\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

The "planes" struck by Ukraine were decoys. Otherwise we'd have full nuke launch

the lack of Russian nuclear retaliation after a supposed hit...
emerald den
  06/01/25
r u an NSAM alt
Underhanded heady home
  06/01/25
Nuclear superpowers at my HS declined to retaliate after a s...
emerald den
  06/01/25
yea
domesticated stag film
  06/01/25
It appears to be a serious degradation of Russia's bomber ar...
Sickened impressive cuckold goal in life
  06/01/25
It doesn't appear to be that at all. And there is plenty of ...
emerald den
  06/01/25
cr
emerald den
  06/01/25
What is the virtue in a proportional response?
Violet curious piazza corn cake
  06/01/25
Putin is a Boomer
Sickened impressive cuckold goal in life
  06/01/25
What would Putin nuke? The point of capturing Ukraine is to ...
stirring theater
  06/01/25
He should and would nuke NATO if real nuclear assets were da...
emerald den
  06/01/25
What would that accomplish other than ensuring that Russia g...
stirring theater
  06/01/25
(retard who's never heard of MAD doctrine and nuclear deterr...
emerald den
  06/01/25
lmao. So your position is that we know no real nuclear asse...
Vigorous masturbator milk
  06/01/25
Still more coherent than Russia’s assertion that NATO ...
marvelous stage
  06/01/25
They don't have decoy planes
Titillating black woman pistol
  06/01/25
Link?
emerald den
  06/01/25


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: June 1st, 2025 2:06 PM
Author: emerald den

the lack of Russian nuclear retaliation after a supposed hit on its nuclear triad is telling.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5732172&forum_id=2Elisa#48978827)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 1st, 2025 2:10 PM
Author: Underhanded heady home

r u an NSAM alt

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5732172&forum_id=2Elisa#48978833)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 1st, 2025 2:19 PM
Author: emerald den

Nuclear superpowers at my HS declined to retaliate after a successful strike on their nuclear triad all the time; it was no big deal

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5732172&forum_id=2Elisa#48978858)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 1st, 2025 2:35 PM
Author: domesticated stag film

yea

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5732172&forum_id=2Elisa#48978902)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 1st, 2025 2:29 PM
Author: Sickened impressive cuckold goal in life

It appears to be a serious degradation of Russia's bomber arm, and there's no reason to think that Ukraine won't be able to do exactly the same thing in 6 months. Or to go after all civilian air travel.

Can Putin get away with just ordering an (ineffective) Oreshnik strike in retaliation for this? Can he get away with it again next time when Ukraine does exactly the same thing again?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5732172&forum_id=2Elisa#48978887)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 1st, 2025 2:30 PM
Author: emerald den

It doesn't appear to be that at all. And there is plenty of reason to believe they won't even be able to hit decoys next time.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5732172&forum_id=2Elisa#48978891)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 1st, 2025 2:53 PM
Author: emerald den

cr

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5732172&forum_id=2Elisa#48978939)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 1st, 2025 6:09 PM
Author: Violet curious piazza corn cake

What is the virtue in a proportional response?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5732172&forum_id=2Elisa#48979298)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 1st, 2025 6:14 PM
Author: Sickened impressive cuckold goal in life

Putin is a Boomer

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5732172&forum_id=2Elisa#48979311)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 1st, 2025 6:06 PM
Author: stirring theater

What would Putin nuke? The point of capturing Ukraine is to have it. It doesn’t make much sense to just bomb it out of existence

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5732172&forum_id=2Elisa#48979296)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 1st, 2025 6:15 PM
Author: emerald den

He should and would nuke NATO if real nuclear assets were damaged.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5732172&forum_id=2Elisa#48979313)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 1st, 2025 6:18 PM
Author: stirring theater

What would that accomplish other than ensuring that Russia gets nuked as well. You seem dumb

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5732172&forum_id=2Elisa#48979315)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 1st, 2025 6:20 PM
Author: emerald den

(retard who's never heard of MAD doctrine and nuclear deterrence)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5732172&forum_id=2Elisa#48979324)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 1st, 2025 6:18 PM
Author: Vigorous masturbator milk

lmao. So your position is that we know no real nuclear assets were damaged because Putin didn't start a war with NATO?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5732172&forum_id=2Elisa#48979316)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 1st, 2025 6:20 PM
Author: marvelous stage

Still more coherent than Russia’s assertion that NATO helped Ukraine nuke Russia last year, Russia did nothing, and none of the nuclear detonation surveillance stations reported anything because of a conspiracy

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5732172&forum_id=2Elisa#48979323)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 1st, 2025 6:21 PM
Author: Titillating black woman pistol

They don't have decoy planes

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5732172&forum_id=2Elisa#48979327)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 1st, 2025 6:22 PM
Author: emerald den

Link?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5732172&forum_id=2Elisa#48979329)