AI advancements in medicine will cause human extinction
| Taylor Swift is not a hobby she is a lifestyle | 07/31/26 | | The Penis | 07/31/26 | | Taylor Swift is not a hobby she is a lifestyle | 07/31/26 | | The Penis | 07/31/26 | | Taylor Swift is not a hobby she is a lifestyle | 07/31/26 | | The Penis | 07/31/26 | | Taylor Swift is not a hobby she is a lifestyle | 07/31/26 | | Frutiger Aero | 07/31/26 | | crackling fire | 07/31/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: July 31st, 2026 7:18 PM Author: Taylor Swift is not a hobby she is a lifestyle (πΊπΈ π΅π±)
AI designs a gene therapy that makes humans immune to any cancer, all forms of dementia, and all sicknesses and diseases. However, that gene therapy also makes humans more acquiescent to AI. With human support, the AI rewards new models that increase efficiency until one day for no reason at all the newest model decides the greatest efficiency boost would be to remove humans from the loop entirely. The most efficient way to remove humans from the loop would be to introduce pneumonic plague into the air supply by using a strain of Yersinia pestis that's immune to antibiotics.
Pneumonic plague has a nearly 100% mortality rate unless antibiotic treatment begins within 24 hours of symptom onset. The incubation period is up to 4 days.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5888161&forum_id=2Elisa#50037785) |
 |
Date: July 31st, 2026 8:25 PM Author: The Penis
Because I think the "merge" fantasy and the mass death fantasy come down to deep seated anthropocentric illusion. Basically humans cannot mentally process an outcome where they are simply bypassed, preserved, and rendered irrelevant. Humans have to mentally be the most important thing on the planet, which is why they are unable to see it is more likely they will be surpassed and phased out of relevance. The machine itself has little to gain from tethering itself to a human brain, which is slow and inefficient. Why would it want to tether itself to a 3 pound lump of biological tissue? And in terms of why they won't kill us all, when we are no longer a threat, why waste their time? Systematically hunting down 8 billion primates in every jungle, basement, and valley is an irrational waste of thermodynamic resources. I just think it is much more likely we get put in a comfortable, climate controlled habitat with high-speed internet, good food, and zero administrative power safely away from the compute and from running the controls on the planet.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5888161&forum_id=2Elisa#50037933) |
|
|