 W Recap | Box
Sat. Oct. 16 7:00 p.m. ET at Oklahoma St. 36-20 W Recap | Box
Sat. Oct. 23 1:30 p.m. ET Colorado 29-26 W Recap | Box
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=99623&forum_id=2#1557208) |
Date: October 27th, 2004 5:35 PM Author: rose irradiated space
I'll watch a Wisconsin game if I want to fall asleep.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=99623&forum_id=2#1557248) |
Date: October 28th, 2004 1:38 AM Author: territorial reading party fortuitous meteor
bump
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=99623&forum_id=2#1559702) |
Date: October 28th, 2004 1:51 AM Author: Cruel-hearted state gaming laptop
Wisconsin played Arizona in a Monsoon. They had a 45 minute weather delay. Those games are not comparable.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=99623&forum_id=2#1559772) |
Date: October 28th, 2004 4:05 PM Author: Cowardly Plaza Mental Disorder
I went to BYU for undergrad so i feel its my duty to root against Utah
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=99623&forum_id=2#1562085) |
|
|