XO POLL: Moast Intelligent Human Being Known In Human Hi$tory?
| insanely creepy pit | 07/04/25 | | Hyperactive histrionic dilemma | 07/04/25 | | Cheese-eating coldplay fan | 07/04/25 | | Soul-stirring duck-like antidepressant drug half-breed | 07/04/25 | | insanely creepy pit | 07/04/25 | | Awkward comical forum | 07/04/25 | | Hyperactive histrionic dilemma | 07/04/25 | | Awkward comical forum | 07/04/25 | | Hyperactive histrionic dilemma | 07/04/25 | | Awkward comical forum | 07/04/25 | | Hyperactive histrionic dilemma | 07/05/25 | | insanely creepy pit | 07/05/25 | | impertinent double fault | 07/05/25 | | insanely creepy pit | 07/06/25 | | impertinent double fault | 07/05/25 | | insanely creepy pit | 07/05/25 | | impertinent double fault | 07/06/25 | | Purple floppy gas station sneaky criminal | 07/06/25 | | honey-headed psychic | 07/05/25 | | concupiscible magical corner french chef | 07/06/25 | | honey-headed psychic | 07/06/25 | | Awkward comical forum | 07/06/25 | | honey-headed psychic | 07/06/25 | | Awkward comical forum | 07/06/25 | | Bronze principal's office partner | 07/05/25 | | Olive corn cake | 07/06/25 | | Vengeful odious plaza voyeur | 07/05/25 | | Violet outnumbered private investor | 07/06/25 | | Awkward comical forum | 07/06/25 | | Plum Sandwich | 07/06/25 | | Awkward comical forum | 07/06/25 | | swollen tan stage degenerate | 07/06/25 | | insanely creepy pit | 07/06/25 | | insanely creepy pit | 07/06/25 | | insanely creepy pit | 07/06/25 | | Purple floppy gas station sneaky criminal | 07/06/25 | | insanely creepy pit | 07/06/25 | | concupiscible magical corner french chef | 07/06/25 | | insanely creepy pit | 07/06/25 | | Plum Sandwich | 07/06/25 | | Olive corn cake | 07/06/25 | | Awkward comical forum | 07/06/25 | | Cerise space mad-dog skullcap | 07/06/25 | | Brindle school ladyboy | 07/06/25 | | laughsome naked field | 07/06/25 | | Brindle school ladyboy | 07/06/25 | | Hilarious generalized bond preventive strike | 07/06/25 | | honey-headed psychic | 07/06/25 | | lavender black woman | 07/06/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: July 4th, 2025 6:09 PM Author: Awkward comical forum
Past, I'm sticking with Feynman.
Present, my vote goes to Penrose.
We don't have sufficient information to speak to the majority of mankind, so it's really not a meaningful question.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2Elisa#49072538) |
 |
Date: July 4th, 2025 6:24 PM Author: Awkward comical forum
Can we really speak to ancient peoples? So little of their work and others' views of them is extant. Their popularity and contributions may be more a function of momentum than objective truths... just look at any old religious book.
I'd argue even the likes of Newton or Leibniz are too old to speak of in the same way as modern people.
I actually don't know much about Witten. I bet most scientists don't have Feynman's charisma & ability to communicate, though. (Just flip through anything Penrose has written.)
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2Elisa#49072579) |
 |
Date: July 6th, 2025 4:33 PM Author: Awkward comical forum
A lot of writings (and the history of people) have been lost over the past 2.5k years.
There were also great contributions from India & the far East in classical & medieval times that most of us aren't aware of. (How many of us could name the author of Al-Jabr, let alone read it?)
We can speak of those the knowledge of whom is extant, or has been translated into our native language, but not so much to the 'most intelligent person ever.'
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2Elisa#49076775) |
 |
Date: July 6th, 2025 7:19 PM Author: Awkward comical forum
Who's to say that the four contributors to QED won't go down as the most intelligent, influential people of the history of the world 2.5k years from now?
I would argue that the most influential individuals aren't necessarily the most intelligent. The further back in time we go, the more influential an individual becomes. Some kid in 2021 with a wacky GUT hasn't had 2.5k years to gain the infamy of a Plato.
Besides, could Plato even handle UG physics at CalTech today? (Conversely, could a CalTech grad today do what Plato did c. 500 BCE?)
Obviously, OP's question has no absolute answer, but it's still fun to argue.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2Elisa#49077202) |
Date: July 6th, 2025 12:10 AM Author: Violet outnumbered private investor
I think it has to be Newton, for coming up with calculus + figuring out all the aspects of practical physics.
The only other contender is Einstein, who on 2 occasions figured out things in physics that don't make intuitive sense at all.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2Elisa#49075462) |
Date: July 6th, 2025 7:26 AM Author: Purple floppy gas station sneaky criminal
Short list:
Tesla, Newton, Da Vinci, Plato
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2Elisa#49075746) |
Date: July 6th, 2025 4:51 PM Author: Olive corn cake
Jansci von Nuemann
As much as I hate to nominate a turd, Ramanujan is easily a top contender
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2Elisa#49076800) |
|
|