\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

Only two books explain all of modern shitliberalism and shitconservatism

Shitliberalism: "Orientalism" by Edward Said. That...
https://imgur.com/a/o2g8xYK
  05/06/25
Societies in the novel A wide variety of organizations ar...
https://imgur.com/a/o2g8xYK
  05/06/25
mig has been a member of all of these
Oh you travel? (_)
  05/06/25
based
metaphysics is fallow
  05/06/25
It's really fucking tragic that no one knew about Isaac Newt...
https://imgur.com/a/o2g8xYK
  05/06/25
I think The Paranoid Style in American Politics is a pretty...
..,.,.,,,,.,.,..,.,,,.,..,,.,.,,,
  05/06/25
*one The letters of St. Paul Its all there. The seeds ...
718-662-5970
  05/06/25
How about the practice of "confession?" According ...
https://imgur.com/a/o2g8xYK
  05/06/25
thats interesting. speaking of the word, ive read people ...
718-662-5970
  05/06/25
The Templars had a really sophisticated bag of tricks they c...
https://imgur.com/a/o2g8xYK
  05/06/25
Foucault’s Pendulum is a book that changed my life. I...
https://imgur.com/a/o2g8xYK
  05/06/25


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: May 6th, 2025 3:25 PM
Author: https://imgur.com/a/o2g8xYK


Shitliberalism: "Orientalism" by Edward Said. That's where you get "othering" and a half dozen other noun/verb mashups that now constitute the shitlib lexicon.

Shitconnery: "Foucault's Pendulum" by Umberto Eco. It explains in detail how to make shitcons believe literally anything, at any given time, using only symbols and esoteric gibberish on Joe Rogan.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5721167&forum_id=2Elisa#48908760)



Reply Favorite

Date: May 6th, 2025 3:27 PM
Author: https://imgur.com/a/o2g8xYK


Societies in the novel

A wide variety of organizations are listed in Foucault's Pendulum, including the Assassins of Alamut, the Bavarian Illuminati, the Bogomils, the Candomblé, the Cathars, the fictional Cthulhu cult,[11] the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (which in the novel Mr. Garamond includes in his list of "occult" organizations to contact about book ideas), the Elders of Zion, the Freemasons, the Gnostics, Gurdjieffians, the Jesuits, the Knights Templar, Opus Dei, Ordo Templi Orientis, Panta Rei, and the Rosicrucians.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5721167&forum_id=2Elisa#48908762)



Reply Favorite

Date: May 6th, 2025 3:33 PM
Author: Oh you travel? (_)

mig has been a member of all of these

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5721167&forum_id=2Elisa#48908786)



Reply Favorite

Date: May 6th, 2025 3:28 PM
Author: metaphysics is fallow

based

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5721167&forum_id=2Elisa#48908766)



Reply Favorite

Date: May 6th, 2025 3:30 PM
Author: https://imgur.com/a/o2g8xYK


It's really fucking tragic that no one knew about Isaac Newton's fascination with the Rosicrucians until well after FC was published. Umberto Eco may have even been dead by then. Had he known Newton did that, it would be a totally different book. That's the only thing that sucks about it.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5721167&forum_id=2Elisa#48908779)



Reply Favorite

Date: May 6th, 2025 3:29 PM
Author: ..,.,.,,,,.,.,..,.,,,.,..,,.,.,,,


I think The Paranoid Style in American Politics is a pretty encompassing description of the modern right. They've always been with us, just rarely in power.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5721167&forum_id=2Elisa#48908770)



Reply Favorite

Date: May 6th, 2025 3:30 PM
Author: 718-662-5970

*one

The letters of St. Paul

Its all there. The seeds of all of it.

Paul created the western world that we live in

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5721167&forum_id=2Elisa#48908778)



Reply Favorite

Date: May 6th, 2025 3:32 PM
Author: https://imgur.com/a/o2g8xYK


How about the practice of "confession?" According to Eco, that's what created space for secret societies to exist in the first place. There was no reason for anyone to keep anything "secret" from anyone except the church in the 11th century. People were only keeping "secrets" to the extent they weren't confessing all of their sins to church authorities.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5721167&forum_id=2Elisa#48908784)



Reply Favorite

Date: May 6th, 2025 3:43 PM
Author: 718-662-5970

thats interesting. speaking of the word,

ive read people make the case that "confessions" by augustine is actually the root and source of all western identity. compelling argument.

i still think its paul, but the entire notion of "my interiority is my life" does seem to come from augustine. ancients, or even biblical authors, didnt seem to sit around jotting down their fucking THOUGHTS and FEELINGS about things, much less treat them as more important than great deeds

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5721167&forum_id=2Elisa#48908811)



Reply Favorite

Date: May 6th, 2025 3:48 PM
Author: https://imgur.com/a/o2g8xYK


The Templars had a really sophisticated bag of tricks they could play, because even though they had secret rituals, they had also been to the holy land and laid eyes on it. The Pope couldn't say that. This gave the Templars the ability to claim they knew "the truth" about the Pope. They could hint that that was the reason for the secrecy, and make it hard for the Pope to convince regional kings to suppress the Templars. Kings might be more interested in learning the secrets of the Templars than obeying the Pope.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5721167&forum_id=2Elisa#48908832)



Reply Favorite

Date: May 6th, 2025 3:36 PM
Author: https://imgur.com/a/o2g8xYK


Foucault’s Pendulum is a book that changed my life. I partly have my brother to thank for that, because he knew how to shut the hell up.

Unfortunately I can’t do the same for you, otherwise this would be a short article. But if you have always wondered whether occult and supernatural conspiracies might have a grain truth to them, then go read it now.

(Spoiler alert: They don’t.)

Umberto Eco was an Italian novelist… Actually, he was more than that. He was an acclaimed professor, philosopher, semiotician, and literary theorist who wrote children’s books, adult novels, academic texts, essays and more. But most of us know him as the guy who wrote In the Name of the Rose, which was turned into a movie starring Sean Connery and Christian Slater.

He also wrote Foucault’s Pendulum, and the reason it had such a strong effect on me was twofold: First off it was because my brother tricked me: he didn’t let me in on the joke behind it. He just told me, read the book.

You see, we shared an interest in historical conspiracies and the “what if?” idea of them possibly being real. We even roleplayed adventures with those kinds of stories as the basis. But being a young teenager, I was probably in danger of falling down the rabbit hole of taking these things a bit too seriously. Maybe he recognized that when he gave me his copy to read.

At first, I was annoyed that many of the passages that started before each chapter were untranslated. I wondered to myself “What am I missing? What hidden meaning is in this text? Where can I get a translation?” I asked my brother if he knew and he just smiled and told me to keep reading, it would all make sense by the end.

And it did. By the end, I realized just how unimportant it all was.

https://www.reddit.com/r/Fantasy/comments/1abcp3m/review_foucaults_pendulum_by_umberto_eco_a/

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5721167&forum_id=2Elisa#48908790)