You must choose 1 to be your partner for the rest of your life. In both cases you get to pick race preference. In the case of the hot ones you can select body type preference and things like that. For the smart women you can select for personality type such as adventurous, submissive, doting, industrious etc.

You must pick one of the two groups up front and and then select your wife from that group and you have to live with her every day for the rest of your life.

If you pick the hot chicks, you have no control over their personality or intellect, e.g. they could be completely insane, they could be mentally retarded. It would be based on even distribution of 100 smoking hot chicks.

If you pick the smart women you have no control over their looks. It would be whatever the range of attractiveness is of 100 chicks with 140 IQ/Ivy degree etc, but again, they will be screened for personality type so guaranteed not to be frigid or psycho or beyond the normal range for that.

After picking one group you never get to see what you missed out on but you can pick any of the 100.

Which do you choose?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5756901&forum_id=2Elisa#49147288)

i'm not in the top 100 smartest men in the world so i'd just be marrying a woman smarter than me and it would be awkward and unenjoyable for both of us

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5756901&forum_id=2Elisa#49147292)

it's like being Shorter than a woman but not as bad

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5756901&forum_id=2Elisa#49147324)

women want you to be physically and intellectually superior to them. significant imbalance here is distressing for everyone involved. see e.g. white lotus season 1.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5756901&forum_id=2Elisa#49161797)

Top 100 smartest is equivalent to the person in the office next to yours.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5756901&forum_id=2Elisa#49147309)

EPAH on the other hand I could see it working out because he is kind of an airhead and also seems hella deferential to women so I can see him just playing the pleaser and doing everything she wanted to do most of the time.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5756901&forum_id=2Elisa#49147394)

18 Asians

12 Indo-Pak

5 Arab/Persian

17 white American

13 western euro

19 eastern euro

16 Russian

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5756901&forum_id=2Elisa#49147502)

hot

wellness bodybuilding physique

persian

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5756901&forum_id=2Elisa#49147494)

The hypo becomes much more interesting if you change the age range to 18-40 or 18-50 or something. Then you run a real risk that all the smart women are aging shrews who are too old for kids or even that there are only a few younger small women who are all fat or flat chested or something. But statistically if you have a set of 100 women under age 25, there will be at least one that is hot enough to wife. Most likely several.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5756901&forum_id=2Elisa#49148852)

The only way choosing that doors fails is if you get an entire room full of Janet Renos and Caroline Ellisons then you're really porked. I don't think I could ever seriously date a 6 or below.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5756901&forum_id=2Elisa#49148908)

If you can do unlimited vetting, you might get a better outcome rolling the dice with the hot chicks. But you have to go through ALL of them, spending a fair amount of time vetting each one. At least a handful will be nice and decently smart, and hotter than any chick from the other group. They won't be as smart as the chicks in the other group, but there is no marginal utility for that extra intelligence (and in some cases there is marginal dis-utility).

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5756901&forum_id=2Elisa#49149186)

Also the smart chicks are going to be REALLY smart not just a little bit. Like CalTech/Stanford STEM research PhD smart, but they could all be smart in different ways like maybe one of them is Nikki Glazer and is a famous comic or something.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5756901&forum_id=2Elisa#49149223)

Another important part of the hypo that was left out is whether any of the woman will like or even love you. The smart women can be selected for "doting," but that doesn't guarantee that they will dote on you. And the hot chicks can't be controlled for personality at all. So say you have a hot crazy bitch who normally would have no interest in you. Is the marriage DOA because you are not someone she would normally marry? Or is she guaranteed to love you in whatever psychotic capacity she has for "love," even if it's twisted and fucked up?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5756901&forum_id=2Elisa#49149429)

She is not guaranteed to love you but she will never leave you. In the event things don't work out she will either cheat or just be miserable all the time and lash out, or go cold. There's no guarantees in life but you can never get divorced or stop cohabitating. If you live in a mansion you can never sleep more than 3 rooms away. In any event you will see her every day, including travel which you must do together. You will never go in opposite directions and she will be introduced to everyone you know as your wife. You both have to tell people that you will never leave each other and that the marriage is for life.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5756901&forum_id=2Elisa#49149444)

This raises the bar a lot. I think it's a better hypo if your bipolar 11/10 "loves" you and you just have to deal with all the ups and downs of her condition. But your way, the marriage is going to be DOA with almost all of the hot group.

The only way to do it under these constraints is to pick from 100 of the nicest, most agreeable women you can find. And then of those 100, you pick the one who looks OK who likes you the most. Anything else probably ends in disaster.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5756901&forum_id=2Elisa#49149572)